—“when your book comes out can you please make sure it’s not full of vacuous complex terminology that doesn’t mean anything. I want to read and understand it”— A Friend
So let me ask you.
Who is my audience?
The people who already agree with me?
The people who want to understand, explain, and defend the causes of the excellences of western civilization?
The people who want to conduct arguments to defend it?
The people who want to understand the constitution that we need to restore and preserve it?
The people who want to understand how to construct natural law within that constitution?
The people who want to debate other philosophers and intellectuals and prevent another intellectual attack on western civilization by various abrahamists?
The people who want to understand what we need to do to win a civil war for our civilization?
Or all of the above?
Which of those are you?
(a) You will never understand all of it – it will take me the rest of my life, and longer if I had it, to understand the implications myself. (b) Nothing I write is vacuous it’s just meaningless to you because you can’t use those parts of it – you don’t have the knowledge. (c) However you can use only those parts you understand. (d) Those parts you need to understand are simple enough to understand.
HERE IS ALL YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND
Seeking excellence(dominance), over emotion, mind, man, beast, nature, and the universe, western man invented the combination of technology, heroism, truth, agency and sovereignty in a semi professional voluntary militia regardless of the impact on the status hierarchy, and as a consequence, western man required reciprocity, and reciprocity requires markets in everything as the only possible means of cooperation. Markets calculate and adapt to change faster than all other social orders, and as such western man evolved faster than the rest, including, and especially because markets are eugenic, and western superiority is the result of eugenic distribution less burdened by the dead weight of the underclasses. However, we were defeated in the ancient world by the abrahamic lies, dysgenic reproduction and dysgenic immigration, and we are being defeated in the current age by abrahamic lies, dysgenic reproduction, and dysgenic immigration. In order to restore our civilization and defeat abrahamism, displacemet, and dysgenia we must only restore that natural law of reciprocity by the construction of a constitution of natural aw, and the restoration of the militia as the distributed dictatorship of natural law.
The fundamental insight of my work is the completion of the scientific method and its application to all of human thought, thereby making it possible to prohibit abrahamic deception – in literary, financial forms, political, and religious forms, in this era and all of those that follow.
And to license the use of violence to do so. Outlawing all those means by which the west was defeated in the ancient world and this one: not by violence, but by lies, financialization, immigration, and dysgenic devolution.
Form: Mini Essay
-
Tying It All Together
(Important post) SCIENCE: Taking action in order to discover, through the process of elimination, operations with which we can, as a consequence, reason – where the principle problem is removing ignorance, error, bias and deceit from free association, we call hypothesizing. MATHEMATICS: the use of positional names to describe averages of operations that result in constant relations, themselves resulting in different symmetries at different scales.
Consequently we can use mathematics to discover patterns which we then seek to reduce to operations. And within the human world we can know these operations thorugh subjective testing (sympathy/empathy/self-experience) whether internal (above the intuitive) or external (physical world). Once we have discovered that set of operations, we can seek the set of operations beneath it – and so on, until we find the lowest possible set of operations from which the universe is constructed. The physical universe, at its lowest level, consists of a market, just like our own markets, wherein humans are just a very complex (high) scale, across multiple hierarchical markets, each of which consists of symmetries, produced by the limits of operations – just as man is limited by his physical, emotional, and intellectual operations that we call ‘actions’. When we operate by markets we operate in harmony with the physical universe – meaning the lowest possible friction – and we fulfill life’s purpose at the highest extant level of symmetry, wherein all life serves the purpose of defeating entropy. As such we defeat entropy by the incrementally fastest means possible. Western man was not first, but he was fastest. Because through truth and eugenics (domestication) he lived in the greatest harmony with the universe. The explanatory power of (number of philosophical problems this model solves) is profound. In metaphysics we often discuss levels of reality, but again that is another ideal, where operations are actions. There. I have done it. I have figured out how to say it in simple terms. -
Tying It All Together
(Important post) SCIENCE: Taking action in order to discover, through the process of elimination, operations with which we can, as a consequence, reason – where the principle problem is removing ignorance, error, bias and deceit from free association, we call hypothesizing. MATHEMATICS: the use of positional names to describe averages of operations that result in constant relations, themselves resulting in different symmetries at different scales.
