Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • WHY ASHKENAZI CULTURE AND BIAS? Jewish culture originated early and we’re not ex

    WHY ASHKENAZI CULTURE AND BIAS?
    Jewish culture originated early and we’re not exactly sure why but they were outcasts from the better coastal land. The egyptians do what all empires do and select a group of outcasts who have no loyalties to the locals, to administer them, and so taught the jews literacy, etc. The rewards were instant and profound. Instead of a pirestly cast that was entirely dependent on taxations, the jwes formed a clerical class that was dependen on TRANSACTIONS. The nepotistic value of this process was so profound that it was continually reinforced by every possible condition. Over time this combination caused heavy selection pressure for cognitively female behavior (empathizing (predicting minds), words, seduction (baiting into hazard), special pleading and pretense of innocence, that has only become self reinforcing over time, especially by redistribution of reproduction to rabbis. Given that Ashkenazim are an admixture of jewish males and european (largely italian) females, and that european IQ is a lot higher than MENA, it would be logical that it would only amplify the reproductive strategy. We are within perhaps 20 years or less of fully explaining it genetically. But in the aggregate of behavior even in outbread ashkenazim it’s universal. Just as the ‘autistic’ tendence of male europeans for the opposite reason: upward redistribution to the middle and upper classes under aristocracy and later manorialism. personaly I find this whole subject fascinating. But at least it’s fixable with minor tweaks to our law to prohibit the spectrum of irresponsibiilty, rent seeking, and baiting into hazard.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    Reply addressees: @superkanga @KiwiBreeder

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 18:04:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635703438385266722

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635700120720232448

  • WHY ASHKENAZI CULTURE AND BIAS? Jewish culture originated early and we’re not ex

    WHY ASHKENAZI CULTURE AND BIAS?
    Jewish culture originated early and we’re not exactly sure why but they were outcasts from the better coastal land. The egyptians do what all empires do and select a group of outcasts who have no loyalties to the locals, to administer them, and so taught the jews literacy, etc. The rewards were instant and profound. Instead of a pirestly cast that was entirely dependent on taxations, the jwes formed a clerical class that was dependen on TRANSACTIONS. The nepotistic value of this process was so profound that it was continually reinforced by every possible condition. Over time this combination caused heavy selection pressure for cognitively female behavior (empathizing (predicting minds), words, seduction (baiting into hazard), special pleading and pretense of innocence, that has only become self reinforcing over time, especially by redistribution of reproduction to rabbis. Given that Ashkenazim are an admixture of jewish males and european (largely italian) females, and that european IQ is a lot higher than MENA, it would be logical that it would only amplify the reproductive strategy. We are within perhaps 20 years or less of fully explaining it genetically. But in the aggregate of behavior even in outbread ashkenazim it’s universal. Just as the ‘autistic’ tendence of male europeans for the opposite reason: upward redistribution to the middle and upper classes under aristocracy and later manorialism. personaly I find this whole subject fascinating. But at least it’s fixable with minor tweaks to our law to prohibit the spectrum of irresponsibiilty, rent seeking, and baiting into hazard.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 18:04:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635703438729261057

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635700120720232448

  • FEMALE AND JEWISH METHODS OF THINKING VS MALE AND EUROPEAN (science, testimony,

    FEMALE AND JEWISH METHODS OF THINKING VS MALE AND EUROPEAN
    (science, testimony, sovereignty, and reciprocity are male concepts.)

    Women are just as aggressive and warlike as men, they just express aggression and war differently from men: by parasitism, special pleading, relativism, undermining, social construction, seduction (baiting into hazard), sedition, treason.
    So if we study male and female differences we observe that the Jews conduct warfare as do women. Why? Weakness, empathizing, verbal acuity: devotion, nepotism, seduction (baiting into hazard), double standards, pilpul(sophistry) and critique(undermining), social construction, sedition, and treason.
    Why? I wont’ get into this in detail but there are pretty large differences between the races in subtle expression. And ingroup traditions accelerate group selection.
    So to some degree (and once you see it you can’t unsee it) the semitic peoples as a trend, jews in general somewhat, and the ashkenazi in particular have either narrowed or reversed cognitive sexual dimorphism.
    We can see this in race differences in expression of mental illness and antisocial behavior, as well as means of expression (langauge) means of argument (aggression), occupational selection (talking, ‘shopping’, ‘hazarding’), family organization, political affiliation, and religious or cultural literature (critique).
    So, personally I find it fascinating. And professionaly I find it allowed me to solve most of our problems by minor reform to the law, that prohibit female antisocial to warfare behavire, as thoroughly as male antisocial to warfare behavior.
    And you know what? That let me understand what’s wrong with the world regardless of sex. Lots of baiting into hazard – everywhere.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    Reply addressees: @superkanga @KiwiBreeder

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 17:30:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635694879543111680

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635691424258699281

  • FEMALE AND JEWISH METHODS OF THINKING VS MALE AND EUROPEAN (science, testimony,

    FEMALE AND JEWISH METHODS OF THINKING VS MALE AND EUROPEAN
    (science, testimony, sovereignty, and reciprocity are male concepts.)

