October 9th, 2018 12:17 PM NO THE BYZANTINES WEREN’T ROMAN AND THE EASTERN ROMAN EMPIRE HAD LITTLE IF NOTHING TO DO WITH ROME OR EUROPE.CHRISTIANITY IS JEWISH, SYRIAN, AND GRECO-ANATOLIAN Ethnically, culturally, organizationally, they were Anatolians and the greek aristocracy (european conquerors) of the athenians and spartans lost. We treat old europe (southeast europe) as european (atlantic+scandinavian + germanic+ celtic+ italic ) but this is just a convention. The balkans were old europe (anatolians), and remain anatolians (I haplogroup), and were not european, or roman, merely a ROMAN CONQUEST of the western Greek Empire. The holy roman empire was neither holy nor roman. The byzantine empire was neither european or roman, but anatolian/syrian. The balkans and greece today are still Anatolian and Muslim, and poor, and low trust, and corrupt. The boot of italy is still ethnically anatolian (greek), and that is why italy consists of two countries: germanic north and greek south. There are no Itals any more than there are Etrus, or Hellenes. There never were romans in Constantinople. There were merely greeks, balkans, anatolians, and syrians that held onto the roman name the way the germans held onto the roman name, and the church held onto the roman name: for status. Roman Empire was, as all european peoples, a religion of the Hearth and Land (“Heathen”). The jews, syrians, and greco-anatolians manufactured this false religion, and imposed it upon the european peoples in order to destroy the aristocratic recovery of rome after the invasion and the plague – a plague given to the west via byzantium. 1 – INDO EUROPEAN EXPANSION BEGINS THE GREAT SHIFT 2 – MESOPOTAMIAN EMPIRES EVOLVE SUMER->ACADIAN->ASSYRIAN (AND LATER ->BABYLONIAN) which appear to have been a locally originating subrace, and Sumerian neither semitic nor indo-european.) 2 – HITTITES(EUROPEANS) AND EGYPTIANS EXHAUST EACH OTHER FIGHTING OVER THE TRADE ROUTES. 3 – ASSYRIANS(MESOPOTAMIANS) CONQUER HITTITES (AND LEVANT/ANATOLIA) 4 – THE SEA PEOPLES (EUROPEANS) RAID AND DEFEAT ALL OLD WORLD CIVS EXCEPT EGYPT BY COLLAPSING WORLD TRADE (but egypt never recovers). 5 – ELAM(West Asians)->PERSIANS(EASTERN INDO EUROPEANS) ESTABLISH THE ACHAEMENID EMPIRE AND THREATEN GREECE 6 – GREEKS CONQUER ANATOLIA TO PERSIA TO EGYPT. (Macedon) (“Greece” is not the peninsula alone but the peninsula and the lands around the aegean, including the peloponnese, islands, and western anatolian coast. 7 – ROMANS CONQUER GREEKS. (Rome) 8 – GREEKS RE-CONQUER ROMANS (Bosphorus-Constantinople) by imposing middle eastern cults and religio-administrative rule in the Persian and Egyptian model. 9 – SELJUKS CONQUER ARABS, THEN EVENTUALLY GREEKS (Bosphorus -> Balkans and enter old europe) 10 – GERMANICS (Europeans) CONQUER SELJUKS, ARABS – THE NEW WORLD, AND ASIA 11 – JEWS AND MUSLIMS STAGE THE SECOND RECONQUEST OF EUROPA: MARXISM-SOCIALISM-POSTMODERNISM-FEMINISM AS AN INTELLECTUAL VANGUARD, WITH MUSLIMS PRACTICING RAIDING, TERRORISM, AND IMMIGRATION TO THE POINT OF FAILURE. THAT’S HISTORY. THATS HISTORY IN A NUTSHELL.
Form: Mini Essay
-
Temples Functioned as Banks
October 9th, 2018 9:45 AM [T]he only historic facts we know are that (a) someone seems to have existed, (b) the fact that temples functioned as banks necessary for trade, and the uprising at the temple, (c)the prosecution and crucifixion of this person. Every other aspect appears to have been produced by the fictionalization and incorporation of other myths, that like all of judaism, began either in mesopotamia, persia, egypt, or greece. We can document and have the evolution of each of the myths, from the first evidence in anatolia, to the spread throughout the fertile crescent.
