Form: Definition

  • Explaining (defining) Propertarianism – for Newbs:

    Jan 2, 2020, 6:35 PM 1 – The completion of the scientific method and all that it entails – which is a lot and why P is such a big program: it touches everything and it converts almost all psychological, social, and political speech to economic expressions – which is counter-intuitive because it’s scientific where our current psychological social, moral, and political speech is only normative or in the case of psychology sociology and politics, both pseudoscientific and sophomoric. 2 – The explanation for western success in ancient and modern worlds (adaptive velocity because of our individual sovereignty and resulting traditional law of property/tort.) 3 – The explanation of the different systems of argument used in the different civilizations, and in particular the abrahamic means of deceit used in the ancient world (judaism, Christianity, islam) and in the modern world (marxism, feminism, postmodernism, denialism/political correctness). EXPLANATION Do you know what a formal logic is? It’s grammar of the logic of inference using sets and binary truth or falsehood. Do you know what programming is? It’s a grammar of operational logic using binary truth or falsehood. Do you know what law is? It’s a formal operational rational grammar of conflict resolution, using ternary falsehood, truth candidacy, and undecidability. Do you know what tort law is? it’s a formal rational operational grammar of conflict resolution over demonstrated interests that we enumerate as property, using ternary logic of falsehood, truth candidacy, undecidability. Propertarianism is a formal (strict), operational(sequential action), grammar (vocabulary, grammar, syntax, logic), of Tort (demonstrated interests), and as a consequence a value neutral universal language (vocabulary, grammar, syntax, logic) across all disciplines (physical science, language-metaphysics, psychology, sociology, politics, ethics, law, group strategy), that allows us to falsify (test) every possible dimension of human action, intuition, cognition, and speech, for both testimonial possibility (truth) and reciprocity(ethics, morality, trespass, tort), and as a consequence allows us to create uninterpretable constitutions, and their enumerated rights and responsibilities, the most influential of which is the conversion of free speech to free truthful and reciprocal speech, in public, to the public, on matters public (commerce, economics, commons, politics, group strategy) by extending the involuntary warranty of due diligence and involuntary liability for the truthfulness and reciprocity of commercial speech to that of political speech. As such it allows us to outlaw hostile religions, and pseudo-religions especially the pseudoscientific and sophomoric restatements of supernatural judaism , christianity, and islam, in pseudoscientific and sophomoric and ir-reciprocal marxism, socialism, feminism, and postmodernism. Propertarianism is equivalent in scope to the revolutions of Aristotelian reason (Realism, Naturalism, Reason), the Empirical Revolution(Realism, Naturalism, Empiricism), in that it completes the scientific method by extending it from the physical to the psychological and social sciences, including that of law, politics, and group strategy. In other words, “Propertarianism consists of the completion of the Scientific Method; its application to the totality of human knowledge; producing a universally commensurable language of all thought; its embodiment in the common law of tort; resulting in a logical and scientific constitution; permitting the criminalization of ir-reciprocal and un-testifiable speech, and as a consequence the eradication of superstition, pseudoscience, sophism, fraud, and deceit from the commercial, financial, economic, political, and informational commons.” When we explain the reason for western success we discover: “Heroism and Excellence; Truth and Duty; Oath and Warranty; Sovereignty and Reciprocity; Law and Jury; And Voluntary Markets in Every Aspect of Life: Association, Cooperation, Production, Reproduction, Commons, Polities and War; The direction of surpluses to the production of commons and the returns therefrom; at the cost of suppression of the reproduction of the unproductive underclasses; and the Direction of Dominance Expression to the Production of Commons by a Distributed Dictatorship of Individually Sovereign People and the Reciprocal Warranty of Denial of Power To Any and All.” Propertarianism is (a) the completion of the Aristotelian program (b) the completion of the scientific method (c ) the logic and science of the social sciences, and (d) the Natural Law of Reciprocity under which all display word and deed is expressible and commensurable. (e) and the means of institutionalizing in a “Market for the Suppression of Fraud” the suppression of the greatest crime against humanity: the big lies that are responsible for the last dark age and the new one that the enemy has sought to bring about.

