Form: Definition

On Truth (Complete)(Core)
ON TRUTH (Complete)(core)TRUTH: “TESTIMONY THAT SATISFIES DEMAND FOR INFALLIBILITY”WHERE TRUTH CONSISTS IN THE SERIES
1. Tautological Truth: That testimony you give when promising the equality of two statements using different terms: A circular definition, a statement of equality or a statement of identity.
2. Analytic Truth: The testimony you give promising the internal consistency of one or more statements used in the construction of a proof in an axiomatic(declarative) system. (a Logical Truth).
3. Ideal Truth: That testimony (description) you would give, if your knowledge (information) was complete, your language was sufficient, stated without error, cleansed of bias, and absent deceit, within the scope of precision limited to the context of the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possessed of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony. (Ideal Truth = Perfect Parsimony.)
4. Truthfulness: that testimony (description) you give if your knowledge (information) is incomplete, your language is insufficient, you have performed due diligence in the elimination of error, imaginary content, wishful thinking, bias, fictionalism, and deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and which you warranty to be so; and the promise that another possessed of the knowledge, performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.
5. Reasonableness: that testimony (description) you give, as justification for your reporting of your belief, justification, preference, coice, or actions with full knowledge that knowledge is incomplete, your language is insufficient, but you have not performed due diligence in the elimination of error and bias, but which you warranty is free of deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possess of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.
6. Honesty: that testimony (description) you give with full knowledge that knowledge is incomplete, your language is insufficient, but you have not performed due diligence in the elimination of error and bias, but which you warranty is free of deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possess of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.
WHERE TRUTHFUL SPEECH
1. Satisfies the Demand for Increasing Infallibility of Decidability
WHERE DEMAND FOR DECIDABILITY:
1. In the REVERSE: a question (statement) is DECIDABLE if an algorithm (set of operations) exists within the limits of the system (rules, axioms, theories) that can produce a decision (choice). In other words, if the sufficient information for the decision is present (ie: is decidable) within the âsystemâ(ie: grammar).
2. In the OBVERSE: Instead, we should determine if there is a means of choosing without the need for additional information supplied from outside the system (ie: not discretionary).
Or in simple terms, if DISCRETION is necessary the question is undecidable, and if discretion is unnecessary, a proposition is decidable. This separates reason (or calculation in the wider sense) from computation (algorithm). GIVEN The Series:
1. Intelligible: Decidable enough to imagine a conceptual relationship
2. Reasonable: Decidable enough for me to feel confident that my decision will satisfy my needs, and is not a waste of time, energy, resources.
3. Actionable: Decidable enough for me to take actions given time, effort, knowledge, resources.
4. Ethical and Moral: Decidable enough for me to not impose risk or costs upon the interests of others, or cause others to retaliate against me, if they have knowledge of and transparency into my actions.
5. Normative: Decidable enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion among my fellow people with similar values.
6. Judicial: Decidable enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion across different peoples with different knowledge, comprehension and values.
7. Scientific: Decidable regardless of all opinions or perspectives (True)
8. Logical: Decidable out of physical or logical necessity
9. Tautological: Decidedly identical in properties (referents) if not references (terms). So to borrow the one of many terms from Economics, we can see in this series (list) a market demand for increasingly infallible decidability.
GIVEN THE HUMAN FACULTIES:
1. Sense(stimuli)
  … … Perception (composition)
  … … … Association
2. Logic Facility (constant relations)
  … … Imagination Facility (prediction)
  … … … Reason Facility (comparison, permutation)
3. Grammar facility (statements)
  … … Paradigms (‘metaphysics’, ‘dimensions’)
  … … Vocabulary
  … … … Sounds
  … … … Signs (acts, actions)
  … … … Marks (records)
  … … … … accidental
  … … … … intentional
  … … … … … Mark
  … … … … … Symbol
  … … … … … … Glyph
  … … … … … Pictogram
  … … … … … Picture
  … … … … … Picture Series
  … … … … … Animation
4. Communication Facility (“Language”)
  … Truths
  … … .Formal Science
  … … … Mathematics
  … … … Logics (deflationary Grammars)
  … … … Algorithms
  … … Physical Sciences
  … … … Physics
  … … … Chemistry
  … … … Biology
  … … … Sentience (Consciousness)
  … …
  … … Rhetorics (argumentative, persuasive Grammars)
  … Descriptions
  … … Testimony
  … Ordinary Language
  … Narrations (inflationary Grammars)
  … … Narrative (description)
  … … … Storytelling (loading, framing)
  … Deceits
  … … … Fictionalism
  … … … …. Pseudoscience -> Magic
  … … … …. Idealism-> Surrealism, and
  … … … …. Supernaturalism->Occult
  … … … Obscurantism (Obscuring, Overloading)
  … … … … Propaganda
  … … … Misdirection (Deceit)
  … … … Fraud (for gain)
  … … … Harm (Evil, for harm regardless of gain)
WHERE THE SPEECH IS CONSISTS OF:
1. Complete Sentences
2. In promissory form
3. In testimonial form
4. In operational vocabulary (as actions)
5. absent the verb to-be (is, are, was, were…)
6. including all changes in state
7. including all consequences of change in state
8. from an observer’s point of view
9. producing a series of testable transactions.
WHERE THE CRITERIA FOR TRUTHFUL SPEECH IS: Coherence Across the Dimensions Testifiable by Man, in The Series:
1. Existential >
  … 2. Realism >
  … 3. Naturalism >
2. Possible >
  … 5. Operational – Demonstrable >
  … 6. Empirical – Externally Correspondent >
  … 7. Logical – Categorically Consistent
3. Rational >
  … 9. Rational Choice – Demonstrated Preference >
  … … 10. Incentives – Demonstrated Interest >
  … … … 11. Body, Mind, Memory, Effort, Time
  … … … 12. Mates, Offspring, Kin
  … … … 13. Status, Reputation, Kith
  … … … 14. Several Interests (in many forms)
  … … … 15. Common Interests (in many forms)
  … 16. Reciprocal >
  … … 17. Productive
  … … 18. Fully Informed
  … … 19. Voluntary Transfer >
  … … 20. Free of Negative Externality >
4. Survivable >
  … 22. Power Distribution of Law >
  … 23. Pareto Distribution of Assets >
  … 24. Nash Distribution of Rewards >
5. Complete >
  … 26. Limits, Completeness, Full Accounting,
  … 27. Consistency, Coherence, Parsimony
6. Competitive – in the market for theories
  … 29. Sufficient – Satisfies the Demand For Infallibility
  … 30. Parsimony – In competition with other testimonies
7. Warrantable >
  … 32. (i)as having performed due diligence in the above dimensions;
  … 33. (ii)where due diligence is sufficient to satisfy the demand for infallibility;
  … 34. (iii)and where one entertains no risk that one cannot perform restitution for.
AS A DEFENSE AGAINST THE SERIES:
1. Ignorance and Willful Ignorance;
2. Error and failure of Due Diligence;
3. Bias and Wishful Thinking;
4. And the many Deceits of:
  … (a) Loading and Framing;
  … (b) Suggestion, Obscurantism, and
  … (c) Overloading, Propaganda and Social Construction
  … (d) Fictionalisms of
  … … i) Idealism -> Pseudorationalism, and
  … … ii) Magic -> Pseudoscience, and
  … … iii) Occult -> Supernaturalism;
  … (e) Sophistry
  … (f) and outright Fabrications (fictions).
IN DEFENSE OR ADVOCACY OF: Any transfer of demonstrated interests that is not reciprocal, the tests of: … (a) productive … (b) fully informed, fully accounted … (d) voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests … (e) free of externality of the same criteria … (c) warrantied and within the limits of liability WHERE DEMONSTRATED INTEREST INCLUDES: 1. Existential (or Natural) Interests: Definition:

Existential (or Natural) Interest: Interests that inherent in physical existence. Where;

1. Self: Life, Body, Genes, Memories, Mind, Attention Time, and Action

2. Stimulation, Experience
1. Cooperative Interests Include
3. Status and Class (reputation, honor) Self-Image, Status, Reputation Social, Sexual, Economic, Political, and Military Market Value

4. Kin and Interpersonal (Relationship) Interests Mates (access to sex/reproduction), and Marriage Children (genetic reproduction) Consanguineous Relations (family, kin, clan, tribal and national relations)

5. Sustainable Patterns of Association, Cooperation, Insurance, Reproduction, Production, Distribution and Trade Friends, Acquaintances, Neighbors, Cooperative Relations, Commercial Relations, Political Relations, and Military Relations.
1. Obtained Interests include:
Definition:

Obtained Interest: Interests that are obtained by bearing a cost of opportunity, time, effort, resources, to obtain that interest without imposing upon the previously born costs of others. Where; Obtained Interests Include:

6. Several (Personal) Interests Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.” Physical Body and Several Property: Those things we claim a monopoly of control over.

7. Shareholder (Fractional) Interests Shares in property: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (claims for partial ownership)

8. Title Interests (Weights and Measures) Trademarks and Brands (prohibitions on fraudulent transfers within a geography).

9. Artificial Interests (Privileges) Letters of Marque, Patents, Copyrights, Grants of License.

10. Common Interests, or “Commons” (Community Property) Institutional Property: “Those objects into which we have invested our forgone opportunities, our efforts, or our material assets, in order to aggregate capital from multiple individuals for mutual gain.”

(i) Informational commons: knowledge. Information.

(ii) Informal (Normative) Institutions: Our norms: habits, manners, ethics and morals. Informal institutional property is nearly impossible to quantify and price. The costs are subjective and consist of forgone opportunities.

(iii) Formal (Physical) Commons: the territory, it’s waterways, parks, buildings, improvements and infrastructure.

(iv) Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion, Education, Banking, Treasury, Government, Laws, Courts.

(v) Monuments (art and artifacts). Monuments claim territory, demonstrate wealth, and provide one of the longest most invariable normative and economic returns that any culture can construct as a demonstration of conspicuous production (wealth), and as such, conspicuous excellence. (hence why competing monuments represent an invasion. Temples, Churches, Museums, Sculptures being the most obvious examples of cultural claim or conquest. )

