Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • “Q: CURT, WHY ARE YOU A POMPOUS ASS?” —“Anyway you’re obviously smart, why do

    “Q: CURT, WHY ARE YOU A POMPOUS ASS?”

    —“Anyway you’re obviously smart, why do you act like a pompous ass and start argument over petty topics/small fb pages?”—

    (Because, “if you want to catch a mouse, make a sound like cheese.”)

    THIS IS WHY:

    The Method to The Appearance of Madness

    (An Opus for the Newbies and Normies)

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156979886192264

    SHORT VERSION

    Because (a) controversy is more interesting than discourse which any tv producer will tell you. (b) interest draws attention for reasons I’ve stated in the post above, (c) the king of the hill game requires me creating ‘bait’ by being a ‘pompous ass’. (d) filtering and educating men is best done by this competition because fools, intellectually dishonest, and the like cannot survive that competition, and can’t stand it. (e) it allows me to recruit the smartest people and leave behind the dim and dishonest.

    I mean. I’m a very smart guy. I do things for what are usually very deliberate reasons. I learned how to teach men who have potential. Filter out those that do not.

    And that’s what I do.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-11 17:45:00 UTC

  • OUR TRIBES AND PACKS MUST WORK TOGETHER TOWARD A SHARED END: OUR SURVIVAL Look.

    OUR TRIBES AND PACKS MUST WORK TOGETHER TOWARD A SHARED END: OUR SURVIVAL

    Look. It’s just reciprocity. Don’t swing at me and mine. It’s not complicated. I don’t swing at others unless they swing first …. or say something so stupid it’s incomprehensible to me (Peterson on “Darwinian Truth” or Taleb on “IQ”… omfg., or basically whenever (((anyone))) in the libertine movement makes and excuse for high fraud.).

    I stated my vision again yesterday. And I’ll state it more clearly here:

    Men form packs, and packs unite in tribes. They form tribes to concentrate forces behind leaders.

    Yet, there are only three means of coercion:

    1 – force vs defense,

    2 – payment vs missed payment,

    3 – and inclusion vs ostracization.

    So we form groups of:

    1 – Force (authoritarian, force),

    2 – Operation (rule of law and commerce, science), and

    3 – Morality (religion, moralism).

    These constitute the three political archetype of aggression, exchange, and boycott. We also seem to have adopted the GSRRM of the left (women’s strategy) which is undermining, and technically speaking that is an extension of boycott, moralizing, religion.

    And because of these three cognitive frameworks, we need leaders of each personality group, cognitive fram, leadership, and strategy. Because together we form a division of knowledge perception comprehension and labor.

    But here is what it will boil down to. The religious provide human shields (defense), the libertarians provide the communication, propaganda and supply, and the fascists fight. And as far as I know this is the history of how people work albeit with significant overlap. Something of this nature will evolve.

    The only thing that matters is that:

    A) we will restore some sort of authority rather than the chaos of the parasites against our people.

    B) we will restore a constitution and an political and bureaucratic system of policy by which our people are no longer preyed upon by.

    C) we will restore our religion to the status of a conditional monopoly since all religions contain morals, ethics, laws which are incompatible and lead only to middle eastern chaos and despotism.

    This is how it will be. Because this is how it must be.

    Nothing else is possible.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-11 16:12:00 UTC

  • THE MARKET FOR DECIDABILITY When the ordinary person fails he appeals to associa

    THE MARKET FOR DECIDABILITY

    When the ordinary person fails he appeals to associates.

    When associates fail he appeals to superiors

    When superiors fail he appeals to professionals

    When professionals fail the appeals to thought leaders.

    When instincts fail we appeal to familial ethics.

    When familial ethics fail we appeal to virtue ethics.

    When virtue ethics fail we appeal to rule ethics

    When rule ethics fail we appeal to outcome ethics.

    When intuition fails one must appeal to logic.

    When logic fails, one must appeal to empiricism.

    When empiricism fails one must appeal to operationalism.

    When operationalism fails one must appeal to limits scope and parsimony.

