(humor: restaurant. chatting up the staff. pizza guy. hispanic. very amerindian. I say “Hey, so my family says the pizza is better since you came here.” He opens spreads his hands a bit, palms up, shrugs an ‘of course’, and goes back to work. I laugh. “A man should be confident”. The women (most are italian) agree.)
Search for opportunities for complimenting others.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 16:29:00 UTC
AWESOME P-HUMOR 😉
by Stephen Wells
To be or not to be.
That is the question.
Whether tis nobler in the mind
to suffer the slings and arrows of Leftist false grammar
or take arms against a sea of operational struggles
and by opposing, end them?
Actor: Lawrence Olivier, Object grammar of P in Hamlet setting Subject: nerdy levity
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 11:03:00 UTC
(Humor.) Re: “Mansplaining and Womansplaining”
Yeah. I’m a little done with womansplaining as well.
Mansplaining is merely useless – it won’t accomplish anything even if it should. Womansplaining is useless and false – but often succeeds even though it shouldn’t. 😉
Womansplaining:”There is no bell curve. Everyone is equal. Everyone has equal potential. And everyone that’s unsuccessful is inhibited by others’ bias or malice.”
In other words, “I want my dead weight offspring to have a chance at achieving devolutionary and undeserving equality with his or her genetic superiors.”
Short term, female, empathetic, feels.
Mansplaining:”There is always a bell curve – and a third of people are dead weight, and its genetic, and women decide who they mate with – so it’s their fault.”
In other words, “I want my tribe to be free of dead weight offspring so we have a chance at achieving at defeating competing tribes who seek to defeat our genes.”
Long term, male, analytic, reals.
That’s the net of it.
Understand the speaker’s bias, and you understand his brain structure and you understand his reproductive strategy – and that none of that is under his cognitive control and everything he (or she) says is just the persona-puppet following instructions of one’s genes.
Really. That’s the entirety of the left (Female cognitive bias) right (male cognitive bias)
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 13:20:00 UTC
(Humor.) Re: “Mansplaining” https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1229546924447019010
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 23:36:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229550339197632513
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1229546924447019010
Yeah. I’m a little done with woman-splaining as well. Mansplaining is merely useless. Woman-splaining is useless and false. 😉
Womansplaining:”There is no bell curve.”
Mansplaining:”There is always a bell curve – and a third of people are dead weight.”
That’s the net of it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 23:23:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229546924447019010
Reply addressees: @AntifaRaising
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229545593866985472
Dedicated to @MartianHoplite 😉
(The technical Name for Eli-Harmanism) https://t.co/aJVrtkpOYE
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 21:18:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229153096460382214
All Hail Lord Trump!!!!!
He’s an exceptional king.
Washington was wrong – he should have taken the job.
Jefferson was wrong – the proletariat cannot conform to meritocracy.
The difference between the classes is genetic load.
Deal with it.
Inferiority is empirical
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-15 18:53:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228754239385669632
Reply addressees: @FriendEden100
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228699014259826688
Feb 13, 2020, 10:00 AM
—“The Propertarians are the only group that takes trinities seriously.”— (Humor)
[I]t takes three points to prove a line. Or conversely, it takes at least three points to falsify any other point. Or said differently, it takes at least three markets to produce and equilibrium. It’s not a random thing – our emphasis on trifunctionalism, tripartism, and markets in everything. It’s the optimum order possible for maximizing all opportunities on one end while falsifying the maximum error, bias, irreciprocity and deceit on the other end.
Feb 13, 2020, 10:00 AM
—“The Propertarians are the only group that takes trinities seriously.”— (Humor)
[I]t takes three points to prove a line. Or conversely, it takes at least three points to falsify any other point. Or said differently, it takes at least three markets to produce and equilibrium. It’s not a random thing – our emphasis on trifunctionalism, tripartism, and markets in everything. It’s the optimum order possible for maximizing all opportunities on one end while falsifying the maximum error, bias, irreciprocity and deceit on the other end.
(Humor: Joyce Behar: Polyamory: “I don’t want more than one man. That means I have to fake an orgasm twice.”)
I just don’t have crazy fantasies. A decent woman, who is into me, a five star hotel, preferably with a view, room service, and a week without phone, work, or other interruptions.
Gotta say that Waldorf Astoria Hotel Rome, and Bellevue Syrene in Sorrento stick out in memory as pretty awesome.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 11:39:00 UTC