(vi) Common Opportunity Interests When people come together in proximity, and suppress impositions of costs upon the interests of others through the incremental evolution of the law of reciprocity, they decrease the time and effort required to produce voluntary association, cooperation and exchange. As such polities decrease opportunity costs, and generate opportunities. These opportunities are un-homsesteaded (opportunities) until invested in by individuals either by expenditure of time effort and resources, or by forgoing opportunities for consumption. As such the proximity of people and the institution of reciprocity under law produce a commons of opportunities that we seize (homestead) by competition. As such no one may claim interest in an opportunity without conducting and exchange by which to seize it.INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO The Series of: … (a) murder, … (b) harm, damage, theft, … (c) fraud, fraud by omission, fraud by indirection, baiting into hazard … (d) free riding, socialization of losses, privatization of commons, … (e) rent seeking, monopoly seeking, conspiracy, statism/corporatism, … (f) conversion(religion/pseudoscience), … (g) displacement(immigration/overbreeding), … (h) conquest (war). (End)
February 23, 2019
On Truth (Complete)(Core)
ON TRUTH (Complete)(core)TRUTH: “TESTIMONY THAT SATISFIES DEMAND FOR INFALLIBILITY”WHERE TRUTH CONSISTS IN THE SERIES
1. Tautological Truth: That testimony you give when promising the equality of two statements using different terms: A circular definition, a statement of equality or a statement of identity.
2. Analytic Truth: The testimony you give promising the internal consistency of one or more statements used in the construction of a proof in an axiomatic(declarative) system. (a Logical Truth).
3. Ideal Truth: That testimony (description) you would give, if your knowledge (information) was complete, your language was sufficient, stated without error, cleansed of bias, and absent deceit, within the scope of precision limited to the context of the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possessed of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony. (Ideal Truth = Perfect Parsimony.)
4. Truthfulness: that testimony (description) you give if your knowledge (information) is incomplete, your language is insufficient, you have performed due diligence in the elimination of error, imaginary content, wishful thinking, bias, fictionalism, and deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and which you warranty to be so; and the promise that another possessed of the knowledge, performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.
5. Reasonableness: that testimony (description) you give, as justification for your reporting of your belief, justification, preference, coice, or actions with full knowledge that knowledge is incomplete, your language is insufficient, but you have not performed due diligence in the elimination of error and bias, but which you warranty is free of deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possess of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.
6. Honesty: that testimony (description) you give with full knowledge that knowledge is incomplete, your language is insufficient, but you have not performed due diligence in the elimination of error and bias, but which you warranty is free of deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possess of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.
WHERE TRUTHFUL SPEECH
1. Satisfies the Demand for Increasing Infallibility of Decidability
WHERE DEMAND FOR DECIDABILITY:
1. In the REVERSE: a question (statement) is DECIDABLE if an algorithm (set of operations) exists within the limits of the system (rules, axioms, theories) that can produce a decision (choice). In other words, if the sufficient information for the decision is present (ie: is decidable) within the âsystemâ(ie: grammar).
2. In the OBVERSE: Instead, we should determine if there is a means of choosing without the need for additional information supplied from outside the system (ie: not discretionary).
Or in simple terms, if DISCRETION is necessary the question is undecidable, and if discretion is unnecessary, a proposition is decidable. This separates reason (or calculation in the wider sense) from computation (algorithm). GIVEN The Series:
1. Intelligible: Decidable enough to imagine a conceptual relationship
2. Reasonable: Decidable enough for me to feel confident that my decision will satisfy my needs, and is not a waste of time, energy, resources.
3. Actionable: Decidable enough for me to take actions given time, effort, knowledge, resources.
4. Ethical and Moral: Decidable enough for me to not impose risk or costs upon the interests of others, or cause others to retaliate against me, if they have knowledge of and transparency into my actions.
5. Normative: Decidable enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion among my fellow people with similar values.
6. Judicial: Decidable enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion across different peoples with different knowledge, comprehension and values.
7. Scientific: Decidable regardless of all opinions or perspectives (True)
8. Logical: Decidable out of physical or logical necessity
9. Tautological: Decidedly identical in properties (referents) if not references (terms). So to borrow the one of many terms from Economics, we can see in this series (list) a market demand for increasingly infallible decidability.
GIVEN THE HUMAN FACULTIES:
1. Sense(stimuli)
  … … Perception (composition)
  … … … Association
2. Logic Facility (constant relations)
  … … Imagination Facility (prediction)
  … … … Reason Facility (comparison, permutation)
3. Grammar facility (statements)
  … … Paradigms (‘metaphysics’, ‘dimensions’)
  … … Vocabulary
  … … … Sounds
  … … … Signs (acts, actions)
  … … … Marks (records)
  … … … … accidental
  … … … … intentional
  … … … … … Mark
  … … … … … Symbol
  … … … … … … Glyph
  … … … … … Pictogram
  … … … … … Picture
  … … … … … Picture Series
  … … … … … Animation
4. Communication Facility (“Language”)
  … Truths
  … … .Formal Science
  … … … Mathematics
  … … … Logics (deflationary Grammars)
  … … … Algorithms
  … … Physical Sciences
  … … … Physics
  … … … Chemistry
  … … … Biology
  … … … Sentience (Consciousness)
  … …
  … … Rhetorics (argumentative, persuasive Grammars)
  … Descriptions
  … … Testimony
  … Ordinary Language
  … Narrations (inflationary Grammars)
  … … Narrative (description)
  … … … Storytelling (loading, framing)
  … Deceits
  … … … Fictionalism
  … … … …. Pseudoscience -> Magic
  … … … …. Idealism-> Surrealism, and
  … … … …. Supernaturalism->Occult
  … … … Obscurantism (Obscuring, Overloading)
  … … … … Propaganda
  … … … Misdirection (Deceit)
  … … … Fraud (for gain)
  … … … Harm (Evil, for harm regardless of gain)
WHERE THE SPEECH IS CONSISTS OF:
1. Complete Sentences
2. In promissory form
3. In testimonial form
4. In operational vocabulary (as actions)
5. absent the verb to-be (is, are, was, were…)
6. including all changes in state
7. including all consequences of change in state
8. from an observer’s point of view
9. producing a series of testable transactions.
WHERE THE CRITERIA FOR TRUTHFUL SPEECH IS: Coherence Across the Dimensions Testifiable by Man, in The Series:
1. Existential >
  … 2. Realism >
  … 3. Naturalism >
2. Possible >
  … 5. Operational – Demonstrable >
  … 6. Empirical – Externally Correspondent >
  … 7. Logical – Categorically Consistent
3. Rational >
  … 9. Rational Choice – Demonstrated Preference >
  … … 10. Incentives – Demonstrated Interest >
  … … … 11. Body, Mind, Memory, Effort, Time
  … … … 12. Mates, Offspring, Kin
  … … … 13. Status, Reputation, Kith
  … … … 14. Several Interests (in many forms)
  … … … 15. Common Interests (in many forms)
  … 16. Reciprocal >
  … … 17. Productive
  … … 18. Fully Informed
  … … 19. Voluntary Transfer >
  … … 20. Free of Negative Externality >
4. Survivable >
  … 22. Power Distribution of Law >
  … 23. Pareto Distribution of Assets >
  … 24. Nash Distribution of Rewards >
5. Complete >
  … 26. Limits, Completeness, Full Accounting,
  … 27. Consistency, Coherence, Parsimony
6. Competitive – in the market for theories
  … 29. Sufficient – Satisfies the Demand For Infallibility
  … 30. Parsimony – In competition with other testimonies
7. Warrantable >
  … 32. (i)as having performed due diligence in the above dimensions;
  … 33. (ii)where due diligence is sufficient to satisfy the demand for infallibility;
  … 34. (iii)and where one entertains no risk that one cannot perform restitution for.
AS A DEFENSE AGAINST THE SERIES:
1. Ignorance and Willful Ignorance;
2. Error and failure of Due Diligence;
3. Bias and Wishful Thinking;
4. And the many Deceits of:
  … (a) Loading and Framing;
  … (b) Suggestion, Obscurantism, and
  … (c) Overloading, Propaganda and Social Construction
  … (d) Fictionalisms of
  … … i) Idealism -> Pseudorationalism, and
  … … ii) Magic -> Pseudoscience, and
  … … iii) Occult -> Supernaturalism;
  … (e) Sophistry
  … (f) and outright Fabrications (fictions).
IN DEFENSE OR ADVOCACY OF: Any transfer of demonstrated interests that is not reciprocal, the tests of: … (a) productive … (b) fully informed, fully accounted … (d) voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests … (e) free of externality of the same criteria … (c) warrantied and within the limits of liability WHERE DEMONSTRATED INTEREST INCLUDES: 1. Existential (or Natural) Interests: Definition:

