Dec 28, 2019, 6:15 PM SAFE SPACE: A forum free of Truth, Reciprocity, Merit, and Consequential Eugenics, creating demand for denial, social construction, sophism, pseudoscience, and supernaturalism that obscures one’s sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value assisting in reproductive dysgenics despite it’s harm to mankind: The conflict strategy of females: the interpersonal and social super-predators. UNSAFE SPACE: A forum free of Ridicule, Shaming, Moralizing, Psychologizing, Rationalizing, Denial, Shouting Down, Rallying, Gossiping, Undermining, and Reputation Destruction in pursuit of Truth, Reciprocity, Merit, and Consequential Eugenics, where we can ignore our differences in sexual social economic political and military market value because Eugenics is in our interest and mankind’s: The conflict strategy of males: political and military super-predators. That’s really it you know. Marxism (men, classes) failed, and the left switched to the female conflict strategy of Cultural Marxism (undermining informal institutions reinforcing compromise between genders and classes), Feminism (undermining compromise between the genders), and Postmodernism (undermining truth), and denial (denying differences.) Why? Masculine meritocratic eugenic markets (Packs), and female equalitarian dysgenic authoritarianism. (The herd). It’s not complicated. It’s just the war on Darwin by the left ( pseudoscience, sophism, and denial) to destroy the family, and the war on Darwin by the formerly left religious( supernaturalism) in pursuit of the family.
Form: Definition
-
Soul = Account of Debts (threats) and Credits (discounts)
Soul = Account of Debts (threats) and Credits (discounts). https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/soul-account-of-debts-threats-and-credits-discounts/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 04:06:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265494646962237440
-
Soul = Account of Debts (threats) and Credits (discounts).
Dec 29, 2019, 1:03 PM Soul = account of debts (threats) and credits (discounts). We are extremely conscious of our status, debts, and credits. We can instantly judge our status debts and credits when we meet others or walk into a room or walk down a street. The Soul is a supernatural narrative of semitic origin like mathematical platonism is an ideal narrative of greek origin – both of which compensate for ancient man’s lack of understanding of the nervous system – a problem we no longer have. You live on in the memories of others as information. Your soul is your balance sheet in the social economy of your people.
-
Soul = Account of Debts (threats) and Credits (discounts).
Dec 29, 2019, 1:03 PM Soul = account of debts (threats) and credits (discounts). We are extremely conscious of our status, debts, and credits. We can instantly judge our status debts and credits when we meet others or walk into a room or walk down a street. The Soul is a supernatural narrative of semitic origin like mathematical platonism is an ideal narrative of greek origin – both of which compensate for ancient man’s lack of understanding of the nervous system – a problem we no longer have. You live on in the memories of others as information. Your soul is your balance sheet in the social economy of your people.
-
DEFINITION: “GRAMMAR” IN P
DEFINITION: “GRAMMAR” IN P https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/definition-grammar-in-p/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 03:56:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265492074440413185
-
DEFINITION: “GRAMMAR” IN P
Dec 31, 2019, 12:54 PM “CURT, WHAT’S A GRAMMAR IN PROPERTARIANISM?” (important)(core) A grammar has traditionally referred to a book containing the rules of a language. But I had to put quite a bit of work into ‘disambiguating’ the terms we use in language. The human cognitive facility consists of identification of constant relations between stimuli in time resulting in categorization (identity). The human auto association facility consists of discovering relations between categories (identities). The human memory facility consists of repetition of stimuli or rehearsal from short term memory, to create, reinforce, change, and eliminate constant relation within and between categories (locations, places, barriers, models, identities) The human logical facility consist of tests of constant, inconstant, and unrecognized relations between states (categories, identities). The human grammar facility refers to our physical ability to perform continuous recursive disambiguation using a stream of signals, most commonly in the form of sounds. The human language facility refers to the use of patterns of symbols or sounds in sequence of continuously recursive attempts at disambiguation. A language consists of Phonemes (sounds), Morphemes(meaningful combination of sounds – roots), Vocabulary (words), Phrases (state), Sentences (changes in state – transactions), Stories (collections of transactions), Grammar (rules of organization making possible disambiguation by inference), and Syntax (further disambiguation – specifically when writing). A vocabulary consists of Names (Nouns, references to referents), Name Substitutes (pronouns), Properties (Adjective, state), Operations (verbs, actions, state of acting), Properties of Operations (Adverb). and Approval or Rejection (yes no true false agree disagree etc). Note that I’ve clarified some terms here a little differently than we traditionally do. However (this is the issue) the collections of permissible dimensions (paradigms) limit the rules of continuous recursive disambiguation: The logic of the paradigm. This is why…. Let’s use math because it’s the most simple language we have that all of us share. Mathematics consists of names of positions (numbers), variables (pronouns), names of operations ( mathematical operations, verbs), phrases (expressions), statements (functions), sentences (transactions), proofs (stories), and Approval or Rejection (true false). There are no adverbs or adjectives. What differs between ordinary language and mathematical language is that mathematics (the language of positional names) and ordinary language (the language of human experience) differ in ‘dimensions of permissible references’ to both Names (nouns) and Operations (verbs). And we can do the same analysis for every Grammar (system of rules) in the spectrum of: math, accounting, logics, programming, physics, chemistry, biochemistry, recipes, protocols, laws, testimony, descriptions, ordinary language, narration, storytelling, fictions, fictionalisms, and deceits – and everything in between. And we use the term “Deflationary grammar” for the narrowest grammars (math, logics), “ordinary grammar” for ordinary language, and “Inflationary grammar” for the widest grammars (story, fiction, fictionalism, deceits).
