Jews have, more successfully than all other people, and somewhat by accident of selective upward redistribution of reproduction, transferred feminine cognitive ability (language and perception) to the males, and male cognitive ability(agency) to females, at the cost of higher rates of homosexuality and mental illness, and lower rates of creativity. (yes, really). This ‘blending’ of traits combines the best of both worlds. The mistake is to think that they are necessarily more exceptional than our most exceptional whites (Anglicans). Anglicans produce higher average IQ. But the Jews produce more outliers because of a wider standard deviation in their distributions. And they practice nepotism on a scale that westerners can’t imagine – the same way women advance their children. There is quite a bit of work studying these things now. So it’s getting much easier to explain the differences. I try to explain Jewish behavior by saying “all Jews are female” and while that’s an exaggeration it does explain the entirety of Jewish success: adopting the female cognitive, collective, and reproductive strategy. This is probably the most explanatory argument available today.
Form: Mini Essay
-
The Secret To Jewish Success: Radical Feminism
Jews have, more successfully than all other people, and somewhat by accident of selective upward redistribution of reproduction, transferred feminine cognitive ability (language and perception) to the males, and male cognitive ability(agency) to females, at the cost of higher rates of homosexuality and mental illness, and lower rates of creativity. (yes, really). This ‘blending’ of traits combines the best of both worlds. The mistake is to think that they are necessarily more exceptional than our most exceptional whites (Anglicans). Anglicans produce higher average IQ. But the Jews produce more outliers because of a wider standard deviation in their distributions. And they practice nepotism on a scale that westerners can’t imagine – the same way women advance their children. There is quite a bit of work studying these things now. So it’s getting much easier to explain the differences. I try to explain Jewish behavior by saying “all Jews are female” and while that’s an exaggeration it does explain the entirety of Jewish success: adopting the female cognitive, collective, and reproductive strategy. This is probably the most explanatory argument available today.
-
We are at war. A War To Destroy The West.
We are at war. A very nearly hot civil war. A civil war brought about by design, beginning in the postwar period, and one that would not have succeeded in overthrow except for underclass, and particularly Hispanic immigration. All liberal societies pursue commercial interests to the point of undermining the society. This is what separates military (armies) states from trading (naval) states: armies do not tolerate imposition of costs upon the civic order. When at war, people demand generals. And every single time any civilization has pursued liberalism to the point where they undermine the homogeneity of the population they have died at the hands of conflicts btween despots. Becuase only a despot can rule over competing peoples. And we now have at least four hostile demographics in at lesat ten culturally separate regions. You get what you ask for. We got what we let HOSTILE PEOPLES ask for.
-
We are at war. A War To Destroy The West.
We are at war. A very nearly hot civil war. A civil war brought about by design, beginning in the postwar period, and one that would not have succeeded in overthrow except for underclass, and particularly Hispanic immigration. All liberal societies pursue commercial interests to the point of undermining the society. This is what separates military (armies) states from trading (naval) states: armies do not tolerate imposition of costs upon the civic order. When at war, people demand generals. And every single time any civilization has pursued liberalism to the point where they undermine the homogeneity of the population they have died at the hands of conflicts btween despots. Becuase only a despot can rule over competing peoples. And we now have at least four hostile demographics in at lesat ten culturally separate regions. You get what you ask for. We got what we let HOSTILE PEOPLES ask for.
-
THE STANDARD DEVIATION IN IQ IS MISLEADING You know, I’ve tended to follow the c
THE STANDARD DEVIATION IN IQ IS MISLEADING
You know, I’ve tended to follow the consensus that 15 points is a standard deviation, in intelligence, but that doesn’t help so much because group standard deviations appear to range from 11 to 13, with 12.5 as the sort of median. Secondly, I’ve followed the convention of the center being 100.
Both of these are kind of obscuring value.
1 – the sort of middle between expensive to train and inexpensive to train is actually 106. (I sort of think of human potential beginning in that area.)
via Lion:
—“A verbal IQ of about 106 defines the cognitive lower bound of the smart fraction. And, each percentage point increase in the “smart percent” is worth about $600 (1998) to per capita GDP.”—
2 – Every six points (about half a standard deviation) rather than seven, we see fairly rapid increases in ability.