Existential (or Natural) Interest: Interests that inherent in physical existence. Where;

1. Self: Life, Body, Genes, Memories, Mind, Attention Time, and Action

2. Stimulation, Experience
1. Cooperative Interests Include
3. Status and Class (reputation, honor) Self-Image, Status, Reputation Social, Sexual, Economic, Political, and Military Market Value

4. Kin and Interpersonal (Relationship) Interests Mates (access to sex/reproduction), and Marriage Children (genetic reproduction) Consanguineous Relations (family, kin, clan, tribal and national relations)

5. Sustainable Patterns of Association, Cooperation, Insurance, Reproduction, Production, Distribution and Trade Friends, Acquaintances, Neighbors, Cooperative Relations, Commercial Relations, Political Relations, and Military Relations.
1. Obtained Interests include:
Definition:

Obtained Interest: Interests that are obtained by bearing a cost of opportunity, time, effort, resources, to obtain that interest without imposing upon the previously born costs of others. Where; Obtained Interests Include:

6. Several (Personal) Interests Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.” Physical Body and Several Property: Those things we claim a monopoly of control over.

7. Shareholder (Fractional) Interests Shares in property: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (claims for partial ownership)

8. Title Interests (Weights and Measures) Trademarks and Brands (prohibitions on fraudulent transfers within a geography).

9. Artificial Interests (Privileges) Letters of Marque, Patents, Copyrights, Grants of License.

10. Common Interests, or “Commons” (Community Property) Institutional Property: “Those objects into which we have invested our forgone opportunities, our efforts, or our material assets, in order to aggregate capital from multiple individuals for mutual gain.”

(i) Informational commons: knowledge. Information.

(ii) Informal (Normative) Institutions: Our norms: habits, manners, ethics and morals. Informal institutional property is nearly impossible to quantify and price. The costs are subjective and consist of forgone opportunities.

(iii) Formal (Physical) Commons: the territory, it’s waterways, parks, buildings, improvements and infrastructure.

(iv) Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion, Education, Banking, Treasury, Government, Laws, Courts.

(v) Monuments (art and artifacts). Monuments claim territory, demonstrate wealth, and provide one of the longest most invariable normative and economic returns that any culture can construct as a demonstration of conspicuous production (wealth), and as such, conspicuous excellence. (hence why competing monuments represent an invasion. Temples, Churches, Museums, Sculptures being the most obvious examples of cultural claim or conquest. )

(vi) Common Opportunity Interests When people come together in proximity, and suppress impositions of costs upon the interests of others through the incremental evolution of the law of reciprocity, they decrease the time and effort required to produce voluntary association, cooperation and exchange. As such polities decrease opportunity costs, and generate opportunities. These opportunities are un-homsesteaded (opportunities) until invested in by individuals either by expenditure of time effort and resources, or by forgoing opportunities for consumption. As such the proximity of people and the institution of reciprocity under law produce a commons of opportunities that we seize (homestead) by competition. As such no one may claim interest in an opportunity without conducting and exchange by which to seize it.INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO The Series of: … (a) murder, … (b) harm, damage, theft, … (c) fraud, fraud by omission, fraud by indirection, baiting into hazard … (d) free riding, socialization of losses, privatization of commons, … (e) rent seeking, monopoly seeking, conspiracy, statism/corporatism, … (f) conversion(religion/pseudoscience), … (g) displacement(immigration/overbreeding), … (h) conquest (war). (End)
February 23, 2019
Definition: GSRM (or GSRRM, RRGSM etc.)
“WHAT DOES GSRM STAND FOR?” (core) —“You mention GSRM all the time, what does it stand for?”– [T]he Female (herd) competitive strategy by circumventing argument by use of undermining, poisoning the well, reputation destruction by use of (G)ossiping (S)haming, (R)allying, (R)idicule, (M)oralizing, (P)sychologizing,(U)ndermining, (R)eputation destruction. and solving for (F)ace or consent – instead of Male (pack) strategy by factual argument solving for truth regardless of face or consent. In other words female “feels” using rejection or approval vs male “reals” of truth of falsehood.