    Women are just as aggressive and warlike as men, they just express aggression and war differently from men: by parasitism, special pleading, relativism, undermining, social construction, seduction (baiting into hazard), sedition, treason.
    So if we study male and female differences we observe that the Jews conduct warfare as do women. Why? Weakness, empathizing, verbal acuity: devotion, nepotism, seduction (baiting into hazard), double standards, pilpul(sophistry) and critique(undermining), social construction, sedition, and treason.
    Why? I wont’ get into this in detail but there are pretty large differences between the races in subtle expression. And ingroup traditions accelerate group selection.
    So to some degree (and once you see it you can’t unsee it) the semitic peoples as a trend, jews in general somewhat, and the ashkenazi in particular have either narrowed or reversed cognitive sexual dimorphism.
    We can see this in race differences in expression of mental illness and antisocial behavior, as well as means of expression (langauge) means of argument (aggression), occupational selection (talking, ‘shopping’, ‘hazarding’), family organization, political affiliation, and religious or cultural literature (critique).
    So, personally I find it fascinating. And professionaly I find it allowed me to solve most of our problems by minor reform to the law, that prohibit female antisocial to warfare behavire, as thoroughly as male antisocial to warfare behavior.
    And you know what? That let me understand what’s wrong with the world regardless of sex. Lots of baiting into hazard – everywhere.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 17:30:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635694879706689548

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635691424258699281

  • I’m not quite sure why we should object to the return to the conflict of civiliz

    I’m not quite sure why we should object to the return to the conflict of civilizations. Our attempts at universalism by universalizing a single class modely of cooperation whether authoritarian socialism(upper), liberalism(upper middle), communism(working) or islamismI(underclass) are all failures. We can spread technology of production but not of governance.

    And if the west should learn one thing it’s that western civ’s group strategy is the most emotionally, psychologically, and intellectually burdensome, and that the rest of the world is unfit for it. And that the only reason we fail, is Aryanism even when cloaked with Christianity, or liberalism, drives us to overextension. We can replace other peoples (europe, americas) but we cannot domesticate, administer, govern, or rule people unfit for our civilizational model that requries maximization of individual rsponsibility for the commons and maximization of truth before face in the commons, and maximization of trust necessary under both. People need temperament and iQ for it, and only eruopeans, the japanese, and koreans are demonstrably fit for it.

    As for Ukraine, Russia. As a ‘resident’ ukrainians are Ruthenians (closer to Poles) not Russians. The russians are closer to muslims and asians in their scope of responsiiblity (family and fence-line), and they are a low trust people who fail the lie-responsibility test.

    America isn’t a civilization. It’s the other side of the river from european civilzation. And neither of us survive without the other over the long term.

    IMO the right favors russia only because they hate their own and are two cowardly and timid to solve the problem of the left at home. While russians are right on culture, they are wrong on politics and economics. And they are so becuase they are a low trust people, who have never built a majority middle class, and have been free of serfdom only for a short window in the late 1800s prior the the bolsheviks, and a short window between 1990 and 2010.

    The family is the priority, not the individual.
    That’s an easy codification to put in place.
    If y’all aren’t too cowardly to show up in numbers and force it.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @TOOEdit

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 16:05:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635673496058580997

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635649197230927872

  • I’m not quite sure why we should object to the return to the conflict of civiliz

    I’m not quite sure why we should object to the return to the conflict of civilizations. Our attempts at universalism by universalizing a single class modely of cooperation whether authoritarian socialism(upper), liberalism(upper middle), communism(working) or islamismI(underclass) are all failures. We can spread technology of production but not of governance.

    And if the west should learn one thing it’s that western civ’s group strategy is the most emotionally, psychologically, and intellectually burdensome, and that the rest of the world is unfit for it. And that the only reason we fail, is Aryanism even when cloaked with Christianity, or liberalism, drives us to overextension. We can replace other peoples (europe, americas) but we cannot domesticate, administer, govern, or rule people unfit for our civilizational model that requries maximization of individual rsponsibility for the commons and maximization of truth before face in the commons, and maximization of trust necessary under both. People need temperament and iQ for it, and only eruopeans, the japanese, and koreans are demonstrably fit for it.

    As for Ukraine, Russia. As a ‘resident’ ukrainians are Ruthenians (closer to Poles) not Russians. The russians are closer to muslims and asians in their scope of responsiiblity (family and fence-line), and they are a low trust people who fail the lie-responsibility test.

    America isn’t a civilization. It’s the other side of the river from european civilzation. And neither of us survive without the other over the long term.

    IMO the right favors russia only because they hate their own and are two cowardly and timid to solve the problem of the left at home. While russians are right on culture, they are wrong on politics and economics. And they are so becuase they are a low trust people, who have never built a majority middle class, and have been free of serfdom only for a short window in the late 1800s prior the the bolsheviks, and a short window between 1990 and 2010.