  • Explaining (defining) Propertarianism – for Newbs:

    Jan 2, 2020, 6:35 PM 1 – The completion of the scientific method and all that it entails – which is a lot and why P is such a big program: it touches everything and it converts almost all psychological, social, and political speech to economic expressions – which is counter-intuitive because it’s scientific where our current psychological social, moral, and political speech is only normative or in the case of psychology sociology and politics, both pseudoscientific and sophomoric. 2 – The explanation for western success in ancient and modern worlds (adaptive velocity because of our individual sovereignty and resulting traditional law of property/tort.) 3 – The explanation of the different systems of argument used in the different civilizations, and in particular the abrahamic means of deceit used in the ancient world (judaism, Christianity, islam) and in the modern world (marxism, feminism, postmodernism, denialism/political correctness). EXPLANATION Do you know what a formal logic is? It’s grammar of the logic of inference using sets and binary truth or falsehood. Do you know what programming is? It’s a grammar of operational logic using binary truth or falsehood. Do you know what law is? It’s a formal operational rational grammar of conflict resolution, using ternary falsehood, truth candidacy, and undecidability. Do you know what tort law is? it’s a formal rational operational grammar of conflict resolution over demonstrated interests that we enumerate as property, using ternary logic of falsehood, truth candidacy, undecidability. Propertarianism is a formal (strict), operational(sequential action), grammar (vocabulary, grammar, syntax, logic), of Tort (demonstrated interests), and as a consequence a value neutral universal language (vocabulary, grammar, syntax, logic) across all disciplines (physical science, language-metaphysics, psychology, sociology, politics, ethics, law, group strategy), that allows us to falsify (test) every possible dimension of human action, intuition, cognition, and speech, for both testimonial possibility (truth) and reciprocity(ethics, morality, trespass, tort), and as a consequence allows us to create uninterpretable constitutions, and their enumerated rights and responsibilities, the most influential of which is the conversion of free speech to free truthful and reciprocal speech, in public, to the public, on matters public (commerce, economics, commons, politics, group strategy) by extending the involuntary warranty of due diligence and involuntary liability for the truthfulness and reciprocity of commercial speech to that of political speech. As such it allows us to outlaw hostile religions, and pseudo-religions especially the pseudoscientific and sophomoric restatements of supernatural judaism , christianity, and islam, in pseudoscientific and sophomoric and ir-reciprocal marxism, socialism, feminism, and postmodernism. Propertarianism is equivalent in scope to the revolutions of Aristotelian reason (Realism, Naturalism, Reason), the Empirical Revolution(Realism, Naturalism, Empiricism), in that it completes the scientific method by extending it from the physical to the psychological and social sciences, including that of law, politics, and group strategy. In other words, “Propertarianism consists of the completion of the Scientific Method; its application to the totality of human knowledge; producing a universally commensurable language of all thought; its embodiment in the common law of tort; resulting in a logical and scientific constitution; permitting the criminalization of ir-reciprocal and un-testifiable speech, and as a consequence the eradication of superstition, pseudoscience, sophism, fraud, and deceit from the commercial, financial, economic, political, and informational commons.” When we explain the reason for western success we discover: “Heroism and Excellence; Truth and Duty; Oath and Warranty; Sovereignty and Reciprocity; Law and Jury; And Voluntary Markets in Every Aspect of Life: Association, Cooperation, Production, Reproduction, Commons, Polities and War; The direction of surpluses to the production of commons and the returns therefrom; at the cost of suppression of the reproduction of the unproductive underclasses; and the Direction of Dominance Expression to the Production of Commons by a Distributed Dictatorship of Individually Sovereign People and the Reciprocal Warranty of Denial of Power To Any and All.” Propertarianism is (a) the completion of the Aristotelian program (b) the completion of the scientific method (c ) the logic and science of the social sciences, and (d) the Natural Law of Reciprocity under which all display word and deed is expressible and commensurable. (e) and the means of institutionalizing in a “Market for the Suppression of Fraud” the suppression of the greatest crime against humanity: the big lies that are responsible for the last dark age and the new one that the enemy has sought to bring about.

