Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • There is so much more to cover. But what’s really going on in intersexual relati

    There is so much more to cover. But what’s really going on in intersexual relations is the same thing that has happened in all of the rest of life: excess wealth, excess debt, produces search for signal value (status, emotion, entertainment) over investment and returns, because of the false promise of the end of scarcity (in our case, time.).

    So the internet and internet dating have created an industry that maximizes the potential for false hope and false advertising in the short term – like massive credit card debt – at the expense of long-term investment.

    This leads to no children, unhappy women who suffer but tolerate it because of female magical thinking, and male suicide because they don’t engage in magical thinking. Feels vs Reals in everything to do with the sexes. Simple version: you get what you pay for. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 17:06:02 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107219881978197667

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107219880301910195

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    I’ve been trying to understand the manosphere and the dating, mating, marrying, reproducing, and family problems. And the pattern is pretty simple: (a) a man interprets a woman by her costs because of female intrinsic value(fertility), and women by her gains because of male demonstrated value (productivity). Men make a cost-benefit decision just like women do. We are looking for the highest return on investment by the only value women have that we find interesting: femininity, nesting, care, and sex. After we make that cost calculation, we determine whether we have the potential to be allies, co-workers, and friends in a family. The reason good men ‘ghost’ or ditch women is because it takes a long time to get past the ‘attraction’ of sex and femininity before we understand the cost and friendship capacity of a woman. This is made worse because women both try to conform for the man that they want, and lie to themselves about themselves until they run out of energy to hide their nature from men. So again, this takes time. It can take weeks or months. (b) women think BEING vs doing is an asset – it isn’t. It means you’re a cost. Just like men ‘being’ rather than doing is a cost. Men know what you look like when you come out of the shower. That is how we see you. Our ideal woman almost always looks like a woman’s ideal man: an athlete. Not a mannequin. We are not fooled by the makeup and the salon. All these tell us is that you try to take care of yourself, but you take it to costly and selfish and ‘unregulated’ extremes. This means you will take other things to unregulated extremes. (c) Women manifest dysfunctional anti-social behavior by gossiping, drama creation, undermining, sexuality and promiscuity the way men do it by dominance expression, risk-taking, criminality, and violence. In science, this is called impulsivity and sensation seeking, and women seek it by manipulation and seduction the way men seek it by threats and force. There is no difference. We know this. We men like ‘crazy-chicks’ so to speak, like women like ‘bad-boys’. It’s the same thing. Just like women like Chads and Tyrones, like men like girls who advertise sexuality and availability. It’s the same thing. So, you would expect to see men and women sort into groups that are mutually self-destructive. And that’s what we see. They do. You would also expect to see women punch above their weight and fail. And you’d expect men to take advantage of women punching above their weight. And the only people that are left out of this game are men who cannot find dates mates and wives amidst the noise created by these men and women while young, and women who cannot find men when they hit the wall. Meanwhile the ‘silent majority’ of normal men and women pair off consistently and quietly, and build families, and wealth, while singles pay the high economic costs of single households, dating, and not investing. (see more in comments below)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107219880301910195

  • I’ve been trying to understand the manosphere and the dating, mating, marrying,

    I’ve been trying to understand the manosphere and the dating, mating, marrying, reproducing, and family problems. And the pattern is pretty simple:

    (a) a man interprets a woman by her costs because of female intrinsic value(fertility), and women by her gains because of male demonstrated value (productivity). Men make a cost-benefit decision just like women do. We are looking for the highest return on investment by the only value women have that we find interesting: femininity, nesting, care, and sex. After we make that cost calculation, we determine whether we have the potential to be allies, co-workers, and friends in a family. The reason good men ‘ghost’ or ditch women is because it takes a long time to get past the ‘attraction’ of sex and femininity before we understand the cost and friendship capacity of a woman. This is made worse because women both try to conform for the man that they want, and lie to themselves about themselves until they run out of energy to hide their nature from men. So again, this takes time. It can take weeks or months.

    (b) women think BEING vs doing is an asset – it isn’t. It means you’re a cost. Just like men ‘being’ rather than doing is a cost. Men know what you look like when you come out of the shower. That is how we see you. Our ideal woman almost always looks like a woman’s ideal man: an athlete. Not a mannequin. We are not fooled by the makeup and the salon. All these tell us is that you try to take care of yourself, but you take it to costly and selfish and ‘unregulated’ extremes. This means you will take other things to unregulated extremes.

