Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • WHY I LOVE UKRAINE The people are sweet. family and friends matter more than wor

    WHY I LOVE UKRAINE

    The people are sweet. family and friends matter more than work and politics. The food is amazing and natural. There is little if any rude public behavior. the culture is communal and civil – you can get a punch in the face still. the men are men and manly. the women are women – and beautiful. People appreciate kindness and consideration. They go to church and dress for it. The women cook. Family is sacred. There are scammers everywhere. The women will use you if you let them. The tech sector is a wild west like the USA in the 90’s because it’s difficult to exercise corruption on information-goods. They work 10-12 hour days. There is a holiday every week or so. No one works between december 10th and January 20th – and can’t, because of food and alcohol. The entire place is falling apart. Nothing works. Banking is questionable. No one can drive at all, and everyone thinks otherwise. There is organized crime everywhere. There is corruption everywhere. There is little if any government. There is little if any police presence. But they are hopeful. And they are ‘becoming a people’ before your eyes. So basically if you make your income elsewhere and spend it in ukraine it’s akin to tripling your income, and everyone you spend it with or on benefits from it.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-25 14:18:00 UTC

  • LIMITING THE PREFERRED AND THE GOOD WITH THE TRUE Well some of us are biased for

    LIMITING THE PREFERRED AND THE GOOD WITH THE TRUE

    Well some of us are biased for true, and some for good, and some for preferable, and those of us who are biased for true, are better at ‘limiting’ those biased for the good and preferable, if we can deflate their ‘moral and normative’ language into ‘technical’ language. In other words, we must force them to meet us on our turf: truth.

    Just as you cannot prove any system of logic within itself, and must appeal to the next higher dimension of logic (that includes more information), we cannot criticize the intuitive (preferable), good (moral and normative) unless we do so with the next higher logic: the true.

    And the language of truth is deflation.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-24 09:37:00 UTC

  • WHY IT’S NOT MY JOB TO MAKE IT SIMPLE FOR SIMPLE FOLK: THE DIVISION OF COGNITIVE

    WHY IT’S NOT MY JOB TO MAKE IT SIMPLE FOR SIMPLE FOLK: THE DIVISION OF COGNITIVE LABOR

    (a) Have you read bacon, Locke, smith, hume, darwin, spencer, hayek and nietzsche? What about Marx, Engels, Boaz, Freud, Adorno, Foucault, Derrida? What about Cantor Poincare Hilbert, and keynes? Of course not. You don’t read original material. You probably don’t even read the people who translate their ideas into common context in intellectual history. It’s possible you read simplifications written by those that simplify the work of the translators into intellectual history. Its most likely that you ‘hear’ the rules of thumb that interested or educated people have learned from the simplifiers.

    (b) Do you ask questions morally? Meaning do you ask how something CAN be true, or do you ask how you might err in how you think today? Especially given the evidence of what you know, have read, and have achieved in your life? No, you are another silly young male.

    (c) Just as there is an occupational hierarchy of politicians > financiers > entrepreneurs > executives > professionals > managers > craftsmen > laborers > underclass, there is an intellectual occupational hierarchy of inventors of ideas (140+) > communicators of ideas (130+) > adapters of ideas(120+) > users of adapted ideas(110+) > users of instructions provided by adopters of ideas (100+) > imitators of instructions provided by adapters of ideas (100-) > and below 100 we get into rumours, parables, and sayings rather than the ideas themselves.

    So ideas degrade with every generation downward. Common examples are that evolution is non-directional, other than the exploitation of niches, and the ludic fallacy that we can calculate probabilities of non-closed distributions.

    So you know, I don’t take criticisms from dimwits seriously and I’m unkind to dimwits because I’ve found that most dimwits are either not worth my time, or they are just young men who haven’t learned how to ask questions using good manners. The way I test young men, is by shaming them. And that separates the moral young men, from the dimwits.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-24 08:39:00 UTC

  • RELIGIONS: SEPARATING THE OPERATIONS FROM THE CONTENT I understand the value of

    RELIGIONS: SEPARATING THE OPERATIONS FROM THE CONTENT

    I understand the value of Myth(Decidability), Ritual (Mass), and Mindfulness (prayer).

    But do you understand that there is nothing in what you call ‘christianity’ that cannot be produced by truthful means, rather than lies?

