Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • I’M NOT TRYING TO CONVERT, BUT TO DENY FALSEHOOD THE FIELD “Via-Negativa.” Every

    I’M NOT TRYING TO CONVERT, BUT TO DENY FALSEHOOD THE FIELD

    “Via-Negativa.”

    Every time a libertarian hits me with nonsense, I respond.

    I hear from converted people every day. So I clearly convert people. Although, I am not trying to convert anyone. I’m denying falsehood the field – from every abrahamic part of the spectrum. I’m trying to provide people who will use violence to restore sovereignty with arguments.

    If you understand my work (and the science) then people are not converted from a genetic moral intuition. The best we can do is eliminate falsehoods so that they are forced to choose the best existentially possible solution and act in favor of it, rather than fantasize over an impossible ideal solution, and take no meaningful action – because no meaningful action is possible in the atempt to produce the impossible.

    It’s analogous to the debate of capitalism vs socialism rather than rule of law vs arbitrary rule. We have been confused by this falsehood. The same is true with socialism, libertarianism, neoconism: the question is only rule of law or arbitrary rule, and kin vs universalism.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-12 11:54:00 UTC

  • I’m Not Trying To Convert, But To Deny Falsehood The Field

    “Via-Negativa.” Every time a libertarian hits me with nonsense, I respond. I hear from converted people every day. So I clearly convert people. Although, I am not trying to convert anyone. I’m denying falsehood the field – from every abrahamic part of the spectrum. I’m trying to provide people who will use violence to restore sovereignty with arguments. If you understand my work (and the science) then people are not converted from a genetic moral intuition. The best we can do is eliminate falsehoods so that they are forced to choose the best existentially possible solution and act in favor of it, rather than fantasize over an impossible ideal solution, and take no meaningful action – because no meaningful action is possible in the atempt to produce the impossible. It’s analogous to the debate of capitalism vs socialism rather than rule of law vs arbitrary rule. We have been confused by this falsehood. The same is true with socialism, libertarianism, neoconism: the question is only rule of law or arbitrary rule, and kin vs universalism.

  • I’m Not Trying To Convert, But To Deny Falsehood The Field

    “Via-Negativa.” Every time a libertarian hits me with nonsense, I respond. I hear from converted people every day. So I clearly convert people. Although, I am not trying to convert anyone. I’m denying falsehood the field – from every abrahamic part of the spectrum. I’m trying to provide people who will use violence to restore sovereignty with arguments. If you understand my work (and the science) then people are not converted from a genetic moral intuition. The best we can do is eliminate falsehoods so that they are forced to choose the best existentially possible solution and act in favor of it, rather than fantasize over an impossible ideal solution, and take no meaningful action – because no meaningful action is possible in the atempt to produce the impossible. It’s analogous to the debate of capitalism vs socialism rather than rule of law vs arbitrary rule. We have been confused by this falsehood. The same is true with socialism, libertarianism, neoconism: the question is only rule of law or arbitrary rule, and kin vs universalism.

  • Anarchism, particularly the anarchism of Chomsky (Left), Marxist (Left) and Roth

    Anarchism, particularly the anarchism of Chomsky (Left), Marxist (Left) and Rothbard (Right), seek to continue the ethics of pastorialism (escape from territorial capital investment) against the ethics of agrarianism (Territorial capital investment). Just as Cain and Able represented the Agrarian Urban and the Rural Pastoralists. Just as abrahamism rallied the underclasses against the military, territorial aristocracy. Just as the pastoralist rallied against the middle eastern (and all other ancient) civilizations.

    it takes a great deal of knowledge to unwind the nonsense of Chomsky’s political discourse, which relies almost entirely on overloading by various appeals to pre-rational mind, combined with conflation, cherry picking, and fictionalism (fabrication).

    Abrahamism v1 – Rebellion against the Semitic Rulers.

    Abrahamism v2 – Rebellion against the Ancient World Rulers.

