Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • IT’S JUST THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT THAT IS OUR ENEMY. (explaining differences that

    IT’S JUST THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT THAT IS OUR ENEMY.
    (explaining differences that cause conflicts)

    I would say that the Chinese GOVERNMENT is our enemy. But, the Chinese people are as much a victim of their government as are the Russian, Iranian, and North Korean people.

    WHITENESS is a technology (science) that is the optimum for human cooperation at the cost of higher stress because of the psychological and emotional costs of whiteness, in exchange for the high trust and vast rewards of high trust whiteness produces.

    And that all of these GOVERNMENTS are resisting modernity (WHITENESS) because they are low trust people, with despotic governments. And despotic governments emerge as diversity increases, and conflict increases. In the case of Russia and China, they are a low-trust people, and an empire over conquered people. In the case of Iran, they are a low trust and low IQ people in the world’s most diverse region. In the case of North Korea, they were influenced by Chinese authoritarianism, and authoritarianism because of a history of Chinese continuous colonization and conquest. And they cannot compete with the more advanced south Koreans.

    Likewise, because they are vehicles for the retention of tribalism (low trust ethics) at the cost of the commons(high trust ethics), where westerners have eliminated tribalism and clannishness to produce commons, I would say the Jewish and Muslim RELIGIONS are an enemy of western civilization.

    There is a problem of race differences in neoteny and therefore aggression. And there is a problem of race differences in class size, and therefore adaptation.

    And so there is a problem of cultural differences that accommodate and must accommodate race and class differences in culture.

    There is a problem of sex differences in cognitive and moral bias, within each race, class, and culture.

    But very few humans, at least within a standard deviation in IQ, really have a problem with one another. The problem is groups and proximity of groups, because groups express, and must express, cumulative needs of their demographic distribution of neoteny, aggression, sex bias, and intelligence.

    Cheers
    -Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-02 18:09:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631356165564030987

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631350354037346304

  • HOW CAN OTHERWISE INTELLIGENT COSMO ELITES BE SO NAIVE? (multiculturalism) Becau

    HOW CAN OTHERWISE INTELLIGENT COSMO ELITES BE SO NAIVE?
    (multiculturalism)
    Because the upper classes across groups have more in common with one another than with their middle and lower classes within the group – while dependence on the group’s cultural norms, traditions, values, prejudices presumptions, metaphysical assumptions, philosophies histories, myths, and religions increases as class decreases.
    Why? We tend each to consider ourselves, our beliefs, values, needs, wants, normal, despite our vast differences across the distributions. We’re all kinda dumb that way. And when we aren’t dumb, we’re virtue signaling, something that isn’t virtuous. It’s just signaling status.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-02 02:01:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631112336210526208

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631101503137107968

  • WHY IS INDIA THE MOST RACIST? BECAUSE OF MULTICULTURALISM. –“I believe many Ind

    WHY IS INDIA THE MOST RACIST? BECAUSE OF MULTICULTURALISM.
    –“I believe many Indians get opportunities to show overt racism because the country is the most multicultural on the planet. When you have 1.3 billion people of a dozen different cultures packed into a small space, what you get is more chances to show such attitudes.”–

    Just as an intellectual alone, I love India and India because the complexity is incomprehensible compared to every other civilization. And calls into question everything we presume about civilizational formation. But the truth is that they’ve been invaded but never truly conquered over and over again. While the gene pool is a gradient from NW to SE it covers so many different racial and ethnic groups, that gradient is a vast oversimplification. India and China are almost certain to be eternal if for no other reason than geography climate, scale, and population.

    Meanwhile, a tiny population of Europeans united the world, dragged it out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, disease, and suffering, and are being displaced from our homelands. By creating the multiculturalism that is the cause of racism and conflict, low social and political trust, corruption, stagnation, and absence of innovation, that ended the progress of the age of agriculture and caused a dark age of a thousand years.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-02 00:46:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631093546571685888

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631091566344302592

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    It’s not just 4k years or the cast system, but the complexity of the gene pool, number of invaders, and legacy of ‘white conquest’. Like most ‘brown’ people lighter skin is a higher status symbol internally. So people INSIDE the country are exposed to as much or more racism than people from OUTSIDE of india.

