Dec 19, 2019, 7:25 PM Emotions are measures of changes in state of property. by Martin Štěpán ( Brandon Hayes)
Emotions are measures of changes in state of property. When they tell you hate or any other emotion is a crime, they’re trying to convince you your measurements are erroneous and to get you to stop measuring so that they can change the state of your property without obstacle.
Dec 19, 2019, 7:25 PM Emotions are measures of changes in state of property. by Martin Štěpán ( Brandon Hayes)
Emotions are measures of changes in state of property. When they tell you hate or any other emotion is a crime, they’re trying to convince you your measurements are erroneous and to get you to stop measuring so that they can change the state of your property without obstacle.
Dec 24, 2019, 3:33 PM DRAFT – WORK IN PROGRESS (Core) What is the difference between morals, ethics and manners? CORRECT ANSWER: It’s not complicated – if we explain it in economic rather than ‘moral’ language. Western civilization is a commercial civilization (middle class), and that is the reason for our wealth, cleanliness, orderliness, customer service, and tolerance. The west was more successful than all but the Japanese at suppression of selfish public behavior, and for this reason was able to produce commons that people did not impose costs upon, providing incentive (lacking disincentive) to produce commons, and therefore creating the high returns on the commons. (Effectively, westerners treat the commons – common spaces and everything in them – as sacred). Engage only in completely voluntary exchanges. That means do not impose costs upon others whether attention (mental), disgust(emotion), or action (body), on their demonstrated interests (things, family, business), and the “commons” anything the public may make use of. Instead, pay the cost of controlling yourself, by maintaining ‘situational awareness of others’ (consideration), especially by managing your children. The public space is not something you may make use of as you desire. it is not your home.
MANNERS Manners advertise fitness for reciprocity. The more costly the manners, the higher the suppression of impulse, the greater the demonstration of agency and training, the better the promise and better the predictor of fitness for reciprocity. Respect consists of using manners to demonstrate reciprocity and presumption of reciprocity regardless of differences between parties, including differences in the status spectrum, differences in wants and needs, differences in opinion, and differences in preferences. Disrespect consists of irreciprocity presumption of irreciprocity given differences between parties, including differences in the status spectrum, differences in wants and needs, differences in knowledge, habit, and opinion, and differences in preferences. Insult consists of (…) Resistance consist of (…) Defection consists of (…) || Spectrum: genetic > sexual > social > economic > political > military Display * Hygiene * Dress * MovementWord * SpeechDeed * Action
Manners are your ‘advertising’ for worthiness of respect. Lack of manners are your ‘advertising’ for unworthiness of respect: meaning, not giving your attention, consideration, or resources (time, energy). And poor manners require others actively disrespect you (‘punish you’) for imposing costs upon others. ETHICS (…) MORALS (…)
Dec 24, 2019, 3:33 PM DRAFT – WORK IN PROGRESS (Core) What is the difference between morals, ethics and manners? CORRECT ANSWER: It’s not complicated – if we explain it in economic rather than ‘moral’ language. Western civilization is a commercial civilization (middle class), and that is the reason for our wealth, cleanliness, orderliness, customer service, and tolerance. The west was more successful than all but the Japanese at suppression of selfish public behavior, and for this reason was able to produce commons that people did not impose costs upon, providing incentive (lacking disincentive) to produce commons, and therefore creating the high returns on the commons. (Effectively, westerners treat the commons – common spaces and everything in them – as sacred). Engage only in completely voluntary exchanges. That means do not impose costs upon others whether attention (mental), disgust(emotion), or action (body), on their demonstrated interests (things, family, business), and the “commons” anything the public may make use of. Instead, pay the cost of controlling yourself, by maintaining ‘situational awareness of others’ (consideration), especially by managing your children. The public space is not something you may make use of as you desire. it is not your home.