    (c) Women manifest dysfunctional anti-social behavior by gossiping, drama creation, undermining, sexuality and promiscuity the way men do it by dominance expression, risk-taking, criminality, and violence. In science, this is called impulsivity and sensation seeking, and women seek it by manipulation and seduction the way men seek it by threats and force. There is no difference. We know this. We men like ‘crazy-chicks’ so to speak, like women like ‘bad-boys’. It’s the same thing. Just like women like Chads and Tyrones, like men like girls who advertise sexuality and availability. It’s the same thing.

    So, you would expect to see men and women sort into groups that are mutually self-destructive. And that’s what we see. They do.

    You would also expect to see women punch above their weight and fail. And you’d expect men to take advantage of women punching above their weight.

    And the only people that are left out of this game are men who cannot find dates mates and wives amidst the noise created by these men and women while young, and women who cannot find men when they hit the wall.

    Meanwhile the ‘silent majority’ of normal men and women pair off consistently and quietly, and build families, and wealth, while singles pay the high economic costs of single households, dating, and not investing.

    (see more in comments below)

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 17:05:36 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107219880301910195

  • WHY VOTING DATA IS ALWAYS PSEUDOSCIENCE: Regarding: WHITE WOMEN COLLEGE GRADS VA

    WHY VOTING DATA IS ALWAYS PSEUDOSCIENCE:
    Regarding:

    WHITE WOMEN COLLEGE GRADS
    VA 2020: 58% Biden, 41% Trump
    VA 2021: 62% McAuliffe, 38% Youngkin

    WHITE WOMEN NON-COLLEGE
    VA 2020: 56% Trump, 44% Biden
    VA 2021: 75% Youngkin, 25% McAuliffe

    1. Most female degrees are non-stem, low-wage (education, psychology, sociology, or worse)
    2. As such Education(EA) is not a proxy for IQ or political competency in females as it might be for males.
    3. The only useful data is sorted by population density, income, marital status, children, and age. Why? Women are more motivated by temporal incentives and social (herd) pressure than males, who do not vary in political affiliation, except with age.
    4. With 2/3 population committed:1/3 conservative(male capitalizing) or 1/3 progressive (female hyper-consumptive), and females the only racial asymmetry, all elections with less than 6% difference are determined by low-information female voters influenced by friend networks and “likability”.
    5. These are well-known facts in the social sciences, especially among political economists. The ‘gated institutional narrative’ always and everywhere attempts to attribute more value to statistics than exist. Like the stock market, the voting market is almost entirely noise.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-03 21:04:27 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107215157140938237

  • HOW THE LEFT LIES BY REDEFINITION OF TERMS BY CONFLATION, INFLATION, AND REPETIT

    HOW THE LEFT LIES BY REDEFINITION OF TERMS BY CONFLATION, INFLATION, AND REPETITION.

    — “Whether one is a terrorist or a freedom fighter depends solely upon media coverage. According to the woke-media; George Washington was a terrorist. Sam Adams was a terrorist. Paul Revere was a terrorist.” — Doug Morrison @RadioFreeNorthwest

    Years ago, at the beginning of the social media age, I had a long discussion with some of the folks who started the international terrorist database, and they didn’t distinguish between civil unrest, freedom fighters, civil war, proxy war, and war itself.

    I thought they were as evil as hell. And they couldn’t understand., (a) they were funded by states, and (b) they were saying all states were legitimate, and (c) presuming that democratic rotation was always sufficient for political reformation.

    This is how the enemy uses funding of fake-academics to produce fake-science, in order to conflate, and inflate vocabulary and concepts, in order to deceive the public, by appealing to the public desire to escape responsibility for policing the commons.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-03 18:50:22 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107214629915890884

  • Spirituality is not an expression of intelligence, its the discipline of mindful

    Spirituality is not an expression of intelligence, its the discipline of mindfulness which is the only way of suppressing neuroticism, which itself is the incentive to worry about status in the pack. all forms of mindfulness emerged about the same time as a solution to alienation as anonymity and irrelevance increases. the optimum is stoicism/epicureanism, then Confucianism, followed by Buddhism, then Hinduism, and finally the Abrahamic traditions., before we get to the African magical traditions. That these disciplines reflect the avg IQ and evolutionary neoteny and heterogeneity of groups is rather obvious. the degree of falsehood increases as intelligence, evolution, and trust decrease.

    We can develop mindfulness in a spectrum of methods. The question is, what cost and responsibility are you avoiding in your search for mindfulness? Or like stoicism are you learning to invest rather than avoid costs?

