Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • Male and Female Loyalty Bias = Our Moral Bias

    (women are devoted, and men are loyal) —“Men marry and fall I love with a women with the belief that he will be the most important part of her life. This is the start of the destruction of so many marriages. Once the female has children her first loyalty becomes those children. The males loyalty still lay with the female. This creates a dangerous dynamic were the Male tries increasingly to become the females first priority to no avail.”— Eric Bumpus 

    ADAPTABILITY VS LOYALTY: ECONOMICS OF RELATIONS

MALE.........................FEMALE 
Greater Loyalty and .........Greater Adaptability and 
Lower Adaptability ..........Lower Loyalty

    Evolution varied the same theme. We are compatible but we are neither identical nor equal. Therefore:  I’m going to state it pejoratively: men mistakenly marry a wife under the presumption of the same priority he was treated by his mother. Women marry a husband with the presumption that her children will be given the same priority by the man as she gives them. Both of these are false presumptions. Men are loyal to tribe, fellows, wife, and children. Women are loyal to children to the exclusion of all others. This reflects genetic differences in morality. Males and conservatives tend to value all six Moral Dimensions relatively equally. Women and liberals tend to value Harm/Care almost exclusively. The fallacy of equality is one of the greatest catastrophes since the invention of false gods, and marxist pseudoscience.

  • Male and Female Loyalty Bias = Our Moral Bias

    (women are devoted, and men are loyal) —“Men marry and fall I love with a women with the belief that he will be the most important part of her life. This is the start of the destruction of so many marriages. Once the female has children her first loyalty becomes those children. The males loyalty still lay with the female. This creates a dangerous dynamic were the Male tries increasingly to become the females first priority to no avail.”— Eric Bumpus 

    ADAPTABILITY VS LOYALTY: ECONOMICS OF RELATIONS

MALE.........................FEMALE 
Greater Loyalty and .........Greater Adaptability and 
Lower Adaptability ..........Lower Loyalty

    Evolution varied the same theme. We are compatible but we are neither identical nor equal. Therefore:  I’m going to state it pejoratively: men mistakenly marry a wife under the presumption of the same priority he was treated by his mother. Women marry a husband with the presumption that her children will be given the same priority by the man as she gives them. Both of these are false presumptions. Men are loyal to tribe, fellows, wife, and children. Women are loyal to children to the exclusion of all others. This reflects genetic differences in morality. Males and conservatives tend to value all six Moral Dimensions relatively equally. Women and liberals tend to value Harm/Care almost exclusively. The fallacy of equality is one of the greatest catastrophes since the invention of false gods, and marxist pseudoscience.

  • There is only one route out of the great deceits

    I know, you are the kind of person who wants a supernatural, secular, or scientific religion. The law says that any religion that is not false, parasitic, predatory, or devolutionary, is a good religion. The problem is you think that religion requires falsehoods, because you have been immersed in an ocean of ‘forgivable, convenient,’ falsehoods. But that’s only because you haven’t researched the religions that aren’t false, and tried to develop a religion that likewise isn’t false. And the reason you must, is that the only means of eliminating bad religions is falsehood, parasitism, predation, and devolution. And if you preserve those falsehoods and ‘bads’ for your own you license the ‘bads’ of others. There is only one route out of the great deceits, of Abrahamic Pilpul and Critique: truth, sovereignty, reciprocity, markets, and as a consequence, transcendence.

  • There is only one route out of the great deceits

    I know, you are the kind of person who wants a supernatural, secular, or scientific religion. The law says that any religion that is not false, parasitic, predatory, or devolutionary, is a good religion. The problem is you think that religion requires falsehoods, because you have been immersed in an ocean of ‘forgivable, convenient,’ falsehoods. But that’s only because you haven’t researched the religions that aren’t false, and tried to develop a religion that likewise isn’t false. And the reason you must, is that the only means of eliminating bad religions is falsehood, parasitism, predation, and devolution. And if you preserve those falsehoods and ‘bads’ for your own you license the ‘bads’ of others. There is only one route out of the great deceits, of Abrahamic Pilpul and Critique: truth, sovereignty, reciprocity, markets, and as a consequence, transcendence.

