Um… before I say anything, lets remember that I claim no special knowledge of

Um… before I say anything, lets remember that I claim no special knowledge of physics. What I claim is to understand the categories of errors man makes that we must circumvent in order to make each generational leap in dimensional knowledge.

It is very hard to believe that E8 is not the map of the full set of forces, given how ‘simple’ that explanation is, the problem of dark (non-reflective) matter, the apparent volume of that matter in the universe, and that the missing particles (forces), in that model would be ‘heavy’ (massive), and that we are still relatively blind or ignorant to the constitution of space time.

My current opinion is that the particles(forces) we do not yet understand, if found, will inform us, and that we have spent the better part of a century now making fairly little progress, because of the limits of visible (reflective) matter, and the vast distraction provided by the chimera of mathematical physics, just as we spent the majority of the 20th century in the vast distraction of the logic of language and sets.

As for the wave function collapse, probability, schrodenger, and multiple worlds, the most simple answer (and the universe keeps telling us it’s simple) is that we do not understand space time. And that all this mathematics is pretty much just “jerking off” for grant money.

We have one present problem in physics that I know of and that is dark matter. Until we solve that problem, or back into the problem with an explanatory theory (E8), everything else is the modern equivalent of contemplating how many angels can dance on a pin.