Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN: DOMESTICATING ANIMAL MAN FOR PEERS AND PROFIT. An

    NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN: DOMESTICATING ANIMAL MAN FOR PEERS AND PROFIT.

    An animal has no agency, only impulse; can enter no contracts, only seize conveniences; can resolve no disputes truthfully, only imagine excuses. It cannot be reasoned with, only bribed or punished. But with bribes and punishments it can be trained. And if training fails, abandoned to the wild, enslaved, imprisoned, or killed.

    We train the animal with property in toto, manners, ethics, morals, and law. We use peers, parents, teachers, sheriffs, police, judges, juries, soldiers, generals and kings.

    The animal can be trained from beast to slave, to serf, to dependent, to freeman, to civilian, to soldier, to aristocracy: human.

    The training requires sentience, awareness, consciousness, reason, knowledge, and agency.

    But each degree of training demands more of the animal, and many – most – cannot complete it, and transcend the animal.

    As such the world is full of a few humans and many domesticated animals of varying degree, and many, many beasts.

    Thankfully, like many domesticatable animals, these animals, once domesticated, can often be put to good use.

    And as such, the beast man, like all other domesticatable beasts, can be domesticated for profit.

    The domestication of man – that occupation we call rule – is the most profitable occupation of all, except for one:

    The success in breeding, and training humans.

    Because while animals are a commodity, producing the rare human is the most profitable industry of all.

    And if it fails, hunting the beast man that remain, is the greatest joy of all.

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-30 22:32:00 UTC

  • OUR TOWER OF BABEL IS NOT LANGUAGE BUT LIES. The church held onto its lies, and

    OUR TOWER OF BABEL IS NOT LANGUAGE BUT LIES.

    The church held onto its lies, and died from it. The academy adopted new lies and prospered from it. The people tried to resurrect their ancient lies, they grasped and the old lies, they grasped at all manner of new lies, and others chose among each of them the most convenient lies. But because of these lies they were all ‘confused’.

    They have rebuilt the Tower of Babel. This time, not only with different languages, but with different lies. They have no means of decidability. they cannot know what is true. So they preserve the costs that each person has invested in the lies that work for him or her. Each person protecting his purse-of-lies trying to find others with compatible lies to trade with them.

    We cannot know the truth. We can rarely if ever know what is good. We can often know what we prefer, and if we work at it, know what is false.

    But knowing what is false provides us with no guidance. We have no ‘authority’ to rely upon, or discount to take, and are stuck with our own devices. It is much easier to rally people around an opportunity that is false that can understand, and fall prey to, than it is to rally them for something that appears more costly – because the truth is often costly.

    So I suspect, given the economics of peoples investment in that personal form of wealth we call ‘meaning’ but is largely a network of lies and errors, biasess, and deceits, that like the priests church, a lot of people, a lot of institutions, will have to die before the Tower of Lies is disassembled.

    Men are not moral. They do not seek the truth. They seek acquisitions. And they seek those acquisitions at a discount. And the discount that they depend upon is their accumulated store of decidability we call prior understanding.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-30 17:32:00 UTC

  • #google #facebook #microsoft Move capital to people and pay the cost of their cu

    #google #facebook #microsoft Move capital to people and pay the cost of their cultural upgrade,not people to our capital and ‘degrade’ ours.

    —“It can’t happen until we stop bombing them for Israel.”—

    Only “useful idiots” believe that. A muslim “Core State” issuing a petro-currency would easily enslave the world.

    —“You give them too much credit.”—

    No one would EVER accuse me of giving people too much credit. Instead, I”m just absurdly well informed.

    I’m a bit of an unpleasant jerk toward the zombie masses. And even more so toward the idiots in government.

    our standard of living has nothing to do with democracy and everything to do with our military’s enforcement of market oil.

    America has only three economies: The sale of homes on cheap land, the USD as stock in doing so, and Arms to keep cheap oil.