  • THE POST-SOCIALIST CURSE: SPRINGFIELD->HARTFORD(->MERIDEN-NORTH HAVEN ->NEW HAVE

    THE POST-SOCIALIST CURSE: SPRINGFIELD->HARTFORD(->MERIDEN-NORTH HAVEN ->NEW HAVEN(->BRIDGEPORT->WATERBURY->DANBURY)

    28. Springfield, Mass.

    Population: 154,079

    Median home value: $154,300

    Poverty rate: 24.7%

    Pct. with at least a bachelor’s degree: 18.0%

    Springfield is the only city in Massachusetts, and one of only three in the broader New England region, to rank among the worst cities to live in. Springfield’s 6.9% unemployment rate is the highest of any Massachusetts city and well above the 4.9% U.S. unemployment rate. The high jobless rate exacerbates financial hardship in the city. About one in every four Springfield residents live below the poverty line, the highest poverty rate of any city in the state.

    As is the case with most cities on this list, real estate is relatively inexpensive in Springfield. The typical home is worth $154,300, the lowest median home value of any city in the state and less than half the median home value of $366,900 across Massachusetts.

    11. Hartford, Conn.

    Population: 123,287

    Median home value: $161,200

    Poverty rate: 27.3%

    Pct. with at least a bachelor’s degree: 16.8%

    Hartford is the worst city to live in in both Connecticut and the broader New England region. The typical Hartford household earns $36,637 a year, less than half the median income in Connecticut of $73,433. Low-income individuals in the city are put under additional financial strain as goods and services are 17.3% more expensive in the city than they are on average nationwide. A bleak jobs picture in the city is partially to blame for the low median income. Some 9.4% of workers are out of a job, the largest share in New England and nearly double the 4.9% 2016 annual U.S. unemployment rate.

    The city’s poor economic conditions may be driving people out of Hartford. In the last five years, Hartford’s population shrank by 1.3% even as the national population increased by 3.7%.

    39. New Haven, Conn.

    Population: 129,939

    Median home value: $191,000

    Poverty rate: 24.5%

    Pct. with at least a bachelor’s degree: 32.4%

    New Haven is one of two Connecticut cities to rank among the worst cities to live in nationwide. The city’s 6.6% unemployment rate is higher than both the state jobless rate of 5.1% and the national rate of 4.9%. The weak job market likely only increases financial hardship for some city residents as it is not a particularly inexpensive place to live. Goods and services in New Haven County are about 16.5% more expensive than they are on average nationwide.

    New Haven is not an especially safe city. There were 938 violent crimes for every 100,000 city residents in 2016, more than double the national violent crime rate of 386 per 100,000.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-13 15:44:00 UTC

  • I know, you are the kind of person who wants a supernatural, secular, or scienti

    I know, you are the kind of person who wants a supernatural, secular, or scientific religion. The law says that any religion that is not false, parasitic, predatory, or devolutionary, is a good religion. The problem is you think that religion requires falsehoods, because you have been immersed in an ocean of ‘forgivable, convenient,’ falsehoods. But that’s only because you haven’t researched the religions that aren’t false, and tried to develop a religion that likewise isn’t false. And the reason you must, is that the only means of eliminating bad religions is falsehood, parasitism, predation, and devolution. And if you preserve those falsehoods and ‘bads’ for your own you license the ‘bads’ of others. There is only one route out of the great deceits, of Abrahamic Pilpul and Critique: truth, sovereignty, reciprocity, markets, and as a consequence, transcendence.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-13 11:34:00 UTC