    Abrahamism v3 – Rebellion against the Modern World Rulers.

    The fundamental question, is why the so called disaporic Anarchists (Pastoralists) were (a) unable to build an advanced technological civilization. And (b) while aristocratic civilization dragged mankind out of ignorance and poverty in the Pre-historic, Ancient, and Modern worlds.

    With the first dark age caused in the bronze age collapse by barbarian immigration and the invention of expansionary religion.

    With the second dark age collapse caused by abrahamic re-invention of legal religion. (Judaism > Christianity > Islam), and barbarian immigration.

    With the third dark age (starting post-darwin) caused by the abrahamic reinvention of pseudoscientific religion (marxism > Socialism > Postmodernism).

    But all that is happening here is that the regressive (feminine) peoples are rebelling against the progressive (masculine) peoples. And they do so for a reason: the dirty secret of western civilization is that by the application of ‘markets in everything’ they create the most eugenic civilization possible – by meritocracy.

    The dirty secret of the left (regressive feminine) is that it’s dysgenic and devolutionary.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-11 12:23:00 UTC

  • Anarchism, particularly the anarchism of Chomsky (Left), Marxist (Left) and Roth

    Anarchism, particularly the anarchism of Chomsky (Left), Marxist (Left) and Rothbard (Right), seek to continue the ethics of pastorialism (escape from territorial capital investment) against the ethics of agrarianism (Territorial capital investment). Just as Cain and Able represented the Agrarian Urban and the Rural Pastoralists. Just as abrahamism rallied the underclasses against the military, territorial aristocracy. Just as the pastoralist rallied against the middle eastern (and all other ancient) civilizations. it takes a great deal of knowledge to unwind the nonsense of Chomsky’s political discourse, which relies almost entirely on overloading by various appeals to pre-rational mind, combined with conflation, cherry picking, and fictionalism (fabrication). Abrahamism v1 – Rebellion against the Semitic Rulers. Abrahamism v2 – Rebellion against the Ancient World Rulers. Abrahamism v3 – Rebellion against the Modern World Rulers. The fundamental question, is why the so called disaporic Anarchists (Pastoralists) were (a) unable to build an advanced technological civilization. And (b) while aristocratic civilization dragged mankind out of ignorance and poverty in the Pre-historic, Ancient, and Modern worlds. With the first dark age caused in the bronze age collapse by barbarian immigration and the invention of expansionary religion. With the second dark age collapse caused by abrahamic re-invention of legal religion. (Judaism > Christianity > Islam), and barbarian immigration. With the third dark age (starting post-darwin) caused by the abrahamic reinvention of pseudoscientific religion (marxism > Socialism > Postmodernism). But all that is happening here is that the regressive (feminine) peoples are rebelling against the progressive (masculine) peoples. And they do so for a reason: the dirty secret of western civilization is that by the application of ‘markets in everything’ they create the most eugenic civilization possible – by meritocracy. The dirty secret of the left (regressive feminine) is that it’s dysgenic and devolutionary.

  • Anarchism, particularly the anarchism of Chomsky (Left), Marxist (Left) and Roth

