This video offers nothing other than sedation and false comfort in a nihilistic fallacy of powerlessness and fatalism. The capitalism vs socialism dichotomy is an Abrahamic deception that implies there is any alternative to a mixed economy – that there ever was or will be. If instead of philosophical terms, we use scientific terms, we discover that the question is one of rule of law by the natural law of reciprocity that our ancestors practiced for millennia or rule by man that every state has sought to bring into being by one trope or artifice or another. If one practices rule of law of reciprocity then you obtain moral markets that include moral capitalists in the sense that moral means reciprocal (non-parasitic). If one practices positive law and capitalism one obtains immoral markets that produce a parasitic global cast that serves as states within states and states across states at the expense of the most developed peoples. If one practices socialism (communism is no more possible than anarchism) then that’s rule by man and not markets and not law. That generates demand for corruption and black markets and low returns on capital. But this triangulation implies that any given political order is stable. Instead, there are times of war and scarcity (total war, Fascism), times of peace and prosperity (rule of law, markets), and there are times of windfalls (redistribution, socialism), and any and all polities must remain sufficiently anti-fragile, with sufficient free capital (inefficiency) such that e can adapt to any condition on the spectrum. The government that achieves this end is rule of law of natural law, monarchy as a judge of last resort (Elizabeth II) a professional cabinet, a set of ‘houses’ of the ‘jury’ with veto power, and the intergenerational family as the subject of all policy. This government can adapt to conditions of war, going concern, and prosperity, without institutionalizing a monopoly method of organization that CANNOT adapt to changes. We have the ultimate government in the UK before the war. Churchill’s unnecessary war cost us the British empire and the gradual domestication of the animal man. And the loss of confidence and our empires was vulnerable the folly the march through our institutions by an enemy that conducts total war. And Europeans are vulnerable to total war as we have seen with china’s rise. Ergo: we have the government and we have the rule of law, but we have destroyed the method of making use of it, and we have tolerated information, demographic, and political warfare against the foundations of our civilization and our reason.
Form: Critique
-
This video offers nothing other than sedation and false comfort in a nihilistic
This video offers nothing other than sedation and false comfort in a nihilistic fallacy of powerlessness and fatalism. The capitalism vs socialism dichotomy is an Abrahamic deception that implies there is any alternative to a mixed economy – that there ever was or will be. If instead of philosophical terms, we use scientific terms, we discover that the question is one of rule of law by the natural law of reciprocity that our ancestors practiced for millennia or rule by man that every state has sought to bring into being by one trope or artifice or another. If one practices rule of law of reciprocity then you obtain moral markets that include moral capitalists in the sense that moral means reciprocal (non-parasitic). If one practices positive law and capitalism one obtains immoral markets that produce a parasitic global cast that serves as states within states and states across states at the expense of the most developed peoples. If one practices socialism (communism is no more possible than anarchism) then that’s rule by man and not markets and not law. That generates demand for corruption and black markets and low returns on capital. But this triangulation implies that any given political order is stable. Instead, there are times of war and scarcity (total war, Fascism), times of peace and prosperity (rule of law, markets), and there are times of windfalls (redistribution, socialism), and any and all polities must remain sufficiently anti-fragile, with sufficient free capital (inefficiency) such that e can adapt to any condition on the spectrum. The government that achieves this end is rule of law of natural law, monarchy as a judge of last resort (Elizabeth II) a professional cabinet, a set of ‘houses’ of the ‘jury’ with veto power, and the intergenerational family as the subject of all policy. This government can adapt to conditions of war, going concern, and prosperity, without institutionalizing a monopoly method of organization that CANNOT adapt to changes. We have the ultimate government in the UK before the war. Churchill’s unnecessary war cost us the British empire and the gradual domestication of the animal man. And the loss of confidence and our empires was vulnerable the folly the march through our institutions by an enemy that conducts total war. And Europeans are vulnerable to total war as we have seen with china’s rise. Ergo: we have the government and we have the rule of law, but we have destroyed the method of making use of it, and we have tolerated information, demographic, and political warfare against the foundations of our civilization and our reason.
