Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • THE END OF THE NEED FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT Well, my broader point is that (a

    THE END OF THE NEED FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

    Well, my broader point is that (a) american prosperity is due to the combination of english law and selling off a continent and putting it to productive work. (b) american technology is largely english and german in origin, (c) and like Rome vs Athens, superior military organization and subsequent administration. (d) and subject to the same failure: that majority middle class (productive) civilizations over extend commerce (profits) beyond the reach of the military and cultural discipline that made that prosperity possible.

    The unity of the USA was only possible because of the competition between the extraordinary value of continental expansion, and the extraordinary risk that the european powers would either claim those territories, bring the states into more wars, or reconquer the continent.

    The industrial revolution allowed the use of cheap american defense (a huge island), its vast coastline, extraordinary rivers, cheap land, resources, and labor, to do to Europe what china has economically done to the USA.

    So, in the absence of external forces, given the loss of competitive economic advantage, given the over-expansion of imperial government that resulted from the world wars, and the false promise that European domestic policy was possible in the USA, and the j-war on culture, there exists no reason for a federal government that has any responsibility other than (a) military (b) foreign policy (c) facilitating physical trade between states, (d) resolution of disputes between states. And that otherwise there is negative value to the federal govt.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-12-04 02:56:20 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107386410119859291

  • NATURAL LAW JUDGEMENT OF THE VACCINE QUESTION I avoided the ‘vax’ controversy be

    NATURAL LAW JUDGEMENT OF THE VACCINE QUESTION

    I avoided the ‘vax’ controversy because I said nothing could be said without empirical evidence and a crime created by the denial of that evidence.

    So as far as I know, the empirical evidence has spoken: Unless a dramatic difference in contagion between vaccinated and non exists, then there is no case for masks or vaccines. And there is no such evidence. The opposite is true.

    What are the crimes the governments are engaged in?

    a) Given Rule of Law: Self Determination, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Markets.

    b) Uninsurability and unwarrantability of vax externalities no matter how small.

    c) State violation of the Rule of Non-Aggression.

    d) State violation of Rule of False Promise of freedom from the laws of nature (fraud).

    e) State violation of the Rule of interfering with adaptation of the population to the laws of nature (immorality).

    f) State mixture of government, and state-religion, by the use of pandering, by propagating falsehoods, in order to satisfy neuroticism, provide mindfulness by symbolism, rather than propagating truths and encouraging, training, and adaptation.

    g) so under the natural law, the law of the european peoples, the germanic law, the English law, and the american law, the state is engaging in a series of crimes which violate all those laws, and as such are evidence of the failure of rule of law, failure of the empirical state.

    h) as such the present state is a clerisy not a government, and is ruling by sophistry, pseudoscience, and deceit, to justify itself and its abuse of powers, in order to obtain attention and approval from the neurotic ending the empirical state.

    Ending the empirical state means ending the rule of law, where the rule of law by the natural law is not a philosophy or an ideology but the science of human cooperation, and the organization of human cooperation by that science.

    So in conclusion, the matter is now settled unless the overwhelming evidence says otherwise. Even if so, then the state has the responsibility to isolate the fragile not the entirety of the polity.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-12-04 01:27:03 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107386059092267083

  • GLOBALIST FASCISTS? OR FASCISTS RESISTING THE NEW GLOBALISTS? Well, the US Gover

    GLOBALIST FASCISTS? OR FASCISTS RESISTING THE NEW GLOBALISTS?

    Well, the US Government is the primary vehicle by which the globalists have obtained sufficient economic power to buy the government, academy, and media, to advance the globalist agenda at the cost of the working and middle classes. Now, it’s important to realize that the globalist agenda has no chance outside of Europe, so that the globalist agenda is just an ant-european agenda – an upper caste application of marxism: the destruction of western civilization’s martial meritocracy.

    The science is what it is (a) ethnocentric states produce the optimum outcomes and heterogeneous states produce the worst outcomes. (b) rule of law majority middle class states require full integration because religions are all macro-political institutions. (c) only majority middle-class ethnocentirc states produce optimum outcomes. (b) the USA was designed as a continuation of the UK and the Holy Roman Empire, consisting of a federation of states under the traditional rule of law which only survives in the anglosphere as the common law. (d) the anglo system is the most behaviorally expensive but it produces the highest trust, highest monetary velocity. highest innovation, and highest standard of living. (e) the painful truth is that the median of the distribution determines the groups competitive competency, and it turns out that each racial group both favors its own above other groups, and has a different demographic distribution of competency. (f) different demographic distributions of competency mean superior or inferior adaptability to high trust norms and institutions (g) non-white and non-asian groups appear to be unable or unwilling to pay the high costs of anglo-germanic civilization BUT want the benefits of living in a high cost high trust anglo-germanic civilization. (h) this means that the white folk have to pay for the non white folk and it’s destroying the white middle class to do so. (i) So is self-defense fascism? Well, fascism was a self-defense political system to protect Germanic (nationalist) countries from communist (globalist) countries.