The fact that most muslim scholars support the story of mohammed against all historical evidence. The fact that most christian scholars support the story of jesus against the historical evidence. And the fact that most jewish scholars support the existence of each of the characters and events, despite the evidence, tells us nothing. Truth is not determined by democracy, or by opinion, nor by historical authorship, but by evidence that survives falsification of all of the above. Someone named jesus seems to have lived. However, the only evidence we have that does not have origin in other myths and religions, is (a) uprising at the temple, (b) prosecution, (c) crucifiction. EVERYTHING ELSE was intentionally imported from prior religions synthesizing Seneca the Younger’s Stoicism, Greek Neo Platonism (idealism)/Authoritarianism, and Jewish pro roman reformation authors. The origin of the ‘risen after three days’ is most interesting because it actually refers to the morning star which, in the jewish tradition, was not just Horace but Lucifer.
-
The Flip Side of Colonialism
October 9th, 2018 9:31 AM THE FLIP SIDE OF COLONIALISM
- Colonialism was a profound if not most profound good since the invention of farming – we dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, disease, hard labor, child mortality, early death, suffering, tyranny, and subjectivity to the vicissitudes of nature – kicking and screaming all the while.
- Slavery was universal and whites were more frequently the subject of it (by muslims) than perpetrators of it. Whites are not malaria-immune but many blacks are. Whites have higher (hotter) metabolisms, and blacks don’t. Whites had to be taken from the criminal class. Africans were captured by other africans as prisoners of war in order to attempt to unify west african empires (which would have happened).
- Creating middle classes by resource exploitation, and selling manufactured (value added) goods to developing peoples was the only means possible of dragging the vast body of dirty, ignorant, superstitious, violent, poor, disease ridden, un-domesticated human animals out of of their condition, and reforming their societies incrementally until they themselves could create a middle class civilization capable of self governance without threat to more advanced civilizations.
Our failure was only in having the european civil wars and leaving our project incomplete. That failure led to the only significant problem of colonialism: (a) the failure to complete the replacement french despotism with english developmentalism. (b) the absence of the technology of fiat money credit that would have eliminated the need for gold and resource extraction. (c) the collapse left an opening for French Socialism, Jewish Communism, Islamic Fundamentalism. (d) the introduction of medicines and health science without the introduction of eugenics (birth control). (e) the failure of our investments in the third world which generally were too insubstantial to do other than delay or inhibit internal growth of demand. This meant that the warm weather colonies most able to produce high value goods (particularly sugar) with Africans, and therefore (a) had more survivors, (b) spread the genres of previously constrained peoples to new territories, (c) forcibly modernized both cultures, civilizations and Genes. And it was not ‘known’ that enslaved primitives were capable of civilized behavior at the time. It was only in the 19th century after the industrial revolution that we found that citizens were more profitable than serfs, were more profitable than slaves. I don’t ignore anything. I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job to expose and educate the ignorant, unable, sophomoric, and willingly deceptive. ã lol
-
No, The Byzantines Weren’t Roman
