Form: Mini Essay

  • It’s increasingly clear to me that the Grammars are as important an insight as i

    It’s increasingly clear to me that the Grammars are as important an insight as is Testimonial Truth, Propertarian Ethics, The Ternary Logic of Social Science.

    Why? Scientists, philosophers, logicians, mathematicians who don’t understand the foundations (grammars) of their disciplines.

    Scientists: It’s testimony on results after falsification of all available dimensions. The means of falsification are irrelevant.

    Philosophers: avoiding cost, actionability, informational asymmetry, and reciprocity creating unreality. Idealism is merely confession of ignorance. The majority of Philosophical terms and categories are dead because they were WRONG.

    Logicians: there is no closure, and logics are only falsificationary, you can’t prove anything without appeal to reality. Stop treating it as scriptural interpretation (hermeneutics).

    Mathematicians: it’s just a language of positional names limited by the grammar of ratios, meaning that positional names provide both perfect disambiguation by a single constant relation (position) and position can be used to generate endless names, so it is endlessly possible to describe constant relations, where the term pattern refers only to some set of constant relation. It’s not that math is unreasonably effective at describing constant relations it’s that it’s only possible for it to describe constant relations.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-30 11:35:00 UTC

  • THE CHRISTIAN DENOMINATIONS AND THEIR VARIATIONS Again, orthodoxy survived becau

    THE CHRISTIAN DENOMINATIONS AND THEIR VARIATIONS

    Again, orthodoxy survived because the church ‘minded its own business’ and did not as in the west, start with an attack on the aristocracy and seek to destroy it, but was imposed by the state as a means of governing (administering) the (ignorant) peasantry. The truth is that our pagan religions whether mediterranean, Atlantic, Germanic, Scandinavian, Slavic, or Finnic are far superior in mirroring reality than the semitic. But that the Jesus figure is certainly an ideal if we want to cooperate in large numbers across families, clans, tribes and nations. Not how Orthodoxy emphasizes god (the community), Catholicism Church Dogma (political), and Protestantism the life of Jesus(Personal). It’s fascinating that the religion managed to specialize for what was needed for each. However, only orthodoxy (god, community, organized religion), and evangelical protestantism (Jesus personal, folk religion) will survive, and that catholicism (political) has devolved into money-seeking traitor to european civilization and now selling indulgences to the superstitious underclasses.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-29 13:40:00 UTC

  • YES A GOOD RELIGION IS POSSIBLE – WE HAD THEM I’m definitely anti theology, but

    YES A GOOD RELIGION IS POSSIBLE – WE HAD THEM

    I’m definitely anti theology, but not anti ‘religion’ in the ancient sense of myth(heroism, tragedy), ritual(sacrifice, debt payment), Oath, feast, sport, and festival, but in addition we require mindfulness as anonymity increases so the stoic-epicurean(science) vs buddhist (nonsense) methods are both superior to the semitic (self destructive). A ‘good’ religion is possible and the romans had just about developed it with Aryanism of homer (upper), Stoicism (upper middle, middle), epicureanism (lower middle), and sol invictus (lower) before the jews began their undermining. Today we know that aryanism of homer (aristocracy) is only available to those with agency, that stoicism was the proactive version of cognitive behavioral therapy and epicureanism the only means of true happiness for ordinary people, and that the underclasses desire escapism by false promise. We see buddhism tried to do all at once, and so did christianity judaism and islam – and all of them through falsehood. In usual european tradition, the market supplied class-religions of aryanism(homer,tragedy), stoicism, epicureanism, and sol invictus (brotherhoood) with christianity attractive mostly to women, slaves, immigrants and the underclasses. Just as Aristotelianism is attractive to our upper classes today, secular christianity our middle, and christianity our working, and islam our underclasses. The european solution to everything is markets that serve the interests of the classes but limited to preservation of cooperation between the classes by truth, duty, promise contract, rule of law of tort-property, and jury. In other words we mandate monopoly only on the material, legal, and political, and let people follow the ‘narrative’ that fits their agency. The problem is, that judaism and islam are both evolved to destroy that market of cooperation and restore authoritarianism and monopoly.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-29 13:33:00 UTC

  • THOUGHTS ON CONSIOUSNESS Consciousness is deterministic with scale, and biased b

    THOUGHTS ON CONSIOUSNESS

    Consciousness is deterministic with scale, and biased by body form. Any being with sufficient neural capacity will develop similar intuitions and behaviors. Consciousness means modeling recursive future states by grammar of action. And we are programmed by action in reality.