MANNERS Manners advertise fitness for reciprocity. The more costly the manners, the higher the suppression of impulse, the greater the demonstration of agency and training, the better the promise and better the predictor of fitness for reciprocity. Respect consists of using manners to demonstrate reciprocity and presumption of reciprocity regardless of differences between parties, including differences in the status spectrum, differences in wants and needs, differences in opinion, and differences in preferences. Disrespect consists of irreciprocity presumption of irreciprocity given differences between parties, including differences in the status spectrum, differences in wants and needs, differences in knowledge, habit, and opinion, and differences in preferences. Insult consists of (…) Resistance consist of (…) Defection consists of (…) || Spectrum: genetic > sexual > social > economic > political > military Display * Hygiene * Dress * MovementWord * SpeechDeed * Action
Manners are your ‘advertising’ for worthiness of respect. Lack of manners are your ‘advertising’ for unworthiness of respect: meaning, not giving your attention, consideration, or resources (time, energy). And poor manners require others actively disrespect you (‘punish you’) for imposing costs upon others. ETHICS (…) MORALS (…)
Dec 26, 2019, 2:12 PM
—“This is a very vague non-answer that tries to appear smart by using a big word salad and sounds like something the typical libertarian atheist who’s sure of his own intellect would say. I still don’t understand what Propertarianism is.”— Ryan Chapman
Always an overconfident moron in the bunch. What’s the difference between aristotelianism, platonism, and abrahamism? What’s the difference between reason, logic, rationalism? What’s the difference between Aristotelian, enlightenment(empirical) and scientific, revolutions? Whats the difference between math, logic, programming, recipes, and protocols? So what is the difference between aristotelianism, empiricism, science, and testimonialism (propertarianism)? Well, the difference is from the rational to the empirical to the operational. What does operational mean? It means the difference between logic (Sets) and programming (operations). It means the difference between logic (language), empiricism (observation), and operations (actions). Propertarianism completes the scientific method. The culmination of the philosophical program of the 20th century was that there is no via positiva scientific method. Instead, The scientific method is a via negativa method: falsificationary. There are only so many dimensions humans can cognitively imagine and cognitively falsify by tests of consistency: categorical, logical, operational, empirical, rational, reciprocal, complete in scope with defined limits, and consistent and therefore coherent across those dimensions, where one warranties such due diligence, and is liable for the consequence of his displays words and deeds resulting from such statements. By using this method we can create a universally commensurable, value neutral, operational language and as such a universally commensurable logic, across all fields: a system of measurement for the truthfulness of speech. We can then use this language and this method to restate the constitution, and our law, in scientific, and operational language, closed to interpretation (legislation from the bench). Moreover we can use this law to outlaw the primary innovation in organized crime that was used to undermine western civilization: false promise; baiting into hazard, using pilpul (sophism) and critique(undermining, straw manning) under cover of plausible deniability to profit from the imposition of harms upon others by financialization (innumeracy), pseudoscience, sophism, supernaturalism, denialism, including the false promises, pseudo-mathematics, pseudoscience, sophistry, and denial of marx, boas, freud, Cantor, Adorno et al, Gramsci et al, Derrida et al, Friedan et al, rand/rothbard, and the neocons. And yes, we can even use it to reform and obtain insight into the failures of Bohr ad Einstein that hilbert predicted, and we can explain the 20th century of mysticism and deceit that hayek warned us of. In other words we can end the jewish-muslim, marxist-postmodernis-feminist program of lying by false promise, and explain why it’s a crime. So, hopefully you can understand why this brief passage here is not something I would stick on the front page for marketing purposes. And if you can’t comprehend it – it doesn’t matter. You probably don’t know calculus, analysis, algebraic geometry, relativity, quantum mechanics, or the difference between hierarchical, relational, functional, object oriented, and bayesian programming, or the design patterns in each. Or the fundamental problems of mathematical economics, categories, use of symmetries as intermediary systems of economic measurement. Or even the problem of protein folding or why all of those questions are related by the problem a lack of an operational logic of geometries that replaces the operational logic of lines and curves using positional names that we call mathematics. I know what the fuck I”m doing.Don’t shit on my doorstep.
Dec 28, 2019, 3:29 PM A Race, Nation, Tribe, Clan, Family are people. Race: a kin group having adapted to local circumstance morphologically distinguishable from other kin groups. Tribe: a kin group within a race. Clan: an extended family within a tribe. A family: one or more generations of nuclear to extended family running a household (micro economy). Assets: territory, resources, monuments, infrastructure, built capital, portable capital, people, their private property. Nation: A kin group sharing institutions, language, tradition, custom, norms, commons (assets). Country: A territory, with borders, under the control of a formal (state) or informal (people) group willing to defend those borders and that territory and the assets within it. State: A state is a corporation governed (ruled, administered) by a monopoly that secures assets, one of which is the people, either as an asset themselves (possession) or as assets on their behalf. Nation-State: A state serving the interests of a Nation (kin group) State: A corporation regardless of the nation or nation, serving it’s own interests whether on behalf of kin groups or not. Federation or Confederation: A corporation of voluntarily organized states and or nation states with right of exit. Empire: A corporation of of involuntarily organized states and or nation-states and or countries and or peoples lacking right of exit. Rule: Means of deciding matters of conflict, wither external-military, or internal-political, or internal-juridical. Government: Means of administering the production and maintenance of commons.