-
One would only read continental philosophy if one was not competent to read cont
One would only read continental philosophy if one was not competent to read contemporary algorithmic logic, genetics, cognitive science, behavioral economics. Philosophy as a paradigm, as knowledge, and truth rather than just choice (preferencde) was exhausted before the 20th, and has gone the way of theology as a footnote in the history of thought. If you invest in the frame provided by the French(Rousseau, Voltaire et al), Germans (Kant et all), or the Ashkenazi (Freud, boas, Marx, et al) then you create an impediment to knowledge, not knowledge. Every single one of those thinkers was trying to deny anglo empiricism and legalism, and to create a secular theology to replace the church – because most if not all people who are indoctrinated into the Abrahamic faiths are left vulnerable to lack of sufficient confidence and resulting mindfulness to bear the continuous struggle of continuous learning, reorganization, and adaptation that adversarial empiricism demands. Or said differently, continental philosophy serves as a psudoscientific range from Russian, to German, to french, to Ashkenazi that seeks to avoid the responsibility of the restoration of Aristotelianism and classical thought. The weak west is addicted to the false promise of false explanations because we lack a narrative or mythos that provides mindfulness in the face of continuous adaptation to the discovery of, application of, and consequences of our increasing correspondence with the laws of the universe. This is why we require military training to compensate for Christian doctrine. And is why the Greeks invented tragedy so that we could tolerate it. And why Jesus of Nazareth discovered and taught the only means of getting over that tragedy for the bottom: the extension of kinship love to all in the polity. But the Paulians abused that message by wrapping it in false promise of freedom from those laws, rather than the use of love and compassion to tolerate them. In other words, this video is yet another exercise in justifying western man’s Christian addiction to submission and cowardice as a pretense of conviction rather than a convenience of not taking responsibility for dragging one’s self, and one’s people out of superstition, ignorance, dysgenia, and decline. So the people who are weak seek pseudoscience and sophistry as sedation against the stress of the recognition of their unfitness to survive because they cannot or will not evolve along with the state of human knowledge in our long journey from beast, to man, to godhood ourselves. The reason the white disenfranchised are alienated, conquered, and defeated is their Christian cowardice masquerading as false pride and conviction – but nothing more than addicts to a frame of lies, and spending down a civilization built by better men.
-
One would only read continental philosophy if one was not competent to read cont
One would only read continental philosophy if one was not competent to read contemporary algorithmic logic, genetics, cognitive science, behavioral economics. Philosophy as a paradigm, as knowledge, and truth rather than just choice (preferencde) was exhausted before the 20th, and has gone the way of theology as a footnote in the history of thought. If you invest in the frame provided by the French(Rousseau, Voltaire et al), Germans (Kant et all), or the Ashkenazi (Freud, boas, Marx, et al) then you create an impediment to knowledge, not knowledge. Every single one of those thinkers was trying to deny anglo empiricism and legalism, and to create a secular theology to replace the church – because most if not all people who are indoctrinated into the Abrahamic faiths are left vulnerable to lack of sufficient confidence and resulting mindfulness to bear the continuous struggle of continuous learning, reorganization, and adaptation that adversarial empiricism demands. Or said differently, continental philosophy serves as a psudoscientific range from Russian, to German, to french, to Ashkenazi that seeks to avoid the responsibility of the restoration of Aristotelianism and classical thought. The weak west is addicted to the false promise of false explanations because we lack a narrative or mythos that provides mindfulness in the face of continuous adaptation to the discovery of, application of, and consequences of our increasing correspondence with the laws of the universe. This is why we require military training to compensate for Christian doctrine. And is why the Greeks invented tragedy so that we could tolerate it. And why Jesus of Nazareth discovered and taught the only means of getting over that tragedy for the bottom: the extension of kinship love to all in the polity. But the Paulians abused that message by wrapping it in false promise of freedom from those laws, rather than the use of love and compassion to tolerate them. In other words, this video is yet another exercise in justifying western man’s Christian addiction to submission and cowardice as a pretense of conviction rather than a convenience of not taking responsibility for dragging one’s self, and one’s people out of superstition, ignorance, dysgenia, and decline. So the people who are weak seek pseudoscience and sophistry as sedation against the stress of the recognition of their unfitness to survive because they cannot or will not evolve along with the state of human knowledge in our long journey from beast, to man, to godhood ourselves. The reason the white disenfranchised are alienated, conquered, and defeated is their Christian cowardice masquerading as false pride and conviction – but nothing more than addicts to a frame of lies, and spending down a civilization built by better men.
