Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • “CURT: HOW CAN I UNDERSTAND STOICISM?”— Well there are a number of implied que

    —“CURT: HOW CAN I UNDERSTAND STOICISM?”—

    Well there are a number of implied questions in there.

    1) Do you mean so that you understand why I say it is superior to religion for the purpose of building mindfulness?

    2) Do you want to learn how and why it functions scientifically?

    3) Do you want to improve your own view of life (very hard to imagine anyone who follows me has that kind of issue, but maybe)

    4) Do you want to solve a problem in your life or others?

    So, here is a series that takes you through the ‘Adult Version” from scientific through literary, to statistical.

    BOOK LIST

    SCIENTIFIC VIEW “Stoic Philosophy as Rational and Cognitive Psychotherapy ” This is the closest book to the science of stoicism that I know of: https://www.amazon.com/Philosophy-Cognitive-Behavioural-Therapy-Psychotherapy/dp/1855757567

    CURATIVE (NEGATIVE) VIEW “Build Your Resistance” This takes the idea and puts it into practice: https://www.amazon.com/Build-Your-Resilience-Survive-Situation/dp/1444168711/

    AMPLYFYING (POSITIVE) VIEW “A Guide to the Good Life” https://www.amazon.com/Guide-Good-Life-Ancient-Stoic/dp/0195374614

    BIOGRAPHICAL (EXAMPLE) VIEW: Everyone recommends reading The Meditations of Aurelius as EVIDENCE that a great and powerful man used the practice every day in his diary. The alternative to (or supplement to) reading his book is THINK LIKE A ROMAN EMPEROR: https://www.amazon.com/How-Think-Like-Roman-Emperor/dp/1250196620 which walks you thru the great man’s life and puts context to his writings. For me it was actually The Letters of Michel de Montaigne (a christianized jew) that gave me an intellectual role model. So I recommend that as well.

    POLITICAL VIEW: Same for Machiavelli’s “The Prince” which i consider the first book on political science precisely because it is a work of stoic mindfulness.

    STATISTICAL VIEW: While it isn’t positioned this way, both BLACK SWAN (Unpredictable Outliers are Far More Important Than Daily Noise) and ANTI-FRAGILE (“That which doesn’t kill you makes you stronger, and stronger, and stronger”) are effectively works on Stoicism for smart people.

    ==== COMMENTARY ===

    So, if you’re a high-iq aspie you’re a stoic by nature. Why? Um. We don’t have all those social fears because we frankly can’t feel any of them. lol. And we kind of think they’re silly. However, we are often ‘ostracized’ when young and have to find out how to fit in. So we have the opposite problem. My family – at least on my mother’s side (french) is just naturally stoic. So my interest in stoicism is political, and because of that scientific.

    So, I can recommend books to normies, but for geeks who need the scientific approach (who are naturally predisposed to resist suggestion) it’s actually pretty hard find a book to recommend – because most stoic reading is framed as self help.

    Stoicism isn’t framed as “Hey, between stoicism and nature, hero, deity worship (‘thanks’), and public ritual and festival (safety in the pack or herd), this set of practices was the collective constitution of our ancient religion”. It’s just that we didn’t IMPOSE that religion as did the monotheists, and didn’t write it down as a LAW. Same for our entire philosophy of western civilization (which is what I have tried to do.)

    We didn’t say: “Military service, particularly in formations, requires you develop stoicism in order to survive and thrive under the stresses of it all”. So between the necessity of military mindfulness, and the utility of applying that mindfulness to the even more chaotic social order our aristocratic ancestors converted the techniques into a standard method of education. They didn’t call it religion but philosophy.

    So there are people who want self-help so that they can self author (Develop Mindfulness). And there are people who want to understand WHY self help (self authoring) serves the function of rational self training vs the rituals and myths of the supernatural in GROUP form.