    Anarchism, particularly the anarchism of Chomsky (Left), Marxist (Left) and Rothbard (Right), seek to continue the ethics of pastorialism (escape from territorial capital investment) against the ethics of agrarianism (Territorial capital investment). Just as Cain and Able represented the Agrarian Urban and the Rural Pastoralists. Just as abrahamism rallied the underclasses against the military, territorial aristocracy. Just as the pastoralist rallied against the middle eastern (and all other ancient) civilizations. it takes a great deal of knowledge to unwind the nonsense of Chomsky’s political discourse, which relies almost entirely on overloading by various appeals to pre-rational mind, combined with conflation, cherry picking, and fictionalism (fabrication). Abrahamism v1 – Rebellion against the Semitic Rulers. Abrahamism v2 – Rebellion against the Ancient World Rulers. Abrahamism v3 – Rebellion against the Modern World Rulers. The fundamental question, is why the so called disaporic Anarchists (Pastoralists) were (a) unable to build an advanced technological civilization. And (b) while aristocratic civilization dragged mankind out of ignorance and poverty in the Pre-historic, Ancient, and Modern worlds. With the first dark age caused in the bronze age collapse by barbarian immigration and the invention of expansionary religion. With the second dark age collapse caused by abrahamic re-invention of legal religion. (Judaism > Christianity > Islam), and barbarian immigration. With the third dark age (starting post-darwin) caused by the abrahamic reinvention of pseudoscientific religion (marxism > Socialism > Postmodernism). But all that is happening here is that the regressive (feminine) peoples are rebelling against the progressive (masculine) peoples. And they do so for a reason: the dirty secret of western civilization is that by the application of ‘markets in everything’ they create the most eugenic civilization possible – by meritocracy. The dirty secret of the left (regressive feminine) is that it’s dysgenic and devolutionary.

  • THE SIMPLIFICATION OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE The left differs from the right just a

    THE SIMPLIFICATION OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE

    The left differs from the right just as men differ from women. The left does not require consistency, because they do not require reciprocity, because they are parasites seeking power not producers seeking markets. Left (Females) gossip, inflate and conflate to exaggerate the experiential for illustration, while Right (Males) use history and hyperbole to inflate the long term for illustration. Only the right seeks competitive survivability. The left and the female like flora and rabbits simply seek to cast their genes to the wind. We cannot change these cognitive biases. And if we look at history, it was the invention of patriarchy (masculinity) that dragged humanity out of ignorance and poverty, and the feminine (abrahamic) that drags it back down.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-10 09:10:00 UTC

  • The Simplification Of Political Discourse

    The left differs from the right just as men differ from women. The left does not require consistency, because they do not require reciprocity, because they are parasites seeking power not producers seeking markets. Left (Females) gossip, inflate and conflate to exaggerate the experiential for illustration, while Right (Males) use history and hyperbole to inflate the long term for illustration. Only the right seeks competitive survivability. The left and the female like flora and rabbits simply seek to cast their genes to the wind. We cannot change these cognitive biases. And if we look at history, it was the invention of patriarchy (masculinity) that dragged humanity out of ignorance and poverty, and the feminine (abrahamic) that drags it back down.

  • The Simplification Of Political Discourse

    The left differs from the right just as men differ from women. The left does not require consistency, because they do not require reciprocity, because they are parasites seeking power not producers seeking markets. Left (Females) gossip, inflate and conflate to exaggerate the experiential for illustration, while Right (Males) use history and hyperbole to inflate the long term for illustration. Only the right seeks competitive survivability. The left and the female like flora and rabbits simply seek to cast their genes to the wind. We cannot change these cognitive biases. And if we look at history, it was the invention of patriarchy (masculinity) that dragged humanity out of ignorance and poverty, and the feminine (abrahamic) that drags it back down.

  • YES, IF YOU WANT AND NEED SOCIALISM, WE WANT YOU TO HAVE IT. I agree. If you wan

    YES, IF YOU WANT AND NEED SOCIALISM, WE WANT YOU TO HAVE IT.

    I agree. If you want a socialist, equalitarian, discretionary rules society you should create and live in a socialist discretionary rule society. I agree, if you want an aristocratic, meritocratic, rule of law society, then those of us who want that should live in an aristocratic society.

    So let’s just agree that the big sort is doing this for us anyway, and divide the country up along the obvious lines that exist by voting patterns, and then live in the societies we want.

    The order of europe was successful because it consisted of small, culturally homogenous states.

    So lets create a europe of north america and then we can stop fighting about it.

    Now, the only reason you can say ‘no’ is greed and oppression of one another. And if you want to do that then I’ guess the only solution is war.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-06 19:02:00 UTC