Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • IS THE AMERICAN EXPERIMENT DEAD OR GOING THROUGH AN EVOLUTIONARY REVOLUTION? The

    IS THE AMERICAN EXPERIMENT DEAD OR GOING THROUGH AN EVOLUTIONARY REVOLUTION?

    The american idea consisted of leaving behind the parasitic aristocracy, parasitic clergy and church, and parasitic underclass, to create a meritocratic majority middle class society of producers.

    However, for a variety of reasons
    (a) jefferson brought in the French utopian ideas,
    (b) the french destruction of german aristocratic and martial civilization suppressing the european restoration of civilization by prussia
    (c) the opportunity to drive warlike europeans out of the western continent
    (d) the north and the south were different civilizations at different stages of development
    (e) the civil war, the american post-civil war effort to push warlike europeans out of our hemisphere,
    (f) and the ‘unjust’ was to contain ‘just’ germany,
    (g) and the migration of postwar jews that had undermined Germany and Russia into America undermined not only the american experiment in a majority middle class, but falsified the experiment with eliminating the aristocracy that preserved ethnonationalism out of self interest. And slowly left behind germanic, anglo, common, natural law for jewish and french positive law.

    Is the american experiment in formalizing germanic civilization’s rule of law, tfifunctionalism, and evolutionary velocity free of the parasitic classes dead? Or is it stalled because we insufficiently understood what it would take to defend it from bad ideas?

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-16 18:43:06 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107809143935865774

  • THE FRENCH REVOLUTION REPEATS THE BYZANTINE DEFEAT OF ROME The french revolution

    THE FRENCH REVOLUTION REPEATS THE BYZANTINE DEFEAT OF ROME

    The french revolution was just a repeat of the byzantine destruction of the western roman empire, killing of its aristocracy, and converting it to feminine utopian false promise. It wasn’t a restoration. It was the destruction of the holy roman empire of the germanic people.

    Rousseau > Kant > Marx et al > Gramsci-Marcuse et al > Derrida-Foucault-Lyotard et al > Friedan-Steinem > (neocons / libertarians) > Pc-Woke Mainstream

    The moment we lost the aristocracy we lost the west, because it was the combination of our tradition of the military order, the common law of european peoples, the aristocracy it produced, and the gradual conversion of the aristocracy into competitive production of excellence in high arts, states, and commons that created the miracles of the ancient, late medieval worlds. ‘

    And it was the french and jewish authoritarian feminine utopian false promise of mothering of the people that created the horrors of the french revolution, the destruction of germanic europe, the destruction of eastern europa and russia as an aextension of germanic europe, the world wars, and today’s destruction of both the global anglosphere and the continental european civilization. And only eastern europen and russia are resisting. While france tries to restore her dominance despite her centuries of evil.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-16 16:46:33 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107808685645182046

  • CONSCIOUSNESS IS TRIVIAL. Qualia was just a little more difficult. Philosophers

    CONSCIOUSNESS IS TRIVIAL.
    Qualia was just a little more difficult. Philosophers and pseudoscientists are just attention whoring on public ignorance.

    — “I still don’t understand qualia.” –MS

    OK, So, there is a difference between understanding what’s going on and the ability to introspect upon it. For example, lift your right arm over your head. How did that happen? I can explain how that happened as biological processes. But knowing that doesn’t mean you can observe it. I can explain why color vision is organized as it is – correctly mirroring the universe. But that doesn’t mean you can introspect upon it. I can explain how consciousness is bjiologically constructed – but that doesn’t mean you can introspect upon it. So why is that any different from the fact that we can describe magnets and magnetism, chemical composition, or subatomic particles but you can’t directly observe them. So what’s the difference between inability to externally observe and internally observe? THERE ISN”T ANY.

    Nerves > Sensation
    Neural Micro Columns > Prediction (fragments)
    Neural Columns > Composition (identification)
    Neural Regions > Disambiguation (valiance)
    Hippocampal Region (three corticies) > Integration
    Hippocampal Association Regions > (Perception)
    Forward Neocortical Regions > (Prediction)
    Thalamus > (attention)
    Frontal Neocortical Regions > (attention regulation – recursion)
    Cerebellum > Muscular Timing
    Cingulate Gyrus > Release of Action.

    Touch and temperature are simple. The development of the eye (sight) and ear are interesting, particularly the ear (hearing).

    How would nerves possibly convert pulse (vibration) and disambiguate it from other nerves by pulse and vibration, and why is it that our touch, sight, and sound is so accurate a reflection of the observable (sensable world)?

    In other words, how would those nerves ‘sort’ stimuli into reflecting precisely the vibrations whether physical pressure, air waves, or light waves, into stimuli (qualia) that so accurately reflects the external world? ISn’t that an interesting question?