    I”m happy you you dimwits starve but I like my creature comforts. Even if it means idiots like you have ‘free speech’. 😉

    —-“It’s unfortunate you lack emotional intelligence for such a smart guy, but years of masturbation do that to too many men.”—

    I am just very good at what I do. -hugs back at ‘cha. 😉

    —“and you are a comedian too! I like you, but you are full of yourself.”—

    That’s part of the idea. To go so over the top, it’s silly but gets the message across. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-30 15:12:00 UTC

  • ON A GRAMMAR OF CATEGORIES (IDENTIFYING CONSTANT RELATIONS) So if we are to spea

    ON A GRAMMAR OF CATEGORIES (IDENTIFYING CONSTANT RELATIONS)

    So if we are to speak precisely we need a term that describes the limits of the human brain’s processes of identifying categories, then one for natural categories (invariant), and then one for utilitarian categories (variant/explanatory), and then for partially-substitutable/unpredictable ( variant/explanatory/plastic): this last being the problem of economic analysis, since that is the point at which mathematics begins to break down in the description of constant relations.

    So we need a grammar of identity (category). Because every category is something we identify, by identifying a set of constant relations. (a search function).

    Unfortunately, until we have artificial intelligences, it will be very difficult to quantify, or define some set of limits, that describe the information necessary to form constant relations. (this is, in my opinion, what Taleb’s work is limited by). This is also why I work with via-negativa, since if we cannot describe the thing in and of itself, but we can describe what it is not.

    The grammar of existence prevents substitution (ignorance, error, bias, deceit), by creating a unique identity for every single action, and therefore a category (recipe) of constant relations.

    i’ll try to give this some thought so that I can create a spectrum(series) that gives us a post-rationalist language for this subject…

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-29 07:22:00 UTC

  • ALL WARS, MARTIAL, ECONOMIC, POLITICAL, AND CULTURAL ARE COSTLY. AND YOU WILL NO

    ALL WARS, MARTIAL, ECONOMIC, POLITICAL, AND CULTURAL ARE COSTLY. AND YOU WILL NOT GET OFF CHEAPLY.

    Lets be clear. Your little comforting lies need to die too.

    The left won the culture war by telling desirable half truths, after failing at the revolutionary, economic, political, and military wars against Aryanism (domestication of man).

    Thankfully we now have testimonialism.

    The left won in the ancient world by vast immigration from the east, and the imposition of eastern half truths and outright lies, followed by rapid conquest of the mediterranean.

    Thankfully we invented empiricism in the modern world – after humanity’s longest dark age.

    The left won in the prehistoric world by the imposition of half truths and outright lies to mobilize the underclasses against Aryanism. Producing humanity’s first visible dark age.

    Thankfully we invented reason in the ancient world, after our second longest dark age.

    The left won the eastern world by the invention of half truths and outright lies: the supernaturalism that we call ‘organized religion’. They did it in response to THE WEST.

    We had created that industry we call Aryanism: the combination of bronze, horse, wheel, contractualism, sovereignty, and heroism: the use of superior technology to allow elites to domesticate and transcend man from beast to human by the incremental suppression of his innate parasitism.

    THAT MEANS YOU TOO.

    We did not understand our own ‘technology’: Aryanism. But now that we do, we can use it to destroy the ‘left’ (the middle-east, the middle world, the people who lie), and destroy them forever, and end the cycle of our innovation of truth and transcendence, and their innovation of deceit and devolution.

    The consequence of the restoration of the west, and the incremental improvement in our technology of domestication, will restore our civilization, but it will also destroy the lies and half truths imported from the east, that our people use as a ‘crutch’ with which to sate their weaknesses with dreams, delusions, fantasies, and escapism.

    There is only one truth, one perfection, one heroism, one aristocracy, and that is the defeat of falsehood, half truths, parasitism, and infection of the mind of man with the entire portfolio of lies.

    And if this is not good enough for you then you are not worthy of transcendence. You may not be as weak as those who are evil, but you are not as strong as the gods we seek.

    There is no room for the weak among the gods.

    And if you must lie, and seek comforts, rather than act, and enact changes, then you are merely weak. Not weak enough to harm perhaps. but not strong enough to transcend.

    So the price of victory of the middle east (the left) is one that all who cannot face truth without fear, but with pleasure, with inspiration, and with conviction, and with action.

    There are many myths to choose from. But they are not truths. They are simply highly condensed means of making decisions that consistently advance our achievement of perfection in a universe of chaotic information among people who are evil, weak, infected, or unable to choose.

    Eat the weak.

    Conquer.

    Rule.

    Transcend.

    And become the gods we seek.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Law of Nature and of Man

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-28 15:43:00 UTC

  • THE CURRENT ERA HAS CONQUERED THE LEFT WITH IN ECONOMICS AND POLITICS WITH FINAN

    THE CURRENT ERA HAS CONQUERED THE LEFT WITH IN ECONOMICS AND POLITICS WITH FINANCIALIZATION BUT THEY HAVE WON WITH CULTURE AND REPRODUCTION.