Consequently we can use mathematics to discover patterns which we then seek to reduce to operations. And within the human world we can know these operations thorugh subjective testing (sympathy/empathy/self-experience) whether internal (above the intuitive) or external (physical world). Once we have discovered that set of operations, we can seek the set of operations beneath it – and so on, until we find the lowest possible set of operations from which the universe is constructed. The physical universe, at its lowest level, consists of a market, just like our own markets, wherein humans are just a very complex (high) scale, across multiple hierarchical markets, each of which consists of symmetries, produced by the limits of operations – just as man is limited by his physical, emotional, and intellectual operations that we call ‘actions’. When we operate by markets we operate in harmony with the physical universe – meaning the lowest possible friction – and we fulfill life’s purpose at the highest extant level of symmetry, wherein all life serves the purpose of defeating entropy. As such we defeat entropy by the incrementally fastest means possible. Western man was not first, but he was fastest. Because through truth and eugenics (domestication) he lived in the greatest harmony with the universe. The explanatory power of (number of philosophical problems this model solves) is profound. In metaphysics we often discuss levels of reality, but again that is another ideal, where operations are actions. There. I have done it. I have figured out how to say it in simple terms. -
Cooperation is Only Useful, Until it is Not.
Cooperation, whether personal, commercial, political, or military, is only valuable until it is not valuable personally, familially, tribally, or nationally, or not valuable organizationally or politically. Cooperation is not an intrinsic good any more than violence is an intrinsic bad. They are just useful or not in producing goods and bands. When cooperation is no longer beneficial, then boycott is in one’s interest. When boycott is no longer beneficial then predation is in one’s interest. And while it is very common that cooperation and boycott are often more valuable, there are many conditions under which violence is preferable to boycott or cooperation. This is the left’s mistake. This is the state’s mistake. This is most everyone’s mistake. Never has an empire been so fragile. Revolutions are always suspect in prospect but deterministic in retrospect. The question is – can I deprive those with the interest in change of confidence in all alternatives such that they will work in very small groups to bring about constitutional, political, and civil change? I think so. Desperation will sink in. When desperate, and with vision of the future, and a plan of action, it’s all possible. Trivial even. Deterministic.
-
Cooperation is Only Useful, Until it is Not.
Cooperation, whether personal, commercial, political, or military, is only valuable until it is not valuable personally, familially, tribally, or nationally, or not valuable organizationally or politically. Cooperation is not an intrinsic good any more than violence is an intrinsic bad. They are just useful or not in producing goods and bands. When cooperation is no longer beneficial, then boycott is in one’s interest. When boycott is no longer beneficial then predation is in one’s interest. And while it is very common that cooperation and boycott are often more valuable, there are many conditions under which violence is preferable to boycott or cooperation. This is the left’s mistake. This is the state’s mistake. This is most everyone’s mistake. Never has an empire been so fragile. Revolutions are always suspect in prospect but deterministic in retrospect. The question is – can I deprive those with the interest in change of confidence in all alternatives such that they will work in very small groups to bring about constitutional, political, and civil change? I think so. Desperation will sink in. When desperate, and with vision of the future, and a plan of action, it’s all possible. Trivial even. Deterministic.