    When religion fails, one appeals to reason

    When reason fails one appeals to philosophy

    When philosophy fails, on appeals to science

    When science fails, one appeals to testimony.

    And the opposite is true.

    Why?

    We only have so much knowledge, and so much time, to satisfy the market for decidability in time for taking action.

    – Curt Doolittle

    – The Propertarian Institute.

    —-

    PS

    by Bill Joslin

    Incremental Disambiguation in one direction (from low to high investment)- Graceful failure in the other (from high to low cost) which explains why the later presents stronger incentives than the former.z

    —-

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-11 13:11:00 UTC

  • RELIGION: NO MORE LIES Here is another lie: LIE: –” The greatest artists were C

    RELIGION: NO MORE LIES

    Here is another lie:

    LIE:

    –“

    The greatest artists were Christian.

    The greatest architects were Christian.

    The greatest composers were Christian.

    The greatest explorers were Christian.

    The greatest philosophers were Christian.

    We are no longer Christian.

    Is it really any wonder why our culture is in such a dire state?

    “– Earl of Grey

    INSTEAD:

    –“

    The greatest artists were atheist

    The greatest architects were polytheist

    The greatest composers were Christian.

    The greatest explorers were polytheist

    The greatest philosophers were polytheist

    u dont know shit Earl of ((( )))

    “— Flo Facchi

    They were european, aryan, heathen when they produced socrates, plato, and aristotle, when they produced alexander, caesar, and the great roman peace.

    They were christian when they produced few arts, few letters, and few explorers.

    They were restored to aristotle ~1200ad and they produced the great law, the great arts, the great letters, the great architecture, the great explorers, and finally the great SCIENTISTS (aristotelians).

    Christianity is a semitic disease we survived. our natural religion is the militia, the law, the heart, our ancestors, the construction of commons, and truth before face.

    There is nothing good in christianity that was not there before it. And everything bad in christianity was not there before semitic lying by false promise, pilpul and critique were introduced to our people by those who invented the lie, and for whom lie is more useful than face, or truth: they who subjugate by lies.

    We germanized christianity. And under germanic thought we have nearly three times escaped the semitic lies. But the underclasses and women and priests always hold back our people from the cure. And because of those women and underclasses and priests and their folly we are conquered by our ancient enemy: the people who lie: the middle east.

    NO MORE LIES

    Christianity is reducible to this and nothing more:

    1) The habituation that life, nature, and the natural order are to be preserved from our impulses (that’s what ‘sacred’ means).

    2) the eradication of hatred from the human heart.

    3) the extension of kinship love to non-kin.

    4) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost,

    5) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.

    That differentiates christianity from any other religion only slightly.

    What differentiates the west from the west is not our religion, but our law: sovereignty and reciprocity, heroism and beauty, truth and duty, law and markets (competition) in all walks of life.

    We have always been a tripartite(3-4part) people: truth and law and power for the aristocracy, sovereignty, reciprocity and contract and markets for the middle class. Freedom, safety, and duty for the laboring classes, and administration, education, lies, fraud, and rent seeking by the priestly classes.

    Those who fight(aristocracy), those who pray (nobility/administer), those who trade (burghers), those who labor (craftsmen and laborers).

    NO MORE LIES. WE ESCAPED CHRISTIANITY.

    Do we need a religion? Yes.

    …(an heroic narrative for our people)

    Do we need temples? Yes.

    …(We need rituals to empathize with (‘commune with’) those great actors of history who were of archetypal example to us.)

    An oath? Yes.

    …(To the universe, nature, our heroes, ancestors, ourselves, our people, and all of our people yet to come)

    Rituals, feasts, and holidays? Yes.

    …(The elimination of our differences in status during ritual, feast and holiday)

    Some form of training that provides mindfulness? Yes.

    …(self authoring stoicism and associated practices)

    Some form of training in manners, ethics, morals, calculations (rwa), and skills of a trade? Yes.

    …( restoration of the church as the central means of education and restoration of financing to the church)

    Limits to those who would work against the interests of our people? Yes.

