Form: Mini Essay

You wouldn’t argue the by referring to any other bit of literature. you would tr

You wouldn’t argue the by referring to any other bit of literature. you would try to learn from literature the way we learn from myths and parables. Just because you derive wisdom from something doesn’t mean it’s a test of truth or necessity.

WTF is wrong with these people. They’re freaking crazy. The fact that they’re spouting crazy literature as if it’s science conveys upon them some sort of protection? Why? I don’t listen to schizophrenics. I don’t listen to german rationalists for that matter.

I consider myself a religious and spiritual person, even if my concepts of these things are somewhat esoteric – scientific even – to the point where its arguable we are talking about the same things. I am skeptical of people who lack such things because there is too high an incidence of sociopathy among them.

But people who argue using religious literature are no different from people arguing by referring to Dr Seuss. It’s ridiculous.

Sigh.

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 15:30:00 UTC

March 28, 2016
CONTRARY TO THE WORDS OF USEFUL IDIOTS IN THE WEST 1) The revolution was finance

CONTRARY TO THE WORDS OF USEFUL IDIOTS IN THE WEST

1) The revolution was financed by local oligarchs not americans, because the president got greedy and threatened the other oligarchical clans. The American state department supports all people’s economic prosperity and economic development because this leads to peace, wealth, and governments hat focus on internal consumption not external expansion.

2) The talent left Ukraine and still does and the oligarchical families are really not very different from the Corleone’s except they’re steppe people and that’s worse. All that remains are the offspring of farmers, the people who are at the bottom, and the gangsters that run the country.

3) American involvement in the revolution here in Ukraine was largely an attempt to prevent bloodshed, as that would ‘look bad’. The reason the revolution is unsuccessful is america’s FAULT because if the right had actually killed a few dozen politicians they would have sufficient fear that they’d reform the bureaucracy. America HINDERED the revolution.

4) Reforming the bureaucracy is difficult because all of its members are now late middle age people who grew up under the soviet government. These people are a cancer that needs to be removed. To remove these people requires an act of ‘lustration’ (cleansing).

5) The government that matters:

i) The finance and treasury bureaucrats.

ii) Judges, Clerks, Bailiffs, Sheriffs.

iii) Police, Fire, Emergency, Healthcare

iiii) Water, sewer, power, gas, roads.

iiiii) Teachers and Professors

iiiiii) The military.

Thats it.

6) The only body of people that can be called upon to defeat corruption are the young, and they will indeed force the change. It might require that we hire three two young people for every position currently held, but at least we could be fairly comfortable that they would have Ukraine’s interests at heart.

7) The problem with the young is that they cannot take over the jobs of finance, treasury, judges, nor the senior roles in infrastructure. They just lack the skills. Bureaucracy takes little if any skill. But calculation does. These people must be brought in from Poland, the USA and Canada.

8) The problem for with making the change is that you must pay these people enough money and Ukraine is too poor.

9) Ukraine is too poor because it lacks credit for risk taking, and land is controlled by oligarchs and the army. 80%of land is owned by the government and sold for agricultural purposes. Housing is too expensive because it’s corrupt. Without land there is no way to create leverage for borrowing.

10) Ukraine needs lustration, particularly of the judiciary, and for it to be replaced by foreign Judges each of whom has multiple young assistants on every case using the apprentice method. Ukraine needs Right Sector volunteers who have risked their lives for their country to fulfill the jobs of sheriffs, working in teams of fives, and to enforce the orders of the courts whenever they apply to members of the state. Ukraine needs a single (blockchain) totally transparent property registry. Ukraine needs young people to create an investigation department that uses the ‘secret shopper’ method to try to bribe. Ukraine needs three foreign banks staffed by foreign people, to administer all government payments.

Ukraine is either a nation of Ukrainians struggling for a better life, or a prison in which the people are slaves. It is one or the other. Right now it is the latter.

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 12:40:00 UTC

March 28, 2016
I think, that if I could say something useful to young libertarian and conservat

