Curt Doolittle

Form: Critique

  • @firstpost Palki (and team) This reporting is out of hand, duplicitous, and dece

    @firstpost
    Palki (and team)

    This reporting is out of hand, duplicitous, and deceitful.

    You know, I think we’re all behind Indian nationalism. And we consider India part of the family along with Japan and Korea. But this is destructive nonsense.

    India is benefiting profoundly from the discount on Russian oil prices… so India is profiting from instability. Why aren’t you calculating the billions that India has saved just like the american companies have made.

    American postwar policy sought to end empires and the resulting world wars, by promoting free trade, borders, human rights, and national sovereignty. And we raised the world out of poverty by doing so at the expense of our own working, laboring, and middle classes.

    Russia has violated the postwar agreement, china has, Iraq has, Iran tries to constantly. But just as China violates your borders and you don’t ask our permission or our assistance, our looser federation of european peoples, whether the many states of the european continent or our large ‘islands’ of Australia, America, and UK, choose to defend our people: the people who want freedom democracy and self determination by self determined means.

    At this point, I could start a news channel producing daily content on Indian propaganda that’s destructive of international relations by the same self congratulatory virtue signaling like the europeans did until their folly was exposed by Russian aggression. Just as India’s governmental weakness is exposed by Chinese literacy economy, and strategic aggression.

    So, stop fomenting conflict between our countries. Otherwise, we’re not the ones who lose out. The USA is autarkic both in resources, population, economics, and strategic defence.

    We didn’t make the modern world perfectly. But we did it better than anyone else, and at our expense rather than for our profit.

    The present rate of isolation, repatriation of industrialization, and our subsequent withdrawal of military policing of world assets, finance, transport, and trade, will cause the restoration of imperial age (pre war, pre-british empire) fragmentation, monopolization, and exclusion. And the consequence will mean the absolute collapse or colonization or conquest those (many) countries that cannot survive without our ‘continued investment against our interest’.

    No one is winning this war. Everyone is losing. In fact, given the dollars you’ve mentioned, It’s India and china benefitting from this war, while the rest of us are bearing incredible costs to conduct it, and we have to reverse our ‘peace dividend’ and restore previous levels of military and strategic spending we had thought we had left behind.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-09 20:32:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656034356811517953

  • You are, he is, an advocate of and defender of fundamentalism, which is why you

    You are, he is, an advocate of and defender of fundamentalism, which is why you levy no counter proposition, and instead demonstrate indoctrination into the abrahamic method of deception by false pretence of knowledge, personal undermining, and rallying instead of an argument equally open to testing, criticism, and falsification. I dont engage with liars. Arrogance ignorance and lack of intelligence are obstale enough to truth as it is.

    Reply addressees: @PPromulgation @NoWhiteGuiltNWG

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-08 05:41:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655447916121579523

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655442915030708225

  • One of the better amature attempts I’ve seen. Does avoid any nonsense claims or

    One of the better amature attempts I’ve seen. Does avoid any nonsense claims or magical thinking (very nice), doesn’t solve the central problems of modernity (lying), but does create a decent government for managing a small homogeneous polity. So in that sense ‘well done’.

    What I’d suggest for your further thought, is you try to address the tendency of religions, cults including philosophical and pseudoscientific cults, academics, and politicians, to sell false and impossible promises that the physical behavioral and evolutionary laws of nature are avoidable or escapable, and the tendency of the unfit to demand redistributions, and the tendency of women to avoid all possible responsibility for self or commons and to vote for them.