    The financialization of the west, first to finance the early 20th century immigrants to the USA, second in the postwar era to rebuild Europe, then third in the seventies and eighties (the petrodollar) was used to fight the cold war (world communism), and fourth to stimulate the economy when the financial system collapsed, has gotten entirely out of hand, and let western governments commit suicide to the point where immigration and extermination of the nations (people) is the only economic lever at their disposal. This whole bit of nonsense is made possible by the collaboration between the left-wing university, the left wing press, the incentives of ‘big’ finance and business, and the oversized state.

    Only very ignorant, immature, and inexperienced people interpret the world in simple terms. everyone in history, for all of history, operates on economic incentives.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-28 15:22:00 UTC

  • INTENTIONS ARE IRRELEVANT. VIA POSITIVA (STORIES) HELP ORGANIZE BUT VIA NEGATIVA

    INTENTIONS ARE IRRELEVANT. VIA POSITIVA (STORIES) HELP ORGANIZE BUT VIA NEGATIVA (LAW) DECIDES OUTCOMES.

    The purpose of Natural Law is to prevent harm, resolve disputes, and force restitution. If no dispute, no harm, no externality exists then this is not a matter for law. law evolves via negativa. by discovering methods of conflict because of parasitism and preventing them by recording them as a warning that one will be forced to pay restitution, and as a help to those who want to know how to avoid conflict. It is a purely empirical process.

    If one seeks to build consensus that is not the function of the law (via negativa). Yet if one seeks to build consensus by MEANS THAT CANNOT BE WARRANTED, and means that cannot be testified to, then one has failed to perform due diligence against harm, and one can be brought up for restitution.

    Intentions are irrelevant.

    The ease of transfer is irrelevant.

    The ‘good’ of the outcome is irrelevant.

    Those are statemetns of positiva (intention and excuse making)

    However, when we come into dispute, disputes are decidable. All differences in property in toto are decidable.

    If one does not impose a cost against property in toto then the matter is undecidable, precisely because it is immaterial. What you do in your own head that does not manifest itself as an imposition of costs upon the costs paid by others is irrelevant. (and reciprocity applies to others).

    If you want a positive political philosophy (methods of cooperating in the production of commons) then we have a spectrum of options from near dictatorship to near anarchy to choose from. I don’t need to list them. We know them.

    If you want a positive personal philosophy (generative options) we have at least these methods to choose from: , dreaming/free-association, the occult/new-age, superstition, myth, literature, Tradition/habit, rules of thumb/imitation, general rules of arbitrary precision (truth/science/history).

    if you want an mental discipline mindfulness discipline we can achieve this through drugs/dreaming, suppression/meditation, internal-(recursive)-conversation/prayer, disciplined and restive ritual, contemplative writing, disciplined action-planning(stoicism), physical exercise/hiking-running-walking.

    But if you want to DECIDE between competing wants, or decide between matters of conflict, there is only one possible method of decidability.

    Now I might prefer a highly redistributed homogenous polity under strict rule of natural law, requiring all of that redistribution to be truthfully stated in the law, transparently performed and objectively measured. And I might prefer that order simply because I am highly independent by virtue of my talents and skills, and people seem to find me useful. But I can see others who are not so independent, not possessed of talents and skills, and not found useful, preferring a different order – although it is hard to understand a better order for getting it to them morally.

    Now, others might prefer a different order for immoral reasons. Those reasons might be obvious (inabilty to compete in a market). Or they might be less obvious: inability to organize toward a productive end truthfllly. or they might be insidious: attempting to disorganize or organize toward a harmful end.

    But all of these cases are decidable.

    But in order for a case to be decidable, someone’s interests (property in toto) must have been subject to harm because of it.

