Well, it was lost by fighting a pair of unnecessary wars in which Germany was in the right, and thereby hollowing out Europe of it’s ancient cultural origins. Doing so collapsed the empire. And the people did not immediately replace a global imperial government with a local national one. As such Britain as much as France, drove marxist imperialism just as hard as the soviets. The problem was not gutting the government OR working with the USA to restore the British empire. One or the other. But in typical British fashion, just as the french lost their civilization at the loss of the monarchy, just as the Spanish civilization died at their loss of empire, and British lost theirs – and became as useless as the french and Spanish. Between 1830 and 1914 the British broke from germanic civilization and became Diasporics in every possible sense.
Form: Mini Essay
-
Women Evolved to Carry a Cognitive Load
As I understand it, on average, it takes three children to produce a rational woman. In other words, the female mind evolved to carry a certain cognitive load, (just as did the male) and without that cognitive load doesn’t perform well. Women with children are less crazy than those without. Women with three or more are less crazy than those with fewer. Women with four to six children do not have the luxury of insanity. So it is better to think of it as men need a physical load and an a loyalty load to stay fit, and women need a cognitive load to stay fit. And for women that fitness comes from governing a brood of children. Evolution is almost always understandable.
-
THE BENEFIT OF THE COGNITIVE LOAD OF “ENOUGH” FAMILY by Collin Turney I worked d
THE BENEFIT OF THE COGNITIVE LOAD OF “ENOUGH” FAMILY
by Collin Turney
I worked door-to-door selling educational books for families that helped from learning ABC’s to SAT college prep. I met a total of aprx 3000 families, and here is my analysis:
1 kid – highly stressed parents and child as a by product of the psychological stress that comes with the “all the eggs in one basket” mentality. This means strict grade requirements, strict curfews and other things that are small but total up to a large amount of stress on the child because he feels like it is his duty to never fail at anything.
2 kids: assuming tbe kids are close in age, aprx 8 years or less, creates a “versus” mentality in the family. One child is always against the other. This often will pit parents against each other as well as the kids are always trying to earn the favor of whichever parent likes them more. The younger child has a high propensity to be a polar opposite of their older sibling as they are so often compared to their older sibling and feel as if they are living in someone’s shadow and will become different out of spite to build their own identity.
3 kids: Nearing the breaking point. Not many negatives other than the youngest often can get away with murder and the middle one feels he has no identity as he is neither the oldest nor youngest.
4+ children: the parents at this stage are fully occupied with raising the kids and stop giving a crap about their own personal problems and just do what needs to be done to keep everyone fed. Also, they will just let kids be kids and not worry so much about if they are wrestling in the house or coloring on the walls or other petty things because the parents reach a point where they realize if they care to much about each individual thing the kids are doing they would go insane in less than a week. Also, at 4 or more kids the dynamic in the kids is such that the older kids often assume a part in raising the younger ones and everyone is held to the same standard rather than the “vs” mentality of the 2 kids family and the “baby, directionless middle child, and oldest most mature child” mentality of the 3 kids family.
The chillest family I met had 8 kids under the age of 10 and the kids were in the middle of what seemed to be the toddler version of MMA in their front yard and the parents gave no hecks.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 10:02:00 UTC
-
THE NUMBER OF WORTHLESS OPINIONS HAS NO BEARING I mean, I don’t put much weight
THE NUMBER OF WORTHLESS OPINIONS HAS NO BEARING
I mean, I don’t put much weight behind the opinions of riders of the intellectual short bus. Opinions don’t matter. Arguments do. And in argument, moralistic, rationalistic, and pseudoscientific don’t matter. Either a critic can make a testimonial (ratio-operational-scientific) argument or one can’t. Most likely a critic can’t make even a trivial one. That’s before we even get to whether he can make one that’s meaningful.
We are creatures of habits, and our arguments consist largely of a string of habits. And our impression or pretense of understanding is a false reward to keep us thinking and acting under an illusion of competence despite the evidence to the contrary.
There are many dehmanizing truths in intellectual history and the degree to which few humans possess material (marginally different) agency is terrifyingly small.
We are well trained apes and while sentience and consciousness exist in almost all of us, agency is still a rarity.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 08:08:00 UTC
-
WOMEN EVOLVED TO CARRY A COGNITIVE LOAD As I understand it, on average, it takes
WOMEN EVOLVED TO CARRY A COGNITIVE LOAD
As I understand it, on average, it takes three children to produce a rational woman. In other words, the female mind evolved to carry a certain cognitive load, (just as did the male) and without that cognitive load doesn’t perform well.
Women with children are less crazy than those without. Women with three or more are less crazy than those with fewer. Women with four to six children do not have the luxury of insanity.
So it is better to think of it as men need a physical load and an a loyalty load to stay fit, and women need a cognitive load to stay fit. And for women that fitness comes from governing a brood of children.
