Jan 29, 2020, 10:47 AM Definitions: CONQUEROR > SETTLER > IMMIGRANT > REFUGEE > INVADER by Thomas Beesley CONQUEROR: Somebody who risks life and limb to domesticate a primitive territory and people by creating a market order, by the organized application of violence. SETTLER: somebody who comes when there is nothing, and builds a civilization from it. A pioneer, an adventurer, a conqueror. Productivity, masculinity, ingenuity, fierce independence. Patrician founders, their heirs the rightful inheritors of the nation and a portion of all of the fruits of it’s production by right of establishment. IMMIGRANT: somebody who comes over long after the work of establishing and building of the civilization has ended and merely reaps the rewards of those who came before. A plebian underclass by nature, at best a person simply looking for opportunity, at worst a parasite looking for a host. Interlopers, opportunists, traveling merchants, unwelcome guests who readily make themselves at home. My ancestors were not immigrants. They were conquerors and settlers. And they left me and mine our inheritance.And I am willing to fight to defend that inheritance.
Form: Definition
-
Strategy: Create Many Options Not a Single Plan
Jan 29, 2020, 11:27 AM by M Ray Deese For many, strategy consist of a series of specific steps carried out in a linear progression toward an objective. However, the essence of strategy is not to carry out a brilliant plan based on a series of specific steps; strategy is putting yourself in a position wherein you have a variety of options at hand. Options, combined with decisive action and mobility is a superb force multiplier and consequently allows for Strategic Depth of Thinking.
-
Strategy: Create Many Options Not a Single Plan
Jan 29, 2020, 11:27 AM by M Ray Deese For many, strategy consist of a series of specific steps carried out in a linear progression toward an objective. However, the essence of strategy is not to carry out a brilliant plan based on a series of specific steps; strategy is putting yourself in a position wherein you have a variety of options at hand. Options, combined with decisive action and mobility is a superb force multiplier and consequently allows for Strategic Depth of Thinking.
-
SURT (giant)
Jan 29, 2020, 12:35 PM SURT (giant) (note how semitic gods are from stars, but european gods are from sky and earth. Why? Astrology vs Metallurgy.) Surt (Old Norse Surtr, “Black,” presumably a reference to his charred appearance) is a fire giant who leads his kin into battle against the Aesir and Vanir gods during Ragnarok, the destruction of the cosmos. His particular fate is to kill the god Freyr and to be slain by him in turn. He arrives from Muspelheim, the extreme southern region of heat and fire, bearing his weapon of choice of a burning sword, with which the world is razed before it sinks into the sea. Historian Rudolf Simek has proposed that Surt is the supernatural force who corresponds to “the (volcanic) fire of the Underworld,”[5] a personage who would surely have had a profound emotional resonance for any early Icelander, given the sheer amount of volcanic activity that characterizes that island.
-
SURT (giant)
Jan 29, 2020, 12:35 PM SURT (giant) (note how semitic gods are from stars, but european gods are from sky and earth. Why? Astrology vs Metallurgy.) Surt (Old Norse Surtr, “Black,” presumably a reference to his charred appearance) is a fire giant who leads his kin into battle against the Aesir and Vanir gods during Ragnarok, the destruction of the cosmos. His particular fate is to kill the god Freyr and to be slain by him in turn. He arrives from Muspelheim, the extreme southern region of heat and fire, bearing his weapon of choice of a burning sword, with which the world is razed before it sinks into the sea. Historian Rudolf Simek has proposed that Surt is the supernatural force who corresponds to “the (volcanic) fire of the Underworld,”[5] a personage who would surely have had a profound emotional resonance for any early Icelander, given the sheer amount of volcanic activity that characterizes that island.
