Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • OUR ASCENT CRUSHES OUR VANITY Copernican Revolution made us understand we were n

    OUR ASCENT CRUSHES OUR VANITY

    Copernican Revolution made us understand we were not the center of the universe.

    Darwinian revolution made us realise that we are a glorious accident.

    The exploration of greater and lesser space made us realise the universe is quite hostile to us.

    The Propertarian revolution has made me understand that our consciousness is a puppet for our genes to use in negotiating cooperation with others. And all our vanity childish, and all our achievement an externality.

    We have progressed from confident to humble to frightened to humiliated.

    But the only possible language of the gods is truth.

    And we learn that language slowly and humbly.

    But there is a lesson here: the most foolish of creatures can become gods with enough effort.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-08 01:46:00 UTC

  • THE WEST’S OTHER FIRE: THE FIRE OF THE MIND: “TRUTH” Prometheus may have stolen

    THE WEST’S OTHER FIRE: THE FIRE OF THE MIND: “TRUTH”

    Prometheus may have stolen fire. But we gave mankind the Fire of The Mind: Truth.

    And from the Fire of the Mind, we gave mankind debate, reason, rationalism, science, physics, medicine, and testimonialism. We gave him testimony, the jury, natural law, the common law, the independent judiciary, the constitutional order: the contractual-order of mankind.

    To hell with equality and those who appeal to it – it’s a deceit by the weak to return us to dysgenic barbarism. We domesticated the human animal, and raised him from mysticism, ignorance, poverty, starvation and disease.

    We domesticated man through the incremental suppression of his natural parasitism, leaving productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange in the market as his only possible method of survival: survival through the service of others. Using the common law, we changed the behavior of those we could. And we hung those we could not. And we built walls and armies to resist those who wish otherwise.

    We have no equals. We either rule or are rule by and preyed upon by our inferiors, who, by their sheer numbers, like locusts, are parasites upon this earth, that with every birth, prevent man from achievement of his promise: godhood.

    Kill them all. Revel in your defense of man from another dark age of dysgenia, mysticism, ignorance, and suffering.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-07 02:50:00 UTC

  • THE ORIGINS OF THE LEFT’S EFFEMINATE R-SELECTION BIAS I think what is abhorrent

    THE ORIGINS OF THE LEFT’S EFFEMINATE R-SELECTION BIAS

    I think what is abhorrent to leftists is that business and productivity are innately competitive and consist of attempting to outwit other tribes of males for market territory.

    This is antithetical to the r-selection instincts of females and their effeminate offspring and the sexually inverted ((( tribes ))).

    In their world the cannot compete and seek consensus and non-conflict and reciprocality.

    They do not see competition as calculation by trial and error of efficiencies in the interest of all.

    They sense only the short term experience rather than judge long term consequences.

    Hence why we must never take the feminine or effeminate opinion seriously.

    It is a temporal blindness and a moral blindness just like Color blindness.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-05 04:30:00 UTC

  • THE PROCESS OF GROWING MAN, TRIBE, CULTURE, AND CIVILIZATION IS NOT ONE OF MANUF

    THE PROCESS OF GROWING MAN, TRIBE, CULTURE, AND CIVILIZATION IS NOT ONE OF MANUFACTURE.

    In every era we use the dominant model of complexity as an analogy for that which we cannot directly explain by operational means.

    Humanity has gone through the natural provision era, the agrarian era (things are grown), the irrigation era, the horse era(things are disciplined and trained), the hydraulic era(hearts pump), the gear and pulley era(mechanical), the steam era(big,scary,dangerous), and the industrial era (leading to our friend socialism), and now we are in the computational era and transitioning to the information era in both physics and social science.

    Unfortunately, our education system remains a product of industrialism. And it is a disaster. Our social science remains in industrialism, and it is likewise a disaster. And our political and legal systems also remain in antique form, and are equally a disaster.

    Human minds and bodies grow and genetics tell us how to grow, and we are the product of the PROCESS of growing. As is our knowlege, as are our cultures, as is mankind.

    And just as the operations that we use to move our limbs are invisible to us, the operations that nature uses to grow us are at present only in the initial stages of observation.

    We do not need to wait for the mechanism of growth to be better understood before we alter our institutions to rely on growth rather than manufacturing, and on growing humans like trees rather than manufacturing parts for factories.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-03 11:01:00 UTC

  • “I’ve been interested in the case of Spain for some time, as my ancestors are pr

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rise_and_Fall_of_the_Great_PowersQ&A: —“I’ve been interested in the case of Spain for some time, as my ancestors are primarily Spanish. And I wanted to understand the reasons for the rise of the Spanish and if they had any philosophical contributions to the western World. If you saw no reason to comment on the Spanish, I don’t wish to take your attention away from something which could be more useful. But, if there is anything to say about the Spanish, I would certainly be willing to read what you have.”— David

    David,

    The Spanish question is interesting because Spanish philosophers were central to the Scholastic movement, the Spanish empire was so powerful, and so successful but rapidly evaporated under industrialization. So that the Spanish had lost their position by the time of the enlightenment’s transfer of power from the landed to the merchant classes, and the vast inte

    The argument for why this happened is well understood:

    1) The Spanish were a hardworking people, and meaningful commercial leaders as trade spread from the Mediterranean to the atlantic..