    …(the extension of Prohibition on falsehood and fraud from commerce to all walks of life: the commercial, financial, economic, legal, political, and pedagogical.)

    WE NEED TO FINISH THE RESTORATION OF OUR PEOPLE WHILE KEEPING THE FIVE RULES OF CHRISTIANITY.

    The five rules of christianity are the OPTIMUM in-group cooperative strategy producing the highest trust, most distributive, least predatory, most protective social order possible.

    Because of those five rules, and imitating the Archetype we call ‘jesus’ when interacting with each other in good faith,

    There are no gods but us. There are Archetypes we have made to help us understand how to act by imitation and role playing. There are supernormal heroes of history we have raised to archetypal status over centuries. There are heroes of history who we use as archetypes despite their humanity.

    But as far as we know, at present, we are the only gods in this universe.

    And the vast share of goodness created by man was created by the european, persian, indo-aryan, and east asian peoples, in a desperate attempt to drag the rest of humanity kicking and screaming out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, hard labor, suffering, disease, child mortality, early death, and the hostility of a nature uncaring for us.

    The semitic peoples have destroyed every people they have touched like a cancer destroys every cell it has touched. If you examine the list of dead gods, which means ‘exterminated peoples’, they are, nearly all, dead by the semitic people, or western people under semitic superstitious influence.

    We saved mankind in the ancient world, and we saved mankind in the modern world, – not because we were christian. But despite the fact that we were still sufficiently christian (meaning syrian, jewish).

    NO MORE LIES.

    Parables and lies are for children and the dim. Indoctrination into parables and lies for children causes infantilization of the mind. Hence our current generation that has been infantilized by the second wave of semitic ‘ideas’: marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and ‘denialism’.

    NO MORE LIES

    The “truth before all” is what made us great in both ancient and modern worlds.

    The truth is enough to save us from the second semitic dark age of ignorance, and death of our people under the influence of semitic lies.

    THE DEVIL WAS CUNNING:

    —“Judaism to undermine, christianity weaken, islam to conquer and destroy.”–

    This statement is the history of the past two thousand years.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-11 12:38:00 UTC

  • GETTING IT DONE My understanding of the current situation is that the previous g

    GETTING IT DONE

    My understanding of the current situation is that the previous generation of the alt right is dead, and that certain people need to disappear for progress to be made without them boat-anchoring everyone.

    There are, as always, three different clans that reflect the possible means of exercising power…

    authoritarian <–> market <-> religious

    … with overlap, and as in all things, that these clans have common genetic interests, but uncommon methods of achieving them.

    My preference is that this is the standard we all approach the clans with, and that we agree to fight the status quo from three angles. But that we do not try to determine which order is best, since all orders are necessary, to serve the three power structures, and the elites in each of the three power structures.

    The reality is that there are limited options available to us. And that those options will favor a legalistic solution as the lowest cost price of entry. That religion has zero hope of anything other than obtaining exclusivity, and that authority requires individuals to emerge capable of that roles – and we have none outside of the military.

    We have anglos (north and west) the anglo scots irish (the south), and the germans and the scandinavians (the center). The evidence is that of them, the only ones who fight and have military experience are the southerners. The germans never fight. The scandinavians are still cucks, and the anglos are too privileged to do much.

    We have a potential of going mainstream, while the religious can follow us if we gain momentum, they can do nothing on their own. All the authoritarians can do is form special forces (prosecutors of enemies) so to speak. That is all that can happen.

    Our (and my) position is that we are better off ‘leaving the alt right behind’ as a failed movement, and will gain normie cred if we either do so, distance ourselves from, or are ‘enemies’ of the hard right.

    This election is basically our last demographic and political chance so I am not terribly interested in pragmatisms.

    This sh-t has to get done.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-10 20:10:00 UTC

  • MORALITY AMORALITY CONFLICT DESPOTISM AND THE SOCIOPATHIC MIND. MORALITY Some ba

    MORALITY AMORALITY CONFLICT DESPOTISM AND THE SOCIOPATHIC MIND.