    There is no mystery to consciousness.

    The nervous system is a lovely, profoundly simple thing, and there is trivial difference between a transistor and a soma, and the organization (adaptation) of the nervous system by dendritic wayfinding is indifferent from wiring circuit boards other than the infinite untraceable unmeasurable complexity of any given set of excitements. I am pretty confident of the structure of each major region of the brain and how it processes information, and there is no magic to recursive memory by thalamic preservation of state, and hippocampal production of indexes, and hippocampal rehearsal to store memories during break, rests, sleep. The experience of awareness is just a concert, like the experience of consciousness and it’s all just a constructed spectrum of preservation of networks.

    And anyone who has written an A* search for way-finding a maze can simply relabel variables and functions with brain regions and grasp the concept. Neural networks approximate that complexity, functions abstract that complexity, classes abstract that complexity further, but the underlying process is the same. Software must make address connections between simulated neurons and serially process calculations, while the brain only makes physical dendritic connections in infinite, inexhaustible, complexity and permutation. At present I dont know (maybe no one does) the provisioning of new episodic indices, and whether they are permanent or temporary.

    And the reason we can only produce robots at present is simply one of scale given the problem of serialization. I suspect we will solve that problem as evolution solved vision, which is to break the problem into pieces producing a symbolic input to a hierarchical system of prediction. I don’t see why we can’t do that other than the current cost would be ridiculous although it’s clear google is trying to use pre-processed information (search content) the way the financial business uses pre-processed information ( prices). I don’t know what they’re doing but as far as I know, it requires the development of symmetries (think, metaphysics) and a grammar (think thought, emotion, action) and a vocabulary to do that for the same reason humans needed language to think more deeply (system of measurement).

    Right now all I see is categorization (identification), and prediction and I don’t see anyone producing a metaphysics, grammar, and vocabulary bounded by similar rules to language, which will be necessary for machines to communicate because shared hierarchical memory would be slow (other than for the predator-prey division of labor), and protocols (languages) are necessary to encapsulate patterns such that access to (chaotic) underlying memory structures (neural networks and the training that got them to a given state) is unnecessary.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-28 09:09:00 UTC

  • WHY DOES COMMON LAW MARRIAGE EXIST? Common law marriage is the origin of all mar

    WHY DOES COMMON LAW MARRIAGE EXIST?

    Common law marriage is the origin of all marriage. The question is, why do church ceremonies, state marriages, and state licenses exist?

    Traditional european marriage required only both parties agree to it, but technically speaking, it was an agreement between families, not just the husband and wife. A marriage agreement (promise, contract) is not only between the husband and wife, between their families, but is insured by the polity. Meaning that if you interfered in a marriage you were liable for damages (Yes really). We are very comfortable today but it was not long ago that life was precarious and reciprocally insured each other, so a failed marriage ment that parental families would absorb costs they might not be able to carry.

    Marriage licenses began so that otherwise illegal marriages could be conducted. In the USA the puritans in Massachusetts began requiring them (I don’t know why) – most likely to maintain their version of eugenic mating which is an unspoken tenet of the protestant ethic. The present reason for marriage licenses, registrations, and ceremonies is the prevention of illegal marriages, and the resolution of property and inheritance disputes by the court now that we have enough wealth to worry about.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-27 17:34:00 UTC

  • WILL AMERICAN CAPITALISM STILL EXIST IN 100 YEARS? America doesn’t practice capi

    WILL AMERICAN CAPITALISM STILL EXIST IN 100 YEARS?

    America doesn’t practice capitalism it practices rule of law, and as a consequence of rule of law, people are limited to survival in markets. Because western civilization began entrepreneurially, developed promise and contract, tort law and property, testimony and jury, we have long standing institutions for enforcing contracts, and long standing tradition of high trust.

    So for these reasons we could develop large scale organizations using contracts. These large scale organizations using contracts could organize a lot of money behind entrepreneurial ventures.

