Form: Definition

  • scold [skōld] NOUN a person, in particular a woman, who nags or grumbles constan

    scold

    [skōld]

    NOUN

    a person, in particular a woman, who nags or grumbles constantly.

    “his mother was the village scold”

    COMMON SCOLD

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    In the common law of crime in England and Wales, a common scold was a type of public nuisance—a troublesome and angry person who broke the public peace by habitually chastising, arguing and quarrelling with their neighbours. The majority of individuals punished for scolding were women, though men could also be labelled scolds.

    The offence, which was exported to North America with the colonists, was punished by monetary fines, but also by methods intended to publicly humiliate such as ducking: being placed in a chair and submerged in a river or pond. Although rarely prosecuted it remained on the statute books in England and Wales until 1967.

    Scolding offences were commonly presented and punished in manorial and borough courts that governed the behaviour of peasants and townspeople across England. Scolds were also presented in church courts.[2] The most common punishment was a monetary fine.

    Various historians have argued that scolding and bad speech were coded as feminine offences by the late medieval period. Women of all marital statuses were prosecuted for scolding, though married women featured most frequently, while widows were rarely labelled scolds.[3] In some places, such as Exeter, scolds were typically poorer women, whereas elsewhere scolds could include members of the local elite.[4] Women who were also charged with other offences, such as violence, nightwandering, eavesdropping or sexual impropriety were also likely to be labelled scolds.[5] Individuals were frequently labelled ‘common scolds’, indicating the impact of their behaviour and speech on the whole community. Karen Jones identified 13 men prosecuted for scolding in Kent’s secular courts, compared to 94 women and 2 couples.[6] Men accused of scolding were often charged alongside their wives. Helen, wife of Peter Bradwall scolded Hugh Welesson and Isabel, his wife, in Middlewich in 1434, calling Isabel a “child murderer” and Hugh a “skallet [wretched] knave”. Isabel and Hugh also scolded Helen, calling her a “lesyng blebberer” (lying bletherer). All parties were fined for the offences, though Hugh and Isabel were fined jointly.[7] Like women, male scolds were often accused of many other offences, such as fornication, theft, illegal trading, and assault.[8]

    Note that in american law, Scolding was folded into disorderly conduct in the early 1970’s


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-03 18:29:00 UTC

  • u·su·ry [ˈyo͞oZH(ə)rē] NOUN the illegal action or practice of lending money at u

    u·su·ry

    [ˈyo͞oZH(ə)rē]

    NOUN

    the illegal action or practice of lending money at unreasonably high rates of interest.

    Why would there be laws against excessive interest rates?

    1. I loan you money. you pay me many times the original amount. and you can’t catch up, ever…..

    2. I loan you money, you cant pay, I take your house….

    3. I loan you money, you can’t pay, you have to resort to crime, others are harmed….

    In each of these circumstances the public is now carrying you as a burden, while the usurer is free riding on the public because he succeeded in baited you into moral hazard. As such it breaks the prohibition on negative externality.

    It breaks productivity by benefitting disproportionately from the suffering of others.

    It breaks asymmetry of information by asymmetry of incentive (taking advantage of the moment).

    The actor has no material skin in the game and no warranty. So we say instead the usurer has a negative due diligence.

    It’s “baiting into moral hazard.”

    TEST OF RECIPROCITY (Morality):

    Productive, (fail)

    Fully Informed (baited into optimism)

    Warrantied, (fail)

    Voluntary Transfer (“under duress”)

    Free of Negative Externality (fail)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 09:44:00 UTC

  • so·cial·ite [ˈsōSHəˌlīt] NOUN socialites (plural noun) —“a [female] person who

    so·cial·ite

    [ˈsōSHəˌlīt]

    NOUN

    socialites (plural noun)

    —“a [female] person who is well known in fashionable society and is fond of social activities and entertainment.”–

    (ie: A Seller)

    Synonyms

    —“a [male] person who is known as a ladies’ man, womanizer, philanderer, rake, roué, rich man about town, ladykiller”—

    ( ie: A Buyer)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 09:22:00 UTC

  • UNDERSTAND NEGATIVE VS POSITIVE COMPETITION (The Economics of Time) (core) In po

    UNDERSTAND NEGATIVE VS POSITIVE COMPETITION

    (The Economics of Time) (core)

    In positive ( market ) competition we compete for the seizure of unseized opportunities (potential capital), by increasing the time content of the products and services we offer whether by price or quality.

    In negative (anti-market) competition we compete for the seizure of previously seized opportunities, thereby stealing (decreasing) the time content (existential capital).

    Capital consists of a store of time produced by human actions.

    When we divide labor we decrease the time demand for production.