    Is fascism bad? Apparently, despite that we won’t admit it, it won the argument of the 20th century over the optimum method of political organization. China is a fascist state. Given the collapse of the anglo project to unify the world under Smithian economic reciprocity, the result is, as predicted, a return to the conflict of civilizations (where civilizations represent macro races), and a return to nationalism (civilizational-ism).

    That this is a deterministic outcome is rather obvious to every synthetic historian.

    So in other words, you’re effectively practicing a pseudoscientific religion that is being replaced by scientific evidence and you’re rebelling against it.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-30 16:49:52 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107367038485135877

  • MIT PREDICTED COLLAPSE IN 2040 BACK IN 1972 The progressive fantasy is that scie

    MIT PREDICTED COLLAPSE IN 2040 BACK IN 1972
    youtube.com/watch?v=kVOTPAxrrP4

    The progressive fantasy is that science and technology will save us from it.

    Tech Won’t Matter because we’ve exhausted consumption capacity (really) and are down to selling virtue signals and hedonism. We knew this by the early 00s.

    Almost all of us in the contrarian side of the economics discipline, especially Turpin, with Strauss and Howe in history, and of course Kondratiev, have predicted the collapse from 2020 to 2030.

    Most of us were certain by 2004 at the latest. I’ve been right about 2008, the teens, and even the insurrection in 2020 – although I assumed it would have been worse.

    Why? Demographics is destiny. And demographic destiny over time determines geostrategic equilibria.

    Why is there a problem today? In the postwar period we stopped all research on human differences, and instead pursued study of equality. This turns out to have been surprisingly catastrophic and even far more so than I’d expected.

    Why? Because the rate of prosperity (evolution) is dependent on the rate of evolutionary computation (competition), and that rate is dependent upon the demographic distribution more so … vastly more so … than anything else including geography and resource availability.

    So studying individual and group differences and seeking opportunities for reciprocity and a heterogeneous economy would have produced sustainable innovation and political harmony instead of conflict.

    So, between the decline in demographic quality (ability), demographic shrinkage, and demographic asymmetry (comparative advantage), geostrategic geo-equilibrium, and (surprisingly) the negative consequences of seeking equality in business, academy and state, that lowered rate of competitive innovation across all but a tiny spectrum.

    As for positives? Hope is not a strategy.

    The dark side is that these changes always produce war and collapse. I’ve said that the USA is going to be much poorer than europe is today, and europe will be as poor as ukraine and russia.

    Best place to live? Middle america. Waterways, food, oil. The only place that absolutely positively will have food. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-26 19:13:21 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107344953447996891

  • WHY CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALISTS ARE THE ENEMY OF OUR PEOPLE The Difference between

    WHY CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALISTS ARE THE ENEMY OF OUR PEOPLE

    The Difference between Christian Classical Liberal Nationalists (CCLN) and Christian Fundamentalist Globalists(CFG) is that we CCLNs put our people, our law, our constitution, our nation, and our faith on equal ground. We DON’T, like the CFGs put our faith and globalism first at the expense of our people, our law, our constitution, nation, and our state. In this sense fundamentalists are the enemy of our people. There is very little difference between Fundamentalism and Woke. Woke is a war against our people. Fundemantalists consider it only a war against their faith – that’s winning.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-26 12:54:26 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107343463450124478

  • DEAR MOTHER ENGLAND…. THE SCIENCE SAYS: (1) Rule of Law by the Natural, Common

    DEAR MOTHER ENGLAND….

    THE SCIENCE SAYS: (1) Rule of Law by the Natural, Common Law of Self Determination by Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, and Markets in association, reproduction, production, commons and polities at the cost of suppression of the reproduction of those unfit for those markets (2) Monarch as Judge of Last Resort, Outside the law in restoration of rule of law (3) Government by Cabinet elected by the houses (4) Lords as Judge of Consequences of Economic Fashion and Whimsy (state, culture, civilization) (5) Parliament (business and industry) of as Judge of Economy (Production). (6) New Lower House as Judge of Fashion and Whimsey (consumption). The proper solution to the problem of politicians is to increase the size of the jury (thang, parliament) to the entire population eliminating all need for politicians? Why not break the population into direct voting by house?

    Brits have lost their minds in the postwar world. You had the best system of government in human history, but you didn’t have a written constitution so that rule of law of natural law continued to consist of an empirical set of transactions against the accountancy of the law. There is a tendency of postwar Brits to degenerate into petty moralizing the same way the french court degenerated into petty moralizing, just as the chinese degenerated into aesthetics rather than competence. Y’all invented the modern state – and you threw it out the window in the postwar period. That’s what the SCIENCE says. Why not stop all the petty posturing? The USA (falling apart), canada (same), australia and NZ could use the restoration of the anglosphere – but that’s not possible without ‘grandparents’ getting the family together under the on parent we have: you.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-25 17:59:41 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107339001463639098

  • LEARNING P-METHOD, LOGIC, SCIENCE, AND LAW — “Curt; What steps would you sugges

    LEARNING P-METHOD, LOGIC, SCIENCE, AND LAW

    — “Curt; What steps would you suggest I take towards sculpting myself into a proper representative of this science?” —

    I’ve asked around again, because asking how to master this science is something that’s asked frequently. And I always get the same answer.