    2) The peak in spanish contirbution to philosophy occurred in Catalan where the Translators of Toledo first translated greek texts from arabic into latin, then to catalan. This set of translations created what we know as the modern spanish language. And is probably the basis for what we call today ‘spain’. And it was the latin translations that reintroduced europe to science and philosophy.

    3) The discovery of the new world created an enormous influx of gold (currency).Spain spent its wealth on wars, notably against the low countries (Netherlands).

    4) As we see with Americans, unearned wealth tends to make a people lazy, and they seek status signals not productivity. And decline after wealth is very difficult for a people to work through.

    5) With the people ‘ruined’ from this process of expansion, wealth, war, and failure to convert to industrialization, they did not produce an enlightenment on the scale of england, france, germany, or ashkenazi-dom (eastern europe and russia). And spain devolved into a relatively poor country despite being second only to the UK in the territorial expansion of spanish language and genetics.

    6) Spanish cultural, military, and economic excellence was was the product of Austrian not Spanish rule. Just as eastern european excellence was the product of german and Austrian rule. (see Kennedy’s book https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rise_and_Fall_of_the_Great_Powers) And when the Hapsburgs declined, so did aristocratic influence in spain.

    So, Spain went into decline, and she was unable to maintain her colonies when the Americans and British chose to deny her access to first the caribbean, and then south america. Read anything basic you can find on the rise and fall of Hapsburg Spain.

    But I will say something uncomfortable:

    That Spain ascended under Roman, Muslim, and Austrian rule, but could not maintain that ascent under her own rule. SO WHY IS THAT?

    Something we must ponder. But most of us probably attribute this to geographic location, and mediterranean (hot weather) culture, catholicism, and the failure of Spainish culture to join the Hanjal Line and develop the absolute nuclear family, and low corruption we see in protestant countries that still practice ‘the oath’.

    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-03 02:29:00 UTC

  • The proof is in the Left’s success.— Lying is a successful strategy. Marxist p

    —The proof is in the Left’s success.—

    Lying is a successful strategy. Marxist pseudoscience was a successful strategy. Kantian pseudorationalism was a successful strategy. Acquinian Christian synthesis was a successful strategy. Christianity was a successful strategy. Jewish synthesis of Egyptian and Babylonian monotheism was a successful strategy.

    If you succeed by lying, have you in fact succeeded?

    —Gramsci was no fraud and no lie and no pseudo-science.—

    Are you sure that his Marxist framing of his criticism of capitalism is not in itself pseudoscientific? (it is). The assumption is that man was innately good and that state and capitalist were predators, rather than man was barbaric, and that religion(norm/ostracism), state(law/force), and capital(remuneration/exchange) were the three tools available to man to engage in the gradual eugenic domestication of man by the systematic culling of the underclasses. And the most successful societies with the highest standard of living are those that most successfully culled the underclasses and therefore domesticated man sufficiently to create a division of labor. This is the scientific explanation.

    Put it his way: if your standard of measure is wrong, or you basic axioms are wrong, all deductions from your standard of measure or your axiom are also wrong – and if they’re right then it’s just an accident.

    So, yes, marxism is pseudoscience, socially, psychologically, and economically, and Gramsci was yet another pseudoscientist. The fact that he bases his arguments on Marxist justificationism rather than Christian theologism, is merely a choice of words – words that were designed to achieve the same ends.

    —And they are a very eugenic group.—

    If that’s true then (a) why are they reproductively undesirable, (b) why do they have such high rates of inverted sexual dimorphism, homosexuality, schizophrenia, and disease? (c) (and the question that matters) why are they unable to hold territory of their own without a host to prey upon? I agree that jews are elites in populist circles but they are only temporarily so, just as anglos were elites during their enlightenment, french theirs, germans theirs, and jews theirs. Jewish enlightenment being the last can take advantage of the lessons learned from the first few. But in the end, the Jewish century just ended and the Jewish pseudosciences: boaz, marx, frued, cantor, mises, Rothbard, rand, frankfurt, will, as Hayek suggested, go down in history as the second attempt to create a lie as a revolt against western truthfulness (rationalism and science).

    –libertarianism is a straw dog —

    Well, I think marxism/socialism is a great lie, just like randian/rothbaridian liberarianism is a great lie, just like straussian/kristol/trotskyism is a great lie.

    BUT HERE IS WHAT YOU ARE SAYING:

    “If lying works we should use it”

    AND HERE IS WHAT I AM SAYING

    “Make lying in the commons a crime and eliminate lying from the public discourse, and we will win by default”

    we are the most creative people that ever lived. And we have the bio data to tell us why now.