    The only reason to have the crisis of the present – and every major crisis since the 1890s, is the sale of false and impossible promises, and the introgression of non-europeans, then our working classes , and then women, into the polity. Because theyu’re the groups that vote for irresponsibility. And what you’ve proposed is a contractual government for those who are willing to act responsibly – without excluding the ability to sell false promises (frauds), and/or excluding those who demonstrate evasion of those responsibilities, and/or those who would vote for those irresponsibilities. 😉

    All in all well done. (I assume you’re under 30, and likely under 25, and so that’s pretty good work for the present day). 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-26 23:22:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651366218958352384

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651361621610995713

  • One of the better amature attempts I’ve seen. Does avoid any nonsense claims or

    One of the better amature attempts I’ve seen. Does avoid any nonsense claims or magical thinking (very nice), doesn’t solve the central problems of modernity (lying), but does create a decent government for managing a small homogeneous polity. So in that sense ‘well done’.

    What I’d suggest for your further thought, is you try to address the tendency of religions, cults including philosophical and pseudoscientific cults, academics, and politicians, to sell false and impossible promises that the physical behavioral and evolutionary laws of nature are avoidable or escapable, and the tendency of the unfit to demand redistributions, and the tendency of women to avoid all possible responsibility for self or commons and to vote for them.

    The only reason to have the crisis of the present – and every major crisis since the 1890s, is the sale of false and impossible promises, and the introgression of non-europeans, then our working classes , and then women, into the polity. Because theyu’re the groups that vote for irresponsibility. And what you’ve proposed is a contractual government for those who are willing to act responsibly – without excluding the ability to sell false promises (frauds), and/or excluding those who demonstrate evasion of those responsibilities, and/or those who would vote for those irresponsibilities. 😉

    All in all well done. (I assume you’re under 30, and likely under 25, and so that’s pretty good work for the present day). 😉

    Reply addressees: @NoahsArkology

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-26 23:22:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651366218782195714

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651361621610995713

  • Humorously rather obvious that none of that follows from anything I said, becaus

    Humorously rather obvious that none of that follows from anything I said, because you’re asserting pretenst of knowledge, understanding, and competency by demonstrating the opposite.

    Instead, given sex differences in cognitive bias, by difference in:

    female in-time empathizing, mimimization of and evasion of responsibility for the commons, and hypreconsumtion as means of status seeking, and as such are biased to magical thinking (demand)

    -vs-

    male over-time systematizing maximization of and competition for responsibility for the commons and capitalization as means of status seeking, and as such are biased to empirical thinking (supply)

    then:

    The sphere of competency of the sexes, including genetic in origin, developmental, and self-selection bias, is demonstrated in the consequence of sex differences in self-evaluation, moral-intuition, and behavior in speech, social, economic, and most importantly political consequences. Where women vote irresponsibility and men for responsibility. Or at least women vote irresponsibly until they have three or more children;

    And where, given that men create liberty by physical mechanical and institutional means, lead in the creation of it, and women follow in opportunity as a consequence, so laws that constrain male antisocial behavior are later followed by laws that constrain female antisocial behavior;

    And given male antisocial behavior is intolerable at both individual and political scale, but female antisocial behavior is (at present) tolerated at individual and political scale, we have used the law to suppress male antisocial behavior, but not female antisocial behavior.

    And as such we are currently running an extraordinary experiment in tolerance for female antisocial behavior at interpersonal, familial, social, economic, and political scale that is leading to a choice to repeat the collapse of every other civilization that has tolerated female antisocial behavior (that they call moral) at political scale, or we will (as expected and as I work toward) outlaw female antisocial behavior in the present as we have in the past under the common law that imposed equal constraints on men and women for their sex differences in antisocial behavior.

    Every major failure of legislation and policy that has led to the cultural collapse we call the culture war has only been possible under ‘positive law’ and the introgression of women into the voting pool.

    Now you won’t refute this because you can’t.

    You can sperg out about it. You can outrage about it. You can ad hominem about it. But it’s true. Sorry. Every good has resulted from the prosperity made possible by the sequence of scientific, technological, and medical revolutions men created. Every single one. And almost exclusively european men. In each of the steel, iron, and bronze ages of mankind.

