Form: Mini Essay

REMOVE WOMEN FROM RELIGION AND MEN FROM MILITARY? OR TEACH MANDATORY STOICISM RE

REMOVE WOMEN FROM RELIGION AND MEN FROM MILITARY? OR TEACH MANDATORY STOICISM REGARDLESS OF GENDER?

(important piece) (synthesis) (from curt doolittle)

If we remove Women women from religion, they just move into pseudo-rationalism (sophism), and pseudoscience, or simply outright denialism. A disproportionate number of Women – largely those whose cognitive load has not been consumed by having children – lack the agency to contemplate that which is economic, political, and military, because their intuition does not scale beyond the subjectively perceivable. This is why women dominate the psychotic and solipsistic end of the spectrum, and why men dominate the analytic and autistic end of the spectrum. We evolved differences in brains and neurochemistry to divide the labor of child (women) and pack (men).

It’s not complicated. It’s Abrahamic, Marxist, Postmodern, and Feminist pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and Denialism that cause attempt to obscure reality as a means of sedating the mind that lacks agency. Mindfulness is necessary. It is easier for men. But we have more agency (independence from our emotions) to start with. But it is more important for women, who have less independence from their emotions.

Religion teaches submissive equalitarian inclusiveness as mindfulness. Military teaches hierarchical loyalty inclusiveness as mindfulness. Both produce mindfulness. Our civilization as always preserved both markets. The Abrahamic Attack on the West from both Ashkenazi and French Authors, and to a lesser extent German (but not italian or british), has sought to create a pseudoscientific, pseudo-rational, and denialist monopoly cult, where the aristocracy preserved the competition between the church, market, and military.

The aristocracy failed to resurrect stoicism primarily because they were so dedicated to the market (division and balance of powers between the institutions that they were incognizant of the option) that they ‘let the market do its job’ (as usual) without realizing the utility of abusing the 19th/20th century media, and the conversion of the academy (previously a middle class training ground) from a market to a new-theological institution.

So the Academy, Media, Cult-State complex sought to form a monopoly that the Aristocracy, Academy-Merchant Class, Church never aspired to. This is the reason for the systematic destruction of the Military, and the Systematic Purch of the military from government – which was it’s historical role. And finally, the use of activism in the courts to remove rule of law by which the Cult, Market, and Aristocracy were mediated.

This is all you need to understand: The left-feminine monopoly herd, versus the right-masculine market of packs.

Knowledge can produce agency, but only if the market for knowledge suppresses sufficient falsehood that the market demand for falsehoods is suppressed.

Ergo: Natural Law : Propertarianism: Rule of Law.

Curt Doolittle

The Propertarian Institute

Source date (UTC): 2018-10-07 10:30:00 UTC

October 7, 2018
STIGLITZ AS THE ARCHETYPE OF FEMININE ARGUMENT IN ECONOMICS It’s amazing. You kn

STIGLITZ AS THE ARCHETYPE OF FEMININE ARGUMENT IN ECONOMICS

It’s amazing. You know, I learned more about how to complete the scientific method from studying economics than any other field, with mathematical economics in particular taking the cake. It’s obvious that psychology and sociology are pseudosciences. They’re articulated in the language of all pseudosciences. But mathematical platonism and the use of aggregates are just another way of changing from the grammar of ordinary language (sophism) to the grammar of positional relations (innumeracy). Economics consists of cherry picking on the left and the timidity of the right to re-enage on the painful reality of eugenics that invalidates the entirety of the classical liberal movement to increase the franchise.

The broader question is, how much agency do we have? Women and men demonstrably think very differently because of the difference between utility and truth, and between proportionality and reciprocity, and between dysgenia and eugenia. Why do we assume that this same cognitive bias is limited to gender rather than a balance between the genders, and that different groups don’t just demonstrate the male cognitive bias or the female cognitive bias?

Truth, Reciprocity, and Physical Violence that Ends when Ended, VERSUS Fraud, Proportionality, and Reputation Destruction that Never Ends until Destroyed. Violence and Threats versus Shaming, Ridicule, Gossip, Straw Manning, Rallying, and Reputation Destruction. Those are the Male versus female competitive strategies.

