Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • Compare American and Russian falsehoods. 1) The american revolution was an attem

    Compare American and Russian falsehoods.

    1) The american revolution was an attempt to escape paying for the french and indian war that nearly bankrupted the crown.

    VSV the Russian myth of the nazis was an excuse to conquer more territory, and Russian occupation of eastern Europe set them back a century of development. The germans would have advanced eastern Europe, and probably the world.

    2) the american civil war was not so much about slavery but the expansion of slavery into the western territories, and therefore the shift in political power from the north to the south.

    VS The cult of soviet, the cult of lenin, the pride in recent history. As far as we know the tzars had created both unions and a parliamentary equivalent. And with time could have reached european standards of living. Instead the soviets murdered 100M people. The experiment was a fucking disaster, and Russia, China, and even India cannot recover from Russian legal codes. (omg don’g let me talk about Ukraine).

    3) the americans spread the cancer of democracy – a luxury good for small homogenous nations that is the result of extreme domestication of the population.

    This is because they argue falsely that democracy is the source of western prosperity,m rather than that rule of law and suppression of the reproduction of the lower classes through the use of the nuclear family, rule of law, and property rights.

    Russians spread communism as an excuse to expand their conquests of asia around the world. Why russians need political power when they have the best resources in the world, is beyond me.

    4) Regan attacked Grenada for the same reason Putin attacked ukraine and syria: to restore national pride, and to distract the population from the economy, and to collect political power.

    WHAT DOES CURT RECOMMEND?

    Russians move south and conquer the ‘problem people’

    chinese move south and conquer the ‘problem people’

    Europeans move south and conquer the ‘problem people’

    Americans go home and mind their own fucking business.

    AND NOBODY MOVES EAST OR WEST

    we have a lot of the world remaining to domesticate.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-04 09:49:00 UTC

  • KILL THE ECONOMY AND THE STATE WILL DIE —“What can we do. Slowly more muslims

    KILL THE ECONOMY AND THE STATE WILL DIE

    —“What can we do. Slowly more muslims are appearing.”–

    They are not appearing. You are letting them appear.

    –Hmm.–

    Liberty is your responsibility. Governments take liberty. You make it. They come because you let them.

    –I wouldnt know what one can do when im one in 23 million.—

    You are one of some number, you are not alone. Where is the rest of your number?

    —Good point. But where to start?—

    By asking this question. And finding others. And determining what is the economic and political weak points that through attrition a small number can exploit and exhaust a state that murders its people by invasion.

    Kill the economy and the state will die.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-04 08:01:00 UTC

  • Governments are all corrupt. It is the nature of government to contain corruptio

    Governments are all corrupt. It is the nature of government to contain corruption, because it is the nature of men to contain corruption.

    The only savior of the west has been our true priesthood: our judges for who the law is sacred, and their status obtained by the preservation of its sacredness.

    Remove corruption from the law, and it is a weapon against those who lie, cheat, defraud, deceive, conspire, invade, prevaricate, propagandize.

    kill their words, we kill their ideas, we kill their ideas we kll them.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-04 07:57:00 UTC

  • THE NEXT ERA OF DOMESTICATION: ENDING ISLAM AND THE RELIGION OF IGNORANCE —“Cu

    THE NEXT ERA OF DOMESTICATION: ENDING ISLAM AND THE RELIGION OF IGNORANCE

    —“Curt Doolittle Humans are not businesses; we’re interdependent for survival. Even cooperations across the world have stop competing to complement each others weaknesses in the business space… not to talk about humans.”—

    We are -because we evolved to be – super-predators that choose to cooperate ONLY when it is MORE beneficial to cooperate than to enslave, or exterminate.

    The west advocates meritocratic trade because as a more advanced society and can compete better than others on the basis of merit. So it is to the west’s advantage to advocate trade and commercialism and consumer capitalism. But if cooperation by trade (or any other method) has become parasitic, then it is to our advantage to return to rule. If not rule enslavement. If not enslavement, extermination.

    Invasion of our lands by semi-human, ignorant, mystical animals is enough of a reason to return to rule, if not rule, enslavement, if not enslavement, extermination.

    SInce all societies want to exterminate muslims EXCEPT the west, if the west stops protecting freedom of religion then all societies will justifiable exterminate islam and mulsims.

    The muslim is teaching the wetsern man that he must not tolerate freedom of religion, since muslims do not practice a religoin, but a law, and a law is a political system not a religion.

    End the west’s protection of islam, and we end much of world conflict. Islam is the source of world conflict. It is a cancer that infects the west, Africa, hindus, and east asians.

    #NewRight

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-04 04:00:00 UTC

  • “So we do need a government.”– We need a market for the production of commons.

    –“So we do need a government.”–

    We need a market for the production of commons. And we need a legal system. Whether we need government is still unsettled but I would argue ‘no’.

    –“So it could still be privatized society, but we need to apply new laws to promote cooperation, trade, and prevent parasitism.”–

    Correct. One law, natural law, total prohibition on parasitism: physical, verbal, and by externality. A market for the production of commons. And as far as I know there is no ‘government’.

    It is useful to have a state department that foreign nations try to negotiate with.

    But even this is better conducted in public.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-03 13:05:00 UTC

  • Just as I’m a good Anglo boy, and Hoppe is a good German boy, Rothbard was a goo

    Just as I’m a good Anglo boy, and Hoppe is a good German boy, Rothbard was a good Jewish boy who intuited that separatism (the ethics between nations) could be universalized as an ethic between individuals.