    MORALITY

    Some basis of morality either exists or it does not. The science, law, and logic say that such a thing is called reciprocity, and reciprocity within the bounds of proportionality, and outside of the bounds of proportionality exit is necessary for any disadvantaged party. And that prohibition on or unbearable cost of exit is the origin of conflict, fighting, and war.

    AMORALITY

    If no basis for morality exists, then all that is required is power to force whatever order upon people that is useful. This is a license for any and all for corruption at every level. In other worse, one has rule of law and decidability, or one has rule by man and authority.

    CONFLICT

    The evolution of the law has been a battle between corruption (rule by man) and morality (rule of law). Even socialism (rule by man) and capitalism (rule of law), and globalism (rule by men) and nationalism (rule of law), and representative democracy (rule by men), and direct democracy (rule of law) are simply various examples of a long standing battle between the moral men who produce and the immoral men to live by parasitism.

    DESPOTISM

    The despot’s argument: empower elites further in order to garner favor (suck up to more successful people). Seize power and opportunity at every opportunity. Incrementally exercise pent up envy, anger, hatred, in order to gain pleasure and relief.

    SOCIOPATHY

    Sociopaths use a well documented set of tactics. They are natural liars. They will choose to lie even if the truth is just as advantageous. And once you know how lies are constructed, by using suggestion to force appeal to intuition, then you are no longer vulnerable to liars.

    The Sociopath’s Mind:

    “I must dominate, rule, punish, harm”

    “I have had no achievements”

    “I have no resources”

    “I am not likable or desirable”

    “I cannot build a following nor participate in one”

    “I cannot build an organization nor participate in one”

    “I can only use deceit and cunning because of this”

    “I will use deceit and cunning to self promote at all times”

    “I will shift locations, alliances, positions, tactics, claims, anything, and deny anything else, in order to exercise my sociopathy and related rewards”

    This person will always favor despotism because it is in his interests. Because there is no other means by which those without merit can exercise any agency over those others they envy, despise, and hate.

    THAT IS A CHAIN OF REASONING.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-10 12:44:00 UTC

  • FEARFUL CONSERVATIVES: UNDERSTAND YOURSELVES MALE VS FEMALE The female mind fear

    FEARFUL CONSERVATIVES: UNDERSTAND YOURSELVES

    MALE VS FEMALE

    The female mind fears being alone and left behind. This drives the left. It is a herd behavior like all other herd animals. it drives demand for proportionality and equality. The male mind fears being alone and conquered. This drives the right. it is a pack behavior. It drives demand for meritocracy and pack position. Each of us demonstrates our position on the spectrum of minds from male and female.

    CONSERVATIVE FEAR

    Conservatism is a genetic predisposition to fear of systemic risk ( Enlarged Amygdala ). Neuroticism is a personality trait that makes all humans worry. Lack of agency incentivizes worry. Low Sexual, Social, Economic, Political and Military market value creates continuous rejection and reason to worry. Failure of the civil society, religion, and family in the face of second wave abrahamism (islamism, judaism, marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism) provide demonstrable reasons to worry. The extremes of fear produce schizotypal behavior as a consequence: paranoia, conspiracy, dread, powerlessness.

    DIVISION OF COGNITIVE AND EMOTIONAL LABOR

    Indoctrination in the fallacies of christian equality, equalitarian democracy, and leftist human equality of ability and value create illusion that we must all agree. In reality tripartism still exists and our ancient classes still exist, and those of us from the martial class that have been in warrior families for four thousand years or more, are very different from those of you who have been peasants or priestly or female for four thousand years or more.

    NON INTERFERENCE IS THE OPTIMUM SOLUTION

    And you who are fearful just need to not INTERFERE with the men and women who are not neurotic, not lacking agency, not lacking sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, and not fearful – but instead REVEL IN THE OPPORTUNITY FOR HEROIC ACHIEVEMENT in the model of our ancestors. You only matter in not hindering “Those who fight”. The rest of us not only don’t fear the fight. we are excited at the possibility of conflict; of heroic efforts in the service of our people; of punishing the enemies of our people; and of leaving a mark on history so that we are immortal in the memories of our descendants.