3 – They suggest average is sort of 95-105, and that’s true, but that’s the arbitrary average of the population given the population. Instead, I would say the average begins at 105 or 106 (105 for simplicity’s sake), and that we are one half standard deviation below the minimum for the upper half to compensate for the lower. And one standard deviation or 12 points below the low end of the optimum for modernity. And that this minimum will increase from 112 to 118 over the next century (or faster).
4 – Roughly speaking 1/3 of the population, meaning the vast majority of the population under 95 has to disappear over the next few hundred years.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 15:29:00 UTC
-
WHAT IF AMERICA BECOMES INSULAR AGAIN? —-“What do Europeans, Canadians, Austra
WHAT IF AMERICA BECOMES INSULAR AGAIN?
—-“What do Europeans, Canadians, Australians and other western societies think of what is happening politically in America right now? Is there fear for the future should the USA become insular once again?”— Quora User
We Americans are going to do everything we can to end imperial postwar America, end the remains of the British empire, and return to the balance of power system, where we are not responsible for financing and policing the ‘uncivilized world’.
We are pretty tired of europeans, austrialians and canadians in particular from signaling moral superiority when the are just free riders on the military financial cultural and political costs born by american peoples.
So if you mean by ‘insular’ we are no longer going to tolerate your virtue signaling, paying for your military defense, the world financial system, the world political system, and being the dumping ground for immigrants, yeah, insular means ‘no more free rides for people who disrespect you for having given them the ride’.
Canada, like Sweden is on the way to making itself the middle east.
Parts of america are on the way to making themselves brazil.
England is on it’s way to making itself north africa,
And france already is north africa.
You don’t get diversity with diversity. You get underclass monopoly. All states that try turn in to poor countries with corrupt governments and some sort of stated or unstated caste system
You can diversity from NATION STATES where every people pays the cost of carrying their own development, and particularly of their underclasses.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 13:07:00 UTC
-
“DO WHITE MEN FIND WOMEN OUTSIDE THEIR RACE ATTRACTIVE?”— (This seems like a v
—“DO WHITE MEN FIND WOMEN OUTSIDE THEIR RACE ATTRACTIVE?”—
(This seems like a very strange question. lol All women are attractive – especially at 19-23 years. It’s the whole point of being female. 😉 )
THE CORRECT ANSWER
Let me help you: **We are men**. **Every woman** that is healthy, and reasonably fit, and reasonably symmetrical (height weight proportionate) is attractive. (Just as every men who can garner attention from others and who possesses some wealth is attractive to women. supermodels and men in professional sports, or attractive professional women and wealthy entrepreneurs. Same everywhere. )
DIFFERENCES IN THE FREQUENCY OF DESIRABLE FEATURES
Of the *major* races and subraces ( african, semitic, iranic, western, indian, eastern, pacific) we vary greatly in our degree of neoteny (retention of childhood traits) that are associated with fertility (and desirability) for no other reason than the geography we evolved in – with cold favoring neoteny, and hot, not so. So some races tend to have more FREQUENTLY desirable features than other races while all races tend to produce some desirable women. (The aboriginals in australia have a low frequency of those traits, and east-slavic women have a high frequency of those traits. with celtic, german, and scandinavian women having a lower frequency than slavic women, but producing more extremes.)
DEGREES OF NEOTENY DUE TO REGIONS
The reason being that the desire for neoteny is high across all populations. East asians have the most neoteny but perhaps too much which is why the asymmetric demand for asian women vs men. Westerners have less morophlogical neoteny, and tend to retain higher demand for females than males in appearance, even if higher demand for males in behavior. This is true for indians as well. For Iranic and semitic the demand is lower for both males and females becuase of greater retention of sexual depth and maturity. And africans mature the fastest and the deepest, because they are in the most biologically hostile part of the world where children must mature quickly or die.
PRACTICALITY
We men are also **practical**: marrying within six degrees is ALWAYS better than the alternative for every possible reason, unless your own sexual market value is too low within six degrees.
(Lastly, and … unpleasantly perhaps, white men (although they will not admit it openly) operate under the belief that ‘women from lower classes’ are ‘cheaper and easier and require less effort’. I don’t actually think this is true. I think it’s just that in-group sensitivity to rejection is higher.)
OUTMARRIAGE RATES
So what we find in the west is about 15% outmarriage (racial mixture) with predictable overlap between black-hispanic, hispanic-white, white-asian, and asian-jewish populations. the reason being that at the top and bottom of each ‘tribe’, a ‘defector’ can obtain a higher sexual market value outside his or her group.
