Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • UNDERSTANDING WESTERN vs ASIAN vs SEMITIC ETHICS Judaism and Islam are poly-mora

    UNDERSTANDING WESTERN vs ASIAN vs SEMITIC ETHICS

    Judaism and Islam are poly-moral/poly-ethical religions. Westerners are monological and mono ethical/moral. Jewish culture relies upon a low trust (ghetto) moral system and culture. Western culture is a high trust (martial) moral system. Jewish culture produces minimum no commons. Western culture produces maximum commons. Jewish culture produces insular commons. Western culture produces universal commons. Jewish culture seeks to privatize commons. Western Culture prohibits privatization of commons. Jewish culture eschews production over arbitrage. Western culture eschews arbitrage and over production. Jewish culture ignores and costs from externalities. Western culture expressly demands responsibility for externalities. Jewish culture universally allies with the state against the people. Western culture expressly defends against the state (aristocracy).

    If you stack the germanic westerners, the mediterranean westerners, the russians, chinese, the jews, and the gypsies, in that order, you move from productive individualistic, to productive clannish, to productive authoritarian, to parasitic tribal, to parasitic clannish civilizations. The only major difference between the gypsies and the jews is the IQ basis and therefore the means of parasitism upon host cultures. The only difference between the chinese and the russian is quality of the bureaucracy. The difference between the protestant and mediterranean west is familial versus militial.

    And that is why the jews and arabs are always ostracized: violation of the contract of the commons. It’s not just the jews. It appears that all the peoples who originated in what is Yemen today, but which was ethiopian/arabian civilization in the prehistoric world, never went through the agrarian phase, and retained low trust parasitic pastoralist ethics. Whether it is genetic or not we don’t know yet. We will know in the span of 20-30 years.

    And if I am correct it will be that the structure of the brains of the semitic peoples (or at least, the arabic/jewish/ethiopian) peoples who are a subset of the semitic speaking peoples, have either preserved the female brain structure, or reversed gender distribution of it, and as a consequence pursue the female reproductive strategy. Which is about all that is necessary to preserve cultural and genetic differences. Small things in large numbers create vast differences.

    I suspect I will be correct in this. The genetic, the hormonal, data and the emerging data on sexual dimorphism is just too consistent. The only major differences between the human races that I an find is the degree of neoteny and the distribution of sexual dimorphism in the body and brain followed by the distribution of the IQ curve. Which leaves the jews as the top semites, then the various arab tribes underneath them. With the turks bridging the gap.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-17 12:21:00 UTC

  • UNDERSTANDING WESTERN vs ASIAN vs SEMITIC ETHICS Judaism and Islam are poly-mora

    UNDERSTANDING WESTERN vs ASIAN vs SEMITIC ETHICS Judaism and Islam are poly-moral/poly-ethical religions. Westerners are monological and mono ethical/moral. Jewish culture relies upon a low trust (ghetto) moral system and culture. Western culture is a high trust (martial) moral system. Jewish culture produces minimum no commons. Western culture produces maximum commons. Jewish culture produces insular commons. Western culture produces universal commons. Jewish culture seeks to privatize commons. Western Culture prohibits privatization of commons. Jewish culture eschews production over arbitrage. Western culture eschews arbitrage and over production. Jewish culture ignores and costs from externalities. Western culture expressly demands responsibility for externalities. Jewish culture universally allies with the state against the people. Western culture expressly defends against the state (aristocracy). If you stack the germanic westerners, the mediterranean westerners, the russians, chinese, the jews, and the gypsies, in that order, you move from productive individualistic, to productive clannish, to productive authoritarian, to parasitic tribal, to parasitic clannish civilizations. The only major difference between the gypsies and the jews is the IQ basis and therefore the means of parasitism upon host cultures. The only difference between the chinese and the russian is quality of the bureaucracy. The difference between the protestant and mediterranean west is familial versus militial. And that is why the jews and arabs are always ostracized: violation of the contract of the commons. It’s not just the jews. It appears that all the peoples who originated in what is Yemen today, but which was ethiopian/arabian civilization in the prehistoric world, never went through the agrarian phase, and retained low trust parasitic pastoralist ethics. Whether it is genetic or not we don’t know yet. We will know in the span of 20-30 years. And if I am correct it will be that the structure of the brains of the semitic peoples (or at least, the arabic/jewish/ethiopian) peoples who are a subset of the semitic speaking peoples, have either preserved the female brain structure, or reversed gender distribution of it, and as a consequence pursue the female reproductive strategy. Which is about all that is necessary to preserve cultural and genetic differences. Small things in large numbers create vast differences. I suspect I will be correct in this. The genetic, the hormonal, data and the emerging data on sexual dimorphism is just too consistent. The only major differences between the human races that I an find is the degree of neoteny and the distribution of sexual dimorphism in the body and brain followed by the distribution of the IQ curve. Which leaves the jews as the top semites, then the various arab tribes underneath them. With the turks bridging the gap.

