Only 7% of people in the empire were christian. The Christians ran around destroying books, arts, temples, architecture, like the french destroyed the aristocracy, and like the Jews destroy our arts, literature, and architecture,and academy, and the muslims are, in this world, destroying ancient monuments. Just as their ‘converts’ to postmodernism and marxism are destroying our monuments. The entire religious systems of the ancient world were destroyed, the great civilizations of the ancient world were destroyed, the great works of art were destroyed, the millions of books were destroyed. trade was destroyed. and we faced a dark age that only the northern europeans rescued us from.
Form: Mini Essay
-
The Jewish, Christian, and Muslim Destruction of The Ancient World
Only 7% of people in the empire were christian. The Christians ran around destroying books, arts, temples, architecture, like the french destroyed the aristocracy, and like the Jews destroy our arts, literature, and architecture,and academy, and the muslims are, in this world, destroying ancient monuments. Just as their ‘converts’ to postmodernism and marxism are destroying our monuments. The entire religious systems of the ancient world were destroyed, the great civilizations of the ancient world were destroyed, the great works of art were destroyed, the millions of books were destroyed. trade was destroyed. and we faced a dark age that only the northern europeans rescued us from.
-
Please Don’t Make Me Go There.
Look. I know what I am doing here but do you? I try to reach people the best that I can. I use locker room talk when I can. I weave narratives across disciplines to show patterns by repetition rather than drag you through all the analytical steps. I am extremely forgiving and tolerant of everyone other than trolls and antagonists. I care deeply about people – but not about protecting your (their) ignorance, errors, wishful-thinking, and excuses. My job is to use truth as a weapon to deprive the enemy of the abrahamic and feminine deceits forever. And that means zero tolerance for comforting falsehoods. The means political and religious and moral falsehoods. There are people in this world who have some knowledge and skill, and are fairly bright. But I’m sorry to tell you that coming at me with your favorite excuse or justification is going to make me gently try to educate you. But if you get critical of me and play pilpul, critique, emoting, or trolling at some point I’m going to have to defend myself from your nonsense one way or the other. People whose arguments are obviously dim I can just block. But if the common man who follows cannot determine if you’re an empty hat or not, I’m gonna go for increasingly painful hits to stop you. So please don’t make me go there. Thanks.
-
Please Don’t Make Me Go There.
Look. I know what I am doing here but do you? I try to reach people the best that I can. I use locker room talk when I can. I weave narratives across disciplines to show patterns by repetition rather than drag you through all the analytical steps. I am extremely forgiving and tolerant of everyone other than trolls and antagonists. I care deeply about people – but not about protecting your (their) ignorance, errors, wishful-thinking, and excuses. My job is to use truth as a weapon to deprive the enemy of the abrahamic and feminine deceits forever. And that means zero tolerance for comforting falsehoods. The means political and religious and moral falsehoods. There are people in this world who have some knowledge and skill, and are fairly bright. But I’m sorry to tell you that coming at me with your favorite excuse or justification is going to make me gently try to educate you. But if you get critical of me and play pilpul, critique, emoting, or trolling at some point I’m going to have to defend myself from your nonsense one way or the other. People whose arguments are obviously dim I can just block. But if the common man who follows cannot determine if you’re an empty hat or not, I’m gonna go for increasingly painful hits to stop you. So please don’t make me go there. Thanks.
-
The Standard Deviation in IQ Is Misleading
You know, I’ve tended to follow the consensus that 15 points is a standard deviation, in intelligence, but that doesn’t help so much because group standard deviations appear to range from 11 to 13, with 12.5 as the sort of median. Secondly, I’ve followed the convention of the center being 100. Both of these are kind of obscuring value. 1 – the sort of middle between expensive to train and inexpensive to train is actually 106. (I sort of think of human potential beginning in that area.) via Lion: —“A verbal IQ of about 106 defines the cognitive lower bound of the smart fraction. And, each percentage point increase in the “smart percent” is worth about $600 (1998) to per capita GDP.”— 2 – Every six points (about half a standard deviation) rather than seven, we see fairly rapid increases in ability. 3 – They suggest average is sort of 95-105, and that’s true, but that’s the arbitrary average of the population given the population. Instead, I would say the average begins at 105 or 106 (105 for simplicity’s sake), and that we are one half standard deviation below the minimum for the upper half to compensate for the lower. And one standard deviation or 12 points below the low end of the optimum for modernity. And that this minimum will increase from 112 to 118 over the next century (or faster). 4 – Roughly speaking 1/3 of the population, meaning the vast majority of the population under 95 has to disappear over the next few hundred years.
