Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • THE UNIFICATION OF THE ARYAN AND CHRISTIAN “Seek To Understand” isn’t just the w

    THE UNIFICATION OF THE ARYAN AND CHRISTIAN

    “Seek To Understand” isn’t just the way to win friends and influence people, it’s the answer to the problem of epistemology, just as christian love is the answer to cooperation at scale: our brains developed a desire for efficiency, but this evolved for reducing physical not verbal or mental costs. As such, both seeking to understand, and exhausting potential for forgiveness, rae the means by which the ariyan and christian achieve both superior political and superior social ends.

    Most of us seek to agree or disagree rather than to understand. And when we can understand we double down on priors. My contribution to our civilization is to understand this failing of human consciousness, and to instead, ‘exhaust’ our potential to understand and to cooperate. And in doign so master ourselves, this universe, and those we conquer and rule this universe with: one another.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 19:16:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769637456546205

  • THE INNOVATION IN DECEPTION BY THE ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS The Conversion of a Mothe

    THE INNOVATION IN DECEPTION BY THE ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS

    The Conversion of a Mother’s Decption of Children Into A Political Institution.

    — “What is this nonsense you can’t stop about Abraham? It’s like you know some truth no one else does, wow! Genius! ” — Another Gamma Vox Day Moron

    They’re called the Abrahamic Religions you nitwit.

    The abrahamic religions were an innovation in religion that conflated all three forms of persuasive coercion (deception) into one monopoly narrative that was then sold by the female method of seduction using false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe, in order for the population, like a mother to her children, to possess confidence in continuing their cooperation, conflict, resistance, and warfare despite all the evidence to the contrary of their socially constructed false narrative.

    This is why mother’s limited social construction was institutionalized by the abrahamic religions into a political and civilizational social construction by the sequence of israelites, jews, christians, muslims in the old world, and the sequence of marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, anti-male feminism, pc, woke, anti-west, antiiwhite, anti-white male.

    RE: @greayman @voxday

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 18:04:47 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769357136014716

  • An INTERMIXED economy solves the problem of malincentives in government and priv

    An INTERMIXED economy solves the problem of malincentives in government and private sector, ends rent seeking on the population by both state and financial sector, reduces taxation; guts the globalist financial sector, restores national sovereignty, maximizing returns on capital. https://t.co/jTkLpGw6q0

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 17:32:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491464938845614089

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491464102862110721

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    A mixed economy See Definition Attached. An Intermixed Economy (as I use the term) refers to the state acting as a strategic venture capitalist (source of credit), with profits returned to the state instead of the financial sector, and consumer credit provided by the state. https://twitter.com/erikbrus25/status/1491269349180850178

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1491464102862110721

  • THE SCIENCE, LOGIC, AND LAW OF LYING BY SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION @curtd @RenegadeScou

    THE SCIENCE, LOGIC, AND LAW OF LYING BY SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION

    @curtd @RenegadeScoutr @Snidely_Whiplash @voxday

    — “It’s not that you use difficult words. It’s that the words you mean do not mean what you think they mean.” —

    Are you sure? Can you testify to that?

    It’s called Continuous Recursive Adversarial Disambiguation by Serialization and Operationalzation producing terms as a spectrum of unambiguous measurements, thereby preventing the many forms of sophistry, denial, deceit, and fraud, made possible by ambiguity in terms.

    At the beginning of this prosecution of the vox-moron-clique, explicitly demonstrated disambiguation of Faith(Theology) > Belief (Philosophy) > Trust (Science(Law)), to illustrated how one of the vox-morons was trying to claim that belief in the supernatural (mythicism) was equal to Trust in science (testimony).

    This is why you can’t tolerate the precision of terms I’m using, or the method of argument I’m using, because they deny you the ability to justify your social construction of falsehood (technically fraud by fictionalism, using sophistry and supernaturalism), by conflation, inflation, sophistry, social construction, false promise (fraud) of freedom from the four sets of laws of the universe, where testimony (truth) would require:

    Realism, Naturalism, Identity(uniqueness,unambiguous), internal consistency, operational possibility, external correspondence, rational choice, reciprocity of rational choice, stated limits, full accounting within those limits, competitive parsimony, warrantability, warranty of due diligence, within the limits of your restitutability.

    Because that’s the test of whether you may claim a statement is true without engaging in lying by design or by falure of due diligence. And when you fail due diligence by motivated reasoning, that means you’ve pursued self interest, and therefore committed a crime against the informational commons upon which all members of the polity depend for understanding, predicting, planning, and action.

    Now, (a) I know this is over your head (b) I know it will likely always be over your head, (c) because you would never try to justify your existing network of socially constructed deceits, and your practice of female method of argument that replaces the priority of truth and falsehood with approval and disapproval, and then relies on pretense of knowledge, denial, disapproval, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, ridiculing, gossiping, rallying, poisoning the well, reputation destruction, and canceling.