Dec 28, 2019, 3:29 PM A Race, Nation, Tribe, Clan, Family are people. Race: a kin group having adapted to local circumstance morphologically distinguishable from other kin groups. Tribe: a kin group within a race. Clan: an extended family within a tribe. A family: one or more generations of nuclear to extended family running a household (micro economy). Assets: territory, resources, monuments, infrastructure, built capital, portable capital, people, their private property. Nation: A kin group sharing institutions, language, tradition, custom, norms, commons (assets). Country: A territory, with borders, under the control of a formal (state) or informal (people) group willing to defend those borders and that territory and the assets within it. State: A state is a corporation governed (ruled, administered) by a monopoly that secures assets, one of which is the people, either as an asset themselves (possession) or as assets on their behalf. Nation-State: A state serving the interests of a Nation (kin group) State: A corporation regardless of the nation or nation, serving it’s own interests whether on behalf of kin groups or not. Federation or Confederation: A corporation of voluntarily organized states and or nation states with right of exit. Empire: A corporation of of involuntarily organized states and or nation-states and or countries and or peoples lacking right of exit. Rule: Means of deciding matters of conflict, wither external-military, or internal-political, or internal-juridical. Government: Means of administering the production and maintenance of commons.
Dec 28, 2019, 4:39 PM TERNARY LOGIC OF SOCIAL SCIENCE (core) We focus largely on the law but not on the other innovations in the propertarian program: Yes, Propertarianism consists of a set of innovations
1. Grammars (metaphysics) 2. Testimonialism (epistemology) 3. Acquisitionism and Propertarianism (ethics) – Together making possible strictly constructed law (ethics) But we also have:
4: Cooperationism, Compatibilism, Cognitive division of labor Which means that we specialize, largely along lines of gender cognition and age, in a division of perception, cognition, advocacy and negotiation. And then we ‘calculate’ by discovering opportunities to cooperate across the spectrum of population, time, and space. So we function as a neural network that discovers opportunities despite variations in our division of labor in perceiving and comprehending the world. And we also have:
5. The Ternary Logic of Political Science. Let’s look at this a bit There are three states of logic, in order:
1. False 2. Truth candidate (actionable) 3. Undecidable (In-actionable) There are three options to cooperation
1. avoidance (ostracization) 2. exchange (cooperation) 3. predation-parasitism (conflict) There are three means of coercion
1. Remuneration (deprivation of trade, or benefit from trade) Middle class – Libertarian Meritocratic 2. Force (imposition of harm, defense from harm) Upper class – Conservative Eugenic 3. Undermining (ostracizing/inhibiting opportunity, including/generating opportunity) Under Class – Progressive Dysgenic There are three axis of elites
1. Scientific, Technical, Entrepreneurial, Financial, Treasury 2. Military, juridical, Police, Sheriff, Militia 3. Priests, Politicians, Public Intellectuals We can organize by three axis of elites (cooperate by)
1. Production and Evolution (europe) 2. Administration and Stagnation (strong:china, weak:india) 3. Parasitism and Degeneration (semitia, gypsies) We can rule by three axis of decidability
1. Science and Law (europe) 2. Reason and Command (china india) 3. Sophistry and Propaganda (semitia) We can govern by three axis
1. Markets,Law,Courts, (europe) Middle Class 2. Bureaucracy (china) Upper class 3. Priesthood (semitia) Underclass The ranking assuming we eradicate the semitic dark ages:
Europe, China, India, Iran-Assyria-Babylon, Egypt Mesoamerica, Semitia(jewish muslim), S-Pacific, E africa, W africa Africa, S Africa, Austronesia The only hard choice being iran vs india and that choice possible only because the Persians were not able to shake off islam and reassert Persian civlization despite efforts just as the germans can’t sake of Christianity despite their efforts and reassert germanic civilization. If something had not ‘gone wrong’ in India she would have produced the best culture with time. It may be climate and demographic curse. But I don’t quite understand what went wrong yet but I”ll figure it out. I think we undrestand what went wrong with persia and germania. And russia, germania, and china are our fault for not lettting russia retake orthodoxy, not letting germany retake europe, and not letting macarthur and patton finish the job of the second world war with russia and china.