-
Ego the fallacy of pretense of the neutrality of belief. You don’t consider that
Ego the fallacy of pretense of the neutrality of belief.
You don’t consider that the purpose of defending belief is exclusively to commit crimes. And like all criminals you think these crimes are justified.
I do law, not philosophy, ideology, or theology.
I deal with crimes.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-07 15:47:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358442241254191105
Reply addressees: @FL1420
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358437928557502467
-
So all I have to do is discover and list the crimes you commit that you justify
So all I have to do is discover and list the crimes you commit that you justify with this lie. All of which are relatively easy.
This is because you you think you’re are conducting a debate over belief or opinion w/o consequences not prosecution of and defense against crimes.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-07 15:45:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358441695197736965
Reply addressees: @FL1420
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358437928557502467
-
There is never, ever a comparison between a conversation with an physicist, engi
There is never, ever a comparison between a conversation with an physicist, engineer, or economist that is vapid as someone in the humanities. It is however, more pleasant going through life in secular theology of the humanities, just as more blissful in supernatural theology.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 12:56:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358036878201651202
Reply addressees: @AlanLevinovitz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358036241489551362
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@AlanLevinovitz Because 1) humanities grads must learn on the job, the skills that are taught in STEM fields- and eventually do 2) must ‘unlearn’ what they were taught was false – and eventually do 3) and the net difference is that non-STEM education cost was a LOSS, and STEM students earned it.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1358036241489551362
-
DUGGIN’S FOURTH THEORY ISN’T. IT’S JUST FASCISM Duggin avoids fascism for the si
DUGGIN’S FOURTH THEORY ISN’T. IT’S JUST FASCISM
Duggin avoids fascism for the simple reason that the present Russian civilizational narrative is the great heroic war against the fascists in germany.
- Fourth Position – Duggin’s combination of liberal democracy, Marxism, and Fascism: “Spengler said it better without all the pseudo-philosophy “
- Third Position – Fascism
- Second Position – Communism
- First Position – Liberalism-Capitalism
And: - Zeroth Position – Theology: Abrahamism: Judaism, Islam, Christianity
IMO Abrahamism is dead, Liberalism is dead, Socialism is dead, and Communism is dead. And Fascism – ethno-nationalism at total war of self-defense against every kind of globalism – creates a balance between the natural conflict of ethnicities, civilizations and races.
Duggin is a fascist just like I’m a fascist – it’s the only non-globalist ethnicity-preserving, culture-preserving, civilization preserving.
Fascism is nothing other than total war against the variations on Abrahamism: globalism by destruction of all.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-03 03:27:34 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105665190542187544
- Fourth Position – Duggin’s combination of liberal democracy, Marxism, and Fascism: “Spengler said it better without all the pseudo-philosophy “
-
Pynchon is a master craftsman like Joyce but he isn’t luscious like Pope or Shak
Pynchon is a master craftsman like Joyce but he isn’t luscious like Pope or Shakespeare. I don’t love fiction and prefer Durant, who cannot decide whether to write history or poetry so conflates both. McCarthy is so deep that one doesn’t wish to come up for air – dark & drowning.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-31 04:37:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355736906445836289
-
Apparently, Christians don’t study the criminal and psychological research on sc
Apparently, Christians don’t study the criminal and psychological research on scam artists, faith healers, fortune tellers, magicians, and prophets.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-31 04:07:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355729383986769921
Reply addressees: @ResistingMordor
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355728628169003008