STIGLITZ AS THE ARCHETYPE OF FEMININE ARGUMENT IN ECONOMICS It’s amazing. You kn

STIGLITZ AS THE ARCHETYPE OF FEMININE ARGUMENT IN ECONOMICS

It’s amazing. You know, I learned more about how to complete the scientific method from studying economics than any other field, with mathematical economics in particular taking the cake. It’s obvious that psychology and sociology are pseudosciences. They’re articulated in the language of all pseudosciences. But mathematical platonism and the use of aggregates are just another way of changing from the grammar of ordinary language (sophism) to the grammar of positional relations (innumeracy). Economics consists of cherry picking on the left and the timidity of the right to re-enage on the painful reality of eugenics that invalidates the entirety of the classical liberal movement to increase the franchise.

The broader question is, how much agency do we have? Women and men demonstrably think very differently because of the difference between utility and truth, and between proportionality and reciprocity, and between dysgenia and eugenia. Why do we assume that this same cognitive bias is limited to gender rather than a balance between the genders, and that different groups don’t just demonstrate the male cognitive bias or the female cognitive bias?

Truth, Reciprocity, and Physical Violence that Ends when Ended, VERSUS Fraud, Proportionality, and Reputation Destruction that Never Ends until Destroyed. Violence and Threats versus Shaming, Ridicule, Gossip, Straw Manning, Rallying, and Reputation Destruction. Those are the Male versus female competitive strategies.

There is nothing in mankind that is complicated other than the lies we tell ourselves and others in order to achieve our desired ends.Updated Oct 6, 2018, 9:07 AM