The Female Technique of Social Superpredation by Gossiping Shaming Ridiculing Rallying and Moralizing
- Undermining (blaming) by GSRRM: Disapproving > Denying, Shaming > Gossiping, Outraging > Rallying, Psychologizing > Moralizing, Dominating > Oppressing, Reputation-Destruction > Propagandizing (Limiting consumption)
The Technique of “GSRRM” includes: … (L)ying by Plausible Deniability By: … (E)vading the Truth By: … (E)quating Truth to (F)ace, (A)pproval, or (C)onsent By: … (D)isapproving … … (D)enying … … … (S)ilence And By Escalating To: … (S)haming, … … (M)oralizing, … … … (P)sychologizing, … … … … (R)idiculing … … … … … (O)utraging, And By Escalating To: … (R)allying … … (G)ossiping … … … (U)ndermining, … … … … (P)ropagandizing And By Escalating To: … (S)houting Down … … (S)ilencing … … … (C)ancelling … … … … (D)eplatforming (interference in communication and colaboration) And By Escalating to: … (R)eputation destruction (interference in reputation) … … (D)oxxing (interference in safety and anonymity) … … … (J)ob Doxxing (interference in employement) … … … … (B)usiness Doxxing (interference in the conduct of a business) And By Escalating to: … (C)ourt Abuse (using cost of litigation to silence, obtain false confession, or to harm) … … (J)udicial Abuse (using select cases to exploit vunlerabilities in the law) … … … (C)onstitutional Abuse (using advocacy of incrementally harmful legislation to exploit vulnerabilities in the construction of the constitution, under cover of moral pretense)

In western history under our ancient laws, men were prohibited from reputation destruction by direct violence between men under the law of the Duel.

In western history Female Conflict (social violence by GSRRM) was largely illegal or punishable under laws against “scolds” –women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace.

During the democratic and Marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony).

Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM.

GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience. [M]en generally make an argument and let the argument do its work. We use shaming if necessary in response to GSRM. Whereas the feminine cognitive strategy is to rely entirely on GSRM as a means of denying or suppressing the argument rather than refuting it. GSRRM (LEFTIST, POSTMODERN, FEMININE) SPEECH Leftist speech is not protected speech. It is always either: Fraud – promising benefits that will never be delivered at costs that will never be disclosed. Slander(oral) and Libel(written) Defamation – malicious lies designed to slur, marginalize, and dehumanize rivals or critics. Obscenity – Transgression of taboos for the purpose of subversion, demoralization, and/or parasitic profit. Blasphemy – Attacking the sacred for the purpose of subversion, undermining, the destruction of intergenerational wisdom, and the erosion of necessary and helpful moral rules. False Alarm : relentlessly fear-mongering and sensationalizing imaginary threats as a means of obscuring/justifying real ones. Abrahamism : False Promise Pilpul (Sophism) – Overloading. Misdirecting. Obscuring. Disputation by sheer volume and variety of fallacy to overwhelm resistance to false and pernicious conclusions. Can include sophism, pseudoscience, fiction, fictionalisms, or supernaturalists. Critique (Undermining) – Criticism of a straw man to undermine without proposing an alternative or superior solution open to equal analysis and criticism. Includes loading, framing, obscuring, suggesting, fictionalizing, denying, deceiving and outright lying. Heaping of Undue Praise – Advancing a hero in order to create an appeal to authority rather than advancing an argument to test whether it survives application to the context. Propaganda – narrative manufacturer by sheer repetition to fill the “marketplace of ideas” with bullshit congenial to the gatekeepers who control the broadcast channels and media. Psychoanalysis (Psychologising) – pseudo-scientifically pathologizing legitimate disagreement as a means of obtaining and exercising social control and marginalizing and silencing dissenting voices and views. Feminine Coercion – Rallying, shaming, gossip, disapproval, moralizing, mockery, ridicule, nagging, scolding, and character assassination to raise the emotional and social cost of disagreement and dissent without addressing their causes. Or some combination of these and other categories of parasitic, deceptive, and destructive speech. HISTORY [I]n western history GSRM was largely illegal or punishable by direct violence between men. And laws against “scolds” -women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace. During the democratic and marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony). Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM. GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience. This is why the abrahamic (jewish in particular, or semitic in general) means of countering greco-roman-european argument by using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism), and critique (undermining) is so effective: it is how our females talk to us, and because of our high trust, we are either genetically or culturally vulnerable to it – where other lower trust people are not. And we are easily undermined politically and academically because our females naturally find greater ‘affinity’ with semitic non-argument (religion, postmodernism, feminism, denialism) than with european reason science truth testimony. Male European – Truth over Face, Regardless of cost. Male everywhere else – some degree of face over truth. Female everywhere – nearly universal face over truth. Yet it is truth over face that is the reason for the ‘western miracle’ – why the rest is so different from the rest. Hence why christians are the vulnerability of western civilization: their religion was developed to obtain the attention of women, and to appeal to GSRM. The religion is stated and argued with false promise(‘salvation’), baiting into hazard (cultural vulnerability to conquest), using pilpul (excuse making) and critique (straw manning), and the fictionalism of supernaturalism. Judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, and islam to destroy. The middle east uses the female reproductive strategy and the far east and the west use the male reproductive strategy, with the far east using face over truth to defend hierarchy and the west using truth before face to defend the market of the peerage. And the middle east today just as in the age of the greeks, just lying and shaming all truth without end. The world is not complicated. It is our lies that make it seem so. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute
February 23, 2019
Definition: GSRM (or GSRRM, RRGSM etc.)
“WHAT DOES GSRM STAND FOR?” (core) —“You mention GSRM all the time, what does it stand for?”– [T]he Female (herd) competitive strategy by circumventing argument by use of undermining, poisoning the well, reputation destruction by use of (G)ossiping (S)haming, (R)allying, (R)idicule, (M)oralizing, (P)sychologizing,(U)ndermining, (R)eputation destruction. and solving for (F)ace or consent – instead of Male (pack) strategy by factual argument solving for truth regardless of face or consent. In other words female “feels” using rejection or approval vs male “reals” of truth of falsehood.