    So all you have done during this little expermiental prosecution of mine, a prosecution you vox-morons have initiated with your female attacks, is provide overwhelming evidence of the veracity of my accusations, arguments, and convictions of you as a criminal network whose purpose is to preserve your organized crimes against the informational commons upon which all people depend.

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 17:14:07 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769157851233847

  • WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE ONLY REQUIRE THREE DIMENSIONS OF MEASUREMENT(DESCRIPTION)

    WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE ONLY REQUIRE THREE DIMENSIONS OF MEASUREMENT(DESCRIPTION) AND ONE DIMENSION OF CHANGE (TIME)?

    “Q: Curt: What’s so special about triangles!”

    The simple answer is that no external information is needed in order to calculate a plane just as no external information is necessary to calculate a sphere.

    Q: “What’s an example of something that would require external information in order to calculate it?”

    1) no matter what you do with three points triangle it will always and only create a triangle. (two opposing forces – two points – can create a stable state – the third point.

    2) no matter what you do to two points they will only create a line. two opposing forces can create a stable relationship.

    3) no matter what you do to a point: it will only create a point. A stable state will remain stable unless subject to an opposite charge (force)

    4) in order to create any other geometry you must apply some rule where the information must be stored externally to the arbitrary relation of the points.

    5) in other words, how can the universe know how to create a square, or a cube? it can’t.

    6) This is why the universe has only three dimensions, and can only have three dimensions.

    This is why we see all the universe evolve from one force -pressure- creating two opposing forces (negative and positive charge) we call polarity.

    This polarity (line) can only survive (maintain state) if it has sufficient energy not to collapse back into the background state – because the background state cannot produce (concentrate) enough negative or positive energy to cancel it out.

    If this object can accumulate enough force to create a stable state (survive) then we now have three points, the negative charge x, the positive charge y, and the sum of the charges z that produces a surface area (total charge) greater than the charges of x and y and such cannot dissipate.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-06 21:14:38 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107753116668331825

  • THE PROBLEM OF BEING AHEAD OF THE REVOLUTIONARY CURVE The problem we have faced

    THE PROBLEM OF BEING AHEAD OF THE REVOLUTIONARY CURVE

    The problem we have faced by being ahead of the curve, is that the overton window – meaning the willingess of people to hear, to recognize what is heard, to adapt to what is heard, to desire to bring about what is heard, to be willing to act upon what is heard, to act when it is convenient, to act when it is imperative, or to act out of desperation as a last resort – doesn’t move across people equally, nor across the population as a whole equally.

    We are incrementally closing on the peak intersection of the factors that cause people to act within that window. I specialize in macro predictions and I can only get it within five to ten years. No one can predict the exact window’s timing. We can only attempt to seize every opportunity to capture that window as it comes along.

    As such ‘morons’ think that trying to organize early is possible. It isn’t. It will only capture dysfunctionals. What you try with any movement is to leave behind dysfunctinoals in order to capture the normies that make political victory desirable for enough people of good character that they will act in concert.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-04 20:45:32 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107741677628330697

  • Back in the day, back in say, 2008/9, a group of people with abilty and money ap

    Back in the day, back in say, 2008/9, a group of people with abilty and money approached me asking if I would organize (really, legitimize) an attack on a media outlet. Of course, I said no. Such actions as one-offs are acts of frustration and desperation of symbolic value that only legitimize further aggression by the state. Instead any group must show first that the state is illegitimate by showing up in large numbers with a set of actionable demands.

    But the point is that this has been going on for a long time and everyone knows that the problem is the financial system and the media, and after that the academy, and that the state is a prisoner of those systems of influence as much as we are.

    All I have seen happen since those of us began to undrestand the outcome back around 1976, is that hispanic immigration has achieved what leftist ideas failed to – despite converting from bolshevik class warfare to neo-marxist race-identity-sex warfare.

    Yes the woke religion (and yes it is a pseudoscientific and sophistic religion) has succeeded as the number of people going to college increases but the quality and ability of the people graduating decreases. But that percentage would not have overcome the majority of the population without the increase in underclass immigration.

    The point being that there are a limited portfolio of possible solutions to the preservation of western civilization and the prevention of the jewish-muslim (semitic) destruction of western civlization as it has destroyed all civilizations it has reached.

    None of these solutions are possible under a system that makes it impossible for us to succeed within the existing political system – it has been undermined by design and our population and culture have been undermined by design.

    Yes our women are the problem. No that doesn’t matter. We are men. And we either take responsibiilty for the failings of women, and the limited abilities of children – or we do not.

    If we do not take that rsponsibility then we have nothing to complain about.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-04 20:22:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107741585420602189

  • WRONG QUESTION: “ARE WE GOING TO LOSE OUR DEMOCRACY?” Confuses the importance of

    WRONG QUESTION: “ARE WE GOING TO LOSE OUR DEMOCRACY?”

