Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • ETHNOCENTRISM DOES NOT REQUIRE NAZISM, IDEOLOGICAL RELIGION, OR “POWER SYMBOLS”.

    ETHNOCENTRISM DOES NOT REQUIRE NAZISM, IDEOLOGICAL RELIGION, OR “POWER SYMBOLS”.

    Ethocentrism, nationalism, rule of law, of sovereign men, is the optimum political order for those capable of that political order (europeans who are of majority middle class genetics).

    RE: “What is the difference between “Nazi Ethnocentricism” and “White Nationalism”? Are we not allowed to preserve our genes at all?

    See what I mean? Even asking me that question exposes the problem with ‘y’all that I am trying desperately to save you from – your ignorance of what made you, your genetics, your intuitions, and your values possible.

    So, the difference is DESPOTISM (rule by man) and Rule of Law, Monarchy, Cabinet, Multi-House Govenment, and the Jury, Nationalism, and all the goods that result from it.

    Does that mean we cannot learn from the various socialist movements in including the pre and war era french german Italian russian experiments, and the postwar successes and failures of social democracy vs communism, and Contemporary chinese fascism?

    No. It means that you cannot have your traditional identity without ALL that it entails.

    I worked very hard to solve this problem because it is in fact a hard problem that previous generations failed to solve. However in previous generations you still had an elite that hadn’t defected to the enemy and abandoned you.

    So you are leaderless, idea-less, organization-less and option-less. And you don’t even have a layer of men capable of understanding solutions or leading you to survival – regardless of whether it leads to political victory.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-21 15:32:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107315773009551682

  • THE CONVERGENCE OF EUROPEAN ARISTOCRATIC EMPIRICISM AND SEMITIC SUPERNATURAL FAI

    THE CONVERGENCE OF EUROPEAN ARISTOCRATIC EMPIRICISM AND SEMITIC SUPERNATURAL FAITH

    Whether you’re a Thomist and a Deist giving precedence to the supernatural faith, or an Aristotelian and Empiricist with Jesus a philosopher – giving precedence to truth over faith, the convergence between aristocracy and peasantry still exists in the compatibility of the two.

    My argument is that we know the laws of the universe, and we cannot claim the existence of a god without also claiming those laws are his laws. The surprise was that Jesus was teaching us how to tolerate the tragic consequences for man of those laws: love.

    I can only say that there is a long history of combining Aryan (European) aristocratic truth, with Semitic (Abrahamic) comforting, and that I can see how to continue that tradition, if religion is needed, as a restoration of martial paganism that includes Jesus and his Christian love.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-19 20:37:36 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107305648562625253

  • THE END OF THE SUPERNORMAL AND SUPERNATURAL The desperate attempt to preserve th

    THE END OF THE SUPERNORMAL AND SUPERNATURAL

    The desperate attempt to preserve the supernatural persists no matter how much we falsify the false promises.

    — “I have been wondering if your ideas are worth reading. You are obviously a materialist (spiritual non-believer. Everything in MY subjective conscious experience tells me that you don’t really don’t ‘get it’. Bottom line – consciousness is not an emergent property of the brain. It is non local and the physical brain is nothing more than a very sophisticated computer/transceiver. But this is only my perception due to subjective experience. Bless you.” — Gary Chartrand

    I just know the science. And like the long history of gradual development of scientific knowledge, it has incrementally deprived us of the promise of ‘undiscovered countries’ of the imagination that soften the burdens of a reality that is all but hostile to life. And that the end of our long journey we discover that there is nothing supernormal, supernatural, in the production of consciousness and those alternatives to reality that have comforted us, fade like our innocence and ignorance, leaving us to create them from the existing universe we are stuck with. However, the fact that we can not only predict the actionable world we live in, imagine what scales beyond our perception, but imagine worlds that might be, allows us to hope and try to bring about those worlds within the laws of the universe and the universe’s god, and in doing so become the gods we imagine, in the worlds and gardens we imagine. Bless you too.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-19 00:15:03 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107300841300546396

  • THE RARITY OF LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE It’s far harder for a planet to survive in th

    THE RARITY OF LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

    It’s far harder for a planet to survive in the habitable zone than we think. You need a relatively peaceful galactic neighborhood. And a star that lives long enough and is stable enough for evolution to compute the possibility of complex life. You need a third or fourth-generation star so that there are metal elements available. You need a relatively rare type of star (yellow dwarf) that will provide a stable habitable zone. You need a metallic planet, which requires something like Jupiter or Jupiter AND Saturn to ‘clean the neighborhood’. You need a molten core on that metallic planet, and a large moon to keep it liquid, producing a protective magnetic field. And you need enough atmosphere, and enough water, and enough volcanic activity to start life.