    I love that crazy country, culture, and people, because they’re the exception to every rule, and because of that they help us analyze ourselves and other cultures with greater depth, curiosity, and uncertainty.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1631091566344302592

  • (mating game) Well, I can see the stats on age, marriage, divorces and childbirt

    (mating game)
    Well, I can see the stats on age, marriage, divorces and childbirths. I hear complaints about the dating and mating market. I see that while hookup culture dominates the market, most marriages still originate from meetings on dating apps. But if the data on promiscuity, age, and childlessness is correct, we are worse off over time than China has been with the one-child policy. I mean, this is a disaster.
    There is some evidence of market failure and market adoption, but if, as usual, it takes a generation to correct, that means we’re going to have a total social, economic, and political collapse before the next generation can reproduce, and even then they’ll be too few in number.
    You can have idealistic notions of equality if you want, but we can’t constantly try to solve this problem through immigration, because we’re continuing to decline in average IQ enough that we’re going to fall into second world ecnoomic competitiveness within a decade or so.
    Turns out promiscuity is a really, really, bad thing.
    (Not that I”m personally against it or anything 🙂 )

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 17:15:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630980139012980754

  • (capital raises) Just finished an interesting meeting with a new company doing t

    (capital raises)
    Just finished an interesting meeting with a new company doing the rounds. Good idea. Good tech. Good deck. Good person. Pitch didn’t inspire confidence though. So, had me thinking, and reiterating, you just have to pitch to the right people for you and your idea. I’ve closed deals with the first presentation on a biz I didn’t think was an easy sell, and taken a year to raise on what I thought was obvious. I’ve pitched to people so competent that It’s a privilege to share a room with them and just learning from how they ask questions. I’ve pitched to the ‘underlings’ on their way up. I’ve done acquisitions from investors who weren’t very bright – and were harming the business they owned. I’ve even had a firm tell me they would invest but wouldn’t like working on a board with me. (They had conflicting ambitions. I felt the ‘dishonesty’. I agreed.). Most of the time you need to give an investor candidate what they need. And mostly what they need is to trust you’re competent – as a team. And that isn’t always the same thing. In other words, it’s just sales, and in any sales gig you need to understand your customer, and give them what they need to decide. Mostly I try to explain that these people NEED to invest money. Most of the time you have to give them sufficient understanding to convince their partners that you check all the boxes so that they CAN invest in or lend to you.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 17:05:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630977653921415169

  • THE UNIVERSE’S ORIGINS I have a pretty good handle on WHY the universe’s laws ar

    THE UNIVERSE’S ORIGINS
    I have a pretty good handle on WHY the universe’s laws are what they are. I have a pretty good handle on the possible options. Those are both testifiable judgments. If you asked me to gamble on which of those origins is most likely I could do so, but I have no reason to believe so other than it’s the ‘simplest’ answer given our present knowledge … a decision criterion that has failed us repeatedly in the past. 😉

    Hmmm.. if you recall that I used the ‘fluke’ explanation, I suspect that I was either listing the possibilities, or I was using that example to refute someone’s undue certainty of a different theory. I can imagine the latter pretty confidently.

    SPECTRUM OF POSSIBILITIES
    One universe expanding and contracting, with that one universe the limit.
    A collection of bubbles of universes (with the same laws) each bursting and replenishing the possibility of the next bubble universe, with the bundle of bubbles the limit.
    Universes as explosions of bubbles in an otherwise ‘infinite’ universe.

    PERMUTATIONS AND OPEN QUESTIONS
    I can go into each of these and the permutations of each, but you can get the idea.
    AFAIK each of space, energy, and time have a zero point and exist no matter what. But we can’t prove it yet.
    We do not know if that zero point is a property of the bubble of our universe, or of the universe that contains our bubble of our universe. We don’t even know how to test it.
    Until we grasp what I suspect are the next two levels down of the quantum background (aether, zero-point-space-time) and can determine whether space is created by the underlying medium(energy), I don’t know if we can for sure answer this question. And our lack of progress is frustrating.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 03:17:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630769218063937536

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630762486403305472

  • CONSERVATIVE PURITY IS OFTEN A BIT … MUCH. One of the problems with our moral

    CONSERVATIVE PURITY IS OFTEN A BIT … MUCH.
    One of the problems with our moral intuition (meaning I probably share yours) is that we have an extreme sensitivity to purity, and often make the mistake, of demanding perfection that doesn’t exist, instead of benefiting from the best possible, that does exist. 😉
    Why? We want to trust our advisors and not have to think whether they’re right or not. But we can’t. We can only find people we trust more than others, and then dismiss the outliers when we think they’ve missed the boat.
    None of us is perfect. Certainly not me. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 20:04:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630660118286049300