    The correct question is “well, else would our senses accomplish and how would they do so other than what they do?” Turns out it’s pretty simple.

    The evolution of increasing sensitivity to the spectrum of vibration and necessity of continuous recursive sortition, would, of course, naturally result in consistency and correspondence with the universe – simply because there is no other information to organize by.

    I mean, it’s so stupidly simple it’s ridiculous.

    And the reason we can’t cmoprehend it ist hat we think there is an observer called ‘I’, when in fact ‘I’ is just a stream of a hierarchy of memory in real time.

    And for the audience, what you consider ‘i’ is a little region in your brain stem that’s regulating homeostasis. That’s it. It’s about as smart as a thermometer. That’s all. Is that humiliatiing? Yeah, well, the earth isn’t the center of the universe either.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-15 14:53:35 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107802579170216589

  • SUBVERTING THE RIGHT’S FAILURE Part 1 – The Origin of Failure Every individual c

    SUBVERTING THE RIGHT’S FAILURE
    Part 1 – The Origin of Failure

    Every individual constructs, by a combination of accident, affinity, and intent, his intuitions, philosophy, self image, and status-claims by investment in a set of identities (imitation), beliefs (presumptions), and rationalizations (excuses, arguments, philosophies).

    Biologically this means, together, this spectrum of ‘beliefs’ regulates our ability to produce serotonin, and serotonin produces our ability to regulate negative emotions. And it’s the regulation of negative emotions that produces what we call mindfulness. And it’s mindfulness that allows us to exercise agency, longer term time preference – rational adult thought.

    So, this series of causality means that we treat, quite logically, our beliefs as very precious assets. I’ve argued elsewhere that depending upon your combination degree of trait neuroticism, stress, or sense of life in an adversarial condition, or in an alienated or oppressed, or conspired-against condition, that you’ll put defense of beliefs above everything other than your life itself.

    Now, some of these beliefs are effective in that they produce an emotional defense against stress for you. Some might produce an emotional advantage of enduring more stress for you. But aside from the emotional feedback, those beliefs may be correspondent with reality and result in success rather just emotional defense or advantage for you; or those beliefs may be non-correspondent with reality and result in lack of success for you; or those beliefs may be contradictory and result in a continuous cycle of failure for you.

    And to make matters worse, because these beliefs are now a means of sedating negative emotions, we double down on those beliefs despite failure, producing cyclical real life, emotional, psychological collapse. Or what our friend Yuri Bezmenov calls ‘demoraization’. And what the rest of us call anger, resentment, resignation, and depression – which is my perception of the majority of the right – at least the vocal right online.

    So now that’ we’ve worked through this we have discovered that the cycle of failure from malinvestment in beliefs that provide emotional regulation at the cost of spiralling into failure, is the same as every other addictive drug – every failure leads to more failure using more sedation by the addictive drug of false beliefs provisoning serotonin. And so, again, we’ve now explained why religion, philosophy, ideology, and false beliefs are in fact the ‘opiates of the masses’ producing personal, group, class, and civilizational collapse.

    And so whether we are on the left selling false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe, or on the right selling false promise of freedom from paying the cost of regulating, limiting, governing, and ruling by purely evidentiary means, we are, left and right causing internal conflict and mutual collapse by the false promise of luxury beliefs as a substitute for material actions.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-14 14:51:20 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107796907964343250

  • WHY THE CHANGE IN THE COST OF ART AND QUALITY OF ART? @shelley11 What has caused

    WHY THE CHANGE IN THE COST OF ART AND QUALITY OF ART?
    @shelley11

    What has caused the change in production of high art, especially monumental art, (as someone who has studied stonemasonry, sculpture, and medieval construction techniques), is that the price of human time has increased to where it’s no longer affordable to pay that many men of that much skill for that long a period of time. Even at the time something on the scale of 1/4 of regional GDP was consumed in the production of those edifices. So they were effectively jobs programs for skilled craftsmen – and we have few of those jobs programs remaining now that we have steel, concrete, and panel construction.

    Worse, when the aristocracy (inheriting sons of nobility) and the church (non-inheriting sonse of nobility), sponsored the arts, they generated competitive demand between nobility for the status provided by the success of artists in their territory. We don’t think of this today, but just as the pyramids still draw tourists, and skyscrapers draw businesses, churches and cathedrals did the same – for obvious reasons. They were one of the primary forms of entertainment, information, and educastion of the day.

    So, as for the price of labor, today, an painter for example must keep some number of paintings – say, six to twelve, in one or more galleries, at a price of 1500-3500 each (just as an average). That means a successful artist must turn over a dozen works per year just to make 40k in income, and only about two thirds of their works are likely to sell at stated prices – some just sit in inventory. So that means at best an artist gets 100 hours per painting including all the related work to that painting – including just thinking about sketching whatyou’re going to paint.. Just to produce enough supply to feed the channel. It’s not an economically viable job. For this reason, over ninety percent of artists lose money. This was’t true of craftsmen before 1880.

