https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhMriteR6r0 (A) European civilization uses Self Determination by individual Sovereignty under common rule of law – not individualism. In fact, Europan civilization relies on ‘Commons-ism’ and the direction of dominance expression to the production of commons. (B) European civilization has a 5000-year record of military reporting, testimonial truth, and truth before face in the commons; meritocratic aristocratic egalitarianism; and the resulting markets in everything including trifunctional elites (military, judicial, and religious). (C) Groups do act together, it’s called cooperation: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons production, polity production, state production, and most importantly the production of war. So yes, people do act in concert. “Man Must Act” is a meaningless trope with no inferential or deductive value. (As many others have argued before me). Why? Man must act to do what? (Acquire, preserve, defend). It is the same as non-aggression … against what? Against imposition of costs. Against imposition of costs against demonstrated interests. What does man demonstrate an interest in? The natural (life), the private; that of family, kin, and kith; interest in commons, in institutions, in norms, traditions, and values that capitalize the commons at the cost of suppression of impulse and at the cost of the reproduction of the unfit for those markets. And, Rothbard, seeking an authoritarian middle-class monopoly, is no different from Marx, seeking a working-class authoritarian monopoly. That’s no different from the Jewish (Trotsky) Neoconservatism seeking an authoritarian upper and upper-middle-class monopoly. Everything they do is in search of a universalist, authoritarian monopoly. And Europe only survived the catholic church’s success at authoritarianism and ‘mythicism’ (lying) using the Abrahamic method of false promise baiting into hazard. It seems never to occur to anyone that European civ is eugenic and meritocratic market and hierarchical and European institutions (participatory) with European rule of law (contractualism) maintaining natural selection causing the common people to adapt to the incremental discovery, adaptation to, and application of the laws of the universe. The jews practice the antithesis, in mythicism, parasitism, baiting into hazard, and authoritarianism necessary to continue ‘not producing, adapting, or evolving’. (D) Regarding Marx vs Locke and man as needing a society: This is again, more mythologizing justifying universalism. Jews live in a ‘society’ – one that has only recently in history converted to monogamy vs serial relationships. That society is dependent upon a host polity providing state, defense, and labor (commons), while simultaneously profiting from the undermining of those commons. Europeans instead lived in families and clans, and through rule of law, commons-ism, and individual sovereignty, suppressed sufficient parasitism that the only high trust civ in the world (at least north of the Hajnal Line) evolved, and repeated the greek and roman aristocratic models of a ‘middle-class rule’. (E) The conservatives understand that the intentional organized, Jewish undermining of western civilization by the oft and openly stated “destruction of the means of cultural production”, and the rapid expansion of parasitic industries: gambling, pornography, entertainment, media, insurance, consumer finance, undermining of rule of law, undermining of eugenic and evolutionary government – destroying the informational, cultural, and institutional commons, that made western commons-ism possible. (F) We have born the cost of the French secular catholic authoritarian counter-revolution against anglo-germanic empirical self-determination, rule of law, sovereignty, and common-ism that destroyed the greater German civilization. We have born the cost of the German Kantian secular-religious counter-revolution against empiricism and self-determination, and we and the Russians have born the cost of Jewish counter-revolution against empiricism. And we are still paying the cost of the Jewish pseudoscientific revolution across the entire intellectual spectrum” Freud, Boaz, Lewontin, Gould, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Krugman, Stiglitz, Samuelson, Picketty, Goolsbee, Sayer, Rez, Kelsey, Hart, Wittgenstein, Kripke, cantor, Bohr, and hundreds of others – all of the Jewish counter-revolution is to deny the laws of the universe: The formal (logical, truthful) physical (scarcity), natural (amorality, reciprocity, kin preference, sex, class, race, differences), evolutionary (mutation, load, natural selection, defeat of the red queen). They hate Western civilization because our success was dependent on continuing natural selection determined by productivity and suppression of imposition of costs on the commons because the jews exist by parasitism upon the commons. The jews created Judaism, Christianity, and Islam and the art of Abrahamic lying, which is as advanced a system of deceit as Aristotelian empiricism is of truth. The simple version is that the Jewish counter-revolution against darwin spencer Nietzsche et all, was a threat to their parasitic economy, society, and culture, and they have by design invaded, failed at selling their ideas, undermined our institutions, and immigrated by circumvention of our laws and our traditions, bringing about the second Bolshevik revolution and the second fall of Europe(Rome) to their lies. Do they know what they are doing? DO women know what they are doing? Some do and the rest follow. Conservatism (European traditional reciprocal grant of and insurance of self-determination by self-determined means, limiting reproduction those who do not export the costs of their reproduction onto the commons. Conservatives can’t win by selling we can only win by defense. We can defend by force directly as our ancestors have, or defend by improving our law to making the strategy tactics and methods Jewish undermining of civilization illegal, and teaching how to identify the Jewish means of Abrahamic baiting into hazard, by suggestion, deceit, and fraud, using false promise of evasion of the laws of the universe, advanced by sophistry (pilpul) and defended by undermining (critique), canceling, and denial. And this is relatively easy. Paul is one of the best of the Jewish revolt against western civilization, but he is in the end an enemy of our civilization. The idea of ‘minding your own business, and producing, and contributing to the commons, under via-negativa rule of law, rather than engaging in political persuasion is a genetic disposition of his tribe. TRUTH TEST: If you can’t write a constitution that can function as an operating system for your civilization, federation, state, and locality that is an improvement on the federal constitution and the federal code then you don’t know what the F—k you’re talking about. It’s extremely difficult. It exposes the failings of your thinking. It demonstrates the exclusivity of the thought of the founders. And with Scalia dead, I’m pretty sure there are maybe three to five of us living that can do that.