How do we know this? You wouldn’t believe how many people study this stuff and how exceptionally good that the data is – especially from all the dating sites.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 12:44:00 UTC
-
THE SECRET TO JEWISH SUCCESS: EXTREME FEMINISM THE CORRECT ANSWER Jews have, mor
THE SECRET TO JEWISH SUCCESS: EXTREME FEMINISM
THE CORRECT ANSWER
Jews have, more successfully than all other peoples, and somewhat by accident of selective upward redistribution of reproduction, transferred feminine cognitive ability (language and perception) to the males, and male cognitive ability(agency) to females, at the cost of higher rates of homosexuality and mental illness, and lower rates of creativity. (yes, really) This ‘blending’ of traits combines the best of both worlds.
The mistake is to think that they are necessarily more exceptional than our most exceptional whites (Anglicans). Anglicans produce higher average IQ. But the Jews produce more outliers because of a wider standard deviation in their distributions. And they practice nepotism on a scale that westerners can’t imagine – the same way women advance their children.
There is quite a bit of work studying these things now. So it’s getting much easier to explain the differences. I try to explain Jewish behavior by saying “all Jews are female” and while that’s an exaggeration it does explain the entirety of Jewish success: adopting the female cognitive, collective, and reproductive strategy.
This is probably the most explanatory argument available today.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 11:42:00 UTC
-
ROMANTICISM (our attempt at restoration of tradition, before the abrahamic attac
ROMANTICISM
(our attempt at restoration of tradition, before the abrahamic attack on history and science)
–Paganism resurfaces as a topic of fascination in 18th to 19th-century Romanticism, in particular in the context of the literary Celtic and Viking revivals, which portrayed historical Celtic and Germanic polytheists as noble savages.
The 19th century also saw much scholarly interest in the reconstruction of pagan mythology from folklore or fairy tales. This was notably attempted by the Brothers Grimm, especially Jacob Grimm in his Teutonic Mythology, and Elias Lönnrot with the compilation of the Kalevala. The work of the Brothers Grimm influenced other collectors, both inspiring them to collect tales and leading them to similarly believe that the fairy tales of a country were particularly representative of it, to the neglect of cross-cultural influence. Among those influenced were the Russian Alexander Afanasyev, the Norwegians Peter Christen Asbjørnsen and Jørgen Moe, and the Englishman Joseph Jacobs.[67]
Romanticist interest in non-classical antiquity coincided with the rise of Romantic nationalism and the rise of the nation state in the context of the 1848 revolutions, leading to the creation of national epics and national myths for the various newly formed states. Pagan or folkloric topics were also common in the Musical nationalism of the period.—
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 10:22:00 UTC
-
There is no superior race, just superior distributions that make use of superior
There is no superior race, just superior distributions that make use of superior ideas.
Thee jews, despite being the most literate people in the dark and middle ages (a darkness they contributed to) achieved precisely NOTHING.
Every Jewish achievement was made by their nearly forcible indoctrination into aristotelianism, in exchange for integration.
They managed to produce the most murderous ideas in ancient history (judaism, christianity, islam), and the most murderous ideas in modern history (marxism), and the pseudosciences and deceits of the modern world (boasianism, fruedianism, cantorian supernaturalism in mathematics, the frankfurt school, and nearly single handedly destroyed both the academy and rule of law. And have nearly destroyed our civilization thrrough the 1965 immigration act, and their continuing efforts at making the world safe for judaism, which roughly transates to turning the world into the levant.
The ONLY thinker they have is Einstein and he is overplayed because everything other than the Frame was the product of Europeans – even E=MC^2. He did manage to explain why. But he is their only non-pseudoscentific thinker. There are plenty of minor players, and a masterful effort for nepotism in the awards process. But data is data is data.
Europeans did everything worth doing in history and did it faster for the simple reason that we tell the truth, —- and on one else does.
So no, I don’t play superiority games, I just look the data.
It’s notable that Babbage and Turing were Brits, and the Logicians were frequently Jewish, and so was Chomsky’s grammatical take on Turing. Turns out the logics were a total waste of time – there is no closure. Turns out mathematical set theory (logic) was harmful. Turns out the Grammars have far more to do with Turing than Chomsky.
Everything is easily explained by jewish pilpul, pseudoscience, pseudomathematics, and psuedo-logic, versus anglo testimony, science, mathematics, and computation.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 09:42:00 UTC