    Stoicism consists of cognitive behavioral therapy in the negative sense, and simply education and training in the positive sense. I consider it ‘self authoring’. but that is because it is taught as an individual discipline rather than a ‘we’ as is religion. I find stoicism to be reducible to ‘don/t’ take it personally, Do your best, Tell the Truth. Keep your word’. The problem is that there are bigger human questions that we need mental defense against. Some people need a guide. Some people are self guided. Some people need to follow the herd as their guide. one way or the other CBT (cognitive behavioral therapy) to discipline the mind (Train) works.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-24 14:29:00 UTC

  • Origins of Militia Obligation

    October 23rd, 2018 3:27 PM ORIGINS OF MILITIA OBLIGATIONThe origins of military obligation in England and can be traced to the ‘common burdens’ of the Anglo-Saxon period, among which was service in the fyrd, or army. [T]here is evidence that such an obligation existed in the Kingdom of Kent by the end of the 7th century, Mercia in the 8th century and Wessex in the 9th century, and the Burghal Hidage of 911–919 indicates that over 27,000 men could have been raised in the defence of 30 West Saxon boroughs. In the late 10th century, areas began to be divided into ‘hundreds’ as units for the fyrd. The obligation to serve was placed on landholders, and the Domesday Book indicates that individuals were expected to serve for approximately 60 days. The Norman conquest of England in 1066 brought with it a feudal system which also contained an element of military obligation in the form of the feudal host. This system supplemented rather than replaced the fyrd, which continued to be deployed until at least the beginning of the 12th century. The Assize of Arms of 1181 combined the two systems by dividing the free population into four categories according to wealth and prescribing the weapons each was to maintain. The first category corresponded to the feudal host, the next two corresponded to the old fyrd and the last to a general levy. The Statute of Winchester in 1285 introduced two more non-feudal categories to impose a general military obligation on all able-bodied males, including non-free, between the ages of 15 and 60, and updated the prescribed weaponry in the light of developments in warfare at the time.[2][3] Because it was not practical to call out every man, King Edward I introduced a system whereby local gentry were authorised to conduct commissions of array to select those who would actually be called for military service

  • Origins of Militia Obligation

    October 23rd, 2018 3:27 PM ORIGINS OF MILITIA OBLIGATIONThe origins of military obligation in England and can be traced to the ‘common burdens’ of the Anglo-Saxon period, among which was service in the fyrd, or army. [T]here is evidence that such an obligation existed in the Kingdom of Kent by the end of the 7th century, Mercia in the 8th century and Wessex in the 9th century, and the Burghal Hidage of 911–919 indicates that over 27,000 men could have been raised in the defence of 30 West Saxon boroughs. In the late 10th century, areas began to be divided into ‘hundreds’ as units for the fyrd. The obligation to serve was placed on landholders, and the Domesday Book indicates that individuals were expected to serve for approximately 60 days. The Norman conquest of England in 1066 brought with it a feudal system which also contained an element of military obligation in the form of the feudal host. This system supplemented rather than replaced the fyrd, which continued to be deployed until at least the beginning of the 12th century. The Assize of Arms of 1181 combined the two systems by dividing the free population into four categories according to wealth and prescribing the weapons each was to maintain. The first category corresponded to the feudal host, the next two corresponded to the old fyrd and the last to a general levy. The Statute of Winchester in 1285 introduced two more non-feudal categories to impose a general military obligation on all able-bodied males, including non-free, between the ages of 15 and 60, and updated the prescribed weaponry in the light of developments in warfare at the time.[2][3] Because it was not practical to call out every man, King Edward I introduced a system whereby local gentry were authorised to conduct commissions of array to select those who would actually be called for military service

