Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • Romanticism

    (our attempt at restoration of tradition, before the abrahamic attack on history and science) –Paganism resurfaces as a topic of fascination in 18th to 19th-century Romanticism, in particular in the context of the literary Celtic and Viking revivals, which portrayed historical Celtic and Germanic polytheists as noble savages.The 19th century also saw much scholarly interest in the reconstruction of pagan mythology from folklore or fairy tales. This was notably attempted by the Brothers Grimm, especially Jacob Grimm in his Teutonic Mythology, and Elias Lönnrot with the compilation of the Kalevala. The work of the Brothers Grimm influenced other collectors, both inspiring them to collect tales and leading them to similarly believe that the fairy tales of a country were particularly representative of it, to the neglect of cross-cultural influence. Among those influenced were the Russian Alexander Afanasyev, the Norwegians Peter Christen Asbjørnsen and Jørgen Moe, and the Englishman Joseph Jacobs.[67]Romanticist interest in non-classical antiquity coincided with the rise of Romantic nationalism and the rise of the nation state in the context of the 1848 revolutions, leading to the creation of national epics and national myths for the various newly formed states. Pagan or folkloric topics were also common in the Musical nationalism of the period.—

  • Romanticism

    (our attempt at restoration of tradition, before the abrahamic attack on history and science) –Paganism resurfaces as a topic of fascination in 18th to 19th-century Romanticism, in particular in the context of the literary Celtic and Viking revivals, which portrayed historical Celtic and Germanic polytheists as noble savages.The 19th century also saw much scholarly interest in the reconstruction of pagan mythology from folklore or fairy tales. This was notably attempted by the Brothers Grimm, especially Jacob Grimm in his Teutonic Mythology, and Elias Lönnrot with the compilation of the Kalevala. The work of the Brothers Grimm influenced other collectors, both inspiring them to collect tales and leading them to similarly believe that the fairy tales of a country were particularly representative of it, to the neglect of cross-cultural influence. Among those influenced were the Russian Alexander Afanasyev, the Norwegians Peter Christen Asbjørnsen and Jørgen Moe, and the Englishman Joseph Jacobs.[67]Romanticist interest in non-classical antiquity coincided with the rise of Romantic nationalism and the rise of the nation state in the context of the 1848 revolutions, leading to the creation of national epics and national myths for the various newly formed states. Pagan or folkloric topics were also common in the Musical nationalism of the period.—

  • ALL STEREOTYPES ARE TRUE Men do not cheat to ‘trade up’ so much as satisfy the n

    ALL STEREOTYPES ARE TRUE

    Men do not cheat to ‘trade up’ so much as satisfy the need, which is not much different (any really) from drug addiction. Women cheat to see if they can trade up, and are willing to trade up (for financial reasons). Women are likely to forgive for financial reasons whether they love or not. Men are more likely to forgive because they love their wives (and loyalty) women are less likely to forgive because they are less likely to love their husbands (devotion), since their devotion almost entirely to their kids. (Really).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-27 14:03:00 UTC

  • THE 90% PERCENT OF THE ANCIENT WORLD THAT WAS PAGAN DID NOT WELCOME THE DESTRUCT

    THE 90% PERCENT OF THE ANCIENT WORLD THAT WAS PAGAN DID NOT WELCOME THE DESTRUCTION BY THE CHRISTIANS

    It’s not that the majority pagan peoples of the ancient world, enjoyed the destruction of their letters, arts, architecture, and monuments by gleeful underclass animals bringing ruination then as the radical islamists and jewish activists bring ruination now. They felt as we felt. The difference is that they couldn’t imagine that they’d get an emperor that would betray them as a means of defeating the western roman empire and turning her own underclass people against her – as is being done to us today via immigration of hostile underclasses.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-27 10:22:00 UTC

  • THE JEWISH, CHRISTIAN, AND MUSLIM DESTRUCTION OF THE ANCIENT WORLD Only 7% of pe

    THE JEWISH, CHRISTIAN, AND MUSLIM DESTRUCTION OF THE ANCIENT WORLD

    Only 7% of people in the empire were christian. The Christians ran around destroying books, arts, temples, architecture, like the french destroyed the aristocracy, and like the Jews destroy our arts, literature, and architecture,and academy, and the muslims are, in this world, destroying ancient monuments. Just as their ‘converts’ to postmodernism and marxism are destroying our monuments.