-
We Must All Find A Method of Mindfulness
WE ALL MUST FIND A METHOD OF MINDFULNESS – IT’S COMPUTATIONALLY NECESSARY —“”Atheism is unnatural. People are not evolved for secular epistemic purity but rather for survival through cooperation through language. A major way that people cooperate through language is by taking part in a community of faith. Searching for the truth apart from myth is also one, but one which is not a significant part of our evolutionary environment.The fact that there are actually “communities” (I use that term loosely)of atheists who actually share their values and search for the truth is just a by-product of the fact that certain successfull faith groups tolerate our presence and find us useful. Atheism is may be factually correct, but it is not natural. Atheists are extremely unnatural; about as unnatural as homosexuals and feminists.We should never be surprised is someone reverts to type and converts from atheism to a religion, especially when they get old, have kids, decide they want kids, decide they want to find a good spouse, or any other life milestone that has to do with our supreme purpose on earth, reproduction of fit offspring.”—Adam Voight Perfect. And, I love this quote: —“People are not evolved for producing statements of secular epistemic purity but rather for survival through cooperation through language. “— The limit to the evolutionary value of language is its utility in cooperation – cooperation which decreases all costs (and increases certainty). This is probably why our brains are smaller, yet we demonstrate far greater achievement than our predecessor species: we distributed “computation” into a network through language, whereas other species had only (largely) distributed sense-perception through ‘calls’. If I can hope to contribute to your post, it would be that mindfulness is ‘computationally’ necessary for the simple reason of cost-savings. And that one simply *MUST* find a method of obtaining mindfulness that he can physically, mentally, and emotionally tolerate. Unfortunately, the evidence is, that mindfulness (like hypnosis) is easier achieved by the simple than the intelligent. And that as one’s intelligence increases, one must seek it by incrementally more abstruse means. Hence why stoicism is the most effective and universal means of universal mindfulness: it requires one pay a physical cost of effort, rather than a cult-cost of believing a falsehood as the price of entry, and price of mindfulness.
-
We Must All Find A Method of Mindfulness
WE ALL MUST FIND A METHOD OF MINDFULNESS – IT’S COMPUTATIONALLY NECESSARY —“”Atheism is unnatural. People are not evolved for secular epistemic purity but rather for survival through cooperation through language. A major way that people cooperate through language is by taking part in a community of faith. Searching for the truth apart from myth is also one, but one which is not a significant part of our evolutionary environment.The fact that there are actually “communities” (I use that term loosely)of atheists who actually share their values and search for the truth is just a by-product of the fact that certain successfull faith groups tolerate our presence and find us useful. Atheism is may be factually correct, but it is not natural. Atheists are extremely unnatural; about as unnatural as homosexuals and feminists.We should never be surprised is someone reverts to type and converts from atheism to a religion, especially when they get old, have kids, decide they want kids, decide they want to find a good spouse, or any other life milestone that has to do with our supreme purpose on earth, reproduction of fit offspring.”—Adam Voight Perfect. And, I love this quote: —“People are not evolved for producing statements of secular epistemic purity but rather for survival through cooperation through language. “— The limit to the evolutionary value of language is its utility in cooperation – cooperation which decreases all costs (and increases certainty). This is probably why our brains are smaller, yet we demonstrate far greater achievement than our predecessor species: we distributed “computation” into a network through language, whereas other species had only (largely) distributed sense-perception through ‘calls’. If I can hope to contribute to your post, it would be that mindfulness is ‘computationally’ necessary for the simple reason of cost-savings. And that one simply *MUST* find a method of obtaining mindfulness that he can physically, mentally, and emotionally tolerate. Unfortunately, the evidence is, that mindfulness (like hypnosis) is easier achieved by the simple than the intelligent. And that as one’s intelligence increases, one must seek it by incrementally more abstruse means. Hence why stoicism is the most effective and universal means of universal mindfulness: it requires one pay a physical cost of effort, rather than a cult-cost of believing a falsehood as the price of entry, and price of mindfulness.