  • “My Current Copy/paste of What Is P Is”

    Jan 6, 2020, 8:29 PM THE MAIN PROPERTARIAN INNOVATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS THAT COMPLETE WESTERN LAW AND ARISTOTELIAN EPISTEMOLOGY. by Alain Dwight My current copy/paste of what is P is pretty much a break down at the narrative level: Here’s what I think the main Propertarian innovations/clarifications are that complete western (common/tort) law and Aristotelian epistemology. 1 – Testimonilaism: The tests you can use to attempt to falsify a claim and truth as real rather an ideal, meaning truth is an adjective meaning “claim I can warranty has survived all means of falsification known to man” Link: https://propertarianinstitute.com/2018/01/14/what-does-truth-mean-and-what-is-its-adjective-form/ 2 – Law as descriptive (framed as the science of co-operation and agency): retaliation and high trust can be deterministically predicted based on measuring reciprocity and impositions against property-en-toto. Errosion of trust erodes social norms and this cascades down to the rest of commons required to accumulate agency and retain sovereignty. Natural law says “if you do this your group will fail.” Common/tort law is men saying “we’re not going to let you do this because we refuse to be a failed group.” 3 – Property-en-toto: all investments acquired without violating reciprocity that a person is willing and able to defend (whereas certain forms of damage against normative and informational commons were exploitable loopholes in tort law – hence we see hte industrialization of professional deception) 4 – Reciprocity as deterministic: reciprocity will be exchanged by co-operation when interactions are “productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntarily exchanged, and free of imposition upon others by externality.” Otherwise reciprocity will be exchanged by means of conflict.

  • “My Current Copy/paste of What Is P Is”

    Jan 6, 2020, 8:29 PM THE MAIN PROPERTARIAN INNOVATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS THAT COMPLETE WESTERN LAW AND ARISTOTELIAN EPISTEMOLOGY. by Alain Dwight My current copy/paste of what is P is pretty much a break down at the narrative level: Here’s what I think the main Propertarian innovations/clarifications are that complete western (common/tort) law and Aristotelian epistemology. 1 – Testimonilaism: The tests you can use to attempt to falsify a claim and truth as real rather an ideal, meaning truth is an adjective meaning “claim I can warranty has survived all means of falsification known to man” Link: https://propertarianinstitute.com/2018/01/14/what-does-truth-mean-and-what-is-its-adjective-form/ 2 – Law as descriptive (framed as the science of co-operation and agency): retaliation and high trust can be deterministically predicted based on measuring reciprocity and impositions against property-en-toto. Errosion of trust erodes social norms and this cascades down to the rest of commons required to accumulate agency and retain sovereignty. Natural law says “if you do this your group will fail.” Common/tort law is men saying “we’re not going to let you do this because we refuse to be a failed group.” 3 – Property-en-toto: all investments acquired without violating reciprocity that a person is willing and able to defend (whereas certain forms of damage against normative and informational commons were exploitable loopholes in tort law – hence we see hte industrialization of professional deception) 4 – Reciprocity as deterministic: reciprocity will be exchanged by co-operation when interactions are “productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntarily exchanged, and free of imposition upon others by externality.” Otherwise reciprocity will be exchanged by means of conflict.

  • Mathiness

    Mathiness https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/mathiness/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 21:14:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265028478237396992

  • Human Capital

    Jan 19, 2020, 10:05 AM In that branch of economics called Political Economy, Human capital consists of the size of the population, their age distribution, their health, their fitness, their intellect and character, and the sum of training in behavior, skills, and knowledge: every physical emotional and intellectual asset a person can have. Human capital is beneficial not just for the individual in achieving his or her full potential but that the economy and the polity achieve their fullest potential together when there is more human capital. This is rather obvious, but it helps to tie the world together for people. The government relies on education as the primary means by which to ensure that everyone rather than just those who can afford it, can achieve their potential, and as a consequence the society achieves its greatest potential. The reason for mass education was just as much to prevent so many indolent useless criminal malcontents as it was to improve the lives of children. lol. We don’t often add that success is more dependent on the average intelligence and personality trait distribution of the group than it is on the education because that would be improper in the context.

  • Human Capital

    Jan 19, 2020, 10:05 AM In that branch of economics called Political Economy, Human capital consists of the size of the population, their age distribution, their health, their fitness, their intellect and character, and the sum of training in behavior, skills, and knowledge: every physical emotional and intellectual asset a person can have. Human capital is beneficial not just for the individual in achieving his or her full potential but that the economy and the polity achieve their fullest potential together when there is more human capital. This is rather obvious, but it helps to tie the world together for people. The government relies on education as the primary means by which to ensure that everyone rather than just those who can afford it, can achieve their potential, and as a consequence the society achieves its greatest potential. The reason for mass education was just as much to prevent so many indolent useless criminal malcontents as it was to improve the lives of children. lol. We don’t often add that success is more dependent on the average intelligence and personality trait distribution of the group than it is on the education because that would be improper in the context.