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-03 01:30:31 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107210541088999387

  • In other words, there is no need to war against males, physical capital by physi

    In other words, there is no need to war against males, physical capital by physical violence, no need to propose an alternative political order, or law – just undermine the female’s ability to self regulate,and male ability to limit them, and to produce adults by infantilization.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-01 13:45:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107202104853635647

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107202104419765141

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    HOW DID THE ENEMY UNDERMINE OUR WOMEN? Female empathy for children evolved to help them understand the children so that they can CORRECT them by preventing maladaption.But combined with female intuition to avoid all costs, woke-bolshevism encouraged women to do nothing to prevent maladaption, instead to encourage it. Evolution’s price of our continuous rapid discovery, innovation, adaptation, and evolution, was the need for increasing training of children thereby preventing variation from the minimum necessary for survival, cooperation, reproduction, and evolution. Woke=Devolution by Evasion. I’ve slowly come to understand that pervasive female mental illness is intentionally created and fostered by the jewish > marxist > bolshevik > leninist > neomarxist > anti-male-feminist > pomo >pc-woke repetition of promising that costs of training and adaptation can be avoided. Worse, that paternalism is a consequence of the longer and deeper maturity of males, who must establish limits to female hyperconsumption, neuroticism, panic produced by the amplification and extension of her nervous system over offspring. Else UNREGULATED selfishness that results. This also explains why women who have enough children to produce cognitive and emotional load are (a) happier (b) fulfilled, (c) stable. This does not mean all women are unstable. It means more than a third of women are unstable, and less than a third are stable. Now, I was raised during the 60’s and 70’s with the traditional pedestal of respect for women, and sexual equality. But the rise in female mental illness over my lifetime, by the false promise of freedom from self-regulation, child regulation, and freedom from the costs, reversed it. So this is another bit of knowledge I prefer not to have and doesn’t make me happy to understand. But it is what it is. And we are now stuck with Judaism > Bolshevism > Neo-Marxism-PC-Woke as warfare against civilization by a demographic evolved to destroy behavioral regulation. And this intuition, this effort, to maximize female cost evasion, and maximize hyperconsumption, free riding, parasitism, while avoiding all costs of production, explains the tendency for ‘attention-seeking, sex perversion, immorality, and criminality in the alien demographic. We are all bots. We are all born with slight variations (biases) in software. But we can create families, tribes, cultures, nations, civilizations that institutionalize MALADAPTION as a group evolutionary strategy. IOW, in the simplest of terms, the success of neo-marxism > postmodernism > anti-male feminism > pc-woke > white-male hate is simply to appeal to natural female biases to prevent their maturity causing infantilization and intergenerational collapse of training and adaptation.

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107202104419765141

  • HOW DID THE ENEMY UNDERMINE OUR WOMEN? Female empathy for children evolved to he

    HOW DID THE ENEMY UNDERMINE OUR WOMEN?

    Female empathy for children evolved to help them understand the children so that they can CORRECT them by preventing maladaption.But combined with female intuition to avoid all costs, woke-bolshevism encouraged women to do nothing to prevent maladaption, instead to encourage it.

    Evolution’s price of our continuous rapid discovery, innovation, adaptation, and evolution, was the need for increasing training of children thereby preventing variation from the minimum necessary for survival, cooperation, reproduction, and evolution. Woke=Devolution by Evasion.

    I’ve slowly come to understand that pervasive female mental illness is intentionally created and fostered by the jewish > marxist > bolshevik > leninist > neomarxist > anti-male-feminist > pomo >pc-woke repetition of promising that costs of training and adaptation can be avoided.

    Worse, that paternalism is a consequence of the longer and deeper maturity of males, who must establish limits to female hyperconsumption, neuroticism, panic produced by the amplification and extension of her nervous system over offspring. Else UNREGULATED selfishness that results.

    This also explains why women who have enough children to produce cognitive and emotional load are (a) happier (b) fulfilled, (c) stable.

    This does not mean all women are unstable. It means more than a third of women are unstable, and less than a third are stable.

    Now, I was raised during the 60’s and 70’s with the traditional pedestal of respect for women, and sexual equality. But the rise in female mental illness over my lifetime, by the false promise of freedom from self-regulation, child regulation, and freedom from the costs, reversed it.

    So this is another bit of knowledge I prefer not to have and doesn’t make me happy to understand. But it is what it is. And we are now stuck with Judaism > Bolshevism > Neo-Marxism-PC-Woke as warfare against civilization by a demographic evolved to destroy behavioral regulation.