Evolution is almost always understandable.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 07:56:00 UTC
-
Reminder of What I Do Here
REMINDER OF WHAT I DO HERE “Let a thousand nations bloom” I don’t do racism. Every group can transcend, by sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, and markets in everything. The net effect must always produce incrementally eugenic populations, that continuously limit the reproduction of the lower classes, allowing the working, middle and upper classes to gradually leave behind the drag of the underclasses, and to continuously compete with the red queen, who requires progress in man as it does in his knowledge and technology. Nationalism merely allows the self interested production of those commons necessary for the distribution of abilities in the group, and prohibits the predation upon other groups by internalizing the costs and benefits of eugenic civilization, and ameliorating differences between nations by trade policy. Every alternative is nothing but theft, parasitism, and predation. Let a thousand nations bloom.
-
Reminder of What I Do Here
REMINDER OF WHAT I DO HERE “Let a thousand nations bloom” I don’t do racism. Every group can transcend, by sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, and markets in everything. The net effect must always produce incrementally eugenic populations, that continuously limit the reproduction of the lower classes, allowing the working, middle and upper classes to gradually leave behind the drag of the underclasses, and to continuously compete with the red queen, who requires progress in man as it does in his knowledge and technology. Nationalism merely allows the self interested production of those commons necessary for the distribution of abilities in the group, and prohibits the predation upon other groups by internalizing the costs and benefits of eugenic civilization, and ameliorating differences between nations by trade policy. Every alternative is nothing but theft, parasitism, and predation. Let a thousand nations bloom.
-
CONSERVATIVES (ARISTOCRACY) WERE FROZEN IN ANCIENT ARGUMENT THE NEW RIGHT IS THE
CONSERVATIVES (ARISTOCRACY) WERE FROZEN IN ANCIENT ARGUMENT
THE NEW RIGHT IS THE SCIENTIFIC RIGHT
Conservatives were stuck with a moral, religious, traditional set of arguments without themselves understanding why our civilization had ‘sped faster than the rest’. Worse, they bought into the lie just as libertarians bought into the lie of an aristocracy (sovereignty) of everyone.
THE NEW RIGHT = SCIENTIFIC RIGHT. The alt right uses ridicule, but by and large the new right differs from the old right in that we now have DATA and we have it from a century of failures with the falsehoods of classical liberalism, and the falsehoods of marxist-postmodernism.
My work is just going back to our roots: impose the law with violence and incrementally suppress all transgressions of it. Men will naturally insure kin, so create nation states, or at least small local polities in the Swiss model with federal governments providing only reciprocal decidability over inter-state conflicts, and acting as insurer of last resort.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:23:00 UTC
-
The Failure of Paradigms (ways of Thinking)
There is a reason the world is continuously coalescing to the vocabulary and grammars of science: and that is because of the commensurability and therefore falsificationary value of the single most parsimonious vocabulary and grammar consisting entirely of continuous relations from the very small below human scale, through to human scale, to the very large beyond human scale – the semantics of which consist of analogies to observable experience: human scale. Any idiot can come up with a paradigm that provides some sort of explanatory power, in the same way that a fairy tale, legend, or mythos provides explanatory power: by analogy. And idiots come up with new paradigms all the time, in an effort to elucidate some set of relations or other. And the they congratulate themselves on their insight and next seek to preserve that insight by justification: a forever-failing attempt to find a way for the rest of human knowledge to fit that paradigm. They over-invest. They fail. It is quite different to start with an attempt to discover the grammar and semantics of science itself, and with that ambition to correct the minor incompatibilities between the arts and sciences, thereby increasing commensurability and falsifiability across all arts and sciences – producing a universal grammar and semantics and as such rendering all human knowledge more parsimonious and synthetic.
-
The Failure of Paradigms (ways of Thinking)
There is a reason the world is continuously coalescing to the vocabulary and grammars of science: and that is because of the commensurability and therefore falsificationary value of the single most parsimonious vocabulary and grammar consisting entirely of continuous relations from the very small below human scale, through to human scale, to the very large beyond human scale – the semantics of which consist of analogies to observable experience: human scale. Any idiot can come up with a paradigm that provides some sort of explanatory power, in the same way that a fairy tale, legend, or mythos provides explanatory power: by analogy. And idiots come up with new paradigms all the time, in an effort to elucidate some set of relations or other. And the they congratulate themselves on their insight and next seek to preserve that insight by justification: a forever-failing attempt to find a way for the rest of human knowledge to fit that paradigm. They over-invest. They fail. It is quite different to start with an attempt to discover the grammar and semantics of science itself, and with that ambition to correct the minor incompatibilities between the arts and sciences, thereby increasing commensurability and falsifiability across all arts and sciences – producing a universal grammar and semantics and as such rendering all human knowledge more parsimonious and synthetic.