  • Math Is Just a Language with A Very Limited Vocabulary: Position and Operation

    Jan 22, 2020, 8:50 AM Math is just a language like every other, consisting of referents (arbitrary categories), nouns (referrers, names of each instance of that category) verbs (operations) and agreement (true/false), but it has only one subject: positional relations, with only one property of its names (position). Because of this singularity of content (name: position, action: operation) and scale independence (positional names), this ‘language’ we call mathematics, with which we produce statements (sentences), that we call well-formed (unambiguous), using the ‘grammar’ ( rule of continuous recursive disambiguation) of that language of positional names (math), and then modify (change) by operations (transactions) that preserve the constant relations (ratios), and therefore agreement (truth), we can describe any unambiguous set of constant relations humans can reference. As such if we cannot describe a given set of relations with some degree of mathematical precision, by some form of proxy, then we cannot claim to make truth (agreement, agreeable) statements about it. (Working on demarcation between pure mathematics and applied mathematics).

  • Math Is Just a Language with A Very Limited Vocabulary: Position and Operation

    Jan 22, 2020, 8:50 AM Math is just a language like every other, consisting of referents (arbitrary categories), nouns (referrers, names of each instance of that category) verbs (operations) and agreement (true/false), but it has only one subject: positional relations, with only one property of its names (position). Because of this singularity of content (name: position, action: operation) and scale independence (positional names), this ‘language’ we call mathematics, with which we produce statements (sentences), that we call well-formed (unambiguous), using the ‘grammar’ ( rule of continuous recursive disambiguation) of that language of positional names (math), and then modify (change) by operations (transactions) that preserve the constant relations (ratios), and therefore agreement (truth), we can describe any unambiguous set of constant relations humans can reference. As such if we cannot describe a given set of relations with some degree of mathematical precision, by some form of proxy, then we cannot claim to make truth (agreement, agreeable) statements about it. (Working on demarcation between pure mathematics and applied mathematics).

  • Definitions: Human Organizations

    Hamlet: a small settlement, generally one smaller than a village, usually a collection of homes in a rural or agrarian region. Village: a group of houses and associated buildings, larger than a hamlet and smaller than a town, situated in a rural area, and possessing minor local commerce. Town: an urban area that has a name, defined boundaries, and local government, and that is generally larger than a village and smaller than a city, with an economy primarily of agricultural, crafts, or light industry. City: A large human settlement in a permanent and densely settled place with administratively defined boundaries whose members work primarily on non-agricultural tasks, and possessing a financial center for the organization of capital. Quarter: a part of a town or city having a specific character or use. *Ghetto(Aliens): a part of a city in which members of a minority group live, typically as a result of social, legal, or economic pressure. *Enclave(Aliens): a portion of territory within or surrounded by a larger territory whose inhabitants are culturally or ethnically distinct. *Colony(Alien): (a) a group of people of one nationality or ethnic group living in a foreign city or country. (b a country or area under the full or partial political control of another country, typically a distant one, and occupied by settlers from that country.) Estate (Proto Plantation): an extensive area of land in the country, usually with a large house, owned by one person, family, or organization. *Plantation (Proto Fief): a usually large farm or estate, especially in a tropical or semitropical country, on which cash crops, including cotton, tobacco, coffee, sugar cane, is cultivated, usually by resident laborers. Manor: (especially in England and Wales) a unit of land, originally a feudal lordship, consisting of a lord’s demesne and lands rented to tenants. (Today: a large country house with lands; the principal house of a landed estate.) Fief(proto-state): an estate of land, especially one held on condition of feudal service. Demesne (land): land attached to a manor and retained for the owner’s own use. Protectorate (military): a state that is controlled and protected by another. State(politics): a territory with an organized political community under one government. Country (territory): A state, with a government, occupying a particular territory. Nation(Ethnicity): a large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory. Nation-State(Ethnicity): a sovereign state whose citizens or subjects are relatively homogeneous in factors such as language or common descent. Federation(politics): a group of states with a central government but independence in internal affairs. Confederation: a more or less permanent union of countries with some or most political power vested in a central authority. League: a collection of people, countries, or groups that combine for a particular purpose, typically mutual protection or cooperation. Empire(politics): an extensive group of states or countries under a single supreme authority, formerly especially an emperor or empress. Civilization: the largest organization of humans with common race, ethnicity, history, culture, religion and often language.