Form: Critique
-
Eh Review: “Doors” (sci fi), ’21, fails. Director failse at pretense of Nolan or
Eh Review: “Doors” (sci fi), ’21, fails. Director failse at pretense of Nolan or Malick, and the ‘kids’ introduction (as horror) conflcits with the adult (as dream state), and the other-side acting and visuals were terrible. I had to give up 2/3 of the way. Don’t overreach.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-23 22:36:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1374490243756220418
-
Answering Tamil Gendler’s Justification of Lefistm (Second Jewish Counter Revolution against Truth)
Just as Nozick answered Rawls, I’ll answer Gendler (And you won’t like it – especially because it’s true. ) This lecture, while explicative on its face, doesn’t, in fact, explain why philosophy failed, has been relegated to a branch of theology, is being defunded, and has been left in the dust by genetics, cognitive science, artificial intelligence, economics, and evolutionary biology and history: that reason being the revolution in thought that was created in northern Europe under the classical restoration (renaissance, empirical revolution, reformation,), mass literacy, the age of sail (in response to the Muslim blockade), allowed Europeans to escape the dead weight of landed aristocracy, parasitic church, and the Americans to escape the decadent peasantry as well, led to the sequence of agrarian, commercial, financial, industrial, and scientific revolutions. But the masses liberated from subsistence living (a) directed their class envy against ‘oppressors’ rather than the combination of nature’s fundamental laws, and their vulnerability to superstition and (b) had anthropomorphized the laws of nature in the aristocracy and church (state and faith) that had previously governed them, (c) despite that Descartes to Hilbert, Maxwell et all, Darwin, Menger, Malthus, Spencer, and Nietzsche had explained the reason for western success at ending poverty as caused by 5000 years of European culture’s and especially customary law’s, unique observance of those formal(logical), physical, natural(behavioral), and evolutionary laws – and natural eugenics (d) and thanks to the Jewish counter-revolution against the industrial and scientific revolution across the spectrum, creating a pseudoscientific superstition to replace the previous. So, Talmal Gendler (obviously Jewish, and selling the traditional Jewish false promise of freedom from those laws ) tries to justify the Marx-to-Rawls ‘Big Lie’ that we are free of formal, physical natural, and evolutionary laws. And that the second “big lie” of oppression conflates Europeans and their discovery, adaptation to, and application of those laws, exchanges constraint of the ‘unfit’ with that this is a European (white male) design – rather than Nature’s. Europeans and less so the Chinese, almost exclusively maintained natural selection. The Jewish counter-revolution against modernity has been as successful as the first Jewish (Christian) counter-revolution against modernity. Christianity (authoritarianism) may have only contributed to the downfall of the roman empire, but it guaranteed that it would not recover, prevented the industrial revolution from occurring before 500ad, and it created a dark age that cost us 1000 years of suffering, and the Muslim destruction of every great civilization of the ancient world: North Africa, Egypt, Levant, Mesopotamia, Greco-roman, Persian, and a vast portion of the original Indian civilization. A false promise of freedom from reality. The second Jewish counter-revolution promises the same, and is in the process of repeating the same dark ages. There is no reason that Rome did not recover, even from the plague, other than the Jewish (Christian) conversion of a civilization predicated on the primacy of life, the primacy of man, the evolution of man, and the transcendence of man into gods, into authoritarian superstition, stagnation, and decay. So far, while the French Revolution cost us empirical rule of law everywhere but the anglosphere, and cost us the holy roman empire, causing the consolidation of greater germanic peoples who have always been the heart of European civilization and in doing so created the french, catholic, authoritarian version of Jewish anti-civilization, the second Jewish counter-revolution against reason, science, and ‘truth’ has cost us Russia, and as a consequence, European Empires, that were dragging mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty,, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, victimization by a nature all but hostile to man. So the proper place of Marxist-to-Rawls “philosophy” is ‘another destructive theology’. It is not natural philosophy or moral philosophy in the European tradition. It is a theology in the Jewish Tradition of the end of scarcity, end of human nature (self-interest, amorality, reciprocity, and proportionality), and blaming host peoples (aristocracy) as a proxy for hating the universe (anthropomorphized as god). There is only one true evil on this planet and it is the Abrahamic religions in all their forms and sects, and the Abrahamic method of deceit, fraud, and cultural destruction: total war against evolution, science, reason, truth, and mankind. It is a religion, philosophy, pseudoscience, fraud, deceit, and denial, of hatred of reality. There is no difference between the second Jewish counter-revolution and the first other than the first was supernatural, and the second is pseudoscientific. THE HISTORY OF THE JEWISH COUNTER-REVOLUTION 1. Marxism(1850+): To cast Jewish condition as a universal condition. To undermine cooperation between the classes. To undermine European ascent into (recapture of) capital concentration. 