    We are working on the constitution, the book, the wiki, and the slides and courseware from the book. This is a huge and difficult project. In the meantime, the best way is to watch the videos, learn the book as we produce it online, follow along on Twitter and telegram, and by asking questions, and participating, pick it up.

    As soon as we can restart the course at the institute we can formalize that education process. I tried running the course from the beginning but found it had to be simplified dramatically for anyone to follow it. So the extra few years we’ve worked on that have been fruitful.

    —

    Response from Coach Noah Revoy :

    Ask someone how to bake a cake from scratch

    Every time they mention an ingredient, ask them to explain how to make it from scratch

    “Flour? How do I make that? Wheat? How do I grow that? A farm? How do I make a farm?” etc.

    Its impossible to explain anything from the beginning

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-25 15:28:00 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107338404997541541

  • WHY YOUNG MEN DOUBLE DOWN ON ‘FAIL’. When a young male that is otherwise unsucce

    WHY YOUNG MEN DOUBLE DOWN ON ‘FAIL’.

    When a young male that is otherwise unsuccessful in life, finds a paradigm he can feel self worth, self image, and status from empathizing with, identifying with, obtaining competency in, and advocating, he doubles down on his malinvestment reinforcing his error, rather than investigating and mastering the competing theories that falsify not only his presumption but each other. This is a universal behavior among what we call ‘the midwits’. It’s also what we call an addiction response. The fundamental problem with such incompetent, ignorant, addicted midwits is that between their addiction-defense, the intellectual dishonesty that will use in defending it, the volume of knowledge one must convey, and the degree of effort required to educate them, it’s too costly in time and patience to do so – and so we let them stumble around like drunks, repeating their fairy stories, polluting the informational commons simply because cleaning up the mess they are and are making is too much effot.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-24 20:20:06 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107333891287600466

  • THE BASIS OF THE NEED FOR FAITH AND WHY IT WORKS (AND WHY IT ONLY WORKS FOR SOME

    THE BASIS OF THE NEED FOR FAITH AND WHY IT WORKS (AND WHY IT ONLY WORKS FOR SOME)

    All religious myths are desirable, intuitionistic, sell and distribute becasue they appeal to animal instincts we can’t rationally inspect. They are just stories. Those stories are useful if you suspend disbelief to further prevent your reason from falsifying them. By suspending disbelief about obvious falsehoods, to sate your primitive animal intutions, you do in fact suppress neuroticism caused by those primitive intuitions given your lack of meaningful responsibility causeal control over your life, social and political anonymitiy irrelevance – all of whch frustrate your brain stem, and limbic system, and cause you stress (lack of mindfulness). Some of us can do only one (belief or reason) some of us can do both belief and reason) and many are in between. If faith works for you it’s not necessarily something you should admit to, but then if it does work for you that’s better than neither faith nor reason working for you. The only thing that matters is knowing what to deliver unto god (faith and obedience), and what to deliver under caesar (truth and reason). In other words, never claim statements of faith are in fact true, only that they are good. Likewise never claim scientific statements are good, only that they are true – and taht ‘good’ is determined only when we voluntarily exchange. This is all there is to know about faith and supernatural vs reason and evidence.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-23 20:57:48 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107328377231794790

  • POLITICAL MOVEMENTS NEED EXECUTIVE TEAMS TOO (Wisdom) Like raising a family, it

    POLITICAL MOVEMENTS NEED EXECUTIVE TEAMS TOO

    (Wisdom) Like raising a family, it takes years to cook an executive management team, and want of, and taking of, responsibility creates agency in peerage without hierarchy, leaving the top execuitive as a judge of last resort, rather than font of everything and infantilizing all. …

    You do not hire a management team, you raise one like a family.
    ( see Jim Collins, Good to Great (2001) ) …

    It only SEEMS slower. In fact, it is the fastest method of producing competency in the individuals, the team, the group, the organization, and the polity. There is no substitute for ‘neural harmonics’. …

    Why? It’s neural economy: because it’s more important that we make 1M weekly tiny decisions by the same distributed criteria across every possible venue and context than the few big decisions by consensus or fiat.” —

    When people ask me how to advise them in business the answer is always the same (a) you either have it or you don’t, and (b) if you have it you have to cook a team (c) and you need the revenue and time to cook a team. (d) that means you build 100 businesses in a sequence not one.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-23 17:12:59 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107327493202495070