  • UNDERSTANDING WESTERN vs ASIAN vs SEMITIC ETHICS Judaism and Islam are poly-mora

    UNDERSTANDING WESTERN vs ASIAN vs SEMITIC ETHICS Judaism and Islam are poly-moral/poly-ethical religions. Westerners are monological and mono ethical/moral. Jewish culture relies upon a low trust (ghetto) moral system and culture. Western culture is a high trust (martial) moral system. Jewish culture produces minimum no commons. Western culture produces maximum commons. Jewish culture produces insular commons. Western culture produces universal commons. Jewish culture seeks to privatize commons. Western Culture prohibits privatization of commons. Jewish culture eschews production over arbitrage. Western culture eschews arbitrage and over production. Jewish culture ignores and costs from externalities. Western culture expressly demands responsibility for externalities. Jewish culture universally allies with the state against the people. Western culture expressly defends against the state (aristocracy). If you stack the germanic westerners, the mediterranean westerners, the russians, chinese, the jews, and the gypsies, in that order, you move from productive individualistic, to productive clannish, to productive authoritarian, to parasitic tribal, to parasitic clannish civilizations. The only major difference between the gypsies and the jews is the IQ basis and therefore the means of parasitism upon host cultures. The only difference between the chinese and the russian is quality of the bureaucracy. The difference between the protestant and mediterranean west is familial versus militial. And that is why the jews and arabs are always ostracized: violation of the contract of the commons. It’s not just the jews. It appears that all the peoples who originated in what is Yemen today, but which was ethiopian/arabian civilization in the prehistoric world, never went through the agrarian phase, and retained low trust parasitic pastoralist ethics. Whether it is genetic or not we don’t know yet. We will know in the span of 20-30 years. And if I am correct it will be that the structure of the brains of the semitic peoples (or at least, the arabic/jewish/ethiopian) peoples who are a subset of the semitic speaking peoples, have either preserved the female brain structure, or reversed gender distribution of it, and as a consequence pursue the female reproductive strategy. Which is about all that is necessary to preserve cultural and genetic differences. Small things in large numbers create vast differences. I suspect I will be correct in this. The genetic, the hormonal, data and the emerging data on sexual dimorphism is just too consistent. The only major differences between the human races that I an find is the degree of neoteny and the distribution of sexual dimorphism in the body and brain followed by the distribution of the IQ curve. Which leaves the jews as the top semites, then the various arab tribes underneath them. With the turks bridging the gap.

  • Alexis O’Toole Maddox Philosophy Investigates the Nature of Reality The Method o

    Alexis O’Toole Maddox

    Philosophy Investigates the Nature of Reality

    The Method of Philosophy can be applied to Any Topic.

    The first thing to consider when looking at the overall purpose of a post, is whether it would serve as a good premise.

    Premises are philosophy prompts meant to elicit rational argumentation and induce critical thinking.