I think, that if I could say something useful to young libertarian and conservative men and women, it would be that fulfillment and money are increasingly difficult to find in combination. Worse, you cannot any longer look for insurance from a stable family. Worse, it is now nearly impossible to save for your old age once you’re married – and are destined to be elderly, lonely, and poor. Worse, the world has been engineered since at least the 1960’s to destroy your traditions, your families, your people, and your futures with just as deliberate a plan as the extermination of the Jews. Except that this deliberate plan has been conducted by pseudo-intellectual, pseudo-scientific fraud, the intentional erasure of rule of law, and the gradual financialization and impoverishment of your peoples through a process of continuous financial extraction. So your feeling of ‘this isn’t right’ is an insight not just an intuition. It’s not right. You’re being exterminated. So what can you do? You can let it happen, right? Or we can change the world forever, and obtain retribution and restitution from those who have committed these socio economic war crimes. To change the world I would recommend to find a job that makes money. To see social fulfillment in like minds. To develop knlowlege of the world. To maintain adequate health and fitness. And to work in as many small ways as possible toward the revolution that we need to create. There is no one else to do it but you. It’s your time. It’s your era. You are the generation that will save your families, your people, your culture, your civilization from genocide. But that revolution will not require money and passion. It will require knowledge and fitness. Our history of revolutions is depednet upon the democxratic narrative of popular will, popular press, and taking to the streets. This is not the revolution we will provide. Why? Because we do not need millions, we do not need money. We do not really need weapons. Money, millions and weapons are strategies that the enemy knows how to wield. We need to establish our demands, raise the cost of the status quo until they are met. To make the state ungovernable. And to take selective actions until the demands are met or the state and economy collapse. Why is this important? Because if we are a credible enough threat, then none of the unpleasant need happen. But if we are not a credible threat, then we will need to make the unpleasant happen in order to become a credible threat. fortunately or not, the timing is arriving a little faster than most of us anticipated. But we will create a network, and start educating in the positives and the negatives. The solutions and the threats. There are those of us who will instill passions, those of us who will spread solutions, and those of us who will suggest plans, and those of us who will take actions. I am fairly sure that I understand how this will play out. But it will play out. And we will succeed. Punish the wicked. Try the guilty. Change the laws. And never again will we be subject to fraud as a means of genocide against our people. But as last resort, if all else fails, we can just kill them all by spitting them upon pikes at every entrance and exit to this the west.

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 11:04:00 UTC

March 28, 2016
All. I succeeded in business because I applied what we call austrian economics t

All.

I succeeded in business because I applied what we call austrian economics to various industries using technology.

I am trained as an artist. I think as a scientist, and I practice either social science or philosophy depending upon your point of view.

When I was in business full time it was common (since the time I was 21) to ask why I was not teaching in university. (Because I am not tolerant of authority or slave labor, and I like making money.) In business I felt a philosopher that was ‘slumming’ for cash.

I’m a philosopher. That is my art. Business is a craft. I build technology. Some men sell books. Some men sell teaching. Some men work in Patent Offices. Some learn their craft in Law or Politics. Some like Spinoza grind glass lenses.

No one is going to remember me for building one of ten thousand technology companies during the birth of mass information age.

And certainly not for creating services companies. Technology is a way of making money. Technology gives you access to many, many businesses and business models. Working with technology is a little like pscyhology of facilitation rather than the psychology of dysfunction. Working with philosophy is a little like working with the psychology of cooperation and morality rather than people who are broken. But for me, business is an experimental workshop that pays me money, and where I don’t have to justify my work to some committee. Profit is enough justification.

But I”m a philosopher. Not a business man. Spinoza was a philosopher not a lens grinder. The fact that I undrestand business is a consequence of understanding man. Those who do not understand business merely do not understand man.

If you put it that way, then you understand just how little the world understands of man.

Learning philosophy, history, and economics, is to learn man.

Everything else is the subject of the physical world, or the lies we tell one another to avoid costs and gain premiums.

😉

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 08:00:00 UTC

March 28, 2016
WE SOLVED SOCIAL SCIENCE #NewRight Aristotle and Plato : Natural Law (vision but

WE SOLVED SOCIAL SCIENCE

#NewRight

Aristotle and Plato : Natural Law

(vision but failure)

Augustine and The Church.

(incremental improvement – but failure)

Hobbes, Locke, Smith and Hume

(incremental improvement but bordering on science)

Menger (Austrian/Galacian Science – German Rational tradition) 1840

Mises (Jewish/Galacian pseudoscience – jewish legal tradition) 1881

Hayek (German/Anglo Empirical – Adopted Anglo legal tradition) 1899

(failure again, with only hayek discovering that it is law not economics that produces social science)

Rothbard (Jewish/Russian Justification -Jewish legal tradition)1926

Hoppe (German Rational – Continental legal tradition), 1949

Doolittle (Anglo Empirical – Anglo Saxon legal tradition). 1959

(success)

Rothbard, Doolittle, and Hoppe. We solved social science in three generations.

The only social science possible is the common law: the discovery of means of violating the requirement for productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, limited to positive externalities of the same. Economics is the study of information and incentives to cooperate.

The basis of natural law is disproportionate value of cooperation.

The language of natural law is economic, not moral.

It was the failure of prior generations to rely upon financial and economic language rather than religious and moral language that prevented the solution to the problem of the social sciences. Morality is economic. It must be. Since we are part of the physical universe.

This is where Hayek ended up. He was right. But even he could not escape his language. And even he did not know how to solve the problem of truth.

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 04:05:00 UTC

March 28, 2016
EVERYONE FIGHTS NO ONE QUITS. DEFEAT THE WICKED. —Имеющаяся система демократии

EVERYONE FIGHTS NO ONE QUITS. DEFEAT THE WICKED.

—Имеющаяся система демократии, к сожалению, определяется количеством, а не качеством голосов отданых партиям, т.е. количеством идиотов, принимающих участие в выборах.