    Because of a combination of rule of law of tort, contracts, and large organizations, we could create high production capacity using high capital investment in machines, without resorting to central government control, militarizing people, serfdom or slavery to organize people into large working groups.

    And using this combination of law, contract, jury, large organizations, and technological innovation, we could drag humanity – resisting us, kicking and screaming – out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and the chaos of natural forces, at the cost of creating uncertainty. So people traded poverty and certainty for prosperity and uncertainty. And people continue to make the choice every day.

    The communists (jews) invented the terms capitalism as a criticism, and socialism and communism as a false promise, as a means of restoring certainty and control over their lives. But neither socialism or communism is possible because both suffer from the four big problems of lack of incentives, and therefore laziness, the inability to use prices to efficiently organize an economy, and endemic corruption by state managed industries and the government, and the tendency of the people to vote themselves or demand themselves into tragedies ofthe commons: consumption higher than production.

    What the future will bring?

    In advanced countries one child policies: Automation will continue to drive down human labor markets until only a third of people, or maybe a fifth of people, can find employment, nd those people who work will end democracy and rule the people that can’t. The end result will be eugenics that suppressed the reproduction and consumption of those people who are unable to participate in production distribution and trade. IN poor countries they will forgo automation and continue to use labor, which will produce subsistence level for the poor and a small wealthy class.

    Just Like the rest of history.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-27 15:36:00 UTC

  • WHAT DOES DEMOCRACY DEPEND UPON? The absurd propositions that: (a) The people ar

    WHAT DOES DEMOCRACY DEPEND UPON?

    The absurd propositions that:

    (a) The people are capable of making positive (policy) decisions rather than just throwing failed governments out.

    (b) That the category of person that runs for office, wins office, and maintains a revenue (donation) stream sufficient to stay in office is better than either a professional trained for life to fulfill that office, or taxpayer randomly selected to serve in that office.

    (b) That democracy is other than a slow road to totalitarianism as people use the state to create vast tragedies of the commons at national scale.

    (c) that people are ignorant of the fact that homogenous ethnocentric, nation states, under rule of law (juridical defense), governed by monarchies (judge of last resort), parliaments (approve or reject state requests for funds), elections (throw out the current ministers), and Juries (determine settlement in matters of dispute) are the optimum social can be improved upon, or that

    (d) it’s possible to have such a political order without a majority middle class population that like europe or china used systemic agrarian eugenics and criminal prosecution to limit the reproduction of the underclasses (unproductive), each member of which is six times as costly as the any member of the productive classes

    .

    People are stupid. Government doesn’t matter. Rule of law matters. Only Europeans created it. Because European law is not a choice, it is the natural law of tort (trespass) meaning that there is no law higher than it – even a god’s. As such Europe is and has been for 5000 years, a cult of the common law of tort. And until Rousseau invented political sophistry, and Kant philosophical sophistry, and Napoleon destroyed Europe and imposed continental law, we were all sovereign.

    Only the Americans remain. And only as long as european peoples rule themselves.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-26 15:26:00 UTC

  • THE PROPERTARIAN CONSTITUTION SOLVES ONE PROBLEM The propertarian constitution s

    THE PROPERTARIAN CONSTITUTION SOLVES ONE PROBLEM

    The propertarian constitution solves one problem – the problem of the abrahamic conquests made possible by roman imperial administration and law combined with and greek literacy and reason, and the problem of the 20th century made possible by the industrial and technical revolutions: the institutionalization of deception made possible by mass media, and fiat credit.

    We solve that problem by demanding Truth and Reciprocity in all aspects of commerce and commons to end (a) false promise (b) baiting into hazard, and (c) rent-seeking (gains without contribution to the risk of productivity).

    So we require full reciprocity:

    1. Productive (prohibition on rents and free riding)

    2. fully informed ( prohibition on false promise, obscurantism)

    3. voluntary transfer (prohibition on takings of demonstrated interests)

    4. including by externality (including others indirectly)

    5. warrantied (liability for productivity, fully informed, voluntary transfer.

    Where all speech in such matters is treated as legal testimony, meaning it must meet the criteria of consistency in the dimensions 1. categorical, 2. logical, 3. operational, 4. empirical, 5. rational, 6. reciprocal 7. complete within limits, and the consequences of which are 8. within one’s ability to perform restitution.