    TRUTH IS ENOUGH

    So stop trying to lie well, and instead learn how to tell the truth well, and how to prosecute liars well.

    That’s my response. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-01 01:45:00 UTC

  • THE CHURCH FAILED TO REFORM AND THE SCIENCES DIDN”T HAVE TIME TO COMPLETE THEIR

    THE CHURCH FAILED TO REFORM AND THE SCIENCES DIDN”T HAVE TIME TO COMPLETE THEIR EVOLUTIONARY PROGRAM

    I mean, another way to look at the 20th century is that in response to Darwin, Maxwell, Spencer, (a) the church failed to reform in response by stating that god and natural and physical laws were the same expression of his divinity, and (b) our intellectual class failed to synthesize operationalism as a means of reforming scientific thought-at its new-grand-scale, and (c) the Jewish pseudoscientists (Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor) filled a void that both state, academy, and finance could use to profit from the new wave of democratic voters (customers), students (customers), and consumers (customers) who they could not force to spend down their accumulated cultural and institutional capital.

    We can easily argue that this is the same strategy the ancient Jews took in response to the imposition of (scientific Aryan-universalist) roman law on top of their (mystical authoritarian separatist) Jewish law. I mean, it worked against classical civilization, why wouldn’t it work against restored classical civilization of the enlightenment?

    Intellectuals provide a product for a market. I am just concerned that we do not let another era of fraudulent defective products like ancient Jewish mysticism and modern Jewish pseudoscience into a civilization where second tier intellectuals, women, and the underclass are all too willing to embrace utter falsehoods at the expense of their civilization and it’s progenitors – and in the case of western civilization, all of human kind that benefits from western creativity.

    So what we see, is that between the failure of democracy, the progressive failure of Keynesian economics, the failure of Freudian psychology, of Boazian anthropology, of Marxist economics and sociology, and even Cantorian infinity to survive scrutiny by late 20’th and early 21st century science, that we have at least a temporary opportunity to overthrow the Second Great Deceit’s attack on western truth, science, and eugenics.

    But we have a short time before the second great deceit and it’s customers in women and the underclasses, possess such numbers that we can be forced into another dark age. And that the promise of a eugenic north America, like a eugenic Europe, insulated from the steppe, desert, and jungle, can continue to provide an engine of innovation for mankind.

    For the simple reason that we pay the high cost of truthfulness: That discipline of eliminating error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, and deceit, that we call ‘science’.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    We must achieve by force what they have achieved in both the ancient and modern world by deceits.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-28 03:38:00 UTC

  • MOSCOW’S INDIRECT EDUCATION OF EUROPEANS Moscow’s conquest of south-eastern ukra

    MOSCOW’S INDIRECT EDUCATION OF EUROPEANS

    Moscow’s conquest of south-eastern ukraine broke not only the postwar consensus on borders, but the peace of Westphalia that made states accountable for the factions inside their borders. To some degree this may help Europeans, and westerners, understand that their definition of war includes the assumption that wars are conducted by states against states rather than by factions within states against states or factions within other states – and that like the high trust society they live in, and the rule of law they live under, or the democracy that they practice, is just another European idiosyncrasy – an artifact of history that like trust, law, democracy, can readily convert to human norms of low trust, corruption, and totalitariansm.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-28 01:26:00 UTC

  • Well, that was the end of the Jewish century. Each enlightenment promise failed.

    Well, that was the end of the Jewish century.

    Each enlightenment promise failed.

    We had it right in the first place: government as a marketplace for the construction of commons by exchanges between the classes.

    The military, the judiciary, the King.

    The houses of the classes.

    The church, academy and school.

    The the insurer, the treasury, the banks, and the industry.

    The nation the family the crafts.

    It is hard to admit you and your ancestors were wrong about so much.

    It is harder still to restore the path of our evolution as the creators of the @opposite@ way: every man a sovereign vs every man a subject that is nearly universal to man.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-27 02:42:00 UTC

  • Just as falsification tells us what may be true by that which we cannot make fal

    Just as falsification tells us what may be true by that which we cannot make false; and proofs tell us what is not false but not what is true; and the law tells us now what we must do, but only what we must not do; and evolution tells us only what fails, not what succeeds, it is not important that the best people lead, as much as it is important that the worst do not. For this reason we must limit access to power to those least likely to lead poorly. How do we know? Demonstrated character in familial, entrepreneurial, political, and military excellence over multiple generations. And the elimination of consideration of those who fail the test of character in familial, entrepreneurial, and military excellence across multiple generations.

    Nobility is most frequently demonstrated by intergenerational excellence. For those who cannot master their passions enough for good breeding, good rearing, good production, and good defense, have demonstrated by their actions that they and their families are unsuitable for leadership.

    Note that survival from the opinions of others in schooling, academy, politics and church, tell us nothing about an individual other than his ability remember and to obey, while engaging in various forms of politicking and deceit. Only family, commercial, and military experience tell us about the capacity of an individual to lead.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-26 13:39:00 UTC