Curt Doolittle

Form: Outline

  • Propertarianism’s Family Tree

    11406742_10153398094787264_6733178299935934599_o

  • Propertarianism’s Family Tree

    11406742_10153398094787264_6733178299935934599_o

  • FIVE AXIS OF INTERTEMPORAL PRODUCTION (from elsewhere) There are five necessary

    FIVE AXIS OF INTERTEMPORAL PRODUCTION

    (from elsewhere)

    There are five necessary axis of inter-temporal production:

    1) The individual, the family, and the church (the production of generations)

    2) The partnership, the corporation, the bank, the treasury. (The production of goods and services.

    3) The local government, state government, and the federal government. (the production of commons)

    4) The judiciary (the resolution of disputes)

    5) The Militia and the Military (the preservation of the monopoly rules of order, allocations of property, and commons.)

    Our founders, as innovators, lacked sufficient understanding how to safeguard each – because they could not imagine the future so radically different after 1830, and particularly after 1914.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-13 07:09:00 UTC

  • The Institutions of Nomocracy (Rule of Law)

    [I]nstitutions:
    The People : A partnership of reciprocal insurance including every living soul in the polity.
    The Militia : Defense and Emergency Services
    The Military : Defense, Strategy, Offense.
    The Judiciary : The Common Organic Law
    The Houses of the Commons : Production of Commons
    The Treasury (The corporation that manages shares of stock as money)
    The Academy : Education
    The Monarchy : A family whose head has veto over the houses of the Commons.

    Source: Curt Doolittle

  • The Institutions of Nomocracy (Rule of Law)

    [I]nstitutions:
    The People : A partnership of reciprocal insurance including every living soul in the polity.
    The Militia : Defense and Emergency Services
    The Military : Defense, Strategy, Offense.
    The Judiciary : The Common Organic Law
    The Houses of the Commons : Production of Commons
    The Treasury (The corporation that manages shares of stock as money)
    The Academy : Education
    The Monarchy : A family whose head has veto over the houses of the Commons.

    Source: Curt Doolittle

  • NOMOCRATIC INSTUTUTIONS The People : A partnership of reciprocal insurance inclu

    NOMOCRATIC INSTUTUTIONS

    The People : A partnership of reciprocal insurance including every living soul in the polity.

    The Militia : Defense and Emergency Services

    The Military : Defense, Strategy, Offense.

    The Judiciary : The Common Organic Law

    The Houses of the Commons : Production of Commons

    The Treasury (The corporation that manages shares of stock as money)

    The Academy : Education

    The Monarchy : A family whose head has veto over the houses of the Commons.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-07 04:41:00 UTC

  • Due Diligence Necessary For the Warranty of Truthfulness

    [D]ue Diligence necessary for Warranty that our Testimony is Truthful.

    1) Have we achieved identity? Is it categorically consistent?

    2) Is it internally consistent? Is it logical? Can we construct a proof(test) of internal consistency?

    3) Is it externally correspondent, and sufficiently parsimonious? Can we construct a proof (test) of external correspondence.

    4) Is it existentially possible? Is it operationally articulated? Can we construct a proof (test) of existential possibility? And is it free of imaginary content when we articulate it as such?

    5) Is it limited? Do you know it’s boundaries (falsification)

    6) Is it fully accounted? Do we account for all costs to all capital in all temporal and inter-temporal dimensions? (Have we avoided selection bias?) Can we construct a proof (test) of full accounting? (Is information lost or artificially gained?)

    7) Is it morally constrained? Does it violate the incentive to cooperate? (Meaning, are all operations productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfers, free of negative externality of the same criterion?)

    If you cannot answer these questions or do not understand them you cannot know if you speak the truth, or if you are polluting the commons with fantasy, bias, error, or deception.

    Source: Curt Doolittle

    (Ed: Note: Updated June 26 to reflect addition of warranty #5.)


  • Due Diligence Necessary For the Warranty of Truthfulness

    [D]ue Diligence necessary for Warranty that our Testimony is Truthful.

    1) Have we achieved identity? Is it categorically consistent?

    2) Is it internally consistent? Is it logical? Can we construct a proof(test) of internal consistency?

    3) Is it externally correspondent, and sufficiently parsimonious? Can we construct a proof (test) of external correspondence.

    4) Is it existentially possible? Is it operationally articulated? Can we construct a proof (test) of existential possibility? And is it free of imaginary content when we articulate it as such?

    5) Is it limited? Do you know it’s boundaries (falsification)

    6) Is it fully accounted? Do we account for all costs to all capital in all temporal and inter-temporal dimensions? (Have we avoided selection bias?) Can we construct a proof (test) of full accounting? (Is information lost or artificially gained?)

    7) Is it morally constrained? Does it violate the incentive to cooperate? (Meaning, are all operations productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfers, free of negative externality of the same criterion?)

    If you cannot answer these questions or do not understand them you cannot know if you speak the truth, or if you are polluting the commons with fantasy, bias, error, or deception.

    Source: Curt Doolittle

    (Ed: Note: Updated June 26 to reflect addition of warranty #5.)


  • DUE DILIGENCE NECESSARY FOR THE WARRANTY OF TRUTHFULNESS 1) Have we achieved ide

    DUE DILIGENCE NECESSARY FOR THE WARRANTY OF TRUTHFULNESS

    1) Have we achieved identity? Is it categorically consistent?

    2) Is it internally consistent? Is it logical? Can we construct a proof(test) of internal consistency?

    3) Is it externally correspondent, and sufficiently parsimonious? Can we construct a proof (test) of external correspondence.

    4) Is it existentially possible? Is it operationally articulated? Can we construct a proof (test) of existential possibility?

    5) Is it fully accounted? Do we account for all costs to all capital in all temporal and inter-temporal dimensions? (Have we avoided selection bias?) Can we construct a proof (test) of full accounting?

    6) Is it morally constrained? Does it violate the incentive to cooperate? (Meaning, are all operations productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfers, free of negative externality of the same criterion?)

    If you cannot answer these questions or do not understand them you cannot know if you speak the truth, or if you are polluting the commons with fantasy, bias, error, or deception.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-04 08:02:00 UTC

  • Repatriation. Ghettos. Separatism. Conversion

    Repatriation. Ghettos. Separatism. Conversion.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-24 05:15:00 UTC