    The overall purpose of an investigative philosophy premise might be:

    To Evaluate (Logic/Objectivity)

    To Analyze (Describe Concept/Theory/Phenomena)

    To Explore (Hypothesize)

    To Inform or Explain (Exhibition)

    To Define (Stipulation/Description/Function/Essence/Meaning)

    To Draw Comparisons and Distinguish Differences

    To Criticize (Identify Faulty Logic or Imprecise Criterion)

    To Discover (New Justified Knowledge)

    To Debunk (Eliminate Disinformation)

    To Draw Syllogisms and Analogies (Deduct)

    To Highlight Relationships/Connections between ideas

    To Report Scientific Observations

    To Confirm or Dispute (Support/Challenge)

    To Present Evidence (Proof/Bibliography)

    To Argue (Validate or Invalidate the truth of a premise)

    Conversely, some overall purposes of non-philosophy might be:

    To Emote (Display or Cause Emotion)

    To Amuse or Entertain (Satire/Trivia/Poetry)

    To Persuade or Urge To Act (Religious/Politcal)

    To Interpret or Suggest (Opinion/Editorial/Biased Belief)

    To Take a Stand (Politcal/Religious)

    To Speculate, Predict, or Warn (Propoganda/Rumors)

    To Reflect (Ranting/Personal/Social testimony)

    To Reassure (Arbitrary Greetings and Salutations)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-16 11:25:00 UTC

  • Alexis O’Toole Maddox Philosophy Investigates the Nature of Reality The Method o

    Alexis O’Toole Maddox Philosophy Investigates the Nature of Reality The Method of Philosophy can be applied to Any Topic. The first thing to consider when looking at the overall purpose of a post, is whether it would serve as a good premise. Premises are philosophy prompts meant to elicit rational argumentation and induce critical thinking. The overall purpose of an investigative philosophy premise might be: To Evaluate (Logic/Objectivity) To Analyze (Describe Concept/Theory/Phenomena) To Explore (Hypothesize) To Inform or Explain (Exhibition) To Define (Stipulation/Description/Function/Essence/Meaning) To Draw Comparisons and Distinguish Differences To Criticize (Identify Faulty Logic or Imprecise Criterion) To Discover (New Justified Knowledge) To Debunk (Eliminate Disinformation) To Draw Syllogisms and Analogies (Deduct) To Highlight Relationships/Connections between ideas To Report Scientific Observations To Confirm or Dispute (Support/Challenge) To Present Evidence (Proof/Bibliography) To Argue (Validate or Invalidate the truth of a premise) Conversely, some overall purposes of non-philosophy might be: To Emote (Display or Cause Emotion) To Amuse or Entertain (Satire/Trivia/Poetry) To Persuade or Urge To Act (Religious/Politcal) To Interpret or Suggest (Opinion/Editorial/Biased Belief) To Take a Stand (Politcal/Religious) To Speculate, Predict, or Warn (Propoganda/Rumors) To Reflect (Ranting/Personal/Social testimony) To Reassure (Arbitrary Greetings and Salutations)

  • Alexis O’Toole Maddox Philosophy Investigates the Nature of Reality The Method o

    Alexis O’Toole Maddox Philosophy Investigates the Nature of Reality The Method of Philosophy can be applied to Any Topic. The first thing to consider when looking at the overall purpose of a post, is whether it would serve as a good premise. Premises are philosophy prompts meant to elicit rational argumentation and induce critical thinking. The overall purpose of an investigative philosophy premise might be: To Evaluate (Logic/Objectivity) To Analyze (Describe Concept/Theory/Phenomena) To Explore (Hypothesize) To Inform or Explain (Exhibition) To Define (Stipulation/Description/Function/Essence/Meaning) To Draw Comparisons and Distinguish Differences To Criticize (Identify Faulty Logic or Imprecise Criterion) To Discover (New Justified Knowledge) To Debunk (Eliminate Disinformation) To Draw Syllogisms and Analogies (Deduct) To Highlight Relationships/Connections between ideas To Report Scientific Observations To Confirm or Dispute (Support/Challenge) To Present Evidence (Proof/Bibliography) To Argue (Validate or Invalidate the truth of a premise) Conversely, some overall purposes of non-philosophy might be: To Emote (Display or Cause Emotion) To Amuse or Entertain (Satire/Trivia/Poetry) To Persuade or Urge To Act (Religious/Politcal) To Interpret or Suggest (Opinion/Editorial/Biased Belief) To Take a Stand (Politcal/Religious) To Speculate, Predict, or Warn (Propoganda/Rumors) To Reflect (Ranting/Personal/Social testimony) To Reassure (Arbitrary Greetings and Salutations)

  • AESTHETICS TRUTH (via negativa) AND EXPERIENCE (via positiva) You know, my educa