There is nothing in mankind that is complicated other than the lies we tell ourselves and others in order to achieve our desired ends.Updated Oct 6, 2018, 9:07 AM

Source date (UTC): 2018-10-06 09:07:00 UTC

October 6, 2018
Agency Is Necessary for Sovereignty: Our Next Great Enterprise

[A]gency is necessary for sovereignty otherwise one cannot self insure. If you cannot self insure then others must insure you out of self defense. If others must insure you then you are dependent upon them as a child upon a parent. You are not sovereign agent, and cannot reciprocally insure those with agency – and you especially cannot insure them against yourself. Western civilization specialized in the continuous production of agency. We emphasize sovereignty. But sovereignty is something we grant one another through reciprocity. Agency over the self exists or it doesn’t – independent of others. Stoicism attempts to produce agency. All other religions do not – they produce avoidance or escapism – with shintoism the closest peer looking backward rather than forward, and the original Buddhism the closest ambition – mindfulness but not agency. And Buddhism does not maintain the western charter demanding heroism, and speaking truth regardless of the consequences to the dominance (competence) hierarchy. If you master Propertarianism (natural law) you will have intellectual agency – all human experience is then explicable in operational terms, and the world coherent and comprehensible. If you master stoicism (self authoring) then you will develop intuitionistic and emotional agency. If you maintain diet and physical fitness – particularly team sports – you will develop physical agency. If you exchange sovereignty with others who do the same, then you will be sovereign. Rome had almost completed the development of a new religion when the Abrahamists worked diligently to undermine the great aristocratic civilizations. The lesson of Constantine is never let anyone other than a member of a noble family that has retained noble status in marriage hold office – ever. The lesson of the Abrahamic revolt against civilization, is that we must suppress all forms of supernaturalism, sophisms (pseudoratioalism), and pseudosciences. And the only way to do that is the use of the LAW: the organized use of force to suppress imposition of costs upon the private and common, existential and informational, by using the courts as a market for truth, thereby empowering all people to suppress falsehoods. Which leads us to our charter: —“Europeans do not know how to live unless they are engaged in some great enterprise. When this is lacking, they grow petty and feeble and their souls disintegrate.”—José Ortega y Gasset, Spanish Philosopher This is our next great enterprise. To rid humanity of the abrahamic falsehoods wither they be supernatural, sophistry, or pseudoscience. We have incrementally suppressed the evil in mankind by forcible domestication of genes and behavior in the ancient world and in the modern. The revolt against us in the ancient world brought about a dark age – we were far too tolerant. The abrahamic revolt against us in the modern world using collectivist pseudoscience and postmodern sophism, and the systematic use of pilpul and critique in the reputation destruction of our great civilization – a civilization that has dragged humanity out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vicissitudes of nature. This revolt against civilization, has not yet been stopped – we have been too tolerant. The most intolerant wins. We must rule by our law, out of self defense, and drag mankind kicking and screaming once again into transcendence of the gods we may yet be, in a universe hostile to all but gods. Transcendence by Agency, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Markets in Everything: the continuous calculation of our ascent into godhood.