    In the via negativa, we do not produce more, we increase the rate of production in time.

    All of economics is the study of time and energy just like all of physics is the study of time and energy. The difference is that universe can’t choose, and because we can remember, act, sympathize, and cooperate, we can save time.

    In this sense we are not wealthier than our pre-language ancestors, we have simply made everything drastically cheaper by cooperating and saving time, first in production and second in the form of capital: stored time.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-27 10:08:00 UTC

  • ANARCHISM VS PROPERTARIANISM “Anarchism” means POLYLOGICAL polycentric law, of v

    ANARCHISM VS PROPERTARIANISM

    “Anarchism” means POLYLOGICAL polycentric law, of voluntary exchange independent of warranty and externality.

    “Propertarianism” ‘s Rule of Law means MONOLOGICAL polycentric (market) law of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, limited to positive externalities.

    Libertarianism = jewish (semitic) Ghetto Ethics,

    and;

    Propertarianism = Anglo Saxon (germanic) Aristocratic ethics.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-27 09:55:00 UTC

  • LIBERTARIAN FREE TRADE VS PROPERTARIAN FREE TRADE —“Are you for a free market

    LIBERTARIAN FREE TRADE VS PROPERTARIAN FREE TRADE

    —“Are you for a free market or against it? I’m curious. I can never really tell with you.”— Matthew

    What is the limit of a free market? In other words, a ‘free market’ like ‘NAP’ is a half truth in order to propagate a lie.

    At what point are you stealing from the shareholders of the polity?

    —“The libertarian concept of property is lacking, I agree.”—

    So we fix libertarianism’s half-truth half-lie:

    Rule of law with warranty of due diligence of a full accounting of externalities means free trade by reciprocity to the limits of proportionality.

    So I teach full accounting not ‘limitless free trade’.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-27 09:49:00 UTC

  • Define accept, define deny, define true. I do not know what ‘deny truth’ means.

    Define accept, define deny, define true. I do not know what ‘deny truth’ means. I only know only what ‘truth CAN’ possibly mean, since only the definition I gave you is possible. Strawson(Performative-Promissory) -> Doolittle (Testimonial, Operational, Warrantied, Insured, )


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-26 19:40:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100480641483923457

    Reply addressees: @Constantinus331 @Societisms

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100476464749834243


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100476464749834243

  • DEFINITION: –“WHAT DOES GSRM (or GSRRM) STAND FOR?”– (needs daily reposting)

    DEFINITION: –“WHAT DOES GSRM (or GSRRM) STAND FOR?”–

    (needs daily reposting)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-25 19:18:00 UTC

  • THE LAW ON RECIPROCITY, RESTITUTION, RESTITUTION Restitution (1x) for Accident D

    THE LAW ON RECIPROCITY, RESTITUTION, RESTITUTION

    Restitution (1x) for Accident
    Double (2x) Damages for failure to admit
    Triple (3x) Damages against individuals for harm
    Decuple (10x) Damages against groups for harm.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-25 15:03:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100048530943721473

  • “CURT: WHAT IS THE ESSENCE OF PROPERTARIANISM?” —“Can you define the essence o

    “CURT: WHAT IS THE ESSENCE OF PROPERTARIANISM?”

    —“Can you define the essence of Propertarianism? There’s a saying “I have found the essence of Bushido – To die” Is there something similar in regard to Propertarianism?

    So for example: sovereignty and reciprocity?”—

    lol… what does ‘essence’ mean?

    Propertarianism isn’t ONE thing.

    It’s a collection of things.

    But let’s use poetic license:

    The essence of P-metaphysics is the grammars.

    The essence of P-psychology of acquisitionism – all human psychology can be explained as acquisition.

    The essence of p-epistemology of testimonialism is the completion of the method.

    The essence of p-sociology of compatibilism is the division of perceptual, cognitive, memory, advocacy, negotiation, and labor with cooperation as a test of comparison.

    The essence of p-ethics (propertarian ethics) is reciprocity as the test of comparison and property as the system of measurement.

    The essence of p-politics (the natural law) is strict construction using all of the above.

    The essence of the western group evolutionary strategy is the uniqueness of aristocratic egalitarianism: heroism and excellence, sovereignty and reciprocity, truth before face, and duty before self and family, Rule of law and the Jury, and markets in all aspects of life.

    So the essence of propertarianism (the set of all ideas) is that this set of ideas that unifies all disciplines of human thought into a single commensurable system that is contiguous with physical science.

    So if you had me make an analogy to the essence of bushido, it’s “The essence of the uniqueness of western civilization” written in logical and scientific terms.

    I mean, you guys can ask me to simplify it all ya want but it’s not simple. It’s A LOT OF STUFF

    Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 18:26:00 UTC