    AESTHETICS TRUTH (via negativa) AND EXPERIENCE (via positiva)

    You know, my education is in fine art. I see the history of man in my mind through the record of his arts. I feel the beauty of those works in every dimension man has made them. I can stand in the sandals of those who made them, and close my eyes and walk among the people who enjoyed and celebrated them. I can feel the stories they told themselves. I can look at a landscape, and in particular, layers of sediment and rock, and feel the passage of time as if it were an extension of my own memory and part of my own body. I can look to the heavens and experience the time and wonder of the formation of all that has come to be. I can understand a wolf’s passion, a raven’s curiosity and an insects mindlessness. I can find beauty in the curve of a woman’s hair, the laughter of a child, the champion of small troubles, and the tragedy of war. One can both feel the range of experience yet at the same time understand their geometry and calculus of existence. Including the geometry and calculus of the human mind. Which, while capable of vastness that we feel as wonder, is as understandable as is the periodic table of elements: reducible to causes deflated of experience, and inflated to the causes of a mother’s love. Nothing is lost in truth. That which we fear to lose is merely lie.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-13 20:02:00 UTC

  • AESTHETICS TRUTH (via negativa) AND EXPERIENCE (via positiva) You know, my educa

    AESTHETICS TRUTH (via negativa) AND EXPERIENCE (via positiva) You know, my education is in fine art. I see the history of man in my mind through the record of his arts. I feel the beauty of those works in every dimension man has made them. I can stand in the sandals of those who made them, and close my eyes and walk among the people who enjoyed and celebrated them. I can feel the stories they told themselves. I can look at a landscape, and in particular, layers of sediment and rock, and feel the passage of time as if it were an extension of my own memory and part of my own body. I can look to the heavens and experience the time and wonder of the formation of all that has come to be. I can understand a wolf’s passion, a raven’s curiosity and an insects mindlessness. I can find beauty in the curve of a woman’s hair, the laughter of a child, the champion of small troubles, and the tragedy of war. One can both feel the range of experience yet at the same time understand their geometry and calculus of existence. Including the geometry and calculus of the human mind. Which, while capable of vastness that we feel as wonder, is as understandable as is the periodic table of elements: reducible to causes deflated of experience, and inflated to the causes of a mother’s love. Nothing is lost in truth. That which we fear to lose is merely lie.

  • AESTHETICS TRUTH (via negativa) AND EXPERIENCE (via positiva) You know, my educa

    AESTHETICS TRUTH (via negativa) AND EXPERIENCE (via positiva) You know, my education is in fine art. I see the history of man in my mind through the record of his arts. I feel the beauty of those works in every dimension man has made them. I can stand in the sandals of those who made them, and close my eyes and walk among the people who enjoyed and celebrated them. I can feel the stories they told themselves. I can look at a landscape, and in particular, layers of sediment and rock, and feel the passage of time as if it were an extension of my own memory and part of my own body. I can look to the heavens and experience the time and wonder of the formation of all that has come to be. I can understand a wolf’s passion, a raven’s curiosity and an insects mindlessness. I can find beauty in the curve of a woman’s hair, the laughter of a child, the champion of small troubles, and the tragedy of war. One can both feel the range of experience yet at the same time understand their geometry and calculus of existence. Including the geometry and calculus of the human mind. Which, while capable of vastness that we feel as wonder, is as understandable as is the periodic table of elements: reducible to causes deflated of experience, and inflated to the causes of a mother’s love. Nothing is lost in truth. That which we fear to lose is merely lie.

  • Our Natural Religion – In Perfect Harmony With Nature

    I would say that it is very rare for humans to accidentally develop the intellectual agency to react to their emotions as nothing more than reactions changes in state of property given uncritical valuations of that property equally accumulated by accident. I would say that it is entirely possible to train humans to develop the intellectual agency to react to their emotions as nothing more than change in state of property to critical evaluations of property. Just as we taught humans all other forms of calculation that reduce the world to the simple and comprehensible and neither magical nor mysterious. Just as buddhists teach the same principle through various forms of nonsense. In other words, it is possible to resurrect and expand stoicism – our natural religion. A religion forcibly taken from us by the Byzantines. A religion of lies replaced by a religion of truth