The Female Technique of Social Superpredation by Gossiping Shaming Ridiculing Rallying and Moralizing
- Undermining (blaming) by GSRRM: Disapproving > Denying, Shaming > Gossiping, Outraging > Rallying, Psychologizing > Moralizing, Dominating > Oppressing, Reputation-Destruction > Propagandizing (Limiting consumption)
The Technique of “GSRRM” includes: … (L)ying by Plausible Deniability By: … (E)vading the Truth By: … (E)quating Truth to (F)ace, (A)pproval, or (C)onsent By: … (D)isapproving … … (D)enying … … … (S)ilence And By Escalating To: … (S)haming, … … (M)oralizing, … … … (P)sychologizing, … … … … (R)idiculing … … … … … (O)utraging, And By Escalating To: … (R)allying … … (G)ossiping … … … (U)ndermining, … … … … (P)ropagandizing And By Escalating To: … (S)houting Down … … (S)ilencing … … … (C)ancelling … … … … (D)eplatforming (interference in communication and colaboration) And By Escalating to: … (R)eputation destruction (interference in reputation) … … (D)oxxing (interference in safety and anonymity) … … … (J)ob Doxxing (interference in employement) … … … … (B)usiness Doxxing (interference in the conduct of a business) And By Escalating to: … (C)ourt Abuse (using cost of litigation to silence, obtain false confession, or to harm) … … (J)udicial Abuse (using select cases to exploit vunlerabilities in the law) … … … (C)onstitutional Abuse (using advocacy of incrementally harmful legislation to exploit vulnerabilities in the construction of the constitution, under cover of moral pretense)

In western history under our ancient laws, men were prohibited from reputation destruction by direct violence between men under the law of the Duel.

In western history Female Conflict (social violence by GSRRM) was largely illegal or punishable under laws against “scolds” –women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace.

During the democratic and Marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony).

Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM.

GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience. [M]en generally make an argument and let the argument do its work. We use shaming if necessary in response to GSRM. Whereas the feminine cognitive strategy is to rely entirely on GSRM as a means of denying or suppressing the argument rather than refuting it. GSRRM (LEFTIST, POSTMODERN, FEMININE) SPEECH Leftist speech is not protected speech. It is always either: Fraud – promising benefits that will never be delivered at costs that will never be disclosed. Slander(oral) and Libel(written) Defamation – malicious lies designed to slur, marginalize, and dehumanize rivals or critics. Obscenity – Transgression of taboos for the purpose of subversion, demoralization, and/or parasitic profit. Blasphemy – Attacking the sacred for the purpose of subversion, undermining, the destruction of intergenerational wisdom, and the erosion of necessary and helpful moral rules. False Alarm : relentlessly fear-mongering and sensationalizing imaginary threats as a means of obscuring/justifying real ones. Abrahamism : False Promise Pilpul (Sophism) – Overloading. Misdirecting. Obscuring. Disputation by sheer volume and variety of fallacy to overwhelm resistance to false and pernicious conclusions. Can include sophism, pseudoscience, fiction, fictionalisms, or supernaturalists. Critique (Undermining) – Criticism of a straw man to undermine without proposing an alternative or superior solution open to equal analysis and criticism. Includes loading, framing, obscuring, suggesting, fictionalizing, denying, deceiving and outright lying. Heaping of Undue Praise – Advancing a hero in order to create an appeal to authority rather than advancing an argument to test whether it survives application to the context. Propaganda – narrative manufacturer by sheer repetition to fill the “marketplace of ideas” with bullshit congenial to the gatekeepers who control the broadcast channels and media. Psychoanalysis (Psychologising) – pseudo-scientifically pathologizing legitimate disagreement as a means of obtaining and exercising social control and marginalizing and silencing dissenting voices and views. Feminine Coercion – Rallying, shaming, gossip, disapproval, moralizing, mockery, ridicule, nagging, scolding, and character assassination to raise the emotional and social cost of disagreement and dissent without addressing their causes. Or some combination of these and other categories of parasitic, deceptive, and destructive speech. HISTORY [I]n western history GSRM was largely illegal or punishable by direct violence between men. And laws against “scolds” -women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace. During the democratic and marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony). Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM. GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience. This is why the abrahamic (jewish in particular, or semitic in general) means of countering greco-roman-european argument by using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism), and critique (undermining) is so effective: it is how our females talk to us, and because of our high trust, we are either genetically or culturally vulnerable to it – where other lower trust people are not. And we are easily undermined politically and academically because our females naturally find greater ‘affinity’ with semitic non-argument (religion, postmodernism, feminism, denialism) than with european reason science truth testimony. Male European – Truth over Face, Regardless of cost. Male everywhere else – some degree of face over truth. Female everywhere – nearly universal face over truth. Yet it is truth over face that is the reason for the ‘western miracle’ – why the rest is so different from the rest. Hence why christians are the vulnerability of western civilization: their religion was developed to obtain the attention of women, and to appeal to GSRM. The religion is stated and argued with false promise(‘salvation’), baiting into hazard (cultural vulnerability to conquest), using pilpul (excuse making) and critique (straw manning), and the fictionalism of supernaturalism. Judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, and islam to destroy. The middle east uses the female reproductive strategy and the far east and the west use the male reproductive strategy, with the far east using face over truth to defend hierarchy and the west using truth before face to defend the market of the peerage. And the middle east today just as in the age of the greeks, just lying and shaming all truth without end. The world is not complicated. It is our lies that make it seem so. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute
February 23, 2019
ON TRUTH (Complete) (core) GIVEN DEMAND FOR DECIDABILITY: a) In the REVERSE: a q