    So my opinion is, like a woman, or a child, you cannot separate the OPERATIONS: teaching myths for the purpose of shared decidability, performing rituals for the purpose of shared trust reinforcing thost patterns of decidability, and performing contemplative disciplines for the purpose of adapting to those patterns of decidability – from the CONTENT of those operations.

    But that it is the OPERATIONS, regardless of the CONTENT that produce the ‘goods’ that result from performing those operations.

    So as far as I know, you are ‘owned’ by your inability to deflate the operations, the content, and the training from those operations. And you treat the content as material, when it is the operations that are material regardless of the content.

    It is trivially easy to reform our church. It is trivially easy to reform the operations in our churches. And trivially easy to reform the mythos of our churches. That is because the good that is in our churches is the use of Myth, Ritual, and Mindfulness to produce that High Trust of the European Peoples.

    And we do not need the lies of the semites, who do not practice this high trust. We do not need the mental disease of the semites, to demand submission – that is the antithesis of our european peoples.

    We have plenty of myths and decidability, we can always use the Feast (Church/Mass) ritual of Toast (preaching), Oath (Creed), Feast (bread) as an opportunity for creating common decidability and common trust.

    And we can always use the some combination of self-analysis (Stoicism), internal dialog with archetypes (prayer), mindless repetitive chanting, and mental discipline (meditation) to adapt ourselves to the order we create by those means of decidability.

    The difference is that we will need to return to the era when the men who lead such civic ceremonies are worthy of our audience.

    Where the decidability provided by the content is materially transcendent, heroic, good, true, and beautiful – in the european heroic ethic not the semitic tyrannical.

    Where the Feast Ritual heralds western man’s achievements in the real world, not the lies of the semitic world that imprisons men in ignorance.

    We can reform our church.

    But the first step is realizing that you err. That you value the content rather than the operations. But that you are wrong. It is the operations regardless of the content that makes a religion valuable.

    And most importantly: there is no content on earth superior to the european scientific, technical legal, political, economic, cultural and historical.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-24 08:06:00 UTC

  • “YOUR BRAIN ISN’T A COMPUTER..!!!” ….. WELL THAT’S NOT QUITE RIGHT Nonsense. A

    “YOUR BRAIN ISN’T A COMPUTER..!!!” ….. WELL THAT’S NOT QUITE RIGHT

    Nonsense. A brain doesn’t compute but it calculates just fine thank you. The difference isn’t that complicated. You compute with perfect information(types) and you calculate with imperfect information (categories). A computer can’t select its own algorithms and weights. You can select your own algorithms and weights. But there is precious little difference between they way you iteratively search google, and your brain iteratively searches for meanings. You just can’t observe the search process in your mind any more than you can observe it in google, and your mind never stops while google waits for your next entry. Otherwise…. not very different AT ALL.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-22 14:55:00 UTC

  • THE SUPREME ART OF WAR? NO. THE JOY OF HEADY MURDER. (revolution comes) Sun Tzu

    THE SUPREME ART OF WAR? NO. THE JOY OF HEADY MURDER.

    (revolution comes)

    Sun Tzu was wrong. the supreme CRAFT of war of STATES is in forcing your enemy to submit without fighting. But the supreme art of war of WARRIORS is in the joy of slaughter and the profiting from it.

    War has only been undesirable since the peace of westphalia limited war to soldiery under states rather than warrior and militia as a commercial venture.

    A war of all against all – for plunder, murder, and the joy of the hunt has always been an opportunity for the men to raise their station by opportunity, looting, responsibility, and heroism.

    Soldiers serve, but warriors fight, and do so for passion, loot, respect, heroism and the outright joy if it. All the rest is propaganda of the state to promote servitude in the army of the state.

    Christianity makes men weak. The state makes men weak.

    There is no greater joy than to crush your enemies, to see them flee before you, to burn their cities, take their land and possessions, to take their women, and enslave their sons and daughters.

    We return to war of all against all.

    Revel in it. Profit from it. Change the course of history with it.

    Transcend.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-22 10:44:00 UTC

  • ON SPIRITUALITY AND TRANSCENDENCE (important) You know, when you use the word sp

    ON SPIRITUALITY AND TRANSCENDENCE

    (important)

    You know, when you use the word spiritual you mean ‘non-rational’. You mean submission of human reason to animal free association. By animal free association to instinct and impulse. And by doing so enjoy the feelings that freedom from reason and exploration of our animal instincts provide us. You can restore the ‘security of the tribe and pack’.