    So all artwork looks like it takes less than twenty hours work for high production artists, and then the works of skilled craftsmen painters (realism etc that does not look like a photo projection) must be very expensive and only practiced as a hobby.

    Economics in everything.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-13 19:25:44 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107792324629370839

  • WHY THE CHANGE IN THE COST OF ART AND QUALITY OF ART? @shelley11 What has caused

    WHY THE CHANGE IN THE COST OF ART AND QUALITY OF ART?
    @shelley11

    What has caused the change in production of high art, especially monumental art, (as someone who has studied stonemasonry, sculpture, and medieval construction techniques), is that the price of human time has increased to where it’s no longer affordable to pay that many men of that much skill for that long a period of time. Even at the time something on the scale of 1/4 of regional GDP was consumed in the production of those edifices. So they were effectively jobs programs for skilled craftsmen – and we have few of those jobs programs remaining now that we have steel, concrete, and panel construction.

    Worse, when the aristocracy (inheriting sons of nobility) and the church (non-inheriting sonse of nobility), sponsored the arts, they generated competitive demand between nobility for the status provided by the success of artists in their territory. We don’t think of this today, but just as the pyramids still draw tourists, and skyscrapers draw businesses, churches and cathedrals did the same – for obvious reasons. They were one of the primary forms of entertainment, information, and educastion of the day.

    So, as for the price of labor, today, an painter for example must keep some number of paintings – say, six to twelve, in one or more galleries, at a price of 1500-3500 each (just as an average). That means a successful artist must turn over a dozen works per year just to make 40k in income, and only about two thirds of their works are likely to sell at stated prices – some just sit in inventory. So that means at best an artist gets 100 hours per painting including all the related work to that painting – including just thinking about sketching whatyou’re going to paint.. Just to produce enough supply to feed the channel. It’s not an economically viable job. For this reason, over ninety percent of artists lose money. This was’t true of craftsmen before 1880.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-13 19:24:14 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107792318766424046

  • HOW DO WE DEVELOP A COMPETENCY IN THE SKILL OF DECIDABILITY? — “So what’s a sou

    HOW DO WE DEVELOP A COMPETENCY IN THE SKILL OF DECIDABILITY?

    — “So what’s a sound entry point to begin to develop this competency?” —

    Practice “Continuous recursive disambiguation of concepts by serialization and operationalization into a spectrum of ordinal measurements closed to conflation, inflation and denial. Producing a single most parsimonious paradigm, vocabulary, grammar, logic of commensurability”

    Why? Evolution constructs the entire persistent universe by the process of continuous, recursive, disambiguation of disorder(entropy) into order(energy) that we call mass in a process we call evolutionary computation.

    If we reverse this organization by disambiguation into first principles using the same process we result in a set of irreducible first principles, vocabulary, grammar and logic of decidability across all human experience, completing unification of sciences and scientfic method.

    So how can you learn that? You can do it yourself, or you can follow those of us who do it, producing that science of universal decidability, and our more than twenty-year project to complete it.

    At least now it’s vaguely comprehensible.

    But we are … an irreverent group. 😉 Our irrevernce provides the humor that lets us tolerate the daily scrifice of our psycholgical and emotional sacred cows. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-12 20:10:47 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107786839516096784

  • WAS THE DESTRUCTION OF WESTERN INSTITUTIONS OF CULTURAL PRODUCTION DONE BY ACCID

    WAS THE DESTRUCTION OF WESTERN INSTITUTIONS OF CULTURAL PRODUCTION DONE BY ACCIDENT OR ON PURPOSE?
    @BasedTreecko

    Undermining the institutions of cultural production was done on purpose. Capture of the academy, media, and government bureaucracy was done on purpose. Immigrating third world underclasses was done on purpose. Immigration overloading was done on purpose. Financial redistribution suppression white middle-class reproduction was done on purpose. Offshoring manufacturing jobs was done on purpose. Degradation of education in favor of minority non-failure was done on purpose. Social destruction by black relocation to urban areas was done on purpose. The selective prosecution of cases before the supreme court to undermine the law and constitution was done on purpose. Financial predation via the financial sector was done on purpose. Baiting-into-hazard credit expansion was done on purpose. White replacement is being done on purpose. Locating immigrants to stable regions is being done on purpose. Resisting putting up a wall, reforming immigration is being done on purpose.

    I mean, I can keep this list going on until I run out of characters on social media posts.

    As for the civil war? All civil wars are achieved by the means available with the economy, technology, population distribution that’s possible at the time, just like all wars are achieved by the same ends.