    I mean, you’d think that there would be lots of life out there given that under the right conditions it’s going to likely emerge over time. But the bigger problem than calculating life is the environment in which the universe can calculate life.

    Tiny possibilities. Tiny. Likely a few per galaxy and they might not overlap in time.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-16 15:46:36 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107287517341531184

  • WHY WHLL IT WORK? Because it P-Law a minor tweak to the most successful system o

    WHY WHLL IT WORK?

    Because it P-Law a minor tweak to the most successful system of government in human history, and the only one to create a modern state capable of bulding and maintaining itself as a first world power.

    There are a set of minor holes in our ‘operating system’ (Constitution, law, tradition, adn religion) through which the enemy can easily march. To the average person this seems unfixable. However it isn’t. The law creates a market for the suppression of criminality. We need only define the crimes in terms that the law can ‘scientifically’ test. And that’s what I’ve done.

    Put the infrastructure in place, and the rest will work. Because these ‘ordinary men’ will have the ability to follow their gut instincts: SUPPRESS WHAT IS IRRECIPROCAL, DISGUSTING, AND DISLOYAL.

    You see. That is what drives their intuitions. But they have no means of organizing that suppression and no means of disambiguating ithe irreciprocal disgusting and disloyal from that which is just ‘odd’ or inventive.

    So the only question is dominate and pay the cost of civilizing the enemy, or separate and let them pay the cost of their failures.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 19:59:18 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282848725506873

  • THE METHOD TO THE APPARENT MADNESS There is a very deep method to my apparent ma

    THE METHOD TO THE APPARENT MADNESS

    There is a very deep method to my apparent madness on the topic of the right’s tendency to fail. That method would be deprecated if I were to state it openly. But as I have demonstrated over the past decade, the use of via negativa king of the hill games tends to produce better outcomes than attempting to ‘sell’ the right. I am not selling. I’m illustrating the failure of every other right-wing fantasy as just that: cost evasion, pretense of unearned virtue, pretense of unearned morality, overconfidence because of all three, manifesting in cowardice. Belief means nothing. It is the feminine means of demanding men serve them. The right has evolved through Christianity, and having risen from germanic peasantry, is demanding service. It is not anglo saxon: creating sovereignty through demonstrated action. So either conservatives will learn to pay the cost of victory – or they will be defeated. Right now, everything conservative means is ‘cost evasion’ so that the enemy wins.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 19:57:12 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282840433419800

  • ( … more … ) Law, constitution, legislation, regulation, policy, and procedu

    ( … more … )

    Law, constitution, legislation, regulation, policy, and procedure are the operating system for government, and money is the resource it uses as influence.

    Do you need to understand the science behind the law that makes all that operation of a complex political organization possible? No you don’t. But I and those like me do. We are the judges that will administer that law. WE have to understand it.

    What do you need to understand? You need to understand that this law is a science and that the judges defend against internal political enemies the way ‘every man a sheriff does against internal physical and social enemies, and as the military defends against external enemies.

    To do that you need to understand the paragraph that describes the European group strategy, the law of reciprocity and testimony, the list of demonstrated interests we call capital, the list of crimes that can be committed, and the rights, obligations, and inalienations under the law that demand we suppress those crimes in ourselves and others.

    Can you do that? Yes you can. It’s possible to write a set of posters you can stick on your wall. It will largely mirror your moral intuitions., Just like magical thinking, selfishness, lying, cheating, and stealing will largely mirror leftist intuitions.

    The problem I have is (a) getting you idiots to pay attention long enough to understand that (b) show up to make it happen (c) stay in the field long enough to bring it into fruition (d) not go all fundamentalist, or nazi and screw it up by making the people more afraid of your having any semblance of influence, than they are of a constitutional reformation.

    So I’ve done my job. It took seventy of the greatest men of the enlightenment to do it the last time. I’m stuck here doing it almost alone with a few others helping me. And you clowns are a train wreck of fail.