  • A Hard Concept to Internalize: Via-Negativa Lying

    October 23rd, 2018 10:08 AM A HARD CONCEPT TO INTERNALIZE: VIA-NEGATIVA LYING [S]cience and Law are via-negativa disciplines. We know truth by eliminating what is false. We know legal, ethical, moral, and good, by eliminating what is irreciprocal, unethical, immoral, criminal, and bad. Science is the means by which we perform due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, suggestion, fictionalism, and deceit – leaving only truth candidates remaining. So, when we say someone is LYING it does not require that they via-positiva relied upon intent. Instead, we require via-negativa, that we take involuntary responsibility for performing due diligence against spreading a falsehood suggestion or deceit. So via-negativa, someone is lying if they distribute a falsehood suggestion or deceit, regardless of whether they intend to. This is a higher standard of suppression of falsehood – one that is necessary to prevent the spread of falsehoods. Because we have been defeated once by the falsehood of monotheism, and the same people are trying to defeat us with mono-classism, and monopoly. We are the only people to create a market between classes and ideas, and everyone else produced a monopoly equalitarianism, or a monopoly hierarchy, rather than the markets that have made our successes possible. People always resist paying the costs of incremental increases in suppression of opportunity for free riding, conspiracy, deception, fraud, theft and violence, just as they resist paying all costs of creating and maintaining the commons: physical, normative, and informational. That does not mean that we are always and everywhere paying those costs in exchange for the most valuable commons we can produce: good information, truthful speech, the trust, economic velocity, and innovation that results from it. Because the only way a small, high-individual-investment, superior population can compete is by producing the economy necessary to pay for the superior technological means ( and arms) by which to compensate for their numbers. Cheers. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • A Hard Concept to Internalize: Via-Negativa Lying

    October 23rd, 2018 10:08 AM A HARD CONCEPT TO INTERNALIZE: VIA-NEGATIVA LYING [S]cience and Law are via-negativa disciplines. We know truth by eliminating what is false. We know legal, ethical, moral, and good, by eliminating what is irreciprocal, unethical, immoral, criminal, and bad. Science is the means by which we perform due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, suggestion, fictionalism, and deceit – leaving only truth candidates remaining. So, when we say someone is LYING it does not require that they via-positiva relied upon intent. Instead, we require via-negativa, that we take involuntary responsibility for performing due diligence against spreading a falsehood suggestion or deceit. So via-negativa, someone is lying if they distribute a falsehood suggestion or deceit, regardless of whether they intend to. This is a higher standard of suppression of falsehood – one that is necessary to prevent the spread of falsehoods. Because we have been defeated once by the falsehood of monotheism, and the same people are trying to defeat us with mono-classism, and monopoly. We are the only people to create a market between classes and ideas, and everyone else produced a monopoly equalitarianism, or a monopoly hierarchy, rather than the markets that have made our successes possible. People always resist paying the costs of incremental increases in suppression of opportunity for free riding, conspiracy, deception, fraud, theft and violence, just as they resist paying all costs of creating and maintaining the commons: physical, normative, and informational. That does not mean that we are always and everywhere paying those costs in exchange for the most valuable commons we can produce: good information, truthful speech, the trust, economic velocity, and innovation that results from it. Because the only way a small, high-individual-investment, superior population can compete is by producing the economy necessary to pay for the superior technological means ( and arms) by which to compensate for their numbers. Cheers. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • My Very Simple Scientific Technique and What I Have Learned from Religion