Deflationary < ---- Ordinary ----> Inflationary.
So instead of the traditional hierarchy:
Human Facilities -> language -> phoneme -> morpheme -> ... ... paradigms (metaphysics) -> vocabulary -> grammar -> syntax.
Instead we have:
Human Facilities (see above) -> vocabulary -> paradigms(dimensions) -> ... grammar of paradigm(rules of story, transaction, ... ... function, expression, operation, names: the LOGIC of the paradigm) -> ... ... ... permissible vocabulary -> necessary syntax.
So a Grammar refers to the Paradigm (permissible dimensions of perception, cognition, and action), the Names, Operations, and Rules of Continuous Recursive Disambiguation (morpheme, word, phrase, sentence, story organization) and the LOGIC (constant relations) that limit consistency, correspondence, coherence, and completeness. So in P we use a ‘grammar’ to refer to the Vocabulary, logic, syntax of a paradigm. And when we use the term “the Grammars’ we mean the spectrum And Operational Grammar or Testimony is a Deflationary Grammar: a Deflation (constraint upon) ordinary language grammar, limiting it to a single point of view, absent the verb to be, using complete promissory sentences, describing a series of operations (human actions), resulting in testable transactions (sentence), and sets of transactions (testimony).
-
DEFINITION: “GRAMMAR” IN P
Dec 31, 2019, 12:54 PM “CURT, WHAT’S A GRAMMAR IN PROPERTARIANISM?” (important)(core) A grammar has traditionally referred to a book containing the rules of a language. But I had to put quite a bit of work into ‘disambiguating’ the terms we use in language. The human cognitive facility consists of identification of constant relations between stimuli in time resulting in categorization (identity). The human auto association facility consists of discovering relations between categories (identities). The human memory facility consists of repetition of stimuli or rehearsal from short term memory, to create, reinforce, change, and eliminate constant relation within and between categories (locations, places, barriers, models, identities) The human logical facility consist of tests of constant, inconstant, and unrecognized relations between states (categories, identities). The human grammar facility refers to our physical ability to perform continuous recursive disambiguation using a stream of signals, most commonly in the form of sounds. The human language facility refers to the use of patterns of symbols or sounds in sequence of continuously recursive attempts at disambiguation. A language consists of Phonemes (sounds), Morphemes(meaningful combination of sounds – roots), Vocabulary (words), Phrases (state), Sentences (changes in state – transactions), Stories (collections of transactions), Grammar (rules of organization making possible disambiguation by inference), and Syntax (further disambiguation – specifically when writing). A vocabulary consists of Names (Nouns, references to referents), Name Substitutes (pronouns), Properties (Adjective, state), Operations (verbs, actions, state of acting), Properties of Operations (Adverb). and Approval or Rejection (yes no true false agree disagree etc). Note that I’ve clarified some terms here a little differently than we traditionally do. However (this is the issue) the collections of permissible dimensions (paradigms) limit the rules of continuous recursive disambiguation: The logic of the paradigm. This is why…. Let’s use math because it’s the most simple language we have that all of us share. Mathematics consists of names of positions (numbers), variables (pronouns), names of operations ( mathematical operations, verbs), phrases (expressions), statements (functions), sentences (transactions), proofs (stories), and Approval or Rejection (true false). There are no adverbs or adjectives. What differs between ordinary language and mathematical language is that mathematics (the language of positional names) and ordinary language (the language of human experience) differ in ‘dimensions of permissible references’ to both Names (nouns) and Operations (verbs). And we can do the same analysis for every Grammar (system of rules) in the spectrum of: math, accounting, logics, programming, physics, chemistry, biochemistry, recipes, protocols, laws, testimony, descriptions, ordinary language, narration, storytelling, fictions, fictionalisms, and deceits – and everything in between. And we use the term “Deflationary grammar” for the narrowest grammars (math, logics), “ordinary grammar” for ordinary language, and “Inflationary grammar” for the widest grammars (story, fiction, fictionalism, deceits).