    So grow up, man up, and learn how to win. But don’t chastise me because I can’t make grownup thinking into a chocolate milkshake of sophistry and ideology for nitwits.

    Nitwits just need to show up and shut up, and if necessary ‘supply’ yourselves by the traditional method militia armies always do.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 17:32:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282271022124228

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282267854606654

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    – “The complaint isn’t that your posts are word salad. The complaint is that you never make a point. A guy like you needs to follow a template, like 1. Briefly state conclusion 2. State context/motivation/problem. 3. Reason. 4. Re-state conclusion.” – Yes it is. Every day. That said… I make the point, I make the point over many posts, not just one. Because people don’t read long posts. (that’s the evidence.) if you can’t follow across the posts then that’s a filter. And you aren’t the audience. There is only one way to save our civilization it’s by showing up in mass. Showing up in mass requires a set of actionable asks that are hard to resist or morally reject by all. The young men (like yourself) are alienated from the upper classes with the skill to do that – you don’t have it. You are also biased to self overconfidence. That overconfidence manifests in simple-stupid-solutions that are impossible, and in leadership that fragments into personality cults – precisely because you lack the competency to do anything else. And this allows the left to pick you off one at a time, and prevent any and all leadership from emerging. And so the left is eating your lunch and drinking your milkshake. As such we are limited in the number of ways we can organize ‘the dumb fucks, the slow kids’ into a political movement. Since we can’t organize these numbskulls into a political movement, we have only the hope of mobilizing them into a rebellion-movement, where we all show up and issue a set of possible demands ‘or else’. Even then, the chances that shit-for-brains, impulsive, ignorant, macho, virtue-signallers will screw it up is almost a certainty. So we have to make everyone dependent upon everyone else, by taking the same risk and ostracizing those from the future who don’t show and take the risk. I’ve produced (a) the moral license (b) the set of demands (c) an actionable and implementable solution that will fix the problem (d) a strategy for a rapid victory, (e) and a devastatingly believable threat of consequences if negotiations on a settlement fail.(this constitution is a settlement that serves everyone left, center, and right) by restoring the constitution to its original designs as a federation of independent states. And this particular strategy is directly licensed by the declaration and constitution. Every other plan is a slow burn to failure. I’ve seen nothing that can survive other than retreat to a region, or retreat into a separate economy, or retreat into religion – meaning we only delay the inevitable. The state will defend itself by happily burning the enemy (finance, academy, education, media, entertainment). The state cannot resist a moral claim without losing very rapidly its geostrategic position. So this plan uses the state’s self-interest against itself. (…more in comments)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282267854606654

  • (… more … ) And to train it we must KNOW it. We cannot train what we don’t k

    (… more … )

    And to train it we must KNOW it. We cannot train what we don’t know. And we didn’t (until now with P-Law) understand the ‘science’ of our group strategy, institutions, traditions, norms, rituals. And now that we know that science we can TRAIN the ‘otherwise unfit’ into it.

    And we can do so because there is no religious, philosophical, moral, or scientific argument against P-Law, because P-Law is just the explanation of the universal law of all the sciences: of all existence.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 16:31:36 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282032002644133