    And the propertarian constitution institutes:

    1. Reformations to institutions and processes thereby eliminating all means of parasitism.

    2. Restitutions to those who have been harmed.

    3. Punishments for those who have done harm.

    4. Preventions: Changes in the constitution and the law creating a continuous market for profiting from the punishment of these forms of parasitism, once again forcing us into the market for voluntary cooperation in oder to survive, prosper, and flourish.

    So the propertarian constitution is structured as the prosecution of a crime by entire classes of people, and the restitutions, punishments, and preventions under law.

    This will be the greatest boon to western civilization since the industrial revolution, and will effectively outlaw the entire leftist program, prosecute, impoverish, ostracize, or imprison (or worse) those who have perpetrated this crime against our people.

    And hopefully it will end the abrahamic program forever.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-26 09:54:00 UTC

  • WHY THE AUTO INDUSTRY? by James Santagata Here is a simply application of the P

    WHY THE AUTO INDUSTRY?

    by James Santagata

    Here is a simply application of the P macro Framework (parasite suppression, denial of cost shifting/externalities, markets in everything).

    As I pointed out earlier, 60% of the US deficit was vehicles, vehicle parts, oil/energy products.

    Why? US automakers got slammed three way in the 1970s – first was the oil crisis – which really was retaliation by Arabs for the US supporting Israel’s pre-emptive attacks on Arabs during the Yom Kippur war – Arabs tanks were about to overrun Israel but US military supplies kept the Israelis armed – in response OPEC and the US consumers paid over $1 trillion at the pumps.

    If you adjust for opportunity cost and present dollars, it is around $2 to $2.5 trillion impact on the US. At the same time, this killed our beloved muscle car industry over night. And put all automakers at risk. Because this was not a normal, long term cost shifting but short term hits against capital intensive industries with major tooling costs and lead time needed for new cars.

    So at that time, US auto makers started to make adjustments, and were also hit with government regulations, DOT, CAFE, and NRLA for unions. they were squeezed dry but rather than fight back, they figured, we will just cost shift onto the backs of consumers – and that worked, until the US consumers found better cars at at fraction of the operating cost in terms of reliability and operation – gas. Japanese.

    By then automakers couldn’t responds, some Honda’s like CVCC were selling for 2x and 3x sticker price! And our energy industry couldn’t respond as environmentalists blocked all the domestic drilling and nuke plants. This resulted in the destruction of Detroit, Ohio, Penn, for cars, car parts, suppliers, and steel. Beyond that, any other industry would back fill – like in silicon valley.

    Ashton Tate to IBM DBs, to Informix, to Siebel to FoxPro to Oracle, competitors swarm, winners win, only to evolve or get replaced themselves – but the US stays on top of those markets – databases, CRM, semiconductors, etc. etc.

    But not in automotive. Super high barriers due to government parasitism and cost shifting. DOT, NTSB, CAFE, NLRA, etc. crush all that industry by industry.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-25 21:03:00 UTC

  • Prewar we had done to europe what china has recently done to us. Panic of 1901,

    Prewar we had done to europe what china has recently done to us.

    Panic of 1901, a U.S. economic recession that started a fight for financial control of the Northern Pacific Railway

    Panic of 1907, a U.S. economic recession with bank failures

    In 1913 we formed the federal reserve.

    The 19-teens. Visions of Big government danced in their heads. Fiat currency catastrophe begins.

    The USA becomes a world creditor because of the wars.

    Depression of 1920-21, a U.S. economic recession following the end of WW1

    Roaring 20’s give us Electrification and the Automobile which are the primary drivers of the 20th century.

    Wall Street Crash of 1929 and Great Depression (1929–1939) the worst depression of modern history

    1930’s the Lost Decade of the Great Depression.

    FDR’s failures at socialism, that end up without result.

    WW1 and WW2 were financed by high taxation. Restores the economy.

    Big government at home, becomes big government worldwide as the USA tries to ‘teach the world a lesson’. See the pattern yet?

    We survived WW2 but the industrialized world was trashed, and the developing world was taking on communism (effectively slave labor).