Deflationary < ---- Ordinary ----> Inflationary.
So instead of the traditional hierarchy:
Human Facilities -> language -> phoneme -> morpheme -> ... ... paradigms (metaphysics) -> vocabulary -> grammar -> syntax.
Instead we have:
Human Facilities (see above) -> vocabulary -> paradigms(dimensions) -> ... grammar of paradigm(rules of story, transaction, ... ... function, expression, operation, names: the LOGIC of the paradigm) -> ... ... ... permissible vocabulary -> necessary syntax.
So a Grammar refers to the Paradigm (permissible dimensions of perception, cognition, and action), the Names, Operations, and Rules of Continuous Recursive Disambiguation (morpheme, word, phrase, sentence, story organization) and the LOGIC (constant relations) that limit consistency, correspondence, coherence, and completeness. So in P we use a ‘grammar’ to refer to the Vocabulary, logic, syntax of a paradigm. And when we use the term “the Grammars’ we mean the spectrum And Operational Grammar or Testimony is a Deflationary Grammar: a Deflation (constraint upon) ordinary language grammar, limiting it to a single point of view, absent the verb to be, using complete promissory sentences, describing a series of operations (human actions), resulting in testable transactions (sentence), and sets of transactions (testimony).
-
DEFINITIONS: Red Queen, The Red Queen, Defeating the Red Queen
DEFINITIONS: Red Queen, The Red Queen, Defeating the Red Queen https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/definitions-red-queen-the-red-queen-defeating-the-red-queen/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 01:05:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265449043020460032
-
DEFINITIONS: Red Queen, The Red Queen, Defeating the Red Queen
Human beings seek to minimize neural costs by seeking stability, stasis, constancy and harmony – but this is suicidal – stability means ne is falling behind others who are not static. This ‘cognitive error’ is a remnant of our hunter-gatherer instincts and only europeans appear to have systematically overcome it – and even then, only a minority. And this is the source of our ‘european creativity’.
From Wikipedia:
The Red Queen hypothesis (also referred to as Red Queen’s, the Red Queen effect, Red Queen’s race, Red Queen dynamics) is an evolutionary hypothesis which proposes that organisms must constantly adapt, evolve, and proliferate in order to survive while pitted against ever-evolving opposing organisms in a constantly changing environment, as well as to gain reproductive advantage.
The hypothesis intends to explain two different phenomena: the constant extinction rates as observed in the paleontological record caused by co-evolution between competing species,“ and the advantage of sexual reproduction (as opposed to asexual reproduction) at the level of individuals.The phenomenon’s name is derived from a statement that the Red Queen made to Alice in Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass in her explanation of the nature of Looking-Glass Land:
“Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place.”
Van Valen coined the hypothesis “Red Queen” because under this interpretation, populations have to “run” or evolve in order to stay in the same place – or else go extinct.
-
DEFINITIONS: Red Queen, The Red Queen, Defeating the Red Queen
Human beings seek to minimize neural costs by seeking stability, stasis, constancy and harmony – but this is suicidal – stability means ne is falling behind others who are not static. This ‘cognitive error’ is a remnant of our hunter-gatherer instincts and only europeans appear to have systematically overcome it – and even then, only a minority. And this is the source of our ‘european creativity’.
From Wikipedia:
The Red Queen hypothesis (also referred to as Red Queen’s, the Red Queen effect, Red Queen’s race, Red Queen dynamics) is an evolutionary hypothesis which proposes that organisms must constantly adapt, evolve, and proliferate in order to survive while pitted against ever-evolving opposing organisms in a constantly changing environment, as well as to gain reproductive advantage.
The hypothesis intends to explain two different phenomena: the constant extinction rates as observed in the paleontological record caused by co-evolution between competing species,“ and the advantage of sexual reproduction (as opposed to asexual reproduction) at the level of individuals.The phenomenon’s name is derived from a statement that the Red Queen made to Alice in Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass in her explanation of the nature of Looking-Glass Land:
“Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place.”
Van Valen coined the hypothesis “Red Queen” because under this interpretation, populations have to “run” or evolve in order to stay in the same place – or else go extinct.