  • The Secret to Listening to Women

    I’ve written about the problem of men learning to listen to women for years now, and it seems like one of those things that we ought to be taught as a general man-rule. The trick to listening to women is listening 10% and thinking about something else 90% rather than asking a woman to distill her thoughts down to the 10% of facts that matter. Worse, we don’t get all the signaling involved between women – it doesn’t exist – so the entire point of communication may in fact be nothing other than the transfer of signals. Unfortunately there is no course in ‘woman speak’ for men to take. Even if it’s the most valuable course we could take. I just listen. And ask questions. The hard part is learning NOT TO TRY TO SOLVE A PROBLEM. Just listen. I think the problem occurs when women ask men to experience their emotions the way another woman does, when they share experiences. This forces men to lie – to pretend either that they understand them, or that they feel them, or that they even can feel them. What I’ve found is that if a woman explains how she felt I can undrestand it. But describing the circumstance itself does not help me understand it. Finally, to just show that I understand, and usually that her feelings were justified. The hard part is not trying to inquire or solve the problem but just show you understand, accept, and let her express (exit, expend, exhaust) her emotions. It’s different with staff. Some women need to be taught that when talking to men, it’s JUST THE FACTS, and WHAT DO YOU WANT ME TO DO?. Otherwise the woman is using my much shallower emotional reservoir and clouding my judgement. Most people by a large margin prefer male bosses for the simple reason that we don’t get involved in the emotional stuff. But it’s actually because we don’t even see it, hear it, or understand it. And if we do, we consider it childish and it makes us angry. The trick for men with women is always patience. 😉 Which is in fact, the trick with all human beings. Patience is the under appreciated and misunderstood. Why? ‘Cause it’s costly

  • The Secret to Listening to Women

    I’ve written about the problem of men learning to listen to women for years now, and it seems like one of those things that we ought to be taught as a general man-rule. The trick to listening to women is listening 10% and thinking about something else 90% rather than asking a woman to distill her thoughts down to the 10% of facts that matter. Worse, we don’t get all the signaling involved between women – it doesn’t exist – so the entire point of communication may in fact be nothing other than the transfer of signals. Unfortunately there is no course in ‘woman speak’ for men to take. Even if it’s the most valuable course we could take. I just listen. And ask questions. The hard part is learning NOT TO TRY TO SOLVE A PROBLEM. Just listen. I think the problem occurs when women ask men to experience their emotions the way another woman does, when they share experiences. This forces men to lie – to pretend either that they understand them, or that they feel them, or that they even can feel them. What I’ve found is that if a woman explains how she felt I can undrestand it. But describing the circumstance itself does not help me understand it. Finally, to just show that I understand, and usually that her feelings were justified. The hard part is not trying to inquire or solve the problem but just show you understand, accept, and let her express (exit, expend, exhaust) her emotions. It’s different with staff. Some women need to be taught that when talking to men, it’s JUST THE FACTS, and WHAT DO YOU WANT ME TO DO?. Otherwise the woman is using my much shallower emotional reservoir and clouding my judgement. Most people by a large margin prefer male bosses for the simple reason that we don’t get involved in the emotional stuff. But it’s actually because we don’t even see it, hear it, or understand it. And if we do, we consider it childish and it makes us angry. The trick for men with women is always patience. 😉 Which is in fact, the trick with all human beings. Patience is the under appreciated and misunderstood. Why? ‘Cause it’s costly