2. Freudianism(90′-20’s): To undermine Darwin and Instincts 3. Boasianism(10-20’s): To undermine Darwin and integration 4. Cantor and Bohr: To undermine mathematical realism. 5. Neo-Marxism(50’s+): To undermine Darwinian Cultural Homogeneity. (Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, Antonio Gramsci) 6. Feminism(60’s+): To undermine Darwin and the Family. 7. Postmodernism(70’s+): To undermine Darwin, Truth, Science, Reason. 8. HBD-Denialism(80’s+): To blatantly deny Darwin and Evolution 9. Identitarianism(90’s+): To undermine the Darwinian European Peoples The full list is here: https://propertarianinstitute.com/2021/03/23/european-vs-jewish-intellectuals-the-jewish-war-on-science-and-reason/ 1. The Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter- Revolution 1850 … The anglo enfranchisement of the jews … (a) The Marxist and Jewish undermining of the Holy Roman Empire. … (b) The Bolshevik overthrow of Russian civilization … (c) The Communist Undermining of Germanic civilization … (d) The Communist seizure of power in France. … (e) The Communist, marxist, postmodernist, invasion and undermining of America.
-
Answering Tamil Gendler’s Justification of Lefistm (Second Jewish Counter Revolution against Truth)
Just as Nozick answered Rawls, I’ll answer Gendler (And you won’t like it – especially because it’s true. ) This lecture, while explicative on its face, doesn’t, in fact, explain why philosophy failed, has been relegated to a branch of theology, is being defunded, and has been left in the dust by genetics, cognitive science, artificial intelligence, economics, and evolutionary biology and history: that reason being the revolution in thought that was created in northern Europe under the classical restoration (renaissance, empirical revolution, reformation,), mass literacy, the age of sail (in response to the Muslim blockade), allowed Europeans to escape the dead weight of landed aristocracy, parasitic church, and the Americans to escape the decadent peasantry as well, led to the sequence of agrarian, commercial, financial, industrial, and scientific revolutions. But the masses liberated from subsistence living (a) directed their class envy against ‘oppressors’ rather than the combination of nature’s fundamental laws, and their vulnerability to superstition and (b) had anthropomorphized the laws of nature in the aristocracy and church (state and faith) that had previously governed them, (c) despite that Descartes to Hilbert, Maxwell et all, Darwin, Menger, Malthus, Spencer, and Nietzsche had explained the reason for western success at ending poverty as caused by 5000 years of European culture’s and especially customary law’s, unique observance of those formal(logical), physical, natural(behavioral), and evolutionary laws – and natural eugenics (d) and thanks to the Jewish counter-revolution against the industrial and scientific revolution across the spectrum, creating a pseudoscientific superstition to replace the previous. So, Talmal Gendler (obviously Jewish, and selling the traditional Jewish false promise of freedom from those laws ) tries to justify the Marx-to-Rawls ‘Big Lie’ that we are free of formal, physical natural, and evolutionary laws. And that the second “big lie” of oppression conflates Europeans and their discovery, adaptation to, and application of those laws, exchanges constraint of the ‘unfit’ with that this is a European (white male) design – rather than Nature’s. Europeans and less so the Chinese, almost exclusively maintained natural selection. The Jewish counter-revolution against modernity has been as successful as the first Jewish (Christian) counter-revolution against modernity. Christianity (authoritarianism) may have only contributed to the downfall of the roman empire, but it guaranteed that it would not recover, prevented the industrial revolution from occurring before 500ad, and it created a dark age that cost us 1000 years of suffering, and the Muslim destruction of every great civilization of the ancient world: North Africa, Egypt, Levant, Mesopotamia, Greco-roman, Persian, and a vast portion of the original Indian civilization. A false promise of freedom from reality. The second Jewish counter-revolution promises the same, and is in the process of repeating the same dark ages. There is no reason that