Why did y’all encourage me to work on the dating, mating, marrying problem? It’s

Why did y’all encourage me to work on the dating, mating, marrying problem? It’s depressing.Seriously. But, as in anything, disambiguation(decomposition) of the problem provides insights into females more so than males, as to just how much we’re bots and how simple the algorithm.

I mean for example, the female instinct is to maximize consumption so she and hers won’t be left behind, just as much as the male instinct is to maximize capital. So in any condition where the female can hyper-consumer without social regulation of it, she will do so on instinct.

But this understanding still provides just the first principle, the causal axis of her behavior.What it doesn’t tell us is that this hyperconsumption is the result of the infant stage, and is produced by our tendency both male and female to coddle girls and women:infantilization.

And what this understanding of infantilization doesn’t tell us directly, is that the difference between the classes is biological limitation on development causing infantilization of self regulation – at least on the conscientiousness axis.

So this is why we see Christians (continuous training in adult responsibility for self, family, commons) producing families across the classes, and conservatives doing it out of instinct and tradition.We see infantilization across the progressive spectrum: responsibility evasion.

So conservatism (adulting by capitalization) vs progressivism (infantilization by hyperconsumption) are biological intuitionistic and cognitive biases that have sexual origins in cognitive dimorphism, and the competition between them in reciprocity calculating ‘optimums’.

So, the algorithm for human behavior is extremely simple but because we have such large brains, capable of such exhaustive generalization, we can apply that algorithm endlessly as we can apply language in infinite permutation. But w/o reciprocity we get F:’cancer’ vs M:’aging’

And I’ll use that Female:Cancer vs Male:Aging as the biological equivalent of the unregulated expression of female hyperconsumption and infatilization vs male hypercapitalization, and …again… reciprocal exchange discovering the continuously moving equilibrium between them