October 9th, 2018 12:17 PM NO THE BYZANTINES WEREN’T ROMAN AND THE EASTERN ROMAN EMPIRE HAD LITTLE IF NOTHING TO DO WITH ROME OR EUROPE.CHRISTIANITY IS JEWISH, SYRIAN, AND GRECO-ANATOLIAN Ethnically, culturally, organizationally, they were Anatolians and the greek aristocracy (european conquerors) of the athenians and spartans lost. We treat old europe (southeast europe) as european (atlantic+scandinavian + germanic+ celtic+ italic ) but this is just a convention. The balkans were old europe (anatolians), and remain anatolians (I haplogroup), and were not european, or roman, merely a ROMAN CONQUEST of the western Greek Empire. The holy roman empire was neither holy nor roman. The byzantine empire was neither european or roman, but anatolian/syrian. The balkans and greece today are still Anatolian and Muslim, and poor, and low trust, and corrupt. The boot of italy is still ethnically anatolian (greek), and that is why italy consists of two countries: germanic north and greek south. There are no Itals any more than there are Etrus, or Hellenes. There never were romans in Constantinople. There were merely greeks, balkans, anatolians, and syrians that held onto the roman name the way the germans held onto the roman name, and the church held onto the roman name: for status. Roman Empire was, as all european peoples, a religion of the Hearth and Land (“Heathen”). The jews, syrians, and greco-anatolians manufactured this false religion, and imposed it upon the european peoples in order to destroy the aristocratic recovery of rome after the invasion and the plague – a plague given to the west via byzantium. 1 – INDO EUROPEAN EXPANSION BEGINS THE GREAT SHIFT 2 – MESOPOTAMIAN EMPIRES EVOLVE SUMER->ACADIAN->ASSYRIAN (AND LATER ->BABYLONIAN) which appear to have been a locally originating subrace, and Sumerian neither semitic nor indo-european.) 2 – HITTITES(EUROPEANS) AND EGYPTIANS EXHAUST EACH OTHER FIGHTING OVER THE TRADE ROUTES. 3 – ASSYRIANS(MESOPOTAMIANS) CONQUER HITTITES (AND LEVANT/ANATOLIA) 4 – THE SEA PEOPLES (EUROPEANS) RAID AND DEFEAT ALL OLD WORLD CIVS EXCEPT EGYPT BY COLLAPSING WORLD TRADE (but egypt never recovers). 5 – ELAM(West Asians)->PERSIANS(EASTERN INDO EUROPEANS) ESTABLISH THE ACHAEMENID EMPIRE AND THREATEN GREECE 6 – GREEKS CONQUER ANATOLIA TO PERSIA TO EGYPT. (Macedon) (“Greece” is not the peninsula alone but the peninsula and the lands around the aegean, including the peloponnese, islands, and western anatolian coast. 7 – ROMANS CONQUER GREEKS. (Rome) 8 – GREEKS RE-CONQUER ROMANS (Bosphorus-Constantinople) by imposing middle eastern cults and religio-administrative rule in the Persian and Egyptian model. 9 – SELJUKS CONQUER ARABS, THEN EVENTUALLY GREEKS (Bosphorus -> Balkans and enter old europe) 10 – GERMANICS (Europeans) CONQUER SELJUKS, ARABS – THE NEW WORLD, AND ASIA 11 – JEWS AND MUSLIMS STAGE THE SECOND RECONQUEST OF EUROPA: MARXISM-SOCIALISM-POSTMODERNISM-FEMINISM AS AN INTELLECTUAL VANGUARD, WITH MUSLIMS PRACTICING RAIDING, TERRORISM, AND IMMIGRATION TO THE POINT OF FAILURE. THAT’S HISTORY. THATS HISTORY IN A NUTSHELL.
-
Temples Functioned as Banks
October 9th, 2018 9:45 AM [T]he only historic facts we know are that (a) someone seems to have existed, (b) the fact that temples functioned as banks necessary for trade, and the uprising at the temple, (c)the prosecution and crucifixion of this person. Every other aspect appears to have been produced by the fictionalization and incorporation of other myths, that like all of judaism, began either in mesopotamia, persia, egypt, or greece. We can document and have the evolution of each of the myths, from the first evidence in anatolia, to the spread throughout the fertile crescent.
The fact that most muslim scholars support the story of mohammed against all historical evidence. The fact that most christian scholars support the story of jesus against the historical evidence. And the fact that most jewish scholars support the existence of each of the characters and events, despite the evidence, tells us nothing. Truth is not determined by democracy, or by opinion, nor by historical authorship, but by evidence that survives falsification of all of the above. Someone named jesus seems to have lived. However, the only evidence we have that does not have origin in other myths and religions, is (a) uprising at the temple, (b) prosecution, (c) crucifiction. EVERYTHING ELSE was intentionally imported from prior religions synthesizing Seneca the Younger’s Stoicism, Greek Neo Platonism (idealism)/Authoritarianism, and Jewish pro roman reformation authors. The origin of the ‘risen after three days’ is most interesting because it actually refers to the morning star which, in the jewish tradition, was not just Horace but Lucifer.