Rome did not recover, even from the plague, other than the Jewish (Christian) conversion of a civilization predicated on the primacy of life, the primacy of man, the evolution of man, and the transcendence of man into gods, into authoritarian superstition, stagnation, and decay. So far, while the French Revolution cost us empirical rule of law everywhere but the anglosphere, and cost us the holy roman empire, causing the consolidation of greater germanic peoples who have always been the heart of European civilization and in doing so created the french, catholic, authoritarian version of Jewish anti-civilization, the second Jewish counter-revolution against reason, science, and ‘truth’ has cost us Russia, and as a consequence, European Empires, that were dragging mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty,, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, victimization by a nature all but hostile to man. So the proper place of Marxist-to-Rawls “philosophy” is ‘another destructive theology’. It is not natural philosophy or moral philosophy in the European tradition. It is a theology in the Jewish Tradition of the end of scarcity, end of human nature (self-interest, amorality, reciprocity, and proportionality), and blaming host peoples (aristocracy) as a proxy for hating the universe (anthropomorphized as god). There is only one true evil on this planet and it is the Abrahamic religions in all their forms and sects, and the Abrahamic method of deceit, fraud, and cultural destruction: total war against evolution, science, reason, truth, and mankind. It is a religion, philosophy, pseudoscience, fraud, deceit, and denial, of hatred of reality. There is no difference between the second Jewish counter-revolution and the first other than the first was supernatural, and the second is pseudoscientific. THE HISTORY OF THE JEWISH COUNTER-REVOLUTION 1. Marxism(1850+): To cast Jewish condition as a universal condition. To undermine cooperation between the classes. To undermine European ascent into (recapture of) capital concentration. 2. Freudianism(90′-20’s): To undermine Darwin and Instincts 3. Boasianism(10-20’s): To undermine Darwin and integration 4. Cantor and Bohr: To undermine mathematical realism. 5. Neo-Marxism(50’s+): To undermine Darwinian Cultural Homogeneity. (Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, Antonio Gramsci) 6. Feminism(60’s+): To undermine Darwin and the Family. 7. Postmodernism(70’s+): To undermine Darwin, Truth, Science, Reason. 8. HBD-Denialism(80’s+): To blatantly deny Darwin and Evolution 9. Identitarianism(90’s+): To undermine the Darwinian European Peoples The full list is here: https://propertarianinstitute.com/2021/03/23/european-vs-jewish-intellectuals-the-jewish-war-on-science-and-reason/ 1. The Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter- Revolution 1850 … The anglo enfranchisement of the jews … (a) The Marxist and Jewish undermining of the Holy Roman Empire. … (b) The Bolshevik overthrow of Russian civilization … (c) The Communist Undermining of Germanic civilization … (d) The Communist seizure of power in France. … (e) The Communist, marxist, postmodernist, invasion and undermining of America.
-
Stop lying. Blame the dems for tolerating the offshoring of strategic industries
Stop lying. Blame the dems for tolerating the offshoring of strategic industries; allowing CDC and WHO to be political caretaking rather than biological warfare organizations – without any stress testing. And gutting civic militarization so we can’t react quickly.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-12 14:30:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1370381614845472768
Reply addressees: @EndTrumpsLies
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1370235409507123203
-
That said I love the show and my frustration is only that you have to be true to
That said I love the show and my frustration is only that you have to be true to the work or the audience knows it. And drama is a cheap way of turning 42 minute episodes of meaning into 60 minute episodes one must endure. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1369735895084118019
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-10 19:45:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1369736175536267273
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1369735895084118019
-
#Debris #debrisnbc You have a great high concept, and a great arc to carry it wi
#Debris #debrisnbc You have a great high concept, and a great arc to carry it with. But I’m guessing studio interference with the choice of director and casting rather than letting the story carry itself. This show requires clean law and order episodes. Not sci-fi soap opera.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-10 19:44:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1369735895084118019
-
Penrose’s Platonism
I would love to explain mathematics to Roger – it would annoy the daylights out of him – because his platonism would be eradicated forever.