    October 23rd, 2018 6:54 AM MY VERY SIMPLE SCIENTIFIC TECHNIQUE AND WHAT I HAVE LEARNED FROM RELIGION [R]eligion is, surprisingly, the ‘hard problem’ of social science. Every other problem I have set out to solve (understand) has been trivial by comparison. Truth took me a year. The grammars took me less than six months. And those are very hard problems. Religion was much harder. I use a very simple (scientific) technique, that long-term followers know well, which is to attack a problem, causing other people to defend it, until I understand their incentives. This is a better method of research than reading what other authors opine (make excuses for or against.) I am trying to understand (better than I do now) why the the demand for the God (bad) and Jesus (good) mythos’ (they are different) persists among some people and groups and not others. I have begun to understand it better than I did. I understand (easily) why certain classes demand it. I have begun to understand the different weights different cultures attach to it. And I am ‘testing’ whether (I think correctly) it is simply a failure to provide mindfulness by non-nonsense means (and why governments would resist teaching a non-nonsense method of mindfulness). Mostly what I have come to understand, is that people are ignorant of the available options and their intuitions have been so successfully trained by the one they already hold, that they cannot imagine training their intuitions by any other means. So (a) man needs mindfulness, and (b) and man needs mindfulness to different degrees, and (c) the mindfulness is dependent a bit on genetics of mindfulness (males less than females in general, and females more in general), (d) personality needs, (e) class circumstances, (f) cultural-political circumstances – all of which generate (or do not generate) demand for mindfulness. Now, that mindfulness can be provided by the Hindu Means (literary immersion), the three abrahamic monotheistic means (organized indoctrination) of low(islam), working(christian), and middle (jewish) religion; the buddhist means (training); the rather ‘new age/european’ (philosophy-as-religion-substitute) means; the shinto and ritual means (ritual); or by cognitive-behavioral education that we call ‘Stoicism’ for context. And there is a great deal to lean just from the ORDER of those methods of training: how much infrastructure is needed to preserve the ‘illusion’ of the mythos vs argument vs ritual vs education. And how much ‘ability’ given the means of training (immersion in hinduism through individual education in stoicism). But this is just a matter of WEALTH sufficient to pay for the means of TRAINING vs a given period of time: ie: producing the mass illusions of the ancient religions required an informational vulnerability (absence of knowledge and alternatives) that existed only in the past – and no longer does. So if one wants to produce a religion that is not made of lies, it is entirely possible to do so – with a total absence of religious parables. And instead, a reliance on parables of history, and training in the virtues. Christianity has a very simple set of underlying principles that are constituted in only four statements. Islam and judaism can also be, but to do so is horrifying. Christianity’s four statements are quite simple and will in general produce consequent goods. There is just no need to lie to people and train them to be vulnerable to lies, and train priests to lie, and politicians to lie by the same means in order to teach those four rules. No more lies by judaism, devolves into christianity, devolves into islam, evolves into marxism, postmodernism, feminism. No more lies. People need “imaginary friends, parents, leaders” for very well underst reasons: they have been failed by those around them, to provide positive socialization and training by existential means. We are able to teach truthful speech (science) and there is no reason we cannot provide positive socialization and training (mindfulness) by equally truthful means. Convergence on the Truth: continuous correspondence between reality perception cognition recollection description negotiation, and advocacy. Affections. -Curt

  • My Very Simple Scientific Technique and What I Have Learned from Religion

    October 23rd, 2018 6:54 AM MY VERY SIMPLE SCIENTIFIC TECHNIQUE AND WHAT I HAVE LEARNED FROM RELIGION [R]eligion is, surprisingly, the ‘hard problem’ of social science. Every other problem I have set out to solve (understand) has been trivial by comparison. Truth took me a year. The grammars took me less than six months. And those are very hard problems. Religion was much harder. I use a very simple (scientific) technique, that long-term followers know well, which is to attack a problem, causing other people to defend it, until I understand their incentives. This is a better method of research than reading what other authors opine (make excuses for or against.) I am trying to understand (better than I do now) why the the demand for the God (bad) and Jesus (good) mythos’ (they are different) persists among some people and groups and not others. I have begun to understand it better than I did. I understand (easily) why certain classes demand it. I have begun to understand the different weights different cultures attach to it. And I am ‘testing’ whether (I think correctly) it is simply a failure to provide mindfulness by non-nonsense means (and why governments would resist teaching a non-nonsense method of mindfulness). Mostly what I have come to understand, is that people are ignorant of the available options and their intuitions have been so successfully trained by the one they already hold, that they cannot imagine training their intuitions by any other means. So (a) man needs mindfulness, and (b) and man needs mindfulness to different degrees, and (c) the mindfulness is dependent a bit on genetics of mindfulness (males less than females in general, and females more in general), (d) personality needs, (e) class circumstances, (f) cultural-political circumstances – all of which generate (or do not generate) demand for mindfulness. Now, that mindfulness can be provided by the Hindu Means (literary immersion), the three abrahamic monotheistic means (organized indoctrination) of low(islam), working(christian), and middle (jewish) religion; the buddhist means (training); the rather ‘new age/european’ (philosophy-as-religion-substitute) means; the shinto and ritual means (ritual); or by cognitive-behavioral education that we call ‘Stoicism’ for context. And there is a great deal to lean just from the ORDER of those methods of training: how much infrastructure is needed to preserve the ‘illusion’ of the mythos vs argument vs ritual vs education. And how much ‘ability’ given the means of training (immersion in hinduism through individual education in stoicism). But this is just a matter of WEALTH sufficient to pay for the means of TRAINING vs a given period of time: ie: producing the mass illusions of the ancient religions required an informational vulnerability (absence of knowledge and alternatives) that existed only in the past – and no longer does. So if one wants to produce a religion that is not made of lies, it is entirely possible to do so – with a total absence of religious parables. And instead, a reliance on parables of history, and training in the virtues. Christianity has a very simple set of underlying principles that are constituted in only four statements. Islam and judaism can also be, but to do so is horrifying. Christianity’s four statements are quite simple and will in general produce consequent goods. There is just no need to lie to people and train them to be vulnerable to lies, and train priests to lie, and politicians to lie by the same means in order to teach those four rules. No more lies by judaism, devolves into christianity, devolves into islam, evolves into marxism, postmodernism, feminism. No more lies. People need “imaginary friends, parents, leaders” for very well underst reasons: they have been failed by those around them, to provide positive socialization and training by existential means. We are able to teach truthful speech (science) and there is no reason we cannot provide positive socialization and training (mindfulness) by equally truthful means. Convergence on the Truth: continuous correspondence between reality perception cognition recollection description negotiation, and advocacy. Affections. -Curt

