Curt Doolittle

Form: Definition

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51925002_10156982735932264_226284136

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51925002_10156982735932264_226284136

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51925002_10156982735932264_2262841367149412352_o_10156982735922264.jpg Singular SpeechThis comes in handy as I just mentioned it.Feb 12, 2019, 8:50 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 20:46:00 UTC

  • CHANTING THE CORE 😉 Given: Any statement passes the tests of: – categorically c

    CHANTING THE CORE 😉

    Given:

    Any statement passes the tests of:

    – categorically consistent (identity)

    – internally consistent (Logically consistent)

    – externally correspondent (empirically consistent)

    – existentially consistent (operationally stated)

    – scope consistent (limits and full accounting)

    – rational (subjectively consistent – incentives )

    – reciprocal (reciprocally subjectively consistent – exchanges)

    – with these warranties of due diligence,

    – within the limits of possible restitution,

    Therefore:

    – Any such display word or deed;

    – is free of imposition of costs,

    And Therefore;

    – free of retaliation.

    And Therefore;

    – it is truthful and moral.

    We can never know if a statement is true (“critical naturalism”).

    We can only know that we have exhausted due diligence sufficient for the demand for due diligence given the promise, claim, testimony we are making.

    This is Propertarian Natural Law’s epistemology:

    … “Testimonialism’:

    … … “The completion of the scientific method”,

    … … … or what some call

    … … … … ‘Critical Naturalism’.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 18:50:00 UTC

  • correct: morality = rules of cooperation across scales. = reciprocity within the

    correct: morality = rules of cooperation across scales. = reciprocity within the limits of proportionality = exit outside the limits of proportionality = conflict (war) outside the limits of reciprocity.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-11 14:08:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1094961295584043009

    Reply addressees: @Alrenous

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1094853112500604928

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Alrenous

    @curtdoolittle Morality is a silly metaphysical name for the fact that when someone attacks you, it is rational to neutralize them. Or when someone attacks your neighbour. Cooperation is always more rational – if the other party is themselves minimally rational.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1094853112500604928

  • NOBLESSE OBLIGE: THE DUTY OF THE ELITE: A RECIPROCITY “Noblesse oblige” is gener

    NOBLESSE OBLIGE: THE DUTY OF THE ELITE: A RECIPROCITY

    “Noblesse oblige” is generally used to imply that with wealth, power, and prestige come responsibilities.

    In ethical discussion, “Noblesse oblige” summarizes a moral economy wherein privilege (ability and achievement) must be balanced by duty towards those who lack such privilege ability and (achievement) or who cannot perform such duty.

    Finally, it has been used recently primarily to refer to public responsibilities of the rich, famous and powerful, notably to provide good examples of behaviour or to exceed minimal standards of decency.

    It has also been used to describe a person taking the blame for something in order to solve an issue or save someone else.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-10 13:35:00 UTC

  • “PROPERTARIANISM ISN’T AN IDEOLOGY. IT’S THE LOGIC OF RECIPROCITY (Propertariani

    “PROPERTARIANISM ISN’T AN IDEOLOGY. IT’S THE LOGIC OF RECIPROCITY (Propertarianism) AND THE SCIENCE OF TESTIMONY, COMBINED INTO A FORMAL RATIO-EMPIRICAL SYSTEM OF LAW (Decidability) FOR ETHICS, AND POLITICS.

    (repost)

    In other words, it’s the solution to social science.

    —“This is crucial for people that want to claim they don’t adhere to the “propertarian ideology”. It is not an ideology. It is a methodology and much like science it focuses on empirical evidence and the falsification of proposed truth claims. Most people that say they don’t agree with “propertarian ideology” have an ideology of their own that has been found to be based on lies via propertarian methods and that’s the real objection.”– Curtus Maximus

    You cannot defeat it. Sorry. You can however, state that despite your ideology being parasitic, predatory(immoral) and dishonest (fraudulent) that you cannot compete by meritocratic (market, evolutionary, eugenic) means, (meaning you’re inferior) and therefore must resort to parasitism, predation, and deceit (fraud), to survive by parasitism, predation, and fraud.

    It’s ok to do that. It’s just the truth. But you can’t make any kind of moral argument to support it.” – Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-10 13:11:00 UTC

  • WHAT IS A TESTIMONIAL ARGUMENT (by request) Testimonial arguments consist of def

    WHAT IS A TESTIMONIAL ARGUMENT

    (by request)

    Testimonial arguments consist of deflating and disambiguating deceitful, fictional, ideal, analogical, ordinary, formal, logical, empirical, statements into complete sentences stated in operational vocabulary and grammar (eprime), that survive tests of consistency and therefore coherence in the possible dimensions of human cognition, including categorical(identity), consistency (logical), correspondence (empirical), existentially possible (operational), rational (voluntary), reciprocal (reciprocally voluntary) dimensions, scope (full accounting and limits).

    Any statement or set of statements or arguments that cannot be reduced to such operational vocabulary and grammar and pass such tests cannot be subject to truth claims, since the information (knowledge) necessary to testify that it is true does not exist.

    The purpose of this grammar, like math, formal logic, algorithmic logic, accounting, is to expose ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalisms of supernatural, ideal, and pseudoscientific), and outright deceit in claims to truth or goodness (morality) of propositions, and to prohibit such claims in commerce, finance, economics, law, politics, and the academy under law, thereby enabling the citizenry to use the negative market of the law to prosecute for profit those who engage in informational harm to the commons.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-08 17:50:00 UTC

  • Ok. Basics? Here are the basics. THERE ARE ONLY THREE METHODS OF INFLUENCE. 1 –

    Ok. Basics? Here are the basics.

    THERE ARE ONLY THREE METHODS OF INFLUENCE.

    1 – Via Negativa: Law. (Force) Here is what you may not do, and we will punish those who do otherwise.

    By: Military, Judiciary, Sheriffs.

    2 – Via Positiva: Propaganda (Persuade). Here is what we should and should not do – and we will undermine those who do otherwise.

    BY: Academics, Priests, Public Intellectuals, Media.

    3 – Via Permutatio: Reciprocity (Exchange). Here is what we offer in exchange, and what you will miss out on otherwise.

    By: commerce, entrepreneurs, merchants, craftsmen, laborers

    That’s it.

    I”m the first (the law) and the third (policy). this means you are your own sovereign person.

    Leftists are second and third.

    Nazboi’s and Traditionalists are the second.

    You notice that you don’t hear a PLAN from anyone else other than ‘faith’. Or a means of administering and operating a society.

    All you get is words.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-07 11:56:00 UTC

  • Propertarianism is a methodology and a law. You can create whatever government y

    —Propertarianism is a methodology and a law. You can create whatever government you want to with that methodology and that law. I propose different governments for different peoples who have different needs.—

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-05 15:20:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092805122151927810

  • COPPERHEAD (plural Copperheads) (US, obsolete, slang) A northerner who sympathiz

    COPPERHEAD (plural Copperheads)
    (US, obsolete, slang)
    A northerner who sympathized with the South or wanted to end hostilities during the American Civil War.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-04 19:42:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092508663472889856

  • COPPERHEAD (plural Copperheads) (US, obsolete, slang) A northerner who sympathiz

    COPPERHEAD (plural Copperheads)

    (US, obsolete, slang)

    A northerner who sympathized with the South or wanted to end hostilities during the American Civil War.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-04 14:42:00 UTC