-
Real Meaning of The Words
Jan 29, 2020, 3:32 PM REAL MEANING OF THE WORDS: LEFT PROGRESSIVE = CONSUMPTION, VS RIGHT CONSERVATIVE = CAPITALIZATION
—“Is progressive or conservative the most appropriate word?”—
Painful Truth:
Socialist: Left, female, herd, equalitarian, dysgenic, proportional, consuming, empathic, devoted, low disgust, fear of being left behind,
-VS-
Aristocratic: Right, male, pack, hierarchical, eugenic, reciprocal, capitalizing, analytic, loyal, high disgust, fear of not producing capital. Hypergamy, hyperconsumption, sh-t testing, defecting, undermining, seducing by false promise into hazard. The left uses the female dysgenic strategy and the right the male eugenic strategy and we no longer have reason to coexist under the same political artifice when there is no possible means of reconciliation of strategies that are polar opposites. The right must separate because the left like cancer is an uncontrolled dysgenic growth reversing thousands of years of evolutionary progress in in our genes, cultures, institutions, and knowledge.
-
Real Meaning of The Words
Jan 29, 2020, 3:32 PM REAL MEANING OF THE WORDS: LEFT PROGRESSIVE = CONSUMPTION, VS RIGHT CONSERVATIVE = CAPITALIZATION
—“Is progressive or conservative the most appropriate word?”—
Painful Truth:
Socialist: Left, female, herd, equalitarian, dysgenic, proportional, consuming, empathic, devoted, low disgust, fear of being left behind,
-VS-
Aristocratic: Right, male, pack, hierarchical, eugenic, reciprocal, capitalizing, analytic, loyal, high disgust, fear of not producing capital. Hypergamy, hyperconsumption, sh-t testing, defecting, undermining, seducing by false promise into hazard. The left uses the female dysgenic strategy and the right the male eugenic strategy and we no longer have reason to coexist under the same political artifice when there is no possible means of reconciliation of strategies that are polar opposites. The right must separate because the left like cancer is an uncontrolled dysgenic growth reversing thousands of years of evolutionary progress in in our genes, cultures, institutions, and knowledge.
-
What Does P Mean? Some Common Terms in Propertarianism
What Does P Mean? Some Common Terms in Propertarianism https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/what-does-p-mean-some-common-terms-in-propertarianism/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 15:51:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264947296791343104
-
What Does P Mean? Some Common Terms in Propertarianism
Jan 30, 2020, 4:24 PM Yes P = Propertarianism, and we use: P-Method, P-Logic, P-Testimony or Testimonialism, P-Ethics or Propertarian ethics, P-Law or Natural Law of Reciprocity, Disambiguation by Serialization and Operationalism, ePrime, The Copula. Operational Language and Vocabulary. Inflationary and deflationary Grammars. Fictionalisms. Deceits. Abrahamic method of deceit. The Grammars, Ternary Logic, Compatibilism, The Coercive Technologies, Three Classes of Elites, Falsification, Decidability, Truth as Demand for decidability., Warranty of Due Diligence, Reciprocity, Imposition of costs, Demonstrated Interest. Property In Toto. And we repeat the properties of Reciprocity, Testimony, property in to, the sequence of deceits, the sequences of crimes, and the abrahamic method pretty much constantly, and we describe human behavior in these terms using the language of economics. It seems overwhelming. If we get it into ‘propertarianism for dummies’ I’m not sure it will be. But it’s been harder than we thought.
-
What Does P Mean? Some Common Terms in Propertarianism
Jan 30, 2020, 4:24 PM Yes P = Propertarianism, and we use: P-Method, P-Logic, P-Testimony or Testimonialism, P-Ethics or Propertarian ethics, P-Law or Natural Law of Reciprocity, Disambiguation by Serialization and Operationalism, ePrime, The Copula. Operational Language and Vocabulary. Inflationary and deflationary Grammars. Fictionalisms. Deceits. Abrahamic method of deceit. The Grammars, Ternary Logic, Compatibilism, The Coercive Technologies, Three Classes of Elites, Falsification, Decidability, Truth as Demand for decidability., Warranty of Due Diligence, Reciprocity, Imposition of costs, Demonstrated Interest. Property In Toto. And we repeat the properties of Reciprocity, Testimony, property in to, the sequence of deceits, the sequences of crimes, and the abrahamic method pretty much constantly, and we describe human behavior in these terms using the language of economics. It seems overwhelming. If we get it into ‘propertarianism for dummies’ I’m not sure it will be. But it’s been harder than we thought.