ON TRUTH (Complete)

(core)

GIVEN DEMAND FOR DECIDABILITY:

a) In the REVERSE: a question (statement) is DECIDABLE if an algorithm (set of operations) exists within the limits of the system (rules, axioms, theories) that can produce a decision (choice). In other words, if the sufficient information for the decision is present (ie: is decidable) within the “system”(ie: grammar).

b) In the OBVERSE: Instead, we should determine if there is a means of choosing without the need for additional information supplied from outside the system (ie: not discretionary).

Or in simple terms, if DISCRETION is necessary the question is undecidable, and if discretion is unnecessary, a proposition is decidable. This separates reason (or calculation in the wider sense) from computation (algorithm).

GIVEN THESE DIMENSIONS:

1. Distinguishability (indistinguishable, distinguishably, meaningful(categorical), identifiable(memorable).

2. Possibility (unimaginable, imaginable, rational, empirical, operational, unavoidable )

3. Actionability (inactionable,contingently actionable, actionable)

4. Population (Self, Others, All, Universal)

YIELDS THE SERIES:

1. Indistinguishable(perception) >

2. Distinguishable(cognition) >

3. Memorable(categorical-referrable) >

4. Possible(material) >

5. Actionable(physical) >

6. Choosable(for use) >

7. Preferable(Personal) >

8. Good(interpersonal) >

9. Decidable(political) >

10. True(most parsimonious descriptive name possible)(universal) >

11. Analytic >

12. Tautological.

WHERE TRUTHFUL SPEECH THAT SATISFIES THE DEMAND FOR INCREASING INFALLIBILITY OF DECIDABILITY YIELDS THE SERIES:

1. Intelligible: Decidable enough to imagine a conceptual relationship

2. Reasonable: Decidable enough for me to feel confident that my decision will satisfy my needs, and is not a waste of time, energy, resources.

3. Actionable: Decidable enough for me to take actions given time, effort, knowledge, resources.

4. Ethical and Moral: Decidable enough for me to not impose risk or costs upon the interests of others, or cause others to retaliate against me, if they have knowledge of and transparency into my actions.

5. Normative: Decidable enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion among my fellow people with similar values.

6. Judicial: Decidable enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion across different peoples with different knowledge, comprehension and values.

7. Scientific: Decidable regardless of all opinions or perspectives (‘True’)

8. Logical: Decidable out of physical or logical necessity

9. Tautological: Decidedly identical in properties (referents) if not references (terms). So to borrow the one of many terms from Economics, we can see in this series (list) a market demand for increasingly infallible decidability.

WHERE TRUTH CONSISTS IN THE SERIES

1. Tautological Truth: That testimony you give when promising the equality of two statements using different terms: A circular definition, a statement of equality or a statement of identity.

2. Analytic Truth: The testimony you give promising the internal consistency of one or more statements used in the construction of a proof in an axiomatic(declarative) system. (a Logical Truth).

3. Ideal Truth: That testimony (description) you would give, if your knowledge (information) was complete, your language was sufficient, stated without error, cleansed of bias, and absent deceit, within the scope of precision limited to the context of the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possessed of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony. (Ideal Truth = Perfect Parsimony.)

4. Truthfulness: that testimony (description) you give if your knowledge (information) is incomplete, your language is insufficient, you have performed due diligence in the elimination of error, imaginary content, wishful thinking, bias, fictionalism, and deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and which you warranty to be so; and the promise that another possessed of the knowledge, performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.

4. Honesty: that testimony (description) you give with full knowledge that knowledge is incomplete, your language is insufficient, but you have not performed due diligence in the elimination of error and bias, but which you warranty is free of deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possess of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.

WHERE THE CRITERIA FOR TRUTHFUL SPEECH IS COHERENCE ACROSS THE DIMENSIONS TESTIFIABLE BY MAN, IN THE SERIES:

1. Categorically Consistent (Non-conflationary, Differences)

2. Internally Consistent (Logical)

3. Externally Correspondent (Empirical)

4. Operationally Consistent (Consisting of Operational Terms that are Repeatable and Testable)

5. Rational Choice (Consisting of Rational choice, in available time frame)

6. Reciprocal (Consisting of Reciprocally Rational Choice)

7. With Stated Limits and Fully Accounted (Defense against cherry picking and inflation)

8. Warrantied

… (i)as having performed due diligence in the above dimensions;

… (ii)where due diligence is sufficient to satisfy the demand for infallibility;

… (iii)and where one entertains no risk that one cannot perform restitution for.

AS A DEFENSE AGAINST THE SERIES:

1. Ignorance and Willful Ignorance;

2. Error and failure of Due Diligence;

3. Bias and Wishful Thinking;

4. And the many Deceits of:

… (a) Loading and Framing;

… (b) Suggestion, Obscurantism, and Overloading and Propaganda;

… (c) Fictionalisms of Sophisms, Pseudorationalisms, Pseudoscience, and Supernaturalism;

… (d) and outright Fabrications.

IN DEFENSE OR ADVOCACY OF:

1. Any transfer that is not:

… (a) productive

… (b) fully informed

… (c) warrantied

… (d) voluntary

… (e) free of externality of the same criteria

INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE SERIES OF THOSE CATEGORIES OF:

1. murder,

2. harm, damage, theft,

3. fraud, fraud by omission, fraud by indirection,

4. free riding, socialization of losses, privatization of commons,

5. rent seeking, monopoly seeking, conspiracy, statism/corporatism,

6. conversion(religion/pseudoscience),

7. displacement(immigration/overbreeding),

8. conquest (war).

