Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • My worldview is that despite the problems of differences in demographic distribu

    My worldview is that despite the problems of differences in demographic distributions it is possible to decrease divergence from the laws of nature (physical, behavioral, evolutionary and the logical to describe them) and in doing so prevent elites from lying to the public in public about matters public, thus over decades and centuries driving us all to smithian cooperation and driving out imperialism that deprives people of self determination by self determined means. In other words, I do the science of cooperation and all ‘myths, legends, false promises, frauds, and lies’ must be purged from mankind in order to make us all at least relatively equally prosperous and fulfilled.

    This means slaying sacred cows as well as cherished falsehoods.

    So my work is reducible to the extension of fraud in commerce to politics.

    The ‘science’ required to do that was just more than any previous generation of thinkers could accomplish. For the simple reason that the knowledge didn’t exist.

    That’s really my goal.
    “No More Lies”

    Reply addressees: @enigma3078 @thenewMJG @whatifalthist

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 15:17:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637835810396332035

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637808821727813635

  • My worldview is that despite the problems of differences in demographic distribu

    My worldview is that despite the problems of differences in demographic distributions it is possible to decrease divergence from the laws of nature (physical, behavioral, evolutionary and the logical to describe them) and in doing so prevent elites from lying to the public in public about matters public, thus over decades and centuries driving us all to smithian cooperation and driving out imperialism that deprives people of self determination by self determined means. In other words, I do the science of cooperation and all ‘myths, legends, false promises, frauds, and lies’ must be purged from mankind in order to make us all at least relatively equally prosperous and fulfilled.

    This means slaying sacred cows as well as cherished falsehoods.

    So my work is reducible to the extension of fraud in commerce to politics.

    The ‘science’ required to do that was just more than any previous generation of thinkers could accomplish. For the simple reason that the knowledge didn’t exist.

    That’s really my goal.
    “No More Lies”

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 15:17:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637835810580885504

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637808821727813635

  • From the class and IQ spectrum, people independently obtain information by self-

    From the class and IQ spectrum, people independently obtain information by self-judgment, to at the bottom, they obtain information by the AGREEMENT of peers. So for example, I work on very complex material across all disciplines (“universally commensurable, value neutral paradigm, vocabulary, and logic, across all disciplines in the four sciences: physical, behavioral, evolutionary, and the spectrum of logics we describe them with.” ) It takes a reasonably high IQ with an extreme male brain ( high systematizing ) about four years to become competent and a little longer to use it well. That’s not socially constructed. yet, for example the feminist-to-woke is imitated and recited not learned. It’s social constructed and has to be because it’s false.

    Reply addressees: @EnjoyerMoirai

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-17 18:00:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636789502222950400

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636786873942298626

  • From the class and IQ spectrum, people independently obtain information by self-

    From the class and IQ spectrum, people independently obtain information by self-judgment, to at the bottom, they obtain information by the AGREEMENT of peers. So for example, I work on very complex material across all disciplines (“universally commensurable, value neutral paradigm, vocabulary, and logic, across all disciplines in the four sciences: physical, behavioral, evolutionary, and the spectrum of logics we describe them with.” ) It takes a reasonably high IQ with an extreme male brain ( high systematizing ) about four years to become competent and a little longer to use it well. That’s not socially constructed. yet, for example the feminist-to-woke is imitated and recited not learned. It’s social constructed and has to be because it’s false.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-17 18:00:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636789502336180225

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636786873942298626

  • IS THE AUDIENCE ANTI-SEMITIC, OR ANTI-ANTI-WESTERN? My audience is intelligent,

    IS THE AUDIENCE ANTI-SEMITIC, OR ANTI-ANTI-WESTERN?
    My audience is intelligent, hyperinformed, especially in history, and biased to systematizing, meaning biased to truth(reals) over face(emotion).

    This set of biases will result in bias against both the non-systematizing (left, women) and the authors of non-systematizing pseudoscience sophistry idealism and utopianism that’s counter to human behavior. And those authors and advocates are almost, but not entirely, jewish authoritarians.

    The same bias is against Russian, Chinese, and Muslim authoritarians. What’s the difference? Jewish presence in the west and relatively limited influence of russian, Chinese, Islamic, (and now hindu fundamentalist) groups in the wast.

    If you didn’t realize what that means it means you’re kind of clueless – because the left has succeeded in social construction of the false narrative and the false promise of ‘salvation’ after ‘whiteness’, where ‘whiteness’ is reducible to nothing more than ‘science’. Not only in nature, but in human behavior.