October 4, 2018
Agency Is Necessary for Sovereignty: Our Next Great Enterprise

[A]gency is necessary for sovereignty otherwise one cannot self insure. If you cannot self insure then others must insure you out of self defense. If others must insure you then you are dependent upon them as a child upon a parent. You are not sovereign agent, and cannot reciprocally insure those with agency – and you especially cannot insure them against yourself. Western civilization specialized in the continuous production of agency. We emphasize sovereignty. But sovereignty is something we grant one another through reciprocity. Agency over the self exists or it doesn’t – independent of others. Stoicism attempts to produce agency. All other religions do not – they produce avoidance or escapism – with shintoism the closest peer looking backward rather than forward, and the original Buddhism the closest ambition – mindfulness but not agency. And Buddhism does not maintain the western charter demanding heroism, and speaking truth regardless of the consequences to the dominance (competence) hierarchy. If you master Propertarianism (natural law) you will have intellectual agency – all human experience is then explicable in operational terms, and the world coherent and comprehensible. If you master stoicism (self authoring) then you will develop intuitionistic and emotional agency. If you maintain diet and physical fitness – particularly team sports – you will develop physical agency. If you exchange sovereignty with others who do the same, then you will be sovereign. Rome had almost completed the development of a new religion when the Abrahamists worked diligently to undermine the great aristocratic civilizations. The lesson of Constantine is never let anyone other than a member of a noble family that has retained noble status in marriage hold office – ever. The lesson of the Abrahamic revolt against civilization, is that we must suppress all forms of supernaturalism, sophisms (pseudoratioalism), and pseudosciences. And the only way to do that is the use of the LAW: the organized use of force to suppress imposition of costs upon the private and common, existential and informational, by using the courts as a market for truth, thereby empowering all people to suppress falsehoods. Which leads us to our charter: —“Europeans do not know how to live unless they are engaged in some great enterprise. When this is lacking, they grow petty and feeble and their souls disintegrate.”—José Ortega y Gasset, Spanish Philosopher This is our next great enterprise. To rid humanity of the abrahamic falsehoods wither they be supernatural, sophistry, or pseudoscience. We have incrementally suppressed the evil in mankind by forcible domestication of genes and behavior in the ancient world and in the modern. The revolt against us in the ancient world brought about a dark age – we were far too tolerant. The abrahamic revolt against us in the modern world using collectivist pseudoscience and postmodern sophism, and the systematic use of pilpul and critique in the reputation destruction of our great civilization – a civilization that has dragged humanity out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vicissitudes of nature. This revolt against civilization, has not yet been stopped – we have been too tolerant. The most intolerant wins. We must rule by our law, out of self defense, and drag mankind kicking and screaming once again into transcendence of the gods we may yet be, in a universe hostile to all but gods. Transcendence by Agency, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Markets in Everything: the continuous calculation of our ascent into godhood.

October 4, 2018
Physical Training, Intuition Training, Calculative Training (reason), Skills Tra

Physical Training, Intuition Training, Calculative Training (reason), Skills Training. Religion trains via suggestion although Buddhism did best of the Magical religions and Stoicism made it a science (cognitive behavioral therapy = self authoring). Training required, not magic.

Source date (UTC): 2018-10-03 02:25:53 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1047311748330672128

Reply addressees: @peternlimberg

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1044653880624205825

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1044653880624205825

October 3, 2018
(F>) Herds, Compromisers, Pack Hunters, Solitary Hunters () Psych

(F>) Herds, Compromisers, Pack Hunters, Solitary Hunters (<M), versus (F>) Psychotic, Solipsistic, Balanced, Analytic, Autistic (<M). With:
Trait differences are minor variations in the stage of the prey drive. And:
Biased by major variations in the differences of the sex drive.

Source date (UTC): 2018-10-03 02:22:55 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1047311002000379904

Reply addressees: @peternlimberg

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1045248759318360064

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1045248759318360064

October 3, 2018
Is Libertarianism A Failed Property Management Business Model?