-
Never Has An Empire Been So Fragile
NEVER HAS AN EMPIRE BEEN MORE FRAGILE There is no natural gas, electrical, or electronic infrastructure that can survive a magazine of steel core 7.62 ammunition. There are no transformers that can survive a collision with a pickup truck. There are no poles that can survive a man with a chainsaw. There is no physical infrastructure than can sustain loss of water pressure and five gallons of gasoline, and a match. There are no railways that cannot be stopped by simple removal of rails. There are no drivers willing to transport goods under threat of snipers, road spikes, and hijacking. America is vast and dependent upon energy and that is its weakness. THE RULE OF THREES Three seconds without blood, three minutes without air, three days without water, three weeks without food, three months without commerce, three quarters without government. It takes about three weeks to a month to collapse a country. Because people fall of their own weight, economies fall of their own weight, countries fall of their own weight. Empires fall of their own weight. Civilizations fall of their own weight. SMALL ACTIONS IN ENOUGH NUMBERS PRODUCE VAST CONSEQUENCES It takes a few hundred if not a few thousand men to conduct a revolution. and all retaliation against those few hundred, or thousand men, by opposition or the state, will accomplish is acceleration. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.
-
Never Has An Empire Been So Fragile
NEVER HAS AN EMPIRE BEEN MORE FRAGILE There is no natural gas, electrical, or electronic infrastructure that can survive a magazine of steel core 7.62 ammunition. There are no transformers that can survive a collision with a pickup truck. There are no poles that can survive a man with a chainsaw. There is no physical infrastructure than can sustain loss of water pressure and five gallons of gasoline, and a match. There are no railways that cannot be stopped by simple removal of rails. There are no drivers willing to transport goods under threat of snipers, road spikes, and hijacking. America is vast and dependent upon energy and that is its weakness. THE RULE OF THREES Three seconds without blood, three minutes without air, three days without water, three weeks without food, three months without commerce, three quarters without government. It takes about three weeks to a month to collapse a country. Because people fall of their own weight, economies fall of their own weight, countries fall of their own weight. Empires fall of their own weight. Civilizations fall of their own weight. SMALL ACTIONS IN ENOUGH NUMBERS PRODUCE VAST CONSEQUENCES It takes a few hundred if not a few thousand men to conduct a revolution. and all retaliation against those few hundred, or thousand men, by opposition or the state, will accomplish is acceleration. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.
-
If you don’t ‘go slumming’ you cannot understand the lower middle, working, labo
If you don’t ‘go slumming’ you cannot understand the lower middle, working, laboring, and underclass peasantry. The vast majority of these people who are above 95 at least, are not immoral. They may be ignorant. They may lack opportunity to produce competitively enough to prosper, and they may feel left behind, that their contribution to moral norms is not reciprocated, but they are not immoral.
Likewise, if you have never dined with the political, industrial (entrepreneurs with > 1000 employees), the financial class (serving the capitalists), or the capitalist class (the wealthy families), then you cannot understand that by and large they try to be moral. In my experience most of us try to be moral. The problem is just that we extend our concept of morality into a universal rather than a class, and that our institutions provide too few means of voluntary exchange, so that the various classes can achieve what they desire without resorting to fraud, conspiracy, and subterfuge. And the presently/academic classes outside of the STEM courses are, along with politicians they produce, the only immoral people that I know of (other than government employees outside of the market.)
I’ve been an effete snob whether it was the early 70’s when my parents were financially struggling to keep the business going, when I was a middle class exec, or a member of the economic 1%.
But I have never lost my Paganism (Love of Nature), Catholicism (Social Love of Others), or my Aryanism (Transcendence of man through heroic excellence). (Although due to my obsessiveness I have lost my senses more than a few times for certain.)
I love most laboring men, I love working class people, I love lower middle class, and middle class people. My distaste for the upper middle is the product of university indoctrination in the pseudoscientific religions of the 20th century. My distaste for the financial and capitalist class is the result of failing to constrain them from perverse incentives. My distaste for the political class is that anyone who would engage in such a thing is an unredeemable danger to the rest of us, and the most evil of all.
We are all fools. Children riding the elephant of our intuition whose actions are controlled by nothing more than reproductive strategy.
Source date (UTC): 2017-10-24 11:22:00 UTC