    You can achieve that experience through action discipline (stoic discipline), buddhist mental discipline, contemplative prayer, or ritualistic (repetition) prayer, asian ritualistic discipline, Or any of the nonsense new age drivel by which the weak escape reality rather than defeat it.

    You can obtain the collective experience of submission to the will of the pack, and the production of reciprocal trust, through sport, festival, feast, group observation (dramatic play), group ritual or ceremony, group ritual prayer.

    You can obtain the collective development of reciprocal trust through military service, emergency service, and civic service in the production and maintenance of commons, and demonstrated civic virtues.

    Now of those three sets of impulses we can abandon reality, we can tolerate reality, or we can change reality. We can embrace our current condition, we can tolerate our current condition, or we can change our current condition.

    Now of those sets of choices, which are transcendent-in-fact, and which claim transcendence but are just chemical rewards no different from taking drugs, producing ends that are no different from taking drugs?

    There are those of us who are fully human and have transcended the beast. There are those who are less fully transcendent and need to retreat to the beast now and then to burn off the frustrations of insufficient transcendence. There are those of us who constantly struggle to demonstrate transcendence and who must retreat to the beast at every opportunity in order to continue their charade, and there are those who have little ability to transcend and merely imitate the various stages of transcendence to the best of their abilities.

    One can make moral rational choices because one has transcended and therefore possesses agency. One can recognize moral rational choices despite one’s lack of full transcendence, and still demonstrate agency most of the time. One can make rational choices if trained and exercises his reason in at least those matters political. One can imitate rational choices made by one’s betters out of desire for moral membership. Or one cannot make such choices because one lacks the agency to do so.

    So one can appeal to spirituality out of genetic, emotional, or intellectual weakness, and still choose a moral decision by non rational means. But one cannot defend or advocate that decision as rational unless he can state it rationally.

    I have no problem with weakness. But the weak cannot rule, and the number of weak, who lack agency due to their failure to transcend must be reduced. And we must never take seriously those who speak in ideal, spiritual, religious or occult terms.

    The stoics invented the only un-religion. We can restore it.

    a) Aryan Sovereignty for the industrialization of the production of agency.

    b) Stoic Personal Discipline that maximizes agency.

    c) Stoic Natural Law that maximizes agency.

    d) Stoic Aesthetics that maximize excellence

    e) Deflationary myths: the use of the Monomyth, the plots, the Archetypes, and the Virtues to teach wisdom by narrative explanations of our psychology of acquisitionism.

    END THE LIE OF MONOPOLY. Restore paganism: the market for personalities, the market for specialties, the market for ages, the market for classes. Markets in everything by which we calculate transcendence one generation at a time.

    Curt Doolittle

    THe Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    (TIP: do you see how I use series to eliminate the ability to weasel word through imprecision? Testimonialism=series rather than ideal types, operational definitions rather than experiential or intentional descriptions or ideal definitions; Full accounting rather than cherry picking.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-22 07:25:00 UTC

  • HUMANS SPECIATE AT 30 POINTS OF DIFFERENCE – ISLAMISTS ARE A DIFFERENT SPECIES –

    HUMANS SPECIATE AT 30 POINTS OF DIFFERENCE – ISLAMISTS ARE A DIFFERENT SPECIES

    —You aren’t spiritually minded—

    I don’t use drugs either. I rely on reason. I’m a european. A member of the martial class.

    islam was the means of arab (underclass) expansion, and has evolved into the worldwide method of underclass expansion. It is the religion of the -90IQ populaces.

    That’s the problem. Not so much islam. But sub 90IQ people who employ islam as a means of rebelling against reason and transcendence (domestication) by their betters.

    At every 15 points we begin to speciate. At 30 points we speciate. it’s not complicated. the Muslim countries are literally a different species because they cannot process information by the same means, therefore they cannot organize societies by the same means. They require AUTHORITY.

    The smarter your population the higher demand for libertarian sentiments because the greater the ability to self research, self analyze, and self choose in an increasingly complex division of knowledge and labor.

    That’s just a fact. It’s just how it is.

    Dunning Kruger and Islam go hand in hand.