    The entire religious systems of the ancient world were destroyed, the great civilizations of the ancient world were destroyed, the great works of art were destroyed, the millions of books were destroyed. trade was destroyed. and we faced a dark age that only the northern europeans rescued us from.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-27 10:14:00 UTC

  • Superior Distributions and Ideas

    There is no superior race, just superior distributions that make use of superior ideas. The jews, despite being the most literate people in the dark and middle ages (a darkness they contributed to) achieved precisely NOTHING. Every Jewish achievement was made by their nearly forcible indoctrination into aristotelianism, in exchange for integration. They managed to produce the most murderous ideas in ancient history (judaism, christianity, islam), and the most murderous ideas in modern history (marxism), and the pseudosciences and deceits of the modern world (boasianism, fruedianism, cantorian supernaturalism in mathematics, the frankfurt school, and nearly single handedly destroyed both the academy and rule of law. And have nearly destroyed our civilization through the 1965 immigration act, and their continuing efforts at making the world safe for judaism, which roughly translates to turning the world into the levant. The ONLY thinker they have is Einstein and he is overplayed because everything other than the Frame was the product of Europeans – even E=MC^2. He did manage to explain why. But he is their only non-pseudoscentific thinker. There are plenty of minor players, and a masterful effort for nepotism in the awards process. But data is data is data. Europeans did everything worth doing in history and did it faster for the simple reason that we tell the truth, —- and on one else does. So no, I don’t play superiority games, I just look the data. It’s notable that Babbage and Turing were Brits, and the Logicians were frequently Jewish, and so was Chomsky’s grammatical take on Turing. Turns out the logics were a total waste of time – there is no closure. Turns out mathematical set theory (logic) was harmful. Turns out the Grammars have far more to do with Turing than Chomsky. Everything is easily explained by jewish pilpul, pseudoscience, pseudomathematics, and psuedo-logic, versus anglo testimony, science, mathematics, and computation.

  • Superior Distributions and Ideas

    There is no superior race, just superior distributions that make use of superior ideas. The jews, despite being the most literate people in the dark and middle ages (a darkness they contributed to) achieved precisely NOTHING. Every Jewish achievement was made by their nearly forcible indoctrination into aristotelianism, in exchange for integration. They managed to produce the most murderous ideas in ancient history (judaism, christianity, islam), and the most murderous ideas in modern history (marxism), and the pseudosciences and deceits of the modern world (boasianism, fruedianism, cantorian supernaturalism in mathematics, the frankfurt school, and nearly single handedly destroyed both the academy and rule of law. And have nearly destroyed our civilization through the 1965 immigration act, and their continuing efforts at making the world safe for judaism, which roughly translates to turning the world into the levant. The ONLY thinker they have is Einstein and he is overplayed because everything other than the Frame was the product of Europeans – even E=MC^2. He did manage to explain why. But he is their only non-pseudoscentific thinker. There are plenty of minor players, and a masterful effort for nepotism in the awards process. But data is data is data. Europeans did everything worth doing in history and did it faster for the simple reason that we tell the truth, —- and on one else does. So no, I don’t play superiority games, I just look the data. It’s notable that Babbage and Turing were Brits, and the Logicians were frequently Jewish, and so was Chomsky’s grammatical take on Turing. Turns out the logics were a total waste of time – there is no closure. Turns out mathematical set theory (logic) was harmful. Turns out the Grammars have far more to do with Turing than Chomsky. Everything is easily explained by jewish pilpul, pseudoscience, pseudomathematics, and psuedo-logic, versus anglo testimony, science, mathematics, and computation.