Dec 28, 2019, 4:39 PM TERNARY LOGIC OF SOCIAL SCIENCE (core) We focus largely on the law but not on the other innovations in the propertarian program: Yes, Propertarianism consists of a set of innovations
1. Grammars (metaphysics) 2. Testimonialism (epistemology) 3. Acquisitionism and Propertarianism (ethics) – Together making possible strictly constructed law (ethics) But we also have:
4: Cooperationism, Compatibilism, Cognitive division of labor Which means that we specialize, largely along lines of gender cognition and age, in a division of perception, cognition, advocacy and negotiation. And then we ‘calculate’ by discovering opportunities to cooperate across the spectrum of population, time, and space. So we function as a neural network that discovers opportunities despite variations in our division of labor in perceiving and comprehending the world. And we also have:
5. The Ternary Logic of Political Science. Let’s look at this a bit There are three states of logic, in order:
1. False 2. Truth candidate (actionable) 3. Undecidable (In-actionable) There are three options to cooperation
1. avoidance (ostracization) 2. exchange (cooperation) 3. predation-parasitism (conflict) There are three means of coercion
1. Remuneration (deprivation of trade, or benefit from trade) Middle class – Libertarian Meritocratic 2. Force (imposition of harm, defense from harm) Upper class – Conservative Eugenic 3. Undermining (ostracizing/inhibiting opportunity, including/generating opportunity) Under Class – Progressive Dysgenic There are three axis of elites
1. Scientific, Technical, Entrepreneurial, Financial, Treasury 2. Military, juridical, Police, Sheriff, Militia 3. Priests, Politicians, Public Intellectuals We can organize by three axis of elites (cooperate by)
1. Production and Evolution (europe) 2. Administration and Stagnation (strong:china, weak:india) 3. Parasitism and Degeneration (semitia, gypsies) We can rule by three axis of decidability
1. Science and Law (europe) 2. Reason and Command (china india) 3. Sophistry and Propaganda (semitia) We can govern by three axis
1. Markets,Law,Courts, (europe) Middle Class 2. Bureaucracy (china) Upper class 3. Priesthood (semitia) Underclass The ranking assuming we eradicate the semitic dark ages:
Europe, China, India, Iran-Assyria-Babylon, Egypt Mesoamerica, Semitia(jewish muslim), S-Pacific, E africa, W africa Africa, S Africa, Austronesia The only hard choice being iran vs india and that choice possible only because the Persians were not able to shake off islam and reassert Persian civlization despite efforts just as the germans can’t sake of Christianity despite their efforts and reassert germanic civilization. If something had not ‘gone wrong’ in India she would have produced the best culture with time. It may be climate and demographic curse. But I don’t quite understand what went wrong yet but I”ll figure it out. I think we undrestand what went wrong with persia and germania. And russia, germania, and china are our fault for not lettting russia retake orthodoxy, not letting germany retake europe, and not letting macarthur and patton finish the job of the second world war with russia and china.
Dec 28, 2019, 6:15 PM SAFE SPACE: A forum free of Truth, Reciprocity, Merit, and Consequential Eugenics, creating demand for denial, social construction, sophism, pseudoscience, and supernaturalism that obscures one’s sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value assisting in reproductive dysgenics despite it’s harm to mankind: The conflict strategy of females: the interpersonal and social super-predators. UNSAFE SPACE: A forum free of Ridicule, Shaming, Moralizing, Psychologizing, Rationalizing, Denial, Shouting Down, Rallying, Gossiping, Undermining, and Reputation Destruction in pursuit of Truth, Reciprocity, Merit, and Consequential Eugenics, where we can ignore our differences in sexual social economic political and military market value because Eugenics is in our interest and mankind’s: The conflict strategy of males: political and military super-predators. That’s really it you know. Marxism (men, classes) failed, and the left switched to the female conflict strategy of Cultural Marxism (undermining informal institutions reinforcing compromise between genders and classes), Feminism (undermining compromise between the genders), and Postmodernism (undermining truth), and denial (denying differences.) Why? Masculine meritocratic eugenic markets (Packs), and female equalitarian dysgenic authoritarianism. (The herd). It’s not complicated. It’s just the war on Darwin by the left ( pseudoscience, sophism, and denial) to destroy the family, and the war on Darwin by the formerly left religious( supernaturalism) in pursuit of the family.