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-28 13:04:00 UTC

  • THE FUNCTION OF A PHILOSOPHER The function of a philosopher is to identify and c

    THE FUNCTION OF A PHILOSOPHER

    The function of a philosopher is to identify and construct general rules of greater precision than the generation of philosophers that came before him – if he is lucky. Otherwise, if that previous generation was not less precise, but just wrong, then he has either to start from the generation before them, and so on, and so on, until some generation is no so much wrong, as imprecise. In our case it appears one has to go back quite a few. ‘Cause, at least, a whole lotta people got it a lot more wrong than right since the dawn of the scientific enlightenment. And if not for Poincare, Maxwell, Darwin, Spencer, Durkheim, Menger, Hayek, Nietzsche, the pre-raphelites and the romanticists, we’d have to rewind all the way back to Locke, Smith, Hume, and Jefferson. I mean. For the past few centuries, we’ve produced so called ‘philosophers’ by the box-car load. And I’m not sure they differ all that much from romance novelists, comic books, and slapstick playwrights. The pretense of wit – particularly with language – is a measure of the population willing to consume it. Popularity is not a measure of truth but of ignorance. Truth is complicated. Otherwise we wouldn’t need the few philosophers and scientists that succeed.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 15:39:00 UTC

  • OMG. I love beautiful code. And yeah, I’m writing f—king BEAUTIFUL code. It’s ok

    OMG. I love beautiful code. And yeah, I’m writing f—king BEAUTIFUL code. It’s ok. I know beautiful code. I’m not looking for opinions. Art is art and human sh-t fingerpainting is just sh-t fingerprinting with tools. And saying so makes me feel better. I’ve been frustrated for a while. So I just had to get all that exasperation off my chest with this (bullshit) being pumped out by FB/Google. But React’s renderer, and Mobx’s observer (watches for changes in the state of data) are (at least architecturally) just like writing 3d video games. (or sprite games, or text games for that matter). I still haven’t chosen the async processing method yet. I mean, I don’t know why I can’t specify what the rest of the app should wait for and what not (what’s serializable and what’s async) but I can’t find a simple (meaning transparent) declarative method. So my gut tells me (at the moment) that I’m going to handle that myself rather than use one of these (bullshit and incompetent) methods that are rolling around the ’new age’ generation of snowflake programmers..…. WTF are they teaching people in university these days? I feel like the sun-wrinkled engineer looking up at the building and saying… um…. you know, those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it…. I mean, what kind of ass designs a glass building with a concave surface large enough to melt cars parked on the street? (BTW: did you see the building collapse from a fire in Tehran the other day? Just like the WTC, you can see the first floor collapse from heat, then cause a domino effect as each floor collapsed faster and faster and brought down the whole building? it doesn’t take much people. VIBRATION is enough. There is no difference between the floors of a building and the tacoma narrows bridge. Shit-in-motion-is-waaaaaay-‘heavier’ than shit-not-in-motion. F—k… I need another planet. The f—king zombies are dangerous. And they don’t know they’re zombies…. And in case your IQ is too low to catch the parallel, I’m drawing an analogy between the fire created by new-age-ignorance, and those floors collapsing sequentially because of the structure of the code…. yeah. I know. I usually leave those little jumps for others to find, as little easter eggs for smart people. But right now I’m feeling like I need to lecture the mentally disabled – just ‘cause it’s cathartic. Otherwise I’m going to just have to start hitting people with wooden clubs so that they have some sense of consequentialism.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 11:45:00 UTC

  • Um… before I say anything, lets remember that I claim no special knowledge of

    Um… before I say anything, lets remember that I claim no special knowledge of physics. What I claim is to understand the categories of errors man makes that we must circumvent in order to make each generational leap in dimensional knowledge.

    It is very hard to believe that E8 is not the map of the full set of forces, given how ‘simple’ that explanation is, the problem of dark (non-reflective) matter, the apparent volume of that matter in the universe, and that the missing particles (forces), in that model would be ‘heavy’ (massive), and that we are still relatively blind or ignorant to the constitution of space time.

    My current opinion is that the particles(forces) we do not yet understand, if found, will inform us, and that we have spent the better part of a century now making fairly little progress, because of the limits of visible (reflective) matter, and the vast distraction provided by the chimera of mathematical physics, just as we spent the majority of the 20th century in the vast distraction of the logic of language and sets.

    As for the wave function collapse, probability, schrodenger, and multiple worlds, the most simple answer (and the universe keeps telling us it’s simple) is that we do not understand space time. And that all this mathematics is pretty much just “jerking off” for grant money.

    We have one present problem in physics that I know of and that is dark matter. Until we solve that problem, or back into the problem with an explanatory theory (E8), everything else is the modern equivalent of contemplating how many angels can dance on a pin.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-26 19:49:00 UTC