    You might argue that christianity is an aristocratic deception, judaism a middle class deception, and islam an underclass deception and that would be accurate.

    But they are all deceptions.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-22 06:34:00 UTC

  • THE INDIAN WARS DURING THE ERA OF CONQUEST My ancestor had a fortified house in

    THE INDIAN WARS DURING THE ERA OF CONQUEST

    My ancestor had a fortified house in connecticut and his home was the first attacked by the indians in the King Phillp’s War

    —“The war was the single greatest calamity to occur in seventeenth century Puritan New England and is considered by many to be the deadliest war in the history of European settlement in North America in proportion to the population.[5] In the space of little more than a year, twelve of the region’s towns were destroyed and many more damaged, the colony’s economy was all but ruined, and its population was decimated, losing one-tenth of all men available for military service.[6]:656 [7] More than half of New England’s towns were attacked by Indians.[8]”—

    The original conflicts were between tribes for access to trade with europeans (furs).

    Further escalated because different settlements by different countries, allied with different indian tribes. The tribes were often enemies of one another. And each defended its relationship with the settlements. These spiralled.

    They further escalated as populations began to increase, there was competition, and ‘fights’ between indians and settlers.

    “…the settlers increasingly encroached on Tuscarora land, raided villages to take slaves, and introduced epidemic diseases….”

    They escalated when for example Kleft murdered the tribes for the territory of manhattan (without permission)

    Scale escalated when tribes would ally with colonists against competing tribes whose land the colonists were taking. This led to the extermination of tribes.

    THen indians allied together against colonists and … well, at that point you have wars.

    I think that we tend not to recognize that the indians nearly won many of these wars and that the losses by whites were in substantial percentages of the population.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-21 19:10:00 UTC

  • PETERSON’S POSTMODERNISM Peterson is in part a postmodernist because he relies u

    PETERSON’S POSTMODERNISM

    Peterson is in part a postmodernist because he relies upon a postmodern (utilitarian) definition of truth – as if the purpose of truth was choice of good or preference when we are cooperating, rather than decidability in matters of conflict when cooperation fails.

    The more complex the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, negotiation, and advocacy, the greater requirement for decidability.

    Peterson (I assume) preserves this postmodernism, in order to preserve his fondness for literature, idealism, and supernaturalism, and especially conflationary idealism and supernaturalism (Fictionalism).

    I can understand why he needs this ‘crutch’ because the monomyth, the list of plots, the archetypes, and the virtues provide our best historical (empirically devolved) and most enduring analysis of psychology, and method of pedagogy.

    However, there is a very great difference between the teaching of meaning so that we may discover and seize opportunities in reality, and the teaching of law so that we may decide conflicts without provoking retaliation cycles.

    So while Peterson COULD say “truth is truth” and “wisdom is wisdom”, and while we can CHOOSE with wisdom, we can only DECIDE with Truth.

    Otherwise, Peterson is on the way to restoring our ancient literary ‘Religion’, but he seems bent on preserving the ‘fictionalism’ (lies) of Abrahamism.

    My question is, why preserve the lies of Abrahamism, if is is the use of the techniques of Abrahamism – fictionalism as a means of deception by suggestion – that the marxists (pseudo-science) and postmodernists (pseudo-rationalism) used to defeat the west in both the ancient (Forcible christianization) and modern (forcible marxism and postmodernism) eras.

    Once Peterson resolves this one question I think he’s not just telling the conservatives what they want to hear. Until then, that’s all he is doing.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    ===RESPONSE TO CRITICISM===

    —“You seem to equate fictionalism, i.e. system that deals in fictitious, imaginary semi-abstract universe and the lies….”—

    No. FIction vs Fictionalism. Fictionalism is a technical term. It means misrepresenting a fiction as existential or true.

    a) Historicize: deflate myth into history and literature for the purpose of decidability in matters of dispute.

    b) Fictionalize: convert into monomyth, plot, archetype, virtues for the purpose of meaning for the self.

    c) Fictionalism: conflate myth, history, literature, law, science, real and ideal for the purpose of deception for political ends.