    The family is the priority, not the individual.
    That’s an easy codification to put in place.
    If y’all aren’t too cowardly to show up in numbers and force it.

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 16:05:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635673496557584388

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635649197230927872

  • We have reached an interesting point in human history where we have the luxury o

    We have reached an interesting point in human history where we have the luxury of thinking for and only of ourselves for the first time, but this is only beause the external consequences of doing so are imperceptible to us at the time.

    When you can see all three or four generations of your family, and predict the future from their names and number, the consequences are predictable. When we remove our ability to perceive such things, we falsely believe that those same consequences will not play out.

    Moral theories are wonderful until the piper of time plays his tune. You may intuit that you are on a higher moral ground, but it’s just virtue signaling because you likewise can’t see the consequences.

    Some of us, still do the work of measuring counting forecasting and systematizing so that you have the privilege of self confidence in your moral virtue, just as some people stay home while others fight wars, or some have no children while others do.

    And if we are lucky we determine some way to solve the problems that come into being despite you. And we endure your castigation while you claim virtues and morals you do not have.

    That’s what reality consists of.
    So who has the moral high ground after all?

    Reply addressees: @AuthorCreekmore @FrailSkeleton

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 03:20:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635481112280440834

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635478902880468992

  • We have reached an interesting point in human history where we have the luxury o

    We have reached an interesting point in human history where we have the luxury of thinking for and only of ourselves for the first time, but this is only beause the external consequences of doing so are imperceptible to us at the time.

    When you can see all three or four generations of your family, and predict the future from their names and number, the consequences are predictable. When we remove our ability to perceive such things, we falsely believe that those same consequences will not play out.

    Moral theories are wonderful until the piper of time plays his tune. You may intuit that you are on a higher moral ground, but it’s just virtue signaling because you likewise can’t see the consequences.

    Some of us, still do the work of measuring counting forecasting and systematizing so that you have the privilege of self confidence in your moral virtue, just as some people stay home while others fight wars, or some have no children while others do.

    And if we are lucky we determine some way to solve the problems that come into being despite you. And we endure your castigation while you claim virtues and morals you do not have.

    That’s what reality consists of.
    So who has the moral high ground after all?

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 03:20:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635481112439824386

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635478902880468992

  • ISRAEL IS THE LAST HOLDOUT IN THE MIDDLE EAST – AND IT’S ON ITS WAY OUT OF RULE

    ISRAEL IS THE LAST HOLDOUT IN THE MIDDLE EAST – AND IT’S ON ITS WAY OUT OF RULE OF LAW
    (We are all reverting to our pre-industrial traditions, because, it turns out, multiculturalism doesn’t work, globalism doesn’t work, and we can’t even change our methods of governance.)

    Kind of humorous that #Bibi is trying and likely to succeed in turning #Israel into an authoritarian ethnostate, abandoning democracy and the rule of law, given that they’re surrounded by authoritarian ethnostates. Without Israel, the illusion of democracy in the middle east is done. And with it the European (neocon) presumption that the rest of the world could equally ‘grow up’ into responsible world citizens, conducting peaceful cooperative Smithian trade, in imitation of the long history of the many-states of Europe, instead of the chaotic tribalism of their traditions.
    India reverts to Hinduism, china to totalitarianism, Russia to totalitarianism, Iran to totalitarianism, Africa stuck with her border problems (we Europeans created) and a population unable to feed itself, and here in the anglosphere, we see the will to separate once again in to many small germanic states, so that we may have the various different societies we desire, even if we all share the same want of sovereignty, liberty, and freedom, and the prosperity that arises from our rule of law, participatory government, and work ethic.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 20:46:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635381788955533312

  • ISRAEL IS THE LAST HOLDOUT IN THE MIDDLE EAST – AND IT’S ON ITS WAY OUT OF RULE

    ISRAEL IS THE LAST HOLDOUT IN THE MIDDLE EAST – AND IT’S ON ITS WAY OUT OF RULE OF LAW
    (We are all reverting to our pre-industrial traditions, because, it turns out, multiculturalism doesn’t work, globalism doesn’t work, and we can’t even change our methods of governance.)

    Kind of humorous that #Bibi is trying and likely to succeed in turning #Israel into an authoritarian ethnostate, abandoning democracy and the rule of law, given that they’re surrounded by authoritarian ethnostates. Without Israel, the illusion of democracy in the middle east is done. And with it the European (neocon) presumption that the rest of the world could equally ‘grow up’ into responsible world citizens, conducting peaceful cooperative Smithian trade, in imitation of the long history of the many-states of Europe, instead of the chaotic tribalism of their traditions.
    India reverts to Hinduism, china to totalitarianism, Russia to totalitarianism, Iran to totalitarianism, Africa stuck with her border problems (we Europeans created) and a population unable to feed itself, and here in the anglosphere, we see the will to separate once again in to many small germanic states, so that we may have the various different societies we desire, even if we all share the same want of sovereignty, liberty, and freedom, and the prosperity that arises from our rule of law, participatory government, and work ethic.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 20:46:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635381789119086600