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282022650660535

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    THINKING:”How do I teach others how to think about all existence, life, thought, feeling, and behavior operationally – by construction from first principles – by disambiguation into first principles?” Well, you list the first principles and gradually learn(habituate) the process. I don’t think there is any magic to it. It’s like anything else. People may want a single insight like they get with ideology or philosophy or theology. But P-Law is in the same categorical hierarchy as math, programming, (P-Law,) formal (Verbal) logic. You have to PRACTICE it. It’s the same with my work. Newbs find something I write or say and then jump to some conclusion that’s false. Or they complain that it’s incoherent or complex or word salad. The answer is you learn math, programming, P-law, and formal logic by STUDY not by immediate insight. That said, given the four sciences: Formal(Logics), Physical, Behavioral, and Evolutionary, why would we expect that truth and law, the logic of cooperation and morality, economics and politics, groups and group evolutionary strategy to require less study than the other sciences? Now the fact that P-Law requires work, doesn’t mean that you have to understand the science to use the products of it any more than you have to understand quantum mechanics to use the transistors in your cell phone. You have to understand the OUTPUTS of P-Law Science. The output of P-Law is expressible as the group evolutionary strategy of the european people when written in p-law. Why? Because the reason europeans invented reason, math, science, technology, and medicine so disproportionately vs all other civs, is that strategy=law=science. That translates to individual responsibility, rather than clan, religion, or state responsibility. Responsibility provides mindfulness, and mindfulness tolerance for the tragedy of nature’s laws, and the only means of overcoming that tragedy as mastery of and application of those laws for our benefit, by not seeking to avoid, but to conquer those laws. So of course, Europeans would not only invent mathematical realism, reason, law proper, philosophy, science and epicureanism, but government, technology, and medicine. The only problem? Many can’t bear that responsibility, lacking ability, agency, and training. So we could as the ancients tried, pay the high cost of training mindfulness or we can pay the cost of NOT training mindfulness – which is what allowed our invasive JChristianity and the destruction of the ancient World, like we allowed Judaism-marxism-pomo-pc-woke in the modern. And so, my overall point here is that we cannot have an advanced (aristocratic, responsible, evolutionarily adaptive) civilization without paying the cost of training those who are not naturally fit for it, or in families naturally fit and able to train it. (…more in comments…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282022650660535

  • ( … more … ) And to train it we must KNOW it. We cannot train what we don’t

    ( … more … )

    And to train it we must KNOW it. We cannot train what we don’t know. And we didn’t (until now with P-Law) understand the ‘science’ of our group strategy, institutions, traditions, norms, rituals. And now that we know that science we can TRAIN the ‘otherwise unfit’ into it.

    And we can do so because there is no religious, philosophical, moral, or scientific argument against P-Law, because P-Law is just the explanation of the universal law of all the sciences: of all existence.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 16:29:25 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282023437449991

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282000785842669

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    WHY I KEEP USING THE TERM “P-LAW” P-complete – Wikipedia “In computational complexity theory, a decision problem is P-complete (complete for the complexity class P) if it is in P and every problem in P can be reduced to it by an appropriate reduction.” Ergo: **All existence can be explained by reduction to the first principles of evolutionary computation. In other words, anything that can exist can be reduced to a formal description in P-Law.** I abandoned the term ‘propertarianism’ since it applied only to the original system of measurement in morality. I kept the “P-” for P-Completeness. And because ‘-ism’ implies a p philosophy, and P-Law is a formal logic: a science that unifies the logics and sciences. Ergo P-Law is P-Complete.

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282000785842669

  • THE PASSIONS OF THE RIGHT Passion for Ideology, Philosophy, Religion, Conspiracy

    THE PASSIONS OF THE RIGHT

    Passion for Ideology, Philosophy, Religion, Conspiracy and Pseudoscience, are all admissions of powerlessness, lack of responsibility, and political, economic, and social irrelevance.

    We need a military aristocracy, true. We need all men to have military training and membership in reserves (militia), but we also need a research class, anentrepreneurial class, a middle, a managerial, a craftsman, and education classes. And we need mothers fathers and families. Not one ideology as one size fits all.

    It is in the nature of simple people to look for simple, one size fits all solutions, because we all seek to act within the scope of our knowledge, understanding, competency and risk tolerance.

    But do not assume that your intuition reflects the incentives of different classes. In fact, all people follow incentives and only resort to dream world intuitions once they are deprived of substantive incentives. It’s in these substantive incentives – particularly family, income, organization, society, and nation that we find non-fanciful incentives. And it is those non-fanciful incentives that allow us to UNIFY, where fantasy ideology, philosophiy, religion, and nonsense only serve to provide fake confidence and divide us.

    The more sentimental you are, the more powerless you are. The more self determination, agency, and responsibility you have the more rational incentives. This is why the young-male-social media sphere is a distortion of political demands. Its powerless minority.

    A set of factions that are ideological, philosophica, religious, conspiratorial, or pseudoscientific signal that we are all equally exasperated – but also that we are equally isloated, disorganized, powerless, and doomed to failure.

    All that matters is that which we share in common. And those interests are material when they matter, and only intuitionistic and imaginary when they don’t, and we’re failing – in fact – when we’re dying as a people.

    Unity only exists in reality. And reality is limited to what is possible. And what is possible is that which we share in common RESPONSIBILITY. Not common fantasy.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-13 01:43:30 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107267215215358802