  • Here Is how They Destroyed Our Civilization…

    October 23rd, 2018 4:48 PM IT’S NOT JUST THE 19TH – HERE IS HOW THEY DESTROYED OUR CIVILIZATION BY DESTROYING OUR UNIQUENESS: MERITOCRATIC, HIGH TRUST NORMS, LAWS, AND INSTITUTIONS. THIS IS HOW IT WAS DONE: They: 1) increased the voting pool, then 2) used immigration, to sink the pool, then 3) used the sunk voting pool to stack the court (left), then 4) funding selected cases before the courts to overthrow the constitution by legislation from the bench – what could not be achieved by pursuading the population to vote. 5) Added women to the work force, then consumed all female generated taxes for redistribution, and forcibly redistributed middle class reproduction to the lower classes, underclasses, and third world immigrants. 6) Using forced integration (immigration act), and then forced relocation (johnson,clinton,obama), and then unregulated immigration to undermine the high trust norms developed over centuries. 7) This is before we address the financialization of the economy and the extraction of retirement and reproduction from the middle classes, or both spending down accumulated intergenerational capital, and borrowing against future production within the same (Boomer) generation. VOTING 1 – white single women are the only defectors from any group 2 – if women had never had the vote, we never would have had a liberal president 3 – women originally defended against marxism (male labor), but were converted by postmodernism (female labor) 4 – *white single women are the primary customers of the Postmodern Academy (pseudosciences and literature), Market Economy via Hyper Consumption of signals (70% of consumer spending), and Virtue Signaling (political) marketplaces. WHY IT MATTERS Without white women exclusively defecting, none of the cultural divisiveness would have occurred, and the end of western civilization as the only high trust policy outside of east asia – and the only civil society to survive. THE LEFT’S SCRIPT They followed the soviet script for moving low trust russians into baltic, eastern european and european high trust populations in order to undermine the high trust norms of europeans such that they would be obedient as Russians who had only been free of serfdom (slavery) for a generation, had no middle class, no middle class norms, and no traditions necessary for the voluntary organization of innovation, investment, production distribution and trade, thereby generating DEMAND FOR STATE CONTROL of every aspect of society. UNDERMINING THE AMENDMENTS The 14th (Federal Dominion over States) The 15th (Race color condition – eliminating segregation) The 17th (Senators by popular vote – eliminating state government power) The 19th (By Sex – eliminating the male-female compromise of the meritocracy of one family one vote ) The 24th (By Poll Tax – eliminating even the lowest contribution and and property requirements) The 26th (By 18 yrs – eliminating all life experience requirements.) UNDERSTANDING THIS LIST OF ‘LEGISLATION FROM THE BENCH IN MATTERS OF NORMS’ https://en.wikipedia.org/…/List_of_landmark_court… AND IN PARTICULAR Brown v. Board of Education (1954) “Separate is not equal” Cooper v. Aaron (1958) Holding: States cannot nullify decisions of the federal courts. Engel v. Vitale (1962) Holding: School initiated-prayer in the public school system violates the First Amendment. Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) Holding: Colleges and universities have a legitimate interest in promoting diversity. New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) Holding: In order to prove libel, a public official must show that what was said against them was made with actual malice. Zelma v. Simmons-Harris (2002) Holding: Certain school voucher programs are constitutional. UNIQUENESS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION: Who, on this earth, other than property owning western males, has the agency to preserve nomocracy (rule of law)? What evidence do we have that ANYONE ELSE has the agency to produce or preserve rule of law? NO ONE. AGENCY IS A SCARCITY AND ONLY WESTERN MAN PRODUCED IT. BECAUSE ONLY WESTERN MAN WAS REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE MERIT AND SPEAK THE TRUTH REGARDLESS OF THE COST TO THE DOMINANCE HIERARCHY.