    Reply addressees: @thenewMJG

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-16 14:03:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636367665307459584

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636363964799143936

  • IS THE AUDIENCE ANTI-SEMITIC, OR ANTI-ANTI-WESTERN? My audience is intelligent,

    IS THE AUDIENCE ANTI-SEMITIC, OR ANTI-ANTI-WESTERN?
    My audience is intelligent, hyperinformed, especially in history, and biased to systematizing, meaning biased to truth(reals) over face(emotion).

    This set of biases will result in bias against both the non-systematizing (left, women) and the authors of non-systematizing pseudoscience sophistry idealism and utopianism that’s counter to human behavior. And those authors and advocates are almost, but not entirely, jewish authoritarians.

    The same bias is against Russian, Chinese, and Muslim authoritarians. What’s the difference? Jewish presence in the west and relatively limited influence of russian, Chinese, Islamic, (and now hindu fundamentalist) groups in the wast.

    If you didn’t realize what that means it means you’re kind of clueless – because the left has succeeded in social construction of the false narrative and the false promise of ‘salvation’ after ‘whiteness’, where ‘whiteness’ is reducible to nothing more than ‘science’. Not only in nature, but in human behavior.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-16 14:03:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636367665479442432

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636363964799143936

  • REPEATING: THE PERFECT GOVERNMENT IS POSSIBLE FOR ALL MANKIND I do my work for a

    REPEATING: THE PERFECT GOVERNMENT IS POSSIBLE FOR ALL MANKIND
    I do my work for all of mankind. Anglo aristocracy worked on me. I care about all humans. Christianity worked on me. It’s OK to call me names for my classism and culturism – because I am correct in my criticism of those that vary from natural law, and how much they vary from natural law, because their variance from natural law is harmful to the humans in those cultures and classes.

    Sure, I would prefer to live in a pre-woke world of homogenous white Christian northern Europeans, because we are the only people other than the Japanese and Koreans capable of the high-trust society we created over the millennia. And the calm, joy, and commons that result. I remember when we were ‘all roughly the same’ and it was a far better social and political world to be in than the world of division created by the cultural, sex, truth, and race Marxists in pursuit of generating demand for authority that only they can (of course) provide.

    But living that way – for me. That’s just a preference. We do not need to have the same preferences. We only need a market for governments that satisfy different preferences.

    Small, ethnically homogenous, secular humanist, natural law, rule of law, republican government with an independent judiciary of that law, a monarchy as judge of last resort, and houses for the classes for the negotiation of the production of commons, a universal militia to insure the above, and a mixed economy where state, semi-private, and private institutions serve the time frames of production they are capable of without the rise of corruption either private or public is simply the minimum variation from the laws of the universe that is humanly possible. Such a polity can revert to authority in war, reciprocity in peace, and redistribution in windfall, with the minimum power distance, inequality, political competition and friction, and the greatest rate of innovation and adaptation possible for man. An alliance of these states into federations provides the scale necessary for defense, insurance, and trade policy, for the benefit of all at the expense of none.

    The only route to get there is a homogenous population, universal military service, evolving a court of natural law, evolving a government of natural law, and from it a population capable of a majority middle class, and as a result the surpluses a majority middle class produces, and the redistribution made possible by the surpluses. There is no shortcut to producing the trust required to convert clan and tribe and class into a homogenous polity. Either you follow this evolutionary path or you hired Europeans to run the judiciary until you do. Because we’re the only people who do it by our nature and culture and traditions alone.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    The cult of hatred:#marxism(class) #neomarxism(culture) #postmodernism (truth) #feminism (sex) #woke (race)

    #WokeIsHate

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:48:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636076848072237059

  • REPEATING: THE PERFECT GOVERNMENT IS POSSIBLE FOR ALL MANKIND I do my work for a

    REPEATING: THE PERFECT GOVERNMENT IS POSSIBLE FOR ALL MANKIND
    I do my work for all of mankind. Anglo aristocracy worked on me. I care about all humans. Christianity worked on me. It’s OK to call me names for my classism and culturism – because I am correct in my criticism of those that vary from natural law, and how much they vary from natural law, because their variance from natural law is harmful to the humans in those cultures and classes.

    Sure, I would prefer to live in a pre-woke world of homogenous white Christian northern Europeans, because we are the only people other than the Japanese and Koreans capable of the high-trust society we created over the millennia. And the calm, joy, and commons that result. I remember when we were ‘all roughly the same’ and it was a far better social and political world to be in than the world of division created by the cultural, sex, truth, and race Marxists in pursuit of generating demand for authority that only they can (of course) provide.

