YES, KEITH WOODS IS AN INTELLECTUALLY DISHONEST, SOPHISTIC MORON SELLING FAIL TO

YES, KEITH WOODS IS AN INTELLECTUALLY DISHONEST, SOPHISTIC MORON SELLING FAIL TO THE FAIL CLASS OF MORONS

Curt, I agree with Dutton’s suggestion that you should watch Keith Woods’s video The Implosion of Propertarianism, at least just so you can demonstrate that you know precisely how he misrepresented and willfully misunderstood your work.

-“I did watch it. It’s a tinfoil hat show. I’ve never paid any attention to him (I don’t pay attention to any of these people). I don’t want to invest in attacking this kind of person. It’s beneath me. But If I need to in order to stave off the parade of morons I will.”-

It’s a shame. Kids like Keith Woods wouldn’t have caused much trouble back when there was no internet or streaming, because his awkward intellectual development could take place more privately until he matures beyond gossip and suggestion (if ever).

In this video Keith Woods misrepresents Doolittle’s work in 2 typical ways: 1) “Word salad” (He claims that it’s too difficult to understand the basics of Prop. because the language is too technical, therefore it must be ungrounded when Eli Harman’s concise Intro-to-Prop article has been available for years, and Curt has tons of intro-level info on his website, not to mention that he responds personally to questions if you ask him yourself. So Keith simply never bothered to learn.)

2) “Propertarianism = Libertarianism” (Keith, like other “Third Position” types), loves to make this heavyhanded claim which is not only false but precludes any disambiguation as to the different movements and practices that often get lumped under “liberalism” as if “liberalism” is some kind of ideological miasma or pathogen that has its own agency.)

3) “Propertarianism is aThEiStIc and mAtErIaLiSt” (Name-calling as to the moot fact that the scientific method does not address religious/metaphysical propositions)

SUMMARY
Yes, that is in fact 3 ways that I can think of, not just 2. Keith Woods is a schoolboy type who employs gossiping, namedropping, and aesthetic gestures to make a brand, and attracts followers who wear the brand and try to bully anyone who threatens it.