    THE STRONG DEFEND, CONQUER, AND RULE

    The rest are along for the ride. Be thankful.

    See Indo European Tripartism, or more recently The Three Orders: http://historyguide.org/ancient/lecture23b.html

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-10 07:48:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51535825_10156975647682264_636461270

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51535825_10156975647682264_636461270

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51535825_10156975647682264_6364612706233745408_o_10156975647677264.jpg WHAT’S WRONG WITH MATERIALISM? (MERIT IS TERRIFYING)

    What’s wrong with materialism is MERITOCRACY. Fictions, Supernaturalism, Sophism, Idealism, Pseudoscience and their conflations provide an alternative mental model in which one’s lower status and therefore mindfulness is not continuously challenged daily evidence in reality.

    If you are not capable of Truth then you are not capable of SOVEREIGNTY AND RECIPROCITY and therefore ‘say’.Bryan Nova Brey“Continuously challenged daily evidence in reality”

    This evolutionary pressure also shows up when speed limits are removed. Drivers and everyone who drives on or crosses a road is on extra high alert as mistakes made are likely fatal.

    I’d like to see a lot of societal evolutionary pressures to increase mindful awareness.

    Bringing back dueling would be another.

    Guillotine for corrupt politicians a third.

    Mindful awareness increases when reciprocity is strictly enforced.Feb 9, 2019, 6:29 PMWHAT’S WRONG WITH MATERIALISM? (MERIT IS TERRIFYING)

    What’s wrong with materialism is MERITOCRACY. Fictions, Supernaturalism, Sophism, Idealism, Pseudoscience and their conflations provide an alternative mental model in which one’s lower status and therefore mindfulness is not continuously challenged daily evidence in reality.

    If you are not capable of Truth then you are not capable of SOVEREIGNTY AND RECIPROCITY and therefore ‘say’.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 17:54:00 UTC

  • OUR LANGUAGES DETERMINE OUR ORGANIZATIONS OF RESISTANCE AND REBELLION Western pe

    OUR LANGUAGES DETERMINE OUR ORGANIZATIONS OF RESISTANCE AND REBELLION

    Western people have always been tripartite: Fight (rule), Pray (administer), Work (produce), and never developed semitic monopoly (submission to an abstraction).

    In our past we had celtic, anglo-saxon, and anglo-saxon-nordic of the common people, anglo-saxon (norman) french of the political class, and the latin and greek of the educated classes.

    We had the hearth religion of the common people, the christianity, aryanism and law of the political class, and the law, christianity and philosophy of the educated classes.

    When we developed the middle classes, we had the hearth religion of the common people, upward migration of participation into christianity and the law, upward participation participation of the middle and upper classes into law and philosophy, and the gradual exit of classes from christianity, leaving the academy as the survivor of the church, and the church a social group for the lower classes.

    This is because law is and philosophy are rational, and therefore problems calculable, and as division of labor increases, complexity arises, wealth is created, demand for consistent rules that limit bad behavior (risk) is amended by greater demand for adaptation, and needs to reason and calculate the continuous unknown in a world of continuous risk offset by continuously improving returns.

    All language consists of measurements(nouns, names) and operations(verbs, actions) resulting in calculations (statements, promises) which accumulate into transactions (sentences, paragraphs, arguments), that produce a contract for reciprocal consistency (meaning).

    Today we have islam and judaism for the enemy, christianity for those indoctrinated, a range of subjective moralizing for those not so (Gossiping, Shaming, Ridicule, Rallying), the combination of sophism, pseudoscience, and deceit in marxism,socialism, postmodernism, feminism, and anarchic denialism, for those indoctrinated by the academy, the allegorical use of literature by the academy, the archaic remnants of philosophical rationalism (the academic version of religion), the law in natural(right), limited(classical), and unlimited(left) forms, the pseudosciences (social) and sciences (physical.)

    We have many grammatical paradigms (vocabulary, rules of disambiguation into transactions that I call the ‘grammars’) for use across and within our classes, and with greater or less frequency in different regions, because of origins of regional peoples, and consequent internal migrations.