-
The Standard Deviation in IQ Is Misleading
You know, I’ve tended to follow the consensus that 15 points is a standard deviation, in intelligence, but that doesn’t help so much because group standard deviations appear to range from 11 to 13, with 12.5 as the sort of median. Secondly, I’ve followed the convention of the center being 100. Both of these are kind of obscuring value. 1 – the sort of middle between expensive to train and inexpensive to train is actually 106. (I sort of think of human potential beginning in that area.) via Lion: —“A verbal IQ of about 106 defines the cognitive lower bound of the smart fraction. And, each percentage point increase in the “smart percent” is worth about $600 (1998) to per capita GDP.”— 2 – Every six points (about half a standard deviation) rather than seven, we see fairly rapid increases in ability. 3 – They suggest average is sort of 95-105, and that’s true, but that’s the arbitrary average of the population given the population. Instead, I would say the average begins at 105 or 106 (105 for simplicity’s sake), and that we are one half standard deviation below the minimum for the upper half to compensate for the lower. And one standard deviation or 12 points below the low end of the optimum for modernity. And that this minimum will increase from 112 to 118 over the next century (or faster). 4 – Roughly speaking 1/3 of the population, meaning the vast majority of the population under 95 has to disappear over the next few hundred years.
-
The Secret to Jewish Success: Extreme Feminism
THE CORRECT ANSWER Jews have, more successfully than all other peoples, and somewhat by accident of selective upward redistribution of reproduction, transferred feminine cognitive ability (language and perception) to the males, and male cognitive ability(agency) to females, at the cost of higher rates of homosexuality and mental illness, and lower rates of creativity. (yes, really) This ‘blending’ of traits combines the best of both worlds. The mistake is to think that they are necessarily more exceptional than our most exceptional whites (Anglicans). Anglicans produce higher average IQ. But the Jews produce more outliers because of a wider standard deviation in their distributions. And they practice nepotism on a scale that westerners can’t imagine – the same way women advance their children. There is quite a bit of work studying these things now. So it’s getting much easier to explain the differences. I try to explain Jewish behavior by saying “all Jews are female” and while that’s an exaggeration it does explain the entirety of Jewish success: adopting the female cognitive, collective, and reproductive strategy. This is probably the most explanatory argument available today.
-
The Secret to Jewish Success: Extreme Feminism
THE CORRECT ANSWER Jews have, more successfully than all other peoples, and somewhat by accident of selective upward redistribution of reproduction, transferred feminine cognitive ability (language and perception) to the males, and male cognitive ability(agency) to females, at the cost of higher rates of homosexuality and mental illness, and lower rates of creativity. (yes, really) This ‘blending’ of traits combines the best of both worlds. The mistake is to think that they are necessarily more exceptional than our most exceptional whites (Anglicans). Anglicans produce higher average IQ. But the Jews produce more outliers because of a wider standard deviation in their distributions. And they practice nepotism on a scale that westerners can’t imagine – the same way women advance their children. There is quite a bit of work studying these things now. So it’s getting much easier to explain the differences. I try to explain Jewish behavior by saying “all Jews are female” and while that’s an exaggeration it does explain the entirety of Jewish success: adopting the female cognitive, collective, and reproductive strategy. This is probably the most explanatory argument available today.
-
We Are At War. We Got What We Let Hostile Peoples Ask For
We are at war. A very nearly hot civil war. A civil war brought about by design, beginning in the postwar period, and one that would not have succeeded in overthrow except for underclass, and particularly Hispanic immigration. All liberal societies pursue commercial interests to the point of undermining the society. This is what separates military (armies) states from trading (naval) states: armies do not tolerate imposition of costs upon the civic order. When at war, people demand generals. And every single time any civilization has pursued liberalism to the point where they undermine the homogeneity of the population they have died at the hands of conflicts between despots. Because only a despot can rule over competing peoples. And we now have at least four hostile demographics in at least ten culturally separate regions. You get what you ask for. We got what we let HOSTILE PEOPLES ask for.
-
We Are At War. We Got What We Let Hostile Peoples Ask For
We are at war. A very nearly hot civil war. A civil war brought about by design, beginning in the postwar period, and one that would not have succeeded in overthrow except for underclass, and particularly Hispanic immigration. All liberal societies pursue commercial interests to the point of undermining the society. This is what separates military (armies) states from trading (naval) states: armies do not tolerate imposition of costs upon the civic order. When at war, people demand generals. And every single time any civilization has pursued liberalism to the point where they undermine the homogeneity of the population they have died at the hands of conflicts between despots. Because only a despot can rule over competing peoples. And we now have at least four hostile demographics in at least ten culturally separate regions. You get what you ask for. We got what we let HOSTILE PEOPLES ask for.