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630658930471837696

  • YOUNG MEN AND WEALTH There are a lot of improve-yourself males promoting stoic m

    YOUNG MEN AND WEALTH
    There are a lot of improve-yourself males promoting stoic masculinity, part of it mental, part of it physical, and part of it posturing. But I’d like you to consider following @Max_Stoic and @Stoic_Media because he’s wrapping financial advice that you SHOULD follow, and he’s someone you CAN trust with your money, in proper masculine, stoic, content that is about as morally loaded with goodness as you can get. Trust is in scarce supply these days. And it’s a lot easier to trust someone that’s on your side of the aisle so to speak.

    (No, my only motivation is moral: to promote people who I think are the best there is across the spectrum, and I follow this guy every single day. Partly, because he’s the real thing. No BS. No posturing. Young Marcus Aurelius in financial form.)

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 20:01:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630659420685213713

  • OK. I’ve been having fun defending Scott Adams and learning from it. And (OMG th

    OK. I’ve been having fun defending Scott Adams and learning from it. And (OMG there are thousands of comments), it’s the usual emotional vs empirical nonsense.

    IRONY: I’ve said in the past that Scott is interesting to me because he relies on suggestion and argument by elimination using suggestion. Where I work in the suppression of suggestion and demand for truthful transparent, unambiguous argument. So… this whole thing occurred, because Scott used a hyperbolic argument as a means of suggestion, to test our intuitions. So, you know, he gets hammered for people who MISUNDERSTAND and I get hammered by people who CAN’T UNDERSTAND, what I’m doing. And… So what does that mean? The terminal dumbitude is exhausting and impossible to overcome on either side of the fence.

    Sigh. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 19:56:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630658216647335946

  • OUR GOOD PEOPLE ARE A VULNERABILITY: HOW GOOD PEOPLE WERE UNDERMINED. I love how

    OUR GOOD PEOPLE ARE A VULNERABILITY: HOW GOOD PEOPLE WERE UNDERMINED.
    I love how you feel. I wish how you felt were how more people felt. I love good people. Unfortunately, our good people are vulnerable to the enemy’s pretense of goodness, when they’re actually evil.

    Our country continued to be homogenous, ethnocentric, and fully integrated until about 1960. We had regular issues as the economy and industry changed us. But we remained ‘integrated’.

    The reason the enemy succeeded in undermine us and creating conflict requires a bit more explanation than I feel energized enough to write right now, but…

    Woke (Race Marxism) is just the most recent attempt to ‘destroy the institutions of western cultural production’ by generating conflict using the Marxist (class), neoMarxist(culture), Postmodern(truth), Feminist(sexes,family), Woke(Race) sequences of sedition to undermine the harmony we’d produced between the classes and sexes (and through integration other Europeans) into northern European **Trifunctional, Rule of Law, Natural law, Concurrent legislation, Common Law, Truth before Face, Duty before self, Christian Love and Charity, high trust, innovative, adaptive, prosperous civilization.***

    They did it on purpose by the ‘march thru the institutions’. They wrote, planned it, migrated here from Europe, financed it, and started with the academy, and from the academy to the media and to the government, and to education. Everything they do that they claim is virtue, instead claims our effort at peaceful integration as oppression.

    Why? Our western civilization is behaviorally costly both psychologically and emotionally. And whether or not other people are CAPABLE of that amount of self-regulation, self-discipline, delayed gratification, and mindfulness that ignores the trivialities and insults of others – they are clearly often, unwilling.

    Once it was clear that communism would not work, the class Marxists converted to race Marxists and then the race Marxists came to America to use American postwar opportunity and global dominance, and ‘freedom and Christian tolerance to intentionally destroy our culture from within.

    It took them seventy years. But perhaps. more interesting is that they did it by (a) our women, (b) immigration, because (c) western men have not changed substantially and still adhere to our Trifunctionalism the balance between the three sacred institutions of and all: God(Faith), Country(Constitution), and Guns(Military) surrounding the core institution: the nuclear family and individual responsibility.

    Cheers
    -Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 19:26:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630650756033290240

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630646434088230943