    And this intuition, this effort, to maximize female cost evasion, and maximize hyperconsumption, free riding, parasitism, while avoiding all costs of production, explains the tendency for ‘attention-seeking, sex perversion, immorality, and criminality in the alien demographic.

    We are all bots. We are all born with slight variations (biases) in software. But we can create families, tribes, cultures, nations, civilizations that institutionalize MALADAPTION as a group evolutionary strategy.

    IOW, in the simplest of terms, the success of neo-marxism > postmodernism > anti-male feminism > pc-woke > white-male hate is simply to appeal to natural female biases to prevent their maturity causing infantilization and intergenerational collapse of training and adaptation.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-01 13:44:58 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107202104419765141

  • We live in a world of unregulated political and social brutality escalated into

    We live in a world of unregulated political and social brutality escalated into warfare b/c men have been prohibited from policing the commons. This has led to the female method of warfare, and the destruction of our civilization.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-29 14:05:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1454086929729925123

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1454086928526151682

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    When the riots were spreading around the bigger cities the men who owned shops on main street stood on the sidewalk with shotguns, while others took photographs as a warning that the race riots would not spread to our little farm town.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1454086928526151682

  • Why did y’all encourage me to work on the dating, mating, marrying problem? It’s

    Why did y’all encourage me to work on the dating, mating, marrying problem? It’s depressing.Seriously. But, as in anything, disambiguation(decomposition) of the problem provides insights into females more so than males, as to just how much we’re bots and how simple the algorithm.

    I mean for example, the female instinct is to maximize consumption so she and hers won’t be left behind, just as much as the male instinct is to maximize capital. So in any condition where the female can hyper-consumer without social regulation of it, she will do so on instinct.

    But this understanding still provides just the first principle, the causal axis of her behavior.What it doesn’t tell us is that this hyperconsumption is the result of the infant stage, and is produced by our tendency both male and female to coddle girls and women:infantilization.

    And what this understanding of infantilization doesn’t tell us directly, is that the difference between the classes is biological limitation on development causing infantilization of self regulation – at least on the conscientiousness axis.

    So this is why we see Christians (continuous training in adult responsibility for self, family, commons) producing families across the classes, and conservatives doing it out of instinct and tradition.We see infantilization across the progressive spectrum: responsibility evasion.

    So conservatism (adulting by capitalization) vs progressivism (infantilization by hyperconsumption) are biological intuitionistic and cognitive biases that have sexual origins in cognitive dimorphism, and the competition between them in reciprocity calculating ‘optimums’.

    So, the algorithm for human behavior is extremely simple but because we have such large brains, capable of such exhaustive generalization, we can apply that algorithm endlessly as we can apply language in infinite permutation. But w/o reciprocity we get F:’cancer’ vs M:’aging’

    And I’ll use that Female:Cancer vs Male:Aging as the biological equivalent of the unregulated expression of female hyperconsumption and infatilization vs male hypercapitalization, and …again… reciprocal exchange discovering the continuously moving equilibrium between them

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 23:38:15 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107181788050996589

  • HOW I WOULD CRASH BTC BTC world domination is Wishful Thinking. Sorry. Zero chan

    HOW I WOULD CRASH BTC

    BTC world domination is Wishful Thinking. Sorry. Zero chance I am wrong on long term state action – that states will only ‘tolerate’ BTC until it’s no longer tolerable. At present, given it’s largely used for criminal activity, and therefore consumer funding of criminal activity thru appreciation.

    You can take it to the bank so to speak that if I know how to destroy it, the govt certainly has someone they can call upon to destroy it. And it’s easy. I will never consider myself wrong by the market cap measure. The tipping point will be when the state loses any influence over the economy, or when BTC becomes a risk to the economy.

    The higher the BTC cap, the bigger the problem is. If I were the govt I would learn all I could from it, develop a treasury equivalent that didn’t eat power supplies, and offer a 30day exchange as of date of announcement, before prohibiting all use, under peanalty of asset siezure. I would issue a bounty in the new fed-coin for anyone reporting someone else’s use of BTC, including a percentage of the assets of whom they reported. This would turn into a hacker industry that profited from the collapse of BTC.

    Right now, like I’ve said all along,the private sector is doing off book empirical research for the state. The state will use the fact that BTC is funding criminal organizations at massive scale in order to justify its suppression.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 20:32:09 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107181056318739714