    THE HERD ALL SPEAKS THE SAME LANGUAGE. THE PACKS DON’T.

    JULY 22, 2018

    The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The more right (masculine) we intuit, the more we seek allies in a pack.

    Furthermore we choose our pack leaders, and we choose our packs, and our pack propaganda (signaling) and strategy (directness) by what we perceive as actionable and voluntary.

    And as such we form packs by class, and by class within age groups although they appear to be only younger(direct and tactical) and older(indirect and strategic) – as our energies (direct) and experience (indirect) warrant

    But whereas the left can be opportunistic, and the herd will follow opportunities. The right can be opportunistic, but will seize fewer opportunities, requiring more momentum and urgency for critical mass.

    And whereas the left herd follows opportunities they are opportunities against the right. Whereas the right packs seek only those opportunities to resist the left’s parasitism.

    So this is why I am still struggling with the Natsoc, WN, working classes – and for no reason. They need an opportunity to obtain what they want. But they can do nothing other than fight.

    So we are in a much harder position than the left. We are operating from a position of defense, and we have a harder time pulling together enough allies on critical mass, unless there is an event that provides possible movement for all.

    The herd all speaks the same language. The packs don’t.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 13:11:00 UTC

  • By: Bill Joslin (via Brandon Hayes ) There are missing distinctions in the criti

    By: Bill Joslin

    (via Brandon Hayes )

    There are missing distinctions in the criticisms of democracy.

    1) democracy in the anglo-sphere but not America, was a last resort offered to the polis before rebellion – a.proxy for violence. This decision being made during the restoration after the glorious rebellion etc (I’m sure you know this). It’s not, nor has it ever has been “the will of the people”.

    Data on voting intentions (the wishes of voter when voting) and the resulting legislation has never had an impact more than about 30% and only in the negative (about 30% of the time a legislation the voters do not want will be blocked, but in terms of policies they do want – the vote has no impact) – this compared to lobbying groups where up to 70% of the time they get what they seek in negative and about 30% in the positive. This means the social changes we are concerned about are not a result of the wishes of the voting public.

    2) there are many means in the American and British system from primaries to electoral vote which address the criticisms launched today at democracy – the “dumb voters trope” is false and based on strawmans.

    The failure of our systems isn’t due to democracy it’s due to the conflation not legislation with weight of law which creates a product which politicians sell to special interests – a market for parasitism.

    Democracy acts as the currency for those transactions. If we weren’t under democracy, this dynamic would persist with a different currency (this issue is law making not democracy).

    3) Daniel Roland Anderson has some good screen shots of how the original documents of America where explicitly ethnocentric.

    These legal documents didn’t prevent the dissolution of a homogeneous because, again, legislature can not be “under the rule of law” as.long as it makes law. This too isn’t a result of democracy but rather legislation being conflated with rule of law.

    We’ve corrected for this via testimonialism, but also by having a separation of judicial and legislative branches which the judiciary holding supremacy, and one law, natural law of reciprocity.

    We can correct the current problems via an alloy of kritocracy, stratocracy, aristocracy and democracy where aristocracy is constrained to via positiva commons creation, democracy to commons management, both of which are subservient and beholden to kritocracy, and stratocracy acts as the teeth for kritarchs (and can boycott if the kritarchs step out of line).

    So – nobles for development of commonly shared property and community services (via positiva commons), management teams to manage the commons via contract – both inferior too and with out the power of the judges and both under the rule of the judges, with a.militia to back the judges.

    If strict barriers exist within these four areas (judges can’t be generals, aristocrat can’t be judged etc) it prevents competition for power between these areas – it explicitly prevents a “product” that rules can “sell” without consequence.

    Modernity had way more correct than not and wasn’t so much wrong as incomplete. I find most fascist and aesthetics arguments against modernity to be strawmans. Monarchy alone, aristocracy alone did not pull humanity out of the Malthusian trap and away from discretionary rule – modernity did.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-08 23:49:00 UTC