-
The Flip Side of Colonialism
October 9th, 2018 9:31 AM THE FLIP SIDE OF COLONIALISM
- Colonialism was a profound if not most profound good since the invention of farming – we dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, disease, hard labor, child mortality, early death, suffering, tyranny, and subjectivity to the vicissitudes of nature – kicking and screaming all the while.
- Slavery was universal and whites were more frequently the subject of it (by muslims) than perpetrators of it. Whites are not malaria-immune but many blacks are. Whites have higher (hotter) metabolisms, and blacks don’t. Whites had to be taken from the criminal class. Africans were captured by other africans as prisoners of war in order to attempt to unify west african empires (which would have happened).
- Creating middle classes by resource exploitation, and selling manufactured (value added) goods to developing peoples was the only means possible of dragging the vast body of dirty, ignorant, superstitious, violent, poor, disease ridden, un-domesticated human animals out of of their condition, and reforming their societies incrementally until they themselves could create a middle class civilization capable of self governance without threat to more advanced civilizations.
Our failure was only in having the european civil wars and leaving our project incomplete. That failure led to the only significant problem of colonialism: (a) the failure to complete the replacement french despotism with english developmentalism. (b) the absence of the technology of fiat money credit that would have eliminated the need for gold and resource extraction. (c) the collapse left an opening for French Socialism, Jewish Communism, Islamic Fundamentalism. (d) the introduction of medicines and health science without the introduction of eugenics (birth control). (e) the failure of our investments in the third world which generally were too insubstantial to do other than delay or inhibit internal growth of demand. This meant that the warm weather colonies most able to produce high value goods (particularly sugar) with Africans, and therefore (a) had more survivors, (b) spread the genres of previously constrained peoples to new territories, (c) forcibly modernized both cultures, civilizations and Genes. And it was not ‘known’ that enslaved primitives were capable of civilized behavior at the time. It was only in the 19th century after the industrial revolution that we found that citizens were more profitable than serfs, were more profitable than slaves. I don’t ignore anything. I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job to expose and educate the ignorant, unable, sophomoric, and willingly deceptive. ã lol
-
No, The Abrahamic Dark Ages Are Something We Survived.
October 9th, 2018 7:47 PM NO, THE ABRAHAMIC DARK AGES ARE SOMETHING WE SURVIVED. [I] don’t make mistakes. It’s my job to not make the mistakes others have made, no matter how frequent. No, the abrahamic dark ages destroyed all the great civilizations of the ancient world. Yes, it was the combination of plague and raids that weakened the roman empire. Yes it was the byzantine conquest of the west, and violent imposition of christianity that prevented the west’s restoration. Yes, islam destroyed all the mediterranean trade routes which vastly reduced trade. But Islam could not cross the sahara well, could not displace hinduism in india, the chinese would have none of it as they still will not, and by the time the muslims made it into europe by the eastern route they had so exhausted the capital of all the great civilizations and reduced them to dysgenia and ignorance that they could not adapt to and compete with modernity. The abrahamic dark ages destroyed every one of the great civilizations – all of them. We were just lucky in europe to SURVIVE THEM thanks to the north’s revolt against the corruption and nepotism of the church, and a reserve of northern peoples late to forcible conversion. We are currently in the second abrahamic dark age, and the second counter-reveolution against western civilization: Rousseau > Kant > Marx/Freud/Boas/Cantor/Adorno > the french postmodernists and feminists. This abrahamic dark age is just using pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and outright denialism to accomplish in the modern world (manufacturing of ignorance, spreading a cult of economic and political promise, forcing immigration and displacement) that were practiced in the ancient world using sophomoric supernaturalism. ( I answered colonialism in another post: www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156694322992264 ) I don’t expect other peoples to thank us for dragging them kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, child mortality, early death, disease, and the vicissitudes of nature, but then I don’t expect them to lie to me and cast our forcible lifting of them from semi animal state in to modernity – whether I in the greco-roman world or this anglo-germanic one. We had, at least until Burke, hoped the rest of mankind was able to join the aristocracy but they have not. And the 20th century was an interesting but failed experiment. This is why authoritarian governments are returning now that the USA as the inheritor of the british empire can no longer pay them for their conformity to the anglo empire. We return to nation states, nationalism, national socialism, and managerial government. The rest of the people of the world are insufficiently developed to operate by rule of law of reciprocity (natural law). They need their falsehoods. Just as you need yours. Cheers.