by Dax Rayner —“Libertarianism is simply marxism for the commons instead of marxism for private property.” —Curt Doolittle https://propertarianinstitute.com/…/libertarian-pretense-of-payi…/ I’ve been thinking a lot about this statement the past few months and I see it more and more every day now that I’m paying attention to it, every time I’m in a libertarian thread or discussion. Coming from a libertarian-ish/Ayn Randian worldview myself for much of my life, I began to really heavily question libertarianism the past few years. Anyone who’s known me for awhile can probably tell my positions have shifted quite a bit on many things. It just became glaringly obvious to me that there were a lot of holes and discrepancies between libertarian theories and what we see happening in the real world. I know many others have felt the same way. I’ve just started scratching the surface of propertarianism as defined by the Propertarian Institute but so far it has given me incredible clarity on the problems I was seeing before with libertarianism that I lacked the operational language to describe. Simply put: It seems the core problem of libertarianism can be boiled down to mismanagement of the commons, and that is why marxism has run rampant through the education system, pop culture and liberal establishments. The irony here is that when libertarians talk about the tragedy of the commons it seems they have actually misinterpreted what that means and the REAL tragedy of the commons, at least in the modern West, is an inversion of their analysis. The solutions they propose are not only incorrect but simply not possible. Many libertarians seem to misunderstand or miscategorize what the commons is or in some cases, deny that it even exists at all. There’s a lot of things that made me begin challenging libertarianism from borders to foreign policy to trade but ultimately what really pushed me over the edge was libertarianism’s complete ineptness and total impotence at countering the societal cancer of social justice warriorism and marxist feminism. Not only has libertarianism been an abysmal failure at using individualism to effectively thwart leftist authoritarians and SJWs, but in many ways it’s directly contributed to the problem and is even actively working to suppress real solutions to the problem. I believe this comes down to, again, mismanagement of the commons, as well as gaping holes in the NAP which I’ve seen for a long time, but furthermore an incomplete understanding of what property actually is and inadequate property norms, which I didn’t begin to understand until coming across propertarianism. If you owned a 30 unit apartment complex and you hired a property management company to take care of it and they allowed the place to turn into a complete dump, with people crapping all over sidewalks, throwing trash on the lawn, etc would you continue to work with that property management company? That’s basically what libertarianism has given us. Luke Weinhagen also said it well: “The way it hit me was that libertarianism survives/exists by miscategorizing relations. Specifically libertarians interpret commons(cooperation) as commons(conflict) and use property rights(IVP) to attempt to resolve that conflict. In doing so they justify libertarianism’s parasitism of the commons(that can only be generated via cooperation) as defense and that justification requires it not suppress any parasitism of the commons(cooperation) as this would self destruct the ideology.” I’m writing a 4 Part series on this that I’m putting on minds.com to elaborate my thoughts on it. I’m still an amateur when it comes to political science and legal theory but having started, run and sold numerous companies in the digital publishing world over the last decade and a half I’ve dealt with my share of intellectual property issues, so I’m writing from that perspective in addition to my other research. I know this has been a particular sore spot for many other internet marketers as well. Just based on my own personal experience and observations, I would say a loose form of libertarianism is kind of the default political philosophy for a good amount of people in the sales and marketing world I come from. It just naturally appeals to our independent entreprenur/anti-corporate personality. But I think if a lot of people looked into it more they may find the propertarian definitions of property to be much more all encompassing, useful and applicable to the real world, as I have. Propertarianism has added a whole new dimension of understanding for me when it comes to asset classes, brand protection, diversification & portfolio management. If you’re a business owner or individual who’s using the ideology and school of libertarianism/AnCapism as your property management company, I might encourage you to consider reevaluating your relationship with them. They may not be caretaking your family’s future, your community, your assets and your retirement as well as you’ve been led to think.

October 2, 2018
Is Libertarianism A Failed Property Management Business Model?

