“Empirical” means observable and therefore measurable, and therefore commensurable, and therefore open to tests of coherence.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 19:13:00 UTC
“Empirical” means observable and therefore measurable, and therefore commensurable, and therefore open to tests of coherence.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 19:13:00 UTC
Abrahamism = authoritarianism (submission) + Pilpul + fictionalism. It is a criticism of technique, not content. Gods serve as a system of calculation (decidability) by most primitive means (anthropic comparison). Monopoly, authority, justificationism(lying), polymoralism, and fictionalism are very different from markets, reciprocity, truth, and law. Abrahamism is hostile to civilization. Which is why jews cannot produce trust, capital, and hold territory and have been repeatedly pushed to near extermination, muslims could use surplus population to conquer, destroy, and rule, but immediately declined into mysticism, dysgenia, tribalism, and poverty, and christianity drove the west into ignorance and poverty from which they only escaped by the reintroduction of scandinavian pagans, germanic law, and greek thought. The lessons of the Syrians (Byzantines) that were used to canonize christianity are very simple: 1 – Extirpate hatred from the human heart. 2 – Extend kinship love to non kin (Exhaust interpersonal Forgiveness) 3 – Devote time effort and wealth to interpersonal charity. 4 – Use political intolerance for those who do otherwise. Personal tolerance political intolerance. And by the science we know that this produces maximum possibility for integration and cooperation. There is nothing else to be learned. Nothing. ZERO.
Abrahamism = authoritarianism (submission) + Pilpul + fictionalism. It is a criticism of technique, not content. Gods serve as a system of calculation (decidability) by most primitive means (anthropic comparison). Monopoly, authority, justificationism(lying), polymoralism, and fictionalism are very different from markets, reciprocity, truth, and law. Abrahamism is hostile to civilization. Which is why jews cannot produce trust, capital, and hold territory and have been repeatedly pushed to near extermination, muslims could use surplus population to conquer, destroy, and rule, but immediately declined into mysticism, dysgenia, tribalism, and poverty, and christianity drove the west into ignorance and poverty from which they only escaped by the reintroduction of scandinavian pagans, germanic law, and greek thought. The lessons of the Syrians (Byzantines) that were used to canonize christianity are very simple: 1 – Extirpate hatred from the human heart. 2 – Extend kinship love to non kin (Exhaust interpersonal Forgiveness) 3 – Devote time effort and wealth to interpersonal charity. 4 – Use political intolerance for those who do otherwise. Personal tolerance political intolerance. And by the science we know that this produces maximum possibility for integration and cooperation. There is nothing else to be learned. Nothing. ZERO.
There is only one natural law, and that is reciprocity. That law is empirically evolving at all times in that branch of law we call tort. That tort law evolves by incremental suppression of parasitism by new discoveries of ir-reciprocity that violate the one law of reciprocity. The principle problem in tort history is the failure to define property as property-in-toto, and this problem has been caused by the Ruler’s interest in preventing defectors as well as defeaters, while at the same time collecting fees for doing so. Like regulating an economy via money supply, we have a very hard time finding a measurement that provides us with decidability that produces no even worse externalities. The answer in both cases is markets, rule of law, and universal standing in matters of the commons, such that the governor is not necessary as other than a judge of last resort. The west invented rule without government for the same reason we invented law without discretion: the consequence of a voluntary militia of equal sovereigns is the only decidability that is possible is tort (reciprocity).
There is only one natural law, and that is reciprocity. That law is empirically evolving at all times in that branch of law we call tort. That tort law evolves by incremental suppression of parasitism by new discoveries of ir-reciprocity that violate the one law of reciprocity. The principle problem in tort history is the failure to define property as property-in-toto, and this problem has been caused by the Ruler’s interest in preventing defectors as well as defeaters, while at the same time collecting fees for doing so. Like regulating an economy via money supply, we have a very hard time finding a measurement that provides us with decidability that produces no even worse externalities. The answer in both cases is markets, rule of law, and universal standing in matters of the commons, such that the governor is not necessary as other than a judge of last resort. The west invented rule without government for the same reason we invented law without discretion: the consequence of a voluntary militia of equal sovereigns is the only decidability that is possible is tort (reciprocity).
There is only one natural law, and that is reciprocity. That law is empirically evolving at all times in that branch of law we call tort. That tort law evolves by incremental suppression of parasitism by new discoveries of irreciprocity that violate the one law of reciprocity. The principle problem in tort history is the failure to define property as property-in-toto, and this problem has been caused by the Ruler’s interest in preventing defectors as well as defeaters, while at the same time collecting fees for doing so. Like regulating an economy via money supply, we have a very hard time finding a measurement that provides us with decidabilty that produces no even worse externalities. The answer in both cases is markets, rule of law, and universal standing in matters of the commons, such that the governor is not necessary as other than a judge of last resort. The west invented rule without government for the same reason we invented law without discretion: the consequence of a voluntary militia of equal sovereigns is the only decidability that is possible is tort (reciprocity).
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 12:10:00 UTC
The way to understand personality traits is to fill in the blanks: “In negotiations with others [trait] helps me with ….. ” 1) Ordliness (risk minimization) <-vs–> (reward maximization) Industriousness 2) Confrontation (risk minimization) <–vs–> (opportunity maximization) Politeness. As far as I know all emotions can be expressed in three dimensions: x) Dominance (Aggression) vs (Flight) Submission y) Pain vs Pleasure. z) Excitement vs Calm
The way to understand personality traits is to fill in the blanks: “In negotiations with others [trait] helps me with ….. ” 1) Ordliness (risk minimization) <-vs–> (reward maximization) Industriousness 2) Confrontation (risk minimization) <–vs–> (opportunity maximization) Politeness. As far as I know all emotions can be expressed in three dimensions: x) Dominance (Aggression) vs (Flight) Submission y) Pain vs Pleasure. z) Excitement vs Calm
DEFINING RELIGION
I define religion in terms of techniques of learning mindfulness(confidence) and the consequent externalities good and bad.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 04:24:00 UTC
TERNARY LOGIC OF WAR
We are only engaged in reciprocity if we are cooperating. if we are not cooperating because of lack of shared opportunity that is still reciprocity. If we are not cooperating because of predation or parasitism, then that is war.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-18 07:59:00 UTC