-
No, The Abrahamic Dark Ages Are Something We Survived.
October 9th, 2018 7:47 PM NO, THE ABRAHAMIC DARK AGES ARE SOMETHING WE SURVIVED. [I] don’t make mistakes. It’s my job to not make the mistakes others have made, no matter how frequent. No, the abrahamic dark ages destroyed all the great civilizations of the ancient world. Yes, it was the combination of plague and raids that weakened the roman empire. Yes it was the byzantine conquest of the west, and violent imposition of christianity that prevented the west’s restoration. Yes, islam destroyed all the mediterranean trade routes which vastly reduced trade. But Islam could not cross the sahara well, could not displace hinduism in india, the chinese would have none of it as they still will not, and by the time the muslims made it into europe by the eastern route they had so exhausted the capital of all the great civilizations and reduced them to dysgenia and ignorance that they could not adapt to and compete with modernity. The abrahamic dark ages destroyed every one of the great civilizations – all of them. We were just lucky in europe to SURVIVE THEM thanks to the north’s revolt against the corruption and nepotism of the church, and a reserve of northern peoples late to forcible conversion. We are currently in the second abrahamic dark age, and the second counter-reveolution against western civilization: Rousseau > Kant > Marx/Freud/Boas/Cantor/Adorno > the french postmodernists and feminists. This abrahamic dark age is just using pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and outright denialism to accomplish in the modern world (manufacturing of ignorance, spreading a cult of economic and political promise, forcing immigration and displacement) that were practiced in the ancient world using sophomoric supernaturalism. ( I answered colonialism in another post: www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156694322992264 ) I don’t expect other peoples to thank us for dragging them kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, child mortality, early death, disease, and the vicissitudes of nature, but then I don’t expect them to lie to me and cast our forcible lifting of them from semi animal state in to modernity – whether I in the greco-roman world or this anglo-germanic one. We had, at least until Burke, hoped the rest of mankind was able to join the aristocracy but they have not. And the 20th century was an interesting but failed experiment. This is why authoritarian governments are returning now that the USA as the inheritor of the british empire can no longer pay them for their conformity to the anglo empire. We return to nation states, nationalism, national socialism, and managerial government. The rest of the people of the world are insufficiently developed to operate by rule of law of reciprocity (natural law). They need their falsehoods. Just as you need yours. Cheers.
-
LIBERALISM VS ABSOLUTISM As usual, the study of Philosophy is almost always used
LIBERALISM VS ABSOLUTISM
As usual, the study of Philosophy is almost always used as simply a reformation of the study of Theology. In that sense, it’s a sophism of the pre-scientific period, or a pseudoscience in the present.
1 – Morality (rules of good (non-retaliatory), and bad (retaliatory) display word and deed)
(a) morality can refer to objective (reciprocal) as in international conflict and law, (b) traditional (contextual) as in civilizational/national/political rules in favor of group evolutionary strategy, (c)normative (contextual) as in class, locality, and disciplinary in favor of social political and commercial cooperation, (d) conflated with legal (which is common). In all cases, from intuition, to norm, to law, all moral rules reflect the incentives and rewards necessary in the given competitive order.
2 – Liberalism (european), Classical Liberalism(american), Conservatism(Anglo) (center-right) vs Anarchism(jewish), Libertinism(Jewish), Libertarianism(anglo/continental) (center-Left),
(a) the purpose of tolerating liberalism is to generate increasing revenues because those revenues increase the state (authoritarian) power, just as the purpose of tolerating theology is to decrease costs and increased revenue through discounts on the cost of suppression.
(b) the problem with authoritarian regimes is that the bureaucracy not the authority ends up ruling, maximizing rents, and consuming the profits that make externalization of power possible.
(c) the problem
(…) 50 more examples here I won’t waste my time on.
CONCLUDING
Liberalism (market society) isn’t beneficial because it is moral, or because it’s ‘legitimate’ in someone’s mind, but because it is the cheapest means of producing COMPETITIVE POWER at the lowest administrative cost, with the greatest opportunity to suppress rents, providing the rulers with the greatest opportunity to exert power.