  • Christianity and The Will to Power

    by Jeff Urizen As Nietzsche correctly stated, this world is the will to power, and I’d add, it’s a will to power over the physical world. Pagan religion was merely an expression of how much control nature in its rawest Form had over man. When man began to master over nature he developed a man centered religion. Our will to power is controlled by hormones in our brain. When we rise up in power we get a serotonin boost. When we want to avoid falling back down the Hierarchy we experience disgust. Disgust sensitivity is the tool we evolved to rise up in power. Christian disgust was an attempt, an altruistic attempt, to forcefully raise the people up the dominance Hierarchy to better rule over the other subspecies and races. It gabe a strategic advantage. Christian disgust is just the human response to being around that which you perceive as being less powerful and more under the control of nature and not your own will. Christianity then reached its zenith and gave birth to the next phase of our ascendence into power which is liberalism, being free of all consequences, free of the limitations of truth, free of the limitations of definitions, completely free of responsibility to the material World. This phase is a divine phase and that is why liberals rightly defend their religion by being disgusted by race and nations, which are seen as merely limitations and thus restrictions on man’s quest to dominate the limitations placed on him by the physical world. Liberalism isn’t degenerate, it is the removal of obligations so that the genes can search for new areas of Conquest without the limitations that the obligation of reproduction would place on them. The right side of the brain detects and defends against predators while the left side of the brain searches for prey. The left is not meant to defend it is is meant to Conquer and so you can’t hate the left for being what they are because essentially they are like Christ, childless martyrs of the pursuit of knowledge of the father, the field, the universe. The right isn’t the enemy either, it must defend its genetic base and must insist that all others do the same so that the most fit genes can ascend, and so the right must prevent all attempts to ascend the Hierarchy which are not based strictly on merit or which come at the cost of the genetic base. The next logical step in this ascendancy is to enter a synthetic stage where we either become robot consciousness or we become a new species that feeds on all those below it. The elite become a new race unidentifiable to the race of the public, and we become their pets as their favorite past time while they search for the next physical limitation to transcend which is the earths biosphere, and our next goal is to inhabit other planets. Genes exist to replicate and thus they will subjugate and stand upon all that which prevents this. Preservation of a race is merely a safety mechanism, a security blanket, allowing the higher orders to take risks and offset losses on the people, and therefore all the left and the right are serving in their divine purpose and pursuit of divinity.As Nietzsche correctly stated, this world is the will to power, and I’d add, it’s a will to power over the physical world. Pagan religion was merely an expression of how much control nature in its rawest Form had over man. When man began to master over nature he developed a man centered religion. Our will to power is controlled by hormones in our brain. When we rise up in power we get a serotonin boost. When we want to avoid falling back down the Hierarchy we experience disgust. Disgust sensitivity is the tool we evolved to rise up in power. Christian disgust was an attempt, an altruistic attempt, to forcefully raise the people up the dominance Hierarchy to better rule over the other subspecies and races. It gabe a strategic advantage. Christian disgust is just the human response to being around that which you perceive as being less powerful and more under the control of nature and not your own will. Christianity then reached its zenith and gave birth to the next phase of our ascendence into power which is liberalism, being free of all consequences, free of the limitations of truth, free of the limitations of definitions, completely free of responsibility to the material World. This phase is a divine phase and that is why liberals rightly defend their religion by being disgusted by race and nations, which are seen as merely limitations and thus restrictions on man’s quest to dominate the limitations placed on him by the physical world. Liberalism isn’t degenerate, it is the removal of obligations so that the genes can search for new areas of Conquest without the limitations that the obligation of reproduction would place on them. The right side of the brain detects and defends against predators while the left side of the brain searches for prey. The left is not meant to defend it is is meant to Conquer and so you can’t hate the left for being what they are because essentially they are like Christ, childless martyrs of the pursuit of knowledge of the father, the field, the universe. The right isn’t the enemy either, it must defend its genetic base and must insist that all others do the same so that the most fit genes can ascend, and so the right must prevent all attempts to ascend the Hierarchy which are not based strictly on merit or which come at the cost of the genetic base. The next logical step in this ascendancy is to enter a synthetic stage where we either become robot consciousness or we become a new species that feeds on all those below it. The elite become a new race unidentifiable to the race of the public, and we become their pets as their favorite past time while they search for the next physical limitation to transcend which is the earths biosphere, and our next goal is to inhabit other planets. Genes exist to replicate and thus they will subjugate and stand upon all that which prevents this. Preservation of a race is merely a safety mechanism, a security blanket, allowing the higher orders to take risks and offset losses on the people, and therefore all the left and the right are serving in their divine purpose and pursuit of divinity.