Кстати, идиоты как правило не слушают советов людей, приезжающих из стран, где демократия более-менее работает.—

It takes a certain mentality to make low trust, nihilistic, pretentious arguments advocating pragmatism rather than work deliberately to produce beneficial solutions even if they are profoundly difficult. It hasn’t occurred to you perhaps that you were indoctrinated into this form of thinking because people like you are easiest to control and most useful bureaucrats for who must oppress others through corruption and disinformation.

Democracy largely works where people are largely moral. Democracy doesn’t work where people are largely immoral. People are largely moral or immoral because of rule of law.

People who demonstrate nihilism confuse the challenge of creating rule-of-law amongst an immoral people with the impossibility that people can act morally, if rule of law is imposed.

That said. You should not antagonize your betters. It merely gives us opportunity to demonstrate your immorality and lack of character.

You are not wise. You are weak.

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-27 10:43:00 UTC

March 27, 2016
When your father is a big, mean, violent, alcoholic who beats your mother, you a

When your father is a big, mean, violent, alcoholic who beats your mother, you and your sisters with regularity, and the sound of his voice, footsteps, or car coming up the drive, makes your heart race – this creates a certain mentality. You can either duplicate it, succumb to victimhood, or never surrender, and work to ensure no one else every experiences such tyranny.

Turns out credibly promising to kill such people changes their temperament radically. It worked for me. It has worked throughout history. It is in man’s nature.

We need fear none. We need show no mercy. We need offer no forgiveness. Yet we need to rely upon reason not wrath. Anger defeats the mind, and tires the body. And we need all the will and energy we have.

Someone reminded me today that the left never had their Nuremberg Trials.

Well now, that’s a goal for us, isn’t it?

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-27 09:26:00 UTC

March 27, 2016
They destroyed America mostly in my lifetime. Sure, they destroyed our potential

They destroyed America mostly in my lifetime. Sure, they destroyed our potential future as another Europe in the Civil War. Sure, they destroyed our eugenic strategy with the federal reserve, income tax, and FDR. Sure they destroyed our constitution through revisionism. But they destroyed our families in the 1960’s. Feminism, the Great Society attempt at copying the Soviets, the destruction of the black family through urban migration, common property and child support, and worse of all, the immigration act. All of which were programs designed to accomplish through soviet-style relocation that which the socialists could not achieve through persuasion.

We need to prosecute them, punish them and collect restitution from them.

And since we can trace the arguments through publications, we have a record that we can prosecute those who still live, and take property from their descendants.

If we can restore property seized by the Nazis by force, why cannot we restore property stolen by the socialists by fraud?

We have all the evidence we need. The perpetrators largely still live. The consequences of their fraud can be repaired through restitution and prosecution.

So we merely need a to prosecute, punish, and repossess, right?

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-27 05:22:00 UTC

March 27, 2016
CHRISTIAN LOVE AS AN EXCEPTIONAL EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY (important) I do hold to

CHRISTIAN LOVE AS AN EXCEPTIONAL EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY

(important)

I do hold to Christianity in this sense: in the extirpation of hatred from the human heart. But I hold to this principle for four reasons: a) that emotion interferes with the reason necessary to plan and alter the course of events for our benefit, and b) trusting first and punishing later provides greater opportunity to entrap unethical and immoral people and eliminate them more quickly, and c) trusting first and investing first, create exceptional economic and innovative velocity, and (d) it is more joyous and less wasted effort if we can trust one another and severely punish the criminal, unethical, and immoral.

Christian Love Is Rational in a Militia, under natural law, under common law, under rule of law, under universal standing, using Testimony, Jury, and Judge.

This is the rational case for the central proposition of Christianity: Love. To Love is to bear the risk of harm, and punish the wicked in order to sort them from society faster – all the wile increasing economic and intellectual velocity.

Love is a bear trap for the wicked.

Curt Doolittle

The Philosophy of Aristocracy

The Propertarian Institute

Kiev, Ukraine

#NewRight

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-27 04:24:00 UTC

March 27, 2016
UKRAINE MAY BE A FAILED STATE BUT NOT A FAILED PEOPLE You can’t fix south americ

UKRAINE MAY BE A FAILED STATE BUT NOT A FAILED PEOPLE

You can’t fix south america. you can’t fix the Arab world. These are failed peoples. They are failed peoples because they are so asymmetrically bottom weighted that it is not possible to construct formal institutions that produce a voluntary organization of production – there are too many dead weights. The only solution to governing bottom weighted populations, is rule of law, brutal, ruthless, fearsome suppression of corruption, and a total inability of the peasantry to gain access to political rents or subsidies.

Democracy is a luxury good for the distribution of proceeds from a highly productive people who have themselves suppressed parasitism at all levels of society.

Democracy is a reward for good behavior that was created by rule of law and careful breeding.

But democracy in the absence of good behavior created by rule of law and careful breeding, is merely permission to engage in bad behavior, lack of rule of law, and careless breeding.

There is nothing wrong with ukraine that young politicians, bureaucrats, and judges wouldn’t fix.

But the solution is not democracy. It is rule of law and a constant propaganda drum of how to do the right thing, and turn in people doing the wrong thing.

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 14:53:00 UTC

March 26, 2016