Curt Doolittle

Form: Definition

  • DEFINITION: “HAZARD” (…in progress) (A definition of hazard “baiting” – which

    DEFINITION: “HAZARD”

    (…in progress)

    (A definition of hazard “baiting” – which is the (((female))) means of persuasion)

    Truth, vs Honesty, Deceit, vs Fraud, vs Hazard

    Creating a hazard:

    Via Positiva:

    1 – Creating the opportunity for a trap by asymmetric information.

    2 – Laying a trap by physical, informational, or emotional means;

    3 – Profiting from or benefitting from failure to disclose possibility of a trap (risk, failure, outcome).

    and

    Via Negativa:

    3 – Failing to perform due diligence against a random harm from another.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-17 13:03:00 UTC

  • UM. FACISM VS AUTHORITARIANISM The term “Authoritarian” can apply to any order b

    UM. FACISM VS AUTHORITARIANISM

    The term “Authoritarian” can apply to any order but fascism was developed to combat the extremes of international communism and capitalism, by increasing the state’s take on the income produced by the post agrarian era (after 1900), but distributing it as commons which produce multipliers rather than privatizing it as political rents, financial rents, priestly rents. Fascism preserved nationalism, the economy, and private property, but directed it to the common good: modernization by concentration of capital in commons without expropriating property.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-09 17:50:00 UTC

  • Um. Fascism vs authoritarianism

    The term “Authoritarian” can apply to any order but fascism was developed to combat the extremes of international communism and capitalism, by increasing the state’s take on the income produced by the post agrarian era (after 1900), but distributing it as commons which produce multipliers rather than privatizing it as political rents, financial rents, priestly rents. Fascism preserved nationalism, the economy, and private property, but directed it to the common good: modernization by concentration of capital in commons without expropriating property.

  • Um. Fascism vs authoritarianism

    The term “Authoritarian” can apply to any order but fascism was developed to combat the extremes of international communism and capitalism, by increasing the state’s take on the income produced by the post agrarian era (after 1900), but distributing it as commons which produce multipliers rather than privatizing it as political rents, financial rents, priestly rents. Fascism preserved nationalism, the economy, and private property, but directed it to the common good: modernization by concentration of capital in commons without expropriating property.

  • Understanding Trust.

    So, when I say “low trust” I am speaking in terms of the institutional development of rule of law as a means of suppressing corruption, and therefore expanding truth telling. The reason russia is rated (and I rate it) as a low trust country is corruption. That said, I promise you, that you want russian friends more than friends from high trust countries. Just as much as you want government from high trust countries. When I say ‘chinese are a low trust society’, this does not mean that they don’t trust each other. It means that (a) they lie, (b) they cheat, (c) the government is corrupt. So high trust describes a RADIUS of trust, not how you trust the people you interact with. In other words, trust is a question of economics. Honestly, I prefer the company of conservative libertarian western europeans, and educated russians equally. I am a russophile just as much as I am a lover of ukraine. Read Fukuyama’s “Trust”.

  • Understanding Trust.

    So, when I say “low trust” I am speaking in terms of the institutional development of rule of law as a means of suppressing corruption, and therefore expanding truth telling. The reason russia is rated (and I rate it) as a low trust country is corruption. That said, I promise you, that you want russian friends more than friends from high trust countries. Just as much as you want government from high trust countries. When I say ‘chinese are a low trust society’, this does not mean that they don’t trust each other. It means that (a) they lie, (b) they cheat, (c) the government is corrupt. So high trust describes a RADIUS of trust, not how you trust the people you interact with. In other words, trust is a question of economics. Honestly, I prefer the company of conservative libertarian western europeans, and educated russians equally. I am a russophile just as much as I am a lover of ukraine. Read Fukuyama’s “Trust”.

  • So, when I say “low trust” I am speaking in terms of the institutional developme

    So, when I say “low trust” I am speaking in terms of the institutional development of rule of law as a means of suppressing corruption, and therefore expanding truth telling.

    The reason russia is rated (and I rate it) as a low trust country is corruption.

    That said, I promise you, that you want russian friends more than friends from high trust countries. Just as much as you want government from high trust countries.

    When I say ‘chinese are a low trust society’, this does not mean that they don’t trust each other. It means that (a) they lie, (b) they cheat, (c) the government is corrupt.

    So high trust describes a RADIUS of trust, not how you trust the people you interact with.

    In other words, trust is a question of economics.

    Honestly, I prefer the company of conservative libertarian western europeans, and educated russians equally. I am a russophile just as much as I am a lover of ukraine.

    Read Fukuyama’s “Trust”.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-07 08:32:00 UTC

  • WHAT’S FICTIONALISM???? 😉

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/03/24/definition-fictionalism/GEE, WHAT’S FICTIONALISM???? 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-02 21:15:00 UTC

  • —“What do conservatives mean when they say “liberal elite?”—

    —-”What do conservatives mean when they say “liberal elite?””—-

    1. Virtue signaling class vs virtue demonstrating class
    2. Talking class vs Productive Class
    3. Others Pay For It class vs Pay Your Own Way class.
    4. Cosmopolitan Class (territorial communism) vs Nationalist Class (territorial nationalism)

    Technically speaking, the “Cathedral Complex” consisting of the alliance of the talking class and the underclass: The Academy, The State, The Media (News, Info-tainment, Entertainment, Advertising, Marketing), The Financial Sector. We use the term ‘Cathedral Complex’ to refer to the replacement of the aristocratic, rule of law, commercial, military and industrial complex (The people who do) with the propaganda complex (the people who talk.) When the church failed to reform, the academy replaced the church. It’s not complicated. We don’t have a separation of church and state any longer. We have a state sponsored church of democratic socialist secular humanism spread by marxist pseudoscience and postmodern pseudorationalism, and outright denial of science.

  • —“What do conservatives mean when they say “liberal elite?”—

    —-”What do conservatives mean when they say “liberal elite?””—-

    1. Virtue signaling class vs virtue demonstrating class
    2. Talking class vs Productive Class
    3. Others Pay For It class vs Pay Your Own Way class.
    4. Cosmopolitan Class (territorial communism) vs Nationalist Class (territorial nationalism)

    Technically speaking, the “Cathedral Complex” consisting of the alliance of the talking class and the underclass: The Academy, The State, The Media (News, Info-tainment, Entertainment, Advertising, Marketing), The Financial Sector. We use the term ‘Cathedral Complex’ to refer to the replacement of the aristocratic, rule of law, commercial, military and industrial complex (The people who do) with the propaganda complex (the people who talk.) When the church failed to reform, the academy replaced the church. It’s not complicated. We don’t have a separation of church and state any longer. We have a state sponsored church of democratic socialist secular humanism spread by marxist pseudoscience and postmodern pseudorationalism, and outright denial of science.