  • Christianity and The Will to Power

    by Jeff Urizen As Nietzsche correctly stated, this world is the will to power, and I’d add, it’s a will to power over the physical world. Pagan religion was merely an expression of how much control nature in its rawest Form had over man. When man began to master over nature he developed a man centered religion. Our will to power is controlled by hormones in our brain. When we rise up in power we get a serotonin boost. When we want to avoid falling back down the Hierarchy we experience disgust. Disgust sensitivity is the tool we evolved to rise up in power. Christian disgust was an attempt, an altruistic attempt, to forcefully raise the people up the dominance Hierarchy to better rule over the other subspecies and races. It gabe a strategic advantage. Christian disgust is just the human response to being around that which you perceive as being less powerful and more under the control of nature and not your own will. Christianity then reached its zenith and gave birth to the next phase of our ascendence into power which is liberalism, being free of all consequences, free of the limitations of truth, free of the limitations of definitions, completely free of responsibility to the material World. This phase is a divine phase and that is why liberals rightly defend their religion by being disgusted by race and nations, which are seen as merely limitations and thus restrictions on man’s quest to dominate the limitations placed on him by the physical world. Liberalism isn’t degenerate, it is the removal of obligations so that the genes can search for new areas of Conquest without the limitations that the obligation of reproduction would place on them. The right side of the brain detects and defends against predators while the left side of the brain searches for prey. The left is not meant to defend it is is meant to Conquer and so you can’t hate the left for being what they are because essentially they are like Christ, childless martyrs of the pursuit of knowledge of the father, the field, the universe. The right isn’t the enemy either, it must defend its genetic base and must insist that all others do the same so that the most fit genes can ascend, and so the right must prevent all attempts to ascend the Hierarchy which are not based strictly on merit or which come at the cost of the genetic base. The next logical step in this ascendancy is to enter a synthetic stage where we either become robot consciousness or we become a new species that feeds on all those below it. The elite become a new race unidentifiable to the race of the public, and we become their pets as their favorite past time while they search for the next physical limitation to transcend which is the earths biosphere, and our next goal is to inhabit other planets. Genes exist to replicate and thus they will subjugate and stand upon all that which prevents this. Preservation of a race is merely a safety mechanism, a security blanket, allowing the higher orders to take risks and offset losses on the people, and therefore all the left and the right are serving in their divine purpose and pursuit of divinity.As Nietzsche correctly stated, this world is the will to power, and I’d add, it’s a will to power over the physical world. Pagan religion was merely an expression of how much control nature in its rawest Form had over man. When man began to master over nature he developed a man centered religion. Our will to power is controlled by hormones in our brain. When we rise up in power we get a serotonin boost. When we want to avoid falling back down the Hierarchy we experience disgust. Disgust sensitivity is the tool we evolved to rise up in power. Christian disgust was an attempt, an altruistic attempt, to forcefully raise the people up the dominance Hierarchy to better rule over the other subspecies and races. It gabe a strategic advantage. Christian disgust is just the human response to being around that which you perceive as being less powerful and more under the control of nature and not your own will. Christianity then reached its zenith and gave birth to the next phase of our ascendence into power which is liberalism, being free of all consequences, free of the limitations of truth, free of the limitations of definitions, completely free of responsibility to the material World. This phase is a divine phase and that is why liberals rightly defend their religion by being disgusted by race and nations, which are seen as merely limitations and thus restrictions on man’s quest to dominate the limitations placed on him by the physical world. Liberalism isn’t degenerate, it is the removal of obligations so that the genes can search for new areas of Conquest without the limitations that the obligation of reproduction would place on them. The right side of the brain detects and defends against predators while the left side of the brain searches for prey. The left is not meant to defend it is is meant to Conquer and so you can’t hate the left for being what they are because essentially they are like Christ, childless martyrs of the pursuit of knowledge of the father, the field, the universe. The right isn’t the enemy either, it must defend its genetic base and must insist that all others do the same so that the most fit genes can ascend, and so the right must prevent all attempts to ascend the Hierarchy which are not based strictly on merit or which come at the cost of the genetic base. The next logical step in this ascendancy is to enter a synthetic stage where we either become robot consciousness or we become a new species that feeds on all those below it. The elite become a new race unidentifiable to the race of the public, and we become their pets as their favorite past time while they search for the next physical limitation to transcend which is the earths biosphere, and our next goal is to inhabit other planets. Genes exist to replicate and thus they will subjugate and stand upon all that which prevents this. Preservation of a race is merely a safety mechanism, a security blanket, allowing the higher orders to take risks and offset losses on the people, and therefore all the left and the right are serving in their divine purpose and pursuit of divinity.