    Confuses the importance of democracy (a luxury good with questionable value and all historical evidence against it) with the importance of self-determination by self-determined means that we imprecisely call sovereignty(political), liberty(economic), and freedom (individual). And worse, overstating the value of democracy understates the rule of law of the natural law of self-determination by self-determined means, by reciprocal insurance, by force of arms, of that self-determination, by the guarantee of sovereignty in demonstrated interests, reciprocity in-display word, and deed, limiting us to truth before face(self), duty before self, loyalty before self, and reciprocity in display word and deed, and the total prohibition on authority. The result of course is competition (markets) in all aspects of life, thus producing an open market for rule, government, economy, and society by the best competitors in those markets. And as such the rate of evolutionary innovation adaptation and application is unique to western civilization. IN other words, democracy is only meaningful if it is meritocratic and earned, and earned by reciprocal insurance in display word, and deed of all others willing to do so. This is why democracy requires chariots, cavalry, spear, phalanx, bowmen, and especially rifles: because all men have equal ability and interest to preserve their sovereignty along with that of others. SO the first ‘right’ is the right, responsibility, and inalienability to bear arms such that our insurance of one another, can produce the luxury of participatory government as an externality.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-04 19:08:30 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107741296082016361

  • CAN WHITES UNDERSTAND THE TRUTH? ENOUGH CAN The Truth – as a concept in and of i

    CAN WHITES UNDERSTAND THE TRUTH? ENOUGH CAN

    The Truth – as a concept in and of itself, and truthful statements in and of themseleves, are only necessary because becuase the truth almost always asks us to bear a cost in order to obtain ever escalating returns. While untruth allows us to avoid a cost in exchange for never obtaining escalating returns. Male Heroism, truth, duty, loyalty and hierarchy are a cost that produces ever escalating returns – evolutionary advantage. Unfortunately, female intuition evolved for the purpose of extracting resources from the tribe in exchange for the production of offspring. And when female intuition is no longer bearing the cost of producing offspring, that same intuition of kleptoparasitism is direted at hyperconsumption including the hyperconsumption and therefore destruction of the means of cultural production that we call heroism, truth, duty, loyalty, and hierarchy. Men are dangerous so naturally rational but cumulatively civil. Women are only hazardaous and naturally irrational, but cumulatively they are dangerous and destructive to civilization. We let pandora out of the box. And then we immigrated and let loose an ancient enemy the jews whose methof of warfare, like the female is to hide behind pretense of virtue and care when their purpose is the female: undermine so that they can hperconsume the production of males we call civilization. Whites can understand this if it’s explaned to them.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-01 23:08:31 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107725252923468728

  • CONSERVATISM CAN’T FAIL – IT’S JUST EMPIRICISM. SO WHAT’S FAILING US? (a) Conser

    CONSERVATISM CAN’T FAIL – IT’S JUST EMPIRICISM. SO WHAT’S FAILING US?

    (a) Conservatism=Burke’s Reaction to the French Revolution that Empowered the Commoners. What we have in America is not conservatism, it’s the republican party, which is the weaker party, in a first-past-the-post democratic electoral system, that by First-past-the-post elections, results in a two-party system.

    (b) This two-party system means that conservatism (empirical rather than theoretical or ideal decision making) will always be the minority influence, and a minority party, that must slowly shift to the left to maintain the ability to even RESIST the majority party. In other words, our electoral system can’t possibly conserve only slow the rate at which we fail to conserve.

    (c) Worse, the combination of Christian utopianism, french enlightenment utopianism, Jewish-Marxist-pomo-woke utopianism – all of which are lies – created a Christian right that and a republican party dependent upon the fundraising by the Christian right, that maintains the utopianism, and ‘hopefulness as Christian cope’ that has prevented the right from using force as had the left to achieve its political goals of resistance.

    (c) The only ‘cure’ for this problem is to end the presidency and prime minister roles, to restore the monarchy as a judge of last resort (last appeals), restore the professional cabinet, and restore criteria for voting for the upper(territorial), middle(commercial), and lower (married families) houses of government, thereby requiring classes to agree on policy rather than the majority, because majority always produces a race to the bottom.

    (d) The only reason ‘conserve’ makes any difference in European civilization is because we are trying to conserve our group evolutionary strategy, and the accumulated cultural capital, from that strategy, all of which is produced by rule of law, of self-determination, by sovereignty in demonstrated interests, reciprocity in display, word, and deed, truth, duty and loyalty to the commons over self, together which produce merit, mindfulness, and responsibility as the natural consequence. And this combination was the reason for the rapid rate of European development in the bronze, iron, and steel ages – with Christian ignorance and superstition the only period of darkness in our history. Why? Because it is the fastest evolutionary system of human organization available to man: scientific government.

    FIX THE PROBLEM
    there is only one solution: revolution, restoration of the constitution, completing that constitution to include the foundations in the natural law and the European group evolutionary strategy under that law, and in particular the prohibition on the utopian false promises so that all frauds are criminalized – including the political frauds.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 13:25:52 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107717299590083009