by Dax Rayner —“Libertarianism is simply marxism for the commons instead of marxism for private property.” —Curt Doolittle https://propertarianinstitute.com/…/libertarian-pretense-of-payi…/ I’ve been thinking a lot about this statement the past few months and I see it more and more every day now that I’m paying attention to it, every time I’m in a libertarian thread or discussion. Coming from a libertarian-ish/Ayn Randian worldview myself for much of my life, I began to really heavily question libertarianism the past few years. Anyone who’s known me for awhile can probably tell my positions have shifted quite a bit on many things. It just became glaringly obvious to me that there were a lot of holes and discrepancies between libertarian theories and what we see happening in the real world. I know many others have felt the same way. I’ve just started scratching the surface of propertarianism as defined by the Propertarian Institute but so far it has given me incredible clarity on the problems I was seeing before with libertarianism that I lacked the operational language to describe. Simply put: It seems the core problem of libertarianism can be boiled down to mismanagement of the commons, and that is why marxism has run rampant through the education system, pop culture and liberal establishments. The irony here is that when libertarians talk about the tragedy of the commons it seems they have actually misinterpreted what that means and the REAL tragedy of the commons, at least in the modern West, is an inversion of their analysis. The solutions they propose are not only incorrect but simply not possible. Many libertarians seem to misunderstand or miscategorize what the commons is or in some cases, deny that it even exists at all. There’s a lot of things that made me begin challenging libertarianism from borders to foreign policy to trade but ultimately what really pushed me over the edge was libertarianism’s complete ineptness and total impotence at countering the societal cancer of social justice warriorism and marxist feminism. Not only has libertarianism been an abysmal failure at using individualism to effectively thwart leftist authoritarians and SJWs, but in many ways it’s directly contributed to the problem and is even actively working to suppress real solutions to the problem. I believe this comes down to, again, mismanagement of the commons, as well as gaping holes in the NAP which I’ve seen for a long time, but furthermore an incomplete understanding of what property actually is and inadequate property norms, which I didn’t begin to understand until coming across propertarianism. If you owned a 30 unit apartment complex and you hired a property management company to take care of it and they allowed the place to turn into a complete dump, with people crapping all over sidewalks, throwing trash on the lawn, etc would you continue to work with that property management company? That’s basically what libertarianism has given us. Luke Weinhagen also said it well: “The way it hit me was that libertarianism survives/exists by miscategorizing relations. Specifically libertarians interpret commons(cooperation) as commons(conflict) and use property rights(IVP) to attempt to resolve that conflict. In doing so they justify libertarianism’s parasitism of the commons(that can only be generated via cooperation) as defense and that justification requires it not suppress any parasitism of the commons(cooperation) as this would self destruct the ideology.” I’m writing a 4 Part series on this that I’m putting on minds.com to elaborate my thoughts on it. I’m still an amateur when it comes to political science and legal theory but having started, run and sold numerous companies in the digital publishing world over the last decade and a half I’ve dealt with my share of intellectual property issues, so I’m writing from that perspective in addition to my other research. I know this has been a particular sore spot for many other internet marketers as well. Just based on my own personal experience and observations, I would say a loose form of libertarianism is kind of the default political philosophy for a good amount of people in the sales and marketing world I come from. It just naturally appeals to our independent entreprenur/anti-corporate personality. But I think if a lot of people looked into it more they may find the propertarian definitions of property to be much more all encompassing, useful and applicable to the real world, as I have. Propertarianism has added a whole new dimension of understanding for me when it comes to asset classes, brand protection, diversification & portfolio management. If you’re a business owner or individual who’s using the ideology and school of libertarianism/AnCapism as your property management company, I might encourage you to consider reevaluating your relationship with them. They may not be caretaking your family’s future, your community, your assets and your retirement as well as you’ve been led to think.

October 2, 2018
—“Q: When the world ends, … “—

—“When the world ends, do you think it’s gonna look like a lush paradise as God promised, or look like the planet is beyond ravaged?”— There are no gods, they are mere fictions men invented so that we can lie to ourselves about being a transitory life form that must struggle to survive, and use the comfort of that lie to manipulate people politically rather than educate them so that they can act rationally to improve their condition, or welcome the end to their discomfort. The planet will turn to ash first because the sun will expand. The planet will be destroyed and absorbed by the sun after it expands. The sun will collapse and take everything with it at the end of its life. We are in adulthood of our star and do not have unlimited time to get off the planet.

October 1, 2018
—“Q: When the world ends, … “—

—“When the world ends, do you think it’s gonna look like a lush paradise as God promised, or look like the planet is beyond ravaged?”— There are no gods, they are mere fictions men invented so that we can lie to ourselves about being a transitory life form that must struggle to survive, and use the comfort of that lie to manipulate people politically rather than educate them so that they can act rationally to improve their condition, or welcome the end to their discomfort. The planet will turn to ash first because the sun will expand. The planet will be destroyed and absorbed by the sun after it expands. The sun will collapse and take everything with it at the end of its life. We are in adulthood of our star and do not have unlimited time to get off the planet.

October 1, 2018