    The primary method of collapsing the USA internally is to produce silence, so that communication that produces false confidence in the population is impossible. This is easy with the collapse of power lines because that has the most effect but is harmful to the population. This means that collapse of communication must be more surgical. It’s relatively easy to preserve power but cut telco, cable, wireless cell, and broadcast. It’s just more labor intensive. IMO that’s what will occur. And it’s unstoppable because all those people have to go home. What we did in Ukraine was show up at police and politicians homes. Everyone stops when that happens.

    A s imple analysis is that the US population is the largest army in the world by many multiples, and that while some of the military will fight against the population not much of it will, less of the national guard, and and few of the police will. They survey differently than they will act.

    The primary strategy of the military will be to protect their stores of weapons and ammunition from the population, not to use it to suppress the population. And more importantly, the first five soldiers that fire on the people, means it’s the end of the military, the end of the government, and the end of the USA as a political force in the world.

    So this is my prediction for how this rolls out and again, it’s not my idea, it’s a common argument by those people who most currently understand the conduct of Fourth Generation Wafare.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-11 23:35:32 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107781982256108588

  • Boost of @curtd WAS THE DESTRUCTION OF WESTERN INSTITUTIONS OF CULTURAL PRODUCTI

    Boost of @curtd

    WAS THE DESTRUCTION OF WESTERN INSTITUTIONS OF CULTURAL PRODUCTION DONE BY ACCIDENT OR ON PURPOSE?
    @BasedTreecko

    Undermining the institutions of cultural production was done on purpose. Capture of the academy, media, and government bureaucracy was done on purpose. Immigrating third world underclasses was done on purpose. Immigration overloading was done on purpose. Financial redistribution suppression white middle-class reproduction was done on purpose. Offshoring manufacturing jobs was done on purpose. Degradation of education in favor of minority non-failure was done on purpose. Social destruction by black relocation to urban areas was done on purpose. The selective prosecution of cases before the supreme court to undermine the law and constitution was done on purpose. Financial predation via the financial sector was done on purpose. Baiting-into-hazard credit expansion was done on purpose. White replacement is being done on purpose. Locating immigrants to stable regions is being done on purpose. Resisting putting up a wall, reforming immigration is being done on purpose.

    I mean, I can keep this list going on until I run out of characters on social media posts.

    As for the civil war? All civil wars are achieved by the means available with the economy, technology, population distribution that’s possible at the time, just like all wars are achieved by the same ends.

    The primary method of collapsing the USA internally is to produce silence, so that communication that produces false confidence in the population is impossible. This is easy with the collapse of power lines because that has the most effect but is harmful to the population. This means that collapse of communication must be more surgical. It’s relatively easy to preserve power but cut telco, cable, wireless cell, and broadcast. It’s just more labor intensive. IMO that’s what will occur. And it’s unstoppable because all those people have to go home. What we did in Ukraine was show up at police and politicians homes. Everyone stops when that happens.

    A s imple analysis is that the US population is the largest army in the world by many multiples, and that while some of the military will fight against the population not much of it will, less of the national guard, and and few of the police will. They survey differently than they will act.

    The primary strategy of the military will be to protect their stores of weapons and ammunition from the population, not to use it to suppress the population. And more importantly, the first five soldiers that fire on the people, means it’s the end of the military, the end of the government, and the end of the USA as a political force in the world.

    So this is my prediction for how this rolls out and again, it’s not my idea, it’s a common argument by those people who most currently understand the conduct of Fourth Generation Wafare.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-11 23:35:32 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107781986715292344

  • FOR THE ARYANS… LIsten, the french and german reactions to the english empiric

    FOR THE ARYANS…

    LIsten, the french and german reactions to the english empirical enlightenment were both coutner revolutions by continental feminine catholic feels against scandinavian masculine protestant reals.

    This is why the french retain a feminine authoritarian motherly governmetn and the germans developed a masclune fatherly government, but neither retained the scandinavian peerage government.

    Too much catholic influence. The italians still can’t organize. The french sought feminine authority. The germans sought secular theology (german continental rationalist philosophy) and the anglos continued with ancient, aryan empirical masculine rule of law of equals among the aristocracy, and where the aristocracy was responsible as parents for the peasantry.

    There is a very good reason I evade everything continental whether french, german, or italian. Because it’s corrupted by church femininity – a want of caretaking vs a climbing of responsibility.

    For that reason I chose to achieve NS ends by Anglo Means: Science and law instead of philosophy and ideology.

    The problem is: it takes superior men to employ a superior weapon.
    Are you superior men?
    The Natural Law is the greek fire, tnhe longbow, the gunpowder, political victory.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 19:21:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769660347672558