    All groups make this mistake. Westerners (wrongly) intuit universal inclusion. Jews (wrongly) interpret universal separatism. These are not universals but group evolutionary strategies that facilitate group survival amidst competition.

    I believe I know more about Anarchism than any man other than perhaps Hoppe. But that’s like saying I also know a great deal about lying and deception. I would not advocate lying and deception, and I would not advocate anarchism.

    I’d advocate truth and nomocracy.

    Truth is enough.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-03 03:57:00 UTC

  • Distribute liquidity to advance the economy directly to citizens by equidistribu

    Distribute liquidity to advance the economy directly to citizens by equidistribution without exception. This will by pass the financial system and create dependence upon citizens rather than the state, and deprive them of most if not all interest fees.

    Eliminate interest collection on consumer borrowing by direct debit from the treasury by rule (formula) that is without exception. Bypassing consumer credit, and bypassing consumer interest.

    Revise freedom of speech to freedom of truthful speech. Meaning that one must warranty that which is placed in the commons, and that we can demand restitution for that false speech inserted into the commons.

    Restore Libel, Slander for court and Insult, Ridicule, and lie as criteria for judicially sanctioned duels. Denial of a duel when challenged for ridicule, insult, and lie (falsehoods) means you will either perform restitution(apology) or you can be simply killed.

    I am not so concerned about politicians once this occurs since we can kill them and their advocates with ease.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 08:19:00 UTC

  • WE DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO IGNORANCE AND MYSTICISM IN THE COMMONS Why do we have

    WE DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO IGNORANCE AND MYSTICISM IN THE COMMONS

    Why do we have the right to ignorance and mysticism (in the commons)?

    –“…the question is unanswerable…”–

    Quite the opposite. The question is answerable either way.

    That one cannot have a right to impose costs upon others.

    You can hold any falsehood you want, any immorality you want, as long as its in your head. But once you bring it into the commons then you are forcing a cost upon others.

    So,

    why does one have the right o act mystically?

    why does one have the right to act ignorantly?

    why does one have the right to act immorally?

    why does one have the right to act unethically?

    why does one have the right to act criminally?

    why does one have the right to act malignantly? (evil)

    You see, when you place ideas on a spectrum of similar ideas it becomes clearer that ignorance, and mysticism are merely increasingly indirect means of exporting costs upon others: another form of crime.

    In the past we have been tolerant of every form of malignant, criminal, unethical, immoral, ignorant, and mystical behaviors.

    But we have incrementally suppressed each form of crime over the generations and it is this suppression of crimes of imposition that have created our ‘domestication of man’. Our prosperity is the result of eliminating criminality as much as eliminating error.

    So again, why does one have the right to ignorance and mysticism any more than the right to immoral, unethical, criminal, and malignant behavior?

    One only possesses that right if others reciprocally grant it.

    That is the origin of all rights: reciprocal insurance.

    Why do we suppress imposition of costs? to force people into beneficial behavior rather than parasitic behavior. And ignorance and mysticism are a cost, and truth and spiritualism are not.

    There is nothing unscientific about spirituality any more than there is anything unscientific about the experience of seeing color in visible light.

    Mysticism is a drug. Ignorance is a form of free riding.

    Drugs are fine in your home. Ignorance is fine in your home.

    Don’t do drugs in public. Don’t speak ignorance in public.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 04:28:00 UTC

  • Democracy is a means of choosing how to distribute the proceeds of capitalism (t

    Democracy is a means of choosing how to distribute the proceeds of capitalism (the voluntary organization of production distribution and trade).

    But it is Rule of Law, and an Independent Judiciary, and the “Juridical Cult” that makes capitalism, wealth, democracy, and the redistribution of the dividends of capitalism by democracy possible.

    Democracy is a luxury that is the product of rule of law.

    It is frosting on the cake. It’s consequence not cause.

    The cause of wealth is universal truth-telling, rule of law, Jury, and the inviolable sacredness of the common organic law we call ‘Natural’, necessary, law.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-29 07:44:00 UTC

  • LITERATURE AND MEANING VS TRUTH AND DECIDABILITY Statements are not arguments. A

    LITERATURE AND MEANING VS TRUTH AND DECIDABILITY

    Statements are not arguments.

    And literary arguments are of necessity false.

    Santa Clause will in fact make you happy – as a child.

    The Iliad and Odyssey will educate you.

    The arthurian legends and the Lord of the Rings inspire you.

    But Achilles, Arthur, and Aragorn and all the saints,

    Have far less power than truth, testimony, natural law, and physical science.

    Only truth is persuasive, everything else is but informative.

    Myth for the children who must learn.

    Religion for the weak, dim, and hopeless who must labor.

    Literature for the able who must organize.

    Science for the self directed who must calculate.

    Truth, Law, History, Economics for the wise who must decide.

    Fairy Tale ethics for child who must learn.

    Virtue ethics for the young adult who must follow.

    Rational ethics for the adult who must act.

    Outcome ethics for the leaders who must calculate.

    Science for the wise who must decide.

    The bible ‘works’ because its central tents are:

    You can ignore the secular, your peers, and others.

    You can do what you can with what you have.

    You will be reasonably happy if you do so.

    Because with love, acceptance of fate, and not stealing from others, you will be of no burden to them, no threat to them, and can survive generation to generation insulated from the storms of man.

    But the bible only survives because the warriors decide,

    Because the financiers calculate

    Because the burghers organize.

    And the clerks coordinate and measure.

    And the labor acts accordingly.

    The west is polytheistic and always has been.

    We have a literature for every class.

    We have a history for every class.

    We have a role for every class.

    But the wise decide.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-29 02:58:00 UTC