  • Here Is how They Destroyed Our Civilization…

    October 23rd, 2018 4:48 PM IT’S NOT JUST THE 19TH – HERE IS HOW THEY DESTROYED OUR CIVILIZATION BY DESTROYING OUR UNIQUENESS: MERITOCRATIC, HIGH TRUST NORMS, LAWS, AND INSTITUTIONS. THIS IS HOW IT WAS DONE: They: 1) increased the voting pool, then 2) used immigration, to sink the pool, then 3) used the sunk voting pool to stack the court (left), then 4) funding selected cases before the courts to overthrow the constitution by legislation from the bench – what could not be achieved by pursuading the population to vote. 5) Added women to the work force, then consumed all female generated taxes for redistribution, and forcibly redistributed middle class reproduction to the lower classes, underclasses, and third world immigrants. 6) Using forced integration (immigration act), and then forced relocation (johnson,clinton,obama), and then unregulated immigration to undermine the high trust norms developed over centuries. 7) This is before we address the financialization of the economy and the extraction of retirement and reproduction from the middle classes, or both spending down accumulated intergenerational capital, and borrowing against future production within the same (Boomer) generation. VOTING 1 – white single women are the only defectors from any group 2 – if women had never had the vote, we never would have had a liberal president 3 – women originally defended against marxism (male labor), but were converted by postmodernism (female labor) 4 – *white single women are the primary customers of the Postmodern Academy (pseudosciences and literature), Market Economy via Hyper Consumption of signals (70% of consumer spending), and Virtue Signaling (political) marketplaces. WHY IT MATTERS Without white women exclusively defecting, none of the cultural divisiveness would have occurred, and the end of western civilization as the only high trust policy outside of east asia – and the only civil society to survive. THE LEFT’S SCRIPT They followed the soviet script for moving low trust russians into baltic, eastern european and european high trust populations in order to undermine the high trust norms of europeans such that they would be obedient as Russians who had only been free of serfdom (slavery) for a generation, had no middle class, no middle class norms, and no traditions necessary for the voluntary organization of innovation, investment, production distribution and trade, thereby generating DEMAND FOR STATE CONTROL of every aspect of society. UNDERMINING THE AMENDMENTS The 14th (Federal Dominion over States) The 15th (Race color condition – eliminating segregation) The 17th (Senators by popular vote – eliminating state government power) The 19th (By Sex – eliminating the male-female compromise of the meritocracy of one family one vote ) The 24th (By Poll Tax – eliminating even the lowest contribution and and property requirements) The 26th (By 18 yrs – eliminating all life experience requirements.) UNDERSTANDING THIS LIST OF ‘LEGISLATION FROM THE BENCH IN MATTERS OF NORMS’ https://en.wikipedia.org/…/List_of_landmark_court… AND IN PARTICULAR Brown v. Board of Education (1954) “Separate is not equal” Cooper v. Aaron (1958) Holding: States cannot nullify decisions of the federal courts. Engel v. Vitale (1962) Holding: School initiated-prayer in the public school system violates the First Amendment. Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) Holding: Colleges and universities have a legitimate interest in promoting diversity. New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) Holding: In order to prove libel, a public official must show that what was said against them was made with actual malice. Zelma v. Simmons-Harris (2002) Holding: Certain school voucher programs are constitutional. UNIQUENESS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION: Who, on this earth, other than property owning western males, has the agency to preserve nomocracy (rule of law)? What evidence do we have that ANYONE ELSE has the agency to produce or preserve rule of law? NO ONE. AGENCY IS A SCARCITY AND ONLY WESTERN MAN PRODUCED IT. BECAUSE ONLY WESTERN MAN WAS REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE MERIT AND SPEAK THE TRUTH REGARDLESS OF THE COST TO THE DOMINANCE HIERARCHY.