(End)

Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 13:04:00 UTC

February 23, 2019
DEFINITIONS: SHORT, MEDIUM AND LONG VERSIONS WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM? (Short) Pr

DEFINITIONS: SHORT, MEDIUM AND LONG VERSIONS

WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM? (Short)

Propertarianism is a system of law designed to prevent lying in politics.

…

…

WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM? (Medium)

Propertarianism is a methodology that completes the scientific method; the application of that method to the law; a set of amendments to restore rule of law; including the prevention of lying about commerce, finance, economics, law, and politics in public speech.

…

…

WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM? (Long)

Propertarianism refers to a body of work. That body of work consists of:

… 1. HISTORY: An explanation for the disproportionate success of western civilization in the ancient and modern worlds.

… 2. METHOD: The completion of the scientific method and and its embodiment in law.

… 3. APPLICATION: Application of that method to all fields and common moral and legal questions.

… 4. LAW: A formal, algorithmic, operational, logic of law.

… 5. CONSTITUTION: A set of Recommended Amendments to the Constitution for the United States – preserving the current legal entity, while altering the current means of government.

… 6. POLICIES: a set of policies to reform our military, political, economic, financial, and social orders.

… 7. RECOMMENDATION: The recommendation that insurrection be used to demand implementation of these amendments to the constitution, given the scale of the parasitic classes in and out of government.

Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 09:47:00 UTC

February 23, 2019
RULE(LAW) VS GOVERNMENT (COMMONS) —“Is it ancap? I searched it it looked like

RULE(LAW) VS GOVERNMENT (COMMONS)

—“Is it ancap? I searched it it looked like some minarchy stuff.”–Mick Seppala

It’s strictly constructed rule of law by test of reciprocity – major difference is you can’t ‘lie’ in political speech – which is the hard problem of converting from free speech to free truthful speech. And … You ‘roll your own’ government with it. I recommend various forms of government for various people. but only one rule of law. P is not ideology, philosophy, or religion. It is LAW.

Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 08:22:00 UTC

February 23, 2019
Female (herd) competitive strategy by undermining, poisoning the well, reputatio

Female (herd) competitive strategy by undermining, poisoning the well, reputation destruction by Gossiping Shaming Rallying, Ridicule, Moralizing, solving for face or consent instead of Male (pack) strategy by argument solving for truth regardless of face or consent.

Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 07:08:41 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099204380543340546

Reply addressees: @NationalAnarchy

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099201016996737025

IN REPLY TO:

@NationalAnarchy

@curtdoolittle You mention GSRM all the time, what does it stand for?

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099201016996737025

February 23, 2019
“WHAT DOES GSRM (or GSRRM, or RRGSM ) STAND FOR?” (core) —“You mention GSRM al

“WHAT DOES GSRM (or GSRRM, or RRGSM ) STAND FOR?”

(core)

—“You mention GSRM all the time, what does it stand for?”–

The Female (herd) competitive strategy by circumventing argument by undermining, poisoning the well, and reputation destruction by use of (G)ossiping (S)haming, (R)allying, (R)idicule, (M)oralizing, and solving for face or consent — Versus the Male (pack) strategy by factual argument solving for truth regardless of face or consent. In other words female “feels” of approval or rejection vs male “reals” of truth of falsehood.

Men generally make an argument and let the argument do it work. We bear the shame ourselves. We use shaming if necessary in response to GSRM. Whereas the feminine cognitive strategy is to rely entirely on GSRM as a means of denying or suppressing the argument rather than refuting it.

In western history GSRM was largely illegal or punishable by direct violence between men. And laws against “scolds” -women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace. During the democratic and marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony). Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM.

GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience.

This is why the abrahamic (jewish in particular, or semitic in general) means of countering greco-roman-european argument by using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism), and critique (undermining) is so effective: it is how our females talk to us, and because of our high trust, we are either genetically or culturally vulnerable to it – where other lower trust people are not. And we are easily undermined politically and academically because our females naturally find greater ‘affinity’ with semitic non-argument (religion, postmodernism, feminism, denialism) than with european reason science truth testimony.

Male European – Truth over Face, Regardless of cost.

Male everywhere else – some degree of face over truth.

Female everywhere – nearly universal face over truth.

Yet it is truth over face that is the reason for the ‘western miracle’ – why the rest is so different from the rest.

Hence why christians are the vulnerability of western civilization: their religion was developed to obtain the attention of women, and to appeal to GSRM. The religion is stated and argued with false promise(‘salvation’), baiting into hazard (cultural vulnerability to conquest), using pilpul (excuse making) and critique (straw manning), and the fictionalism of supernaturalism.

Judaism to undermine, Christanity to weaken, and islam to destroy. The middle east uses the female reproductive strategy and the far east and far west use the male, with the far east using face over truth to defend hierarchy and the west using truth before face to defend the market of the peerage. And the middle east today just as in the age of the greeks, just lying and shaming all truth without end.

The world is not complicated. It is our lies that make it seem so.

Curt Doolittle

The Propertarian Institute

Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 02:34:00 UTC

February 23, 2019
NOTE: When we speak of alphas we are applying a aterm from the study of apes to

NOTE: When we speak of alphas we are applying a aterm from the study of apes to humans. The definition is of apes and of humans by analogy. human males have dominated reproduction periodically, but with the evolution of weapons (tools) it became possible to redistribute reproduction. With agrarian property even more so. With modernity less so. Ergo dont overthink the analogy.

Source date (UTC): 2019-02-22 02:34:00 UTC

February 22, 2019