    But living that way – for me. That’s just a preference. We do not need to have the same preferences. We only need a market for governments that satisfy different preferences.

    Small, ethnically homogenous, secular humanist, natural law, rule of law, republican government with an independent judiciary of that law, a monarchy as judge of last resort, and houses for the classes for the negotiation of the production of commons, a universal militia to insure the above, and a mixed economy where state, semi-private, and private institutions serve the time frames of production they are capable of without the rise of corruption either private or public is simply the minimum variation from the laws of the universe that is humanly possible. Such a polity can revert to authority in war, reciprocity in peace, and redistribution in windfall, with the minimum power distance, inequality, political competition and friction, and the greatest rate of innovation and adaptation possible for man. An alliance of these states into federations provides the scale necessary for defense, insurance, and trade policy, for the benefit of all at the expense of none.

    The only route to get there is a homogenous population, universal military service, evolving a court of natural law, evolving a government of natural law, and from it a population capable of a majority middle class, and as a result the surpluses a majority middle class produces, and the redistribution made possible by the surpluses. There is no shortcut to producing the trust required to convert clan and tribe and class into a homogenous polity. Either you follow this evolutionary path or you hired Europeans to run the judiciary until you do. Because we’re the only people who do it by our nature and culture and traditions alone.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    The cult of hatred:#marxism(class) #neomarxism(culture) #postmodernism (truth) #feminism (sex) #woke (race)

    #WokeIsHate

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:48:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636076848420474894

  • The left has only one techinque. The same technique women have used to undermine

    The left has only one techinque. The same technique women have used to undermine men since the dawn of time:

    “Seduction by Baiting into Hazard”
    The Female > Abrahamic > Marxist sequence

    How many women in divorce court today provoke men intentionally into physical force, then claim they are victims?

    What is the left doing to the conservatives and the government? Why are the government and the right accused of authoritarianism when they police the commons against the left. And why do we oddly have any sense of guilt about it. Yet the right can protest and it strikes fear into the hearts of government and the left?

    The question is rather odd really: why do we put up with the feminine-left false oppression narrative, when in both cases we are correcting female anti-social behavior by social economic and political harm, but suppress male anti-social behavior by physical harm?

    Wny do we pander to women and the left?
    Is it culture or instinct? It appears to be animal instinct. Becuase it’s irrational on its face.

    WHy is ‘masculine policing of the commons’ even vaguely considered authoritarian when the entire purpose of the feminine and the left is baiting into hazard: ‘the crime of construction’ just like in the inverse they egage in deceit by ‘social construction’.

    Seduction > Baiting Into Hazard > Social Construction of A Falsehood > Under cover of what? Pretense of innocence? Incompetence?

    Why do we permit feminine crime and not masculine?

    Biology we need to ‘counter’.
    That’s why I worked on the law, to equally suppress feminine criminality as we have suppressed masculine.

    Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 15:33:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636027899714187266

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636022835008208896

  • The left has only one techinque. The same technique women have used to undermine

    The left has only one techinque. The same technique women have used to undermine men since the dawn of time:

    “Seduction by Baiting into Hazard”
    The Female > Abrahamic > Marxist sequence

    How many women in divorce court today provoke men intentionally into physical force, then claim they are victims?

    What is the left doing to the conservatives and the government? Why are the government and the right accused of authoritarianism when they police the commons against the left. And why do we oddly have any sense of guilt about it. Yet the right can protest and it strikes fear into the hearts of government and the left?

    The question is rather odd really: why do we put up with the feminine-left false oppression narrative, when in both cases we are correcting female anti-social behavior by social economic and political harm, but suppress male anti-social behavior by physical harm?

    Wny do we pander to women and the left?
    Is it culture or instinct? It appears to be animal instinct. Becuase it’s irrational on its face.

    WHy is ‘masculine policing of the commons’ even vaguely considered authoritarian when the entire purpose of the feminine and the left is baiting into hazard: ‘the crime of construction’ just like in the inverse they egage in deceit by ‘social construction’.

    Seduction > Baiting Into Hazard > Social Construction of A Falsehood > Under cover of what? Pretense of innocence? Incompetence?

    Why do we permit feminine crime and not masculine?

    Biology we need to ‘counter’.
    That’s why I worked on the law, to equally suppress feminine criminality as we have suppressed masculine.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 15:33:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636027899844128771

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636022835008208896