  • IT’S NOT JUST THE 19TH – HERE IS HOW THEY DESTROYED OUR CIVILIZATION BY DESTROYI

    IT’S NOT JUST THE 19TH – HERE IS HOW THEY DESTROYED OUR CIVILIZATION BY DESTROYING OUR UNIQUENESS: MERITOCRATIC, HIGH TRUST NORMS, LAWS, AND INSTITUTIONS.

    THIS IS HOW IT WAS DONE:

    They:

    1) increased the voting pool, then

    2) used immigration, to sink the pool, then

    3) used the sunk voting pool to stack the court (left), then

    4) funding selected cases before the courts to overthrow the constitution by legislation from the bench – what could not be achieved by pursuading the population to vote.

    5) Added women to the work force, then consumed all female generated taxes for redistribution, and forcibly redistributed middle class reproduction to the lower classes, underclasses, and third world immigrants.

    6) Using forced integration (immigration act), and then forced relocation (johnson,clinton,obama), and then unregulated immigration to undermine the high trust norms developed over centuries.

    7) This is before we address the financialization of the economy and the extraction of retirement and reproduction from the middle classes, or both spending down accumulated intergenerational capital, and borrowing against future production within the same (Boomer) generation.

    VOTING

    1 – *white single women are the only defectors from any group*

    2 – *if women had never had the vote, we never would have had a liberal president*

    3 – *women originally defended against marxism (male labor), but were converted by postmodernism (female labor)*

    4 – *white single women are the primary customers of the Postmodern Academy (pseudosciences and literature), Market Economy via Hyper Consumption of signals (70% of consumer spending), and Virtue Signaling (political) marketplaces.

    WHY IT MATTERS

    Without white women exclusively defecting, none of the cultural divisiveness would have occurred, and the end of western civilization as the only high trust policy outside of east asia – and the only civil society to survive.

    THE LEFT’S SCRIPT

    They followed the soviet script for moving low trust russians into baltic, eastern european and european high trust populations in order to undermine the high trust norms of europeans such that they would be obedient as Russians who had only been free of serfdom (slavery) for a generation, had no middle class, no middle class norms, and no traditions necessary for the voluntary organization of innovation, investment, production distribution and trade, thereby generating DEMAND FOR STATE CONTROL of every aspect of society.

    UNDERMINING THE AMENDMENTS

    The 14th (Federal Dominion over States)

    The 15th (Race color condition – eliminating segregation)

    The 17th (Senators by popular vote – eliminating state government power)

    The 19th (By Sex – eliminating the male-female compromise of the meritocracy of one family one vote )

    The 24th (By Poll Tax – eliminating even the lowest contribution and and property requirements)

    The 26th (By 18 yrs – eliminating all life experience requirements.)

    UNDERSTANDING THIS LIST OF ‘LEGISLATION FROM THE BENCH IN MATTERS OF NORMS’

    https://en.wikipedia.org/…/List_of_landmark_court…

    AND IN PARTICULAR

    Brown v. Board of Education (1954) “Separate is not equal”

    Cooper v. Aaron (1958) Holding: States cannot nullify decisions of the federal courts.

    Engel v. Vitale (1962) Holding: School initiated-prayer in the public school system violates the First Amendment.

    Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) Holding: Colleges and universities have a legitimate interest in promoting diversity.

    New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) Holding: In order to prove libel, a public official must show that what was said against them was made with actual malice.

    Zelma v. Simmons-Harris (2002) Holding: Certain school voucher programs are constitutional.

    UNIQUENESS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION:

    Who, on this earth, other than property owning western males, has the agency to preserve nomocracy (rule of law)? What evidence do we have that ANYONE ELSE has the agency to produce or preserve rule of law?

    NO ONE.

    AGENCY IS A SCARCITY AND ONLY WESTERN MAN PRODUCED IT. BECAUSE ONLY WESTERN MAN WAS REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE MERIT AND SPEAK THE TRUTH REGARDLESS OF THE COST TO THE DOMINANCE HIERARCHY.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-23 16:48:00 UTC