  • Anglicans vs Jews

    The highest average white IQ (Anglican/Episcopalian:113 ) is higher than the the jewish IQ: 112) The jewish distribution is WIDER (13.1 vs 11.1), with more at the bottom and more at the top. So they produce an extra 10% above 130, and it is 130 and 140’s that provide executive (130) and academic (140) competitive ability.

    The size of the world jewish population is about 6.5m. World anglican population is about 85m. Jews pursue a narrower set of careers than Anglicans/Episcopalians. Jews practice more nepotism. And Jewish excellence, which is verbal, is in demand in an era of mass communication. So, Anglicans are white equivalent of the jews (which we have known for 400 years, and is why we had the scientific revolution in britain, and both the English and Scottish enlightenments). If whites returned to practicing nepotism, and outlawed fictionalism in the commons by involuntary warranty of due diligence, and elminated financialization – all of which are easy – the numbers would stabilize. My observation which I cannot find research to confirm or deny is that jews have not only obtained female verbal ability, but the abilty of women to work on details for long periods of time. This ‘reverse dimorphism’ combined with culling of the underclasses, upward redistribution of reproduction to rabbis, extreme clannishness and nepotism, and specialization in extractive professions explains the statistical differences. So, anglicans choose a wider distribution of careers, are not nepotistic but universal, and produce about as many outliers. Jews are people of words, cunning, and mysticism, and europeans are people of metalsmithing, truth, and magic. We still specialize in our ancient traditional occupations.

  • Anglicans vs Jews

    The highest average white IQ (Anglican/Episcopalian:113 ) is higher than the the jewish IQ: 112) The jewish distribution is WIDER (13.1 vs 11.1), with more at the bottom and more at the top. So they produce an extra 10% above 130, and it is 130 and 140’s that provide executive (130) and academic (140) competitive ability.

    The size of the world jewish population is about 6.5m. World anglican population is about 85m. Jews pursue a narrower set of careers than Anglicans/Episcopalians. Jews practice more nepotism. And Jewish excellence, which is verbal, is in demand in an era of mass communication. So, Anglicans are white equivalent of the jews (which we have known for 400 years, and is why we had the scientific revolution in britain, and both the English and Scottish enlightenments). If whites returned to practicing nepotism, and outlawed fictionalism in the commons by involuntary warranty of due diligence, and elminated financialization – all of which are easy – the numbers would stabilize. My observation which I cannot find research to confirm or deny is that jews have not only obtained female verbal ability, but the abilty of women to work on details for long periods of time. This ‘reverse dimorphism’ combined with culling of the underclasses, upward redistribution of reproduction to rabbis, extreme clannishness and nepotism, and specialization in extractive professions explains the statistical differences. So, anglicans choose a wider distribution of careers, are not nepotistic but universal, and produce about as many outliers. Jews are people of words, cunning, and mysticism, and europeans are people of metalsmithing, truth, and magic. We still specialize in our ancient traditional occupations.

  • Look. I know what I am doing here but do you? I try to reach people the best tha

    Look. I know what I am doing here but do you? I try to reach people the best that I can. I use locker room talk when I can. I weave narratives across disciplines to show patterns by repetition rather than drag you through all the analytical steps. I am extremely forgiving and tolerant of everyone other than trolls and antagonists. I care deeply about people – but not about protecting your (their) ignorance, errors, wishful-thinking, and excuses. My job is to use truth as a weapon to deprive the enemy of the abrahamic and feminine deceits forever. And that means zero tolerance for comforting falsehoods. The means political and religious and moral falsehoods.

    There are people in this world who have some knowledge and skill, and are fairly bright. But I’m sorry to tell you that coming at me the justifications for your favorite excuse or justification is going to make me gently try to educate you. But if you get critical of me and play pilpul, critique, emoting, or trolling at some point I’m going to have to defend myself from your nonsense one way or the other.

    People whose arguments are obviously dim I can just block. But if the common man who follows cannot determine if you’re an empty hat or not, I’m gonna go for increasingly painful hits to stop you.

    So please don’t make me go there.

    Thanks.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 18:39:00 UTC