    Compare 1) Science(measurements that remove error,bias,deceit), Common Law: empirical evidence of disputes. Economics: empirical record of demonstrated preferences. History (narrative of cause and effect), Literature(Fiction), Myth (hyperbole), under anthropomorphic gods, demigods, heroes all subject to the laws of the universe, who represent portfolios of virtues and sins for personal ends with 2) idealism supernaturalism, and conflation: supernatural authoritarianism, for the purpose of communicating POLITICAL ends, in which history, myth, laws, archetypes, ideals, utopias, and false promises of paradise in the present or after death are conflated. The most common examples are monotheistic religion (pseudo-myth) and mathematical platonism, marxist pseudoscience, and postmodern pseudo-rationalism.

    There is a difference between use of deflation by monomyth, plot, archetype and virtue, and use of conflation in matters of wisdom of the self, and the use of deceit in politics. Virtues assist us in maximizing opportunities while limiting negative consequences to ourselves and the polity. The individual can enact his own compromises and exchanges, but politics is not but a proxy for violence and is not a matter of wisdom but DECIDABILITY. If not, then it is not a matter for politics which can only be decidable if it is empirical.

    THis is how the left works: to circumvent the compromises of exchange necessary for the political to consist of moral actions (non parasitism).

    —“The fairy tale – is it a lie to be exterminated? It seems to be an idea so grotesque, that only the complete anti-humanist would dwell on it.”—

    A fairy tale consists of fiction (myth) not fictionalism (virgin birth of a savior).

    —“Well, it does. Because decidability in real world situation has nothing to do in general with verifiable truth in Popperian sense nor with falsifiability of the hypothetical proposition.”–

    Personal decidability does not, But POLITICAL decidability DOES. Because personal choice requires non-imposition, and political decidability requires imposition..

    There is a very good reason why the west, using common law, deflationary truth, deflated institutions, maintained the separation of religion(wisdom) and state(law). And that reason is largely responsible for western rates of development versus their nearest competitor the chinese who also avoided conflation.

    —“Now, I totally open to the idea that the scientific truth one day may tell me a good answer to that dilemma, but I am dealing with not a fictional proposal of a complete ULTIMATE science, but with a real and extremely limited science that does not know much about how an individual functions, nor how the society functions in a sense relevant to a question at hand.”—

    The fact that you cannot imagine that it is possible to create tests of dimensions in natural language the same way we create tests of dimensions in mathematical language is simply due to the very recent solutions to questions of language in philosophy, the development of algorithmic language in computer science, and the scientific method’s inversion of justificationism (intent) with criticism (darwinian survival of ideas in the market for application), and the very recent confirmation of stoic acquisitionism, which I’ve expressed as propertarianism. In other words, locke was close to the stoics: we can in fact reduce not only all moral action to statements of property, but all of psychology and sociology as statements of property – thus, providing the social sciences with the final unit of commensurability: property.

    So the fact that you don’t know those things is simply because it’s taken us from 300AD to the present to vacate enough of Abrahamic Fictionalism to restore our thought to it’s deflationary state 1700 years ago.

    Now if that loss of 1700 years, and the rather obvious fact that by Archimedes greece had started the industrial revolution, is not enough of a criticism of immigration of non-european underclasses, and the cancer of abrahamic fictionalism, I don’t know what is.

    We lost four great civilizations to Abrahamism in the form of judaism, christianity, and islam, and we are currently in the process of being forced into another migratory dark age by the fact that Abrahamic deceptions are so appealing to women and the underclasses.

    Is there a greater moral crime in all of history than Abrahamic Fictionalism? I don’t think anything comes close. Abrahamic fictionalism has no equivalent. It destroyed the ancient world, and it is in the process of destroying the modern.

    1) Zoroastrianism > Judaism > Christianity > Islamism defeated Greek and Roman Reason and destroyed north african, levantine, persian, byzantine and roman civilizations, and brought about the dark age through continuous raiding of the west.

    2) German Rationalism > Jewish Marxism > French Postmodernism > Puritan Feminism are defeating the anglo germanic enlightenment. The same process is being repeated. The only people to resist the abrahamic deceits were the north sea peoples who ‘saved themselves’ from Christianity, and the Chinese who built a wall to keep out the barbarians and preserved their kinship purity even at economic cost to them.

    So there is a very great difference between decidable literature of history, law, and science, and wisdom literature in the form of fiction, and fictionalism, in the form of abrahamic conflation and deception by suggestion.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-21 15:51:00 UTC