Democracy is rather ridiculous and certainly a failed experiment outside of producing a constantly rotating senate (oligarchy), and monarchy is clearly superior at the conduct of war and the production of durable commons. But liberalism is simply a scheme for reaping the highest returns from the population given that money, prices, and markets allow the population to be self governing, and corruption limited and inexpensive.
The problem with absolutism is that it’s highly error prone at the expense of easy replacement by Regicide – usually by the Regent’s own family. The problem with non-kin absolutism (corporatism), is that it sorts for the most malincentivized leadership.
The optimum government is one that, like the roman, concentrates power for war, and redistributes power for normal times, and redistributes income from windfalls.
The search for monopoly is merely the naive and not very bright youthful mind searching for that which it can comprehend.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 09:19:00 UTC
-
WHY WHITE PRIVILEGE? HERE IS THE CORRECT ANSWER: THE ECONOMICS OF ASSOCIATION IN
WHY WHITE PRIVILEGE? HERE IS THE CORRECT ANSWER: THE ECONOMICS OF ASSOCIATION IN HETEROGENEOUS POLITIES
It’s because ethnic europeans, particularly northern europeans, largely because of geography and culture came out of the dark ages first, had the enlightenment first, developed the first fully middle class civilization first, and did so both genetically, culturally, and institutionally, by using militias due to weak central governments, individual sovereignty because of militias, rule of law not rule by discretion, manorialism’s suppression of underclass rates of reproduction, and by aggressive hanging of criminal population for 1000 years, and as a consequence producing the highest trust society, with the highest trust population.
So, in commerce and politics ethnic europeans have obtained a premium for their (earned) reputation for relative trustworthiness and work ethic (middle class public behavior), and they preserve the premium through intergenerational transfer of those habits, norms, traditions, and values.
The problem is that high trust polities and a ‘deserved’ reputation for high trust is extremely expensive and no other people so far have been able to produce it except the Japanese and Koreans. This is the reason for the west’s higher standard of living.
The rest is due to demographic distributions, meaning that the vast majority of ethnic europeans are within one degree of the genetic middle class (meaning that they can learn to use technology independently by reading), whereas the vast majority of peoples who complain about the reputational advantage of ethnic europeans are from groups with historically larger underclasses, and therefore, lower medians, where cultural norms are determined by the median, and we are all judged by ‘averages (median) of our group”. Why? Because stereotypes are the most accurate measurement in the social sciences. They are verified or falsified every day in ever personal interaction.
We are all punished for (experience discounts), and privileged for (experience premiums) our identities: manners, ethics, morals, habits, body language, hygiene, speech pattern, vocabulary, dress, fitness, and everything else.
To lose your discount or gain a premium, change your group’s sexual, social, economic, intellectual, and market value, by changing your group’s demographics, habits, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, values, rituals so that they are ALSO middle class (market) rather than whatever tradition you come from. it’s not complicated. Before the 1964 immigration act, everyone who came to america did it.
The lesson is that people are not scarce. Individuals are not special.Humans by and large are a commodity. There are, if anything, far too many of us. People must work hard to find some way of providing value to others so that they are useful in the marketplace for sexual, social, economic, political cooperation. And because value is rare, and people are not scarce, all people are careful in making the best investments that they can. And they invest in what they can see.
Hence why jews and asians do better than ethnic europeans in american university acceptance, but no one criticizes them. While whites are criticized daily, and experience reverse discrimination in the academy, politics, and the media, while preserving their economic advantage in the work place, and their social status.
So, it’s not a privilege, it’s a cultural premium for 1350 years of suppression of underclass reproduction and downward expansion of the middle class. And training your children to do what is uncomfortable in order to obtain long term benefits of conforming to middle class behaviors.
And it’s almost impossible to alter for that reason.
People from other cultures or ethnicities assume white identity is arbitrary but it is merely the universal adaptation of middle class market behavior on a civilizational scale.
Join the middle class by acting as middle class, and getting others with your identity to act middle class. It’s not complicated, but it’s terribly difficult, which is why so few cultures can do it without many generations of middle class civilization.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 00:27:00 UTC