( insert nonsense response from moron here)
Roger is a mathematical platonist. Most mathematical platonists – including Roger – lack the vocabulary to evolve to join the computational (operational) revolution of ‘sciencing’ mathematics. Leaving behind set (ideal and verbal) foundations and converting to operational (real) foundations. Roger’s strength is that despite being a mathematical platonist, he creates mental models, instead of treating mathematical symbolism as a language (sophistry). Pure mathematics (measurement and deduction) and Mathematical physics (description of constant religions ) differ in their tolerance. The reason Roger is successful despite his mathematical platonism is his mental models: realism. If you were anywhere near as informed on the subject of the conflict over the foundations of mathematics you would at least have a vague understanding that this was a primary research problem in the past and that the operationlists succeeded in some disciplines (physics) but failed in others (mathematics) and that at least at present, the operationalists (computationalist) are winning that battle for rather obvious reasons: the field of computable descriptions is greater than the field of calculable descriptions because in the end, mathematics breaks down at the extremes because it is all fundamentally statistical not causal at extremes. (which might take a bit of work to understand). As such Economics and Fundamental Physics break down. As for my content, the fact that science explains ‘conservatism’ and ‘progressivism’ as eugenic and dysgenic is not novel. What’s novel is the completeness of the model from first causes, creating a continuous coherent paradigm through physical, biology, cognition, language, and behavior and consequences. As Popper suggested, there are sources of ignorance. Sources of ignorance prevent knowledge and understanding. Those sources of ignorance tend to provide an incentive to deny or evade the formal, physical, cooperative, and evolutionary laws of the universe. The self-test is rather simple: Does your preference, belief or argument seek to circumvent formal, physical, natural, or evolutionary laws? If so then it’s a natural cognitive (social) bias. And it’s false. Cheers.
-
Penrose’s Platonism
I would love to explain mathematics to Roger – it would annoy the daylights out of him – because his platonism would be eradicated forever.
( insert nonsense response from moron here)
Roger is a mathematical platonist. Most mathematical platonists – including Roger – lack the vocabulary to evolve to join the computational (operational) revolution of ‘sciencing’ mathematics. Leaving behind set (ideal and verbal) foundations and converting to operational (real) foundations. Roger’s strength is that despite being a mathematical platonist, he creates mental models, instead of treating mathematical symbolism as a language (sophistry). Pure mathematics (measurement and deduction) and Mathematical physics (description of constant religions ) differ in their tolerance. The reason Roger is successful despite his mathematical platonism is his mental models: realism. If you were anywhere near as informed on the subject of the conflict over the foundations of mathematics you would at least have a vague understanding that this was a primary research problem in the past and that the operationlists succeeded in some disciplines (physics) but failed in others (mathematics) and that at least at present, the operationalists (computationalist) are winning that battle for rather obvious reasons: the field of computable descriptions is greater than the field of calculable descriptions because in the end, mathematics breaks down at the extremes because it is all fundamentally statistical not causal at extremes. (which might take a bit of work to understand). As such Economics and Fundamental Physics break down. As for my content, the fact that science explains ‘conservatism’ and ‘progressivism’ as eugenic and dysgenic is not novel. What’s novel is the completeness of the model from first causes, creating a continuous coherent paradigm through physical, biology, cognition, language, and behavior and consequences. As Popper suggested, there are sources of ignorance. Sources of ignorance prevent knowledge and understanding. Those sources of ignorance tend to provide an incentive to deny or evade the formal, physical, cooperative, and evolutionary laws of the universe. The self-test is rather simple: Does your preference, belief or argument seek to circumvent formal, physical, natural, or evolutionary laws? If so then it’s a natural cognitive (social) bias. And it’s false. Cheers.
-
(there isn’t one. he’s a gossip. he’s just a highly intellectualized gossip. nev
(there isn’t one. he’s a gossip. he’s just a highly intellectualized gossip. never take insightful critique as an insightful solution. he doesn’t have any. whining attracts commiseration. solutions attract opposition. he fears that opposition.)
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-09 18:53:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1369360736112246784
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago @TVTBennyhana @squared_tb @Boba_Tett @stranahan @DanielSchmacht1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1369360061361922048