    1950’s were a quiet boom, the height of fashion, family, masculinity and mass migration into home ownership and the middle class.

    By 1960 it was clear communism couldn’t function. This led to intellectual postmodernism (what we call political correctness – pseudoscience, pseudomathematics, sophistry and denialism)

    By the mid 1960’s the world had recovered.

    In 1964 we implement the immigration act designed to flood the country with underclass labor that would drive down the price of labor, and destroy the american experiment of a nation ‘of people of character’ (meaning a middle class nation state).

    The 1960’s ended the feeling of certainty. Why? The counter culture and media, and the assault on our civilization. Everything goes wrong here. Everything.

    By 1970 it was clear that unions had run up costs during a period of recovery that could not be paid.

    Nixon’s was in the right doing it wrong. He’s gone. Vietnam ends. Cold war is at its height.

    In 1973 we had the oil crisis that crashed our economy. By the mid 70’s only a minority of college educated graduates would find jobs. Gasoline went from .25 a gallon to over $1.00

    Secondary banking crisis of 1973–1975 in the UK

    Latin American debt crisis (late 1970s, early 1980s) known as “lost decade”

    The automotive industry collapsed, as it tried to convert from making poor quality, heavy cars, to those that could operate

    By 1976 we understood that Johnson’s Great society project to imitate the soviets had failed and all we had done was destroy black families, the black middle class, and great vast ghettos in urban areas that would bankrupt our cities.

    In 77 we had star wars and” something changed” – the tech revolution was starting. (I built my first computer).

    In 1979 we had the second oil crisis. We were tired of ‘losing’ more and more year after year.

    The seventies ended the postwar economy and with it the socialists and communists’ dreams.

    In 1980 we elected reagan. He and thatcher ended the postwar social fantasy that soviet or social democratic economics were possible.

    in 1980 and 1982 we had two recessions.

    In the 1980s we had the savings and loan crisis.

    Reagan’s strategy was to bankrupt the soviets and the chinese. It worked. It worked at the cost of debt.

    Black Monday in 1987

    1992 Soviet Collapse results in 1990’s peace dividend, and the roaring 90’s. client server peaks. Internet era starts, cell phone era starts.

    Dot-com bubble (2000-2002) (US) and… wow.

    Uncertainty returns. The 1980-2000 period like the teens and twenties, and like the 50’s is a high period for america.

    2007-2009 Financial Crisis

    2010’s the Lost Decade of World Financial Exhaustion.

    Late 20-teens america begins ending the postwar order and returning to the world balance of powers, now that technology and power have been equilibrated by the rest of the world ‘catching up’ and americans ‘falling behind’.

    Do I need to give a lesson to you on the economics of of the late 19th – early 21st century?

    America was artificially wealthy for (a) conquering a continent, (b) buying the rest from napoleon for cheap, (c) selling it off to ethnic europeans (largely germans) who were genetically middle class and land- constrained (c) using fiat currency to finance the immigration of through the 20’s, (d) inheriting the british empire and replacing london as the world currency, (e) using our resources to fund the world’s recovery (f) and the war against world communism (g) and the war against world islamism that has replaced it.

    But the world has caught up and we have immigrated the underclasses our ancestors sought to avoid -because they create demand for parasitic redistribution, and authoritarian government, because they are not genetically middle class.

    We no longer have 400 years of northern european institutional, technological, knowledge, cultural and genetic advantage.

    Meanwhile the destruction of the family, the substitution of INTEREST for TAXATION, and the decline in reproduction has pushed US IQ levels from 115 victorian era to 97 and soon we will fall off the cliff to third world IQ levels.

    We are entering a century where the american standard of living will decline in parallel with the US Military and the use of the dollar as a reserve currency.

    The world is going to equilibrate but that means we will be relatively poorer.

    Just as the vast underclass population we allowed into the country becomes a majority, generates demand for a centrally planned state, and we follow south america into collapse.

    And that’s before I get started on automation, changes to the labor force, and the problem of organizing people if the voluntary organization of production (markets, money, productivity, incentives)

    So when you look at that chart outlined in red, you don’t knw what the fk you’re talking about.

    Drop a few tech companies out of the economy – heck, just apple – and look for productivity gains.

    They aren’t there.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-25 19:37:00 UTC