Form: Critique

YES, KEITH WOODS IS AN INTELLECTUALLY DISHONEST, SOPHISTIC MORON SELLING FAIL TO THE FAIL CLASS OF MORONS

Curt, I agree with Dutton’s suggestion that you should watch Keith Woods’s video The Implosion of Propertarianism, at least just so you can demonstrate that you know precisely how he misrepresented and willfully misunderstood your work.

-“I did watch it. It’s a tinfoil hat show. I’ve never paid any attention to him (I don’t pay attention to any of these people). I don’t want to invest in attacking this kind of person. It’s beneath me. But If I need to in order to stave off the parade of morons I will.”-

It’s a shame. Kids like Keith Woods wouldn’t have caused much trouble back when there was no internet or streaming, because his awkward intellectual development could take place more privately until he matures beyond gossip and suggestion (if ever).

In this video Keith Woods misrepresents Doolittle’s work in 2 typical ways: 1) “Word salad” (He claims that it’s too difficult to understand the basics of Prop. because the language is too technical, therefore it must be ungrounded when Eli Harman’s concise Intro-to-Prop article has been available for years, and Curt has tons of intro-level info on his website, not to mention that he responds personally to questions if you ask him yourself. So Keith simply never bothered to learn.)

2) “Propertarianism = Libertarianism” (Keith, like other “Third Position” types), loves to make this heavyhanded claim which is not only false but precludes any disambiguation as to the different movements and practices that often get lumped under “liberalism” as if “liberalism” is some kind of ideological miasma or pathogen that has its own agency.)

3) “Propertarianism is aThEiStIc and mAtErIaLiSt” (Name-calling as to the moot fact that the scientific method does not address religious/metaphysical propositions)

SUMMARY
Yes, that is in fact 3 ways that I can think of, not just 2. Keith Woods is a schoolboy type who employs gossiping, namedropping, and aesthetic gestures to make a brand, and attracts followers who wear the brand and try to bully anyone who threatens it.

YES. IT’S TRUE. KEITH WOODS IS A MORON FOR MORONS

So yes, I finally watched the hit-piece video, and yes, Keith Woods is a moron. Which is why his followers are morons. Which is why his morons continue to troll the public discourse. Because morons can’t do better than troll the discourse. Because they’re morons. Morons in. Morons Out.

-“That video [by Keith Woods] is as misinformed as some of the more clownish MSM fake news (research material: opposition ad hominem/gossip, reports gossip as summary, w/ fraudulent implication of professionalism/ inside-scoop /due diligence)… Lost all respect for the kid in the first 2 minutes.”-

This is, of course, my criticism: Morons that follow morons that post intellectually dishonest ad hom and gossip, under pretense of special knowledge or insight – are proving my point that all liars use the same technique to poison the discourse and maintain Right incompetence.

-“They seem to make a [habit] of bullying and I think it’s persistent reasoning they dislike. Hyp: they know they’re fake and can’t hold up.”-

Ouch. That’s a hell of a criticism. And I think it’s true. So they live in a world of pretentious external self-confidence to mask pervasive internal self-doubt. And they’re seeking allies and attention because they’re otherwise incompetent in the production of answers.

-“Keith Woods has the benefit from not taking any risks other than talking about philosophy and muh ethnocentric feels online to criticize every real right-wing movement that actually attempts to make a difference.”-

He’s a do-nothing whiner. The alt-right example of British virtue-signaling hyper moralism as compensation for loss of empire. They signal the pretense of virtue by thought, word, and opinion, rather than action – a lost civilization as feminine as the french, but not fully converted to continental feminine acquiescence.

-“[Keith Woods] lacks any real-world experience and as a result of this insecurity, he hides behind 19th-century philosophers. Never puts forth his own thoughts only repeats”-

Yep. Thanks. But neither do the morons who follow him. Which is the point – they have no experience with successful competition with men of ability in the real world so they search for fellow fantasy storytellers so that they can continue their dreamland without learning, adapting, reforming, and ACTING.

-“I’d be more offended, but they taught me one valuable lesson: how to spot their ilk and not waste attention cycles being influenced by them. They exist via a slippery slope from entertaining followers to defrauding them, much like the politicians, ethnie, etc they claim to despise.”-

Correct. That was my criticism of the Alt Right from the beginning: doomed to fail. You copy the left and you are doomed to become them. They have. A bunch of shallow ignorant whiny school girls getting their asses handed to them on a daily basis so that they can continue doing nothing while online larping.