    Democracy is a privilege of rule of law of the natural law of reciprocal (male) insurance of self determination by self determined means by soverignty in demonstrated intersets and reciprocity in display word and deed.

    And primary among those is the obligation to speak the truth regardless of cost (reals over feels) and women can’t appear to do so in sufficient numbers to maintain the privileges that result from adhering to those criteria of natural law.

    It’s not even clear that most women are capable of sufficient ‘disconnect’ between emotions and evidence to make rational adult thought on problems of scale.

    And yes, that’s – the science. Sorry.
    We’ve been trying to find just one woman – just ONE – that’s capable of the marginal genius that men provide with every generation, specifically because of the disconnection and systematizing of the male mind. And no matter how hard we try, we can’t find one.

    But we can find a lot of women who believe in magical thinking, manifestation, astrology, and oppression narratives as a means of evading the responsibility of rational thought.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-18 16:51:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648368749597147136

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648362074441957377

  • Humorously rather obvious that none of that follows from anything I said, becaus

    Humorously rather obvious that none of that follows from anything I said, because you’re asserting pretenst of knowledge, understanding, and competency by demonstrating the opposite.

    Instead, given sex differences in cognitive bias, by difference in:

    female in-time empathizing, mimimization of and evasion of responsibility for the commons, and hypreconsumtion as means of status seeking, and as such are biased to magical thinking (demand)

    -vs-

    male over-time systematizing maximization of and competition for responsibility for the commons and capitalization as means of status seeking, and as such are biased to empirical thinking (supply)

    then:

    The sphere of competency of the sexes, including genetic in origin, developmental, and self-selection bias, is demonstrated in the consequence of sex differences in self-evaluation, moral-intuition, and behavior in speech, social, economic, and most importantly political consequences. Where women vote irresponsibility and men for responsibility. Or at least women vote irresponsibly until they have three or more children;

    And where, given that men create liberty by physical mechanical and institutional means, lead in the creation of it, and women follow in opportunity as a consequence, so laws that constrain male antisocial behavior are later followed by laws that constrain female antisocial behavior;

    And given male antisocial behavior is intolerable at both individual and political scale, but female antisocial behavior is (at present) tolerated at individual and political scale, we have used the law to suppress male antisocial behavior, but not female antisocial behavior.

    And as such we are currently running an extraordinary experiment in tolerance for female antisocial behavior at interpersonal, familial, social, economic, and political scale that is leading to a choice to repeat the collapse of every other civilization that has tolerated female antisocial behavior (that they call moral) at political scale, or we will (as expected and as I work toward) outlaw female antisocial behavior in the present as we have in the past under the common law that imposed equal constraints on men and women for their sex differences in antisocial behavior.

    Every major failure of legislation and policy that has led to the cultural collapse we call the culture war has only been possible under ‘positive law’ and the introgression of women into the voting pool.

    Now you won’t refute this because you can’t.

    You can sperg out about it. You can outrage about it. You can ad hominem about it. But it’s true. Sorry. Every good has resulted from the prosperity made possible by the sequence of scientific, technological, and medical revolutions men created. Every single one. And almost exclusively european men. In each of the steel, iron, and bronze ages of mankind.

    Democracy is a privilege of rule of law of the natural law of reciprocal (male) insurance of self determination by self determined means by soverignty in demonstrated intersets and reciprocity in display word and deed.

    And primary among those is the obligation to speak the truth regardless of cost (reals over feels) and women can’t appear to do so in sufficient numbers to maintain the privileges that result from adhering to those criteria of natural law.

    It’s not even clear that most women are capable of sufficient ‘disconnect’ between emotions and evidence to make rational adult thought on problems of scale.

    And yes, that’s – the science. Sorry.
    We’ve been trying to find just one woman – just ONE – that’s capable of the marginal genius that men provide with every generation, specifically because of the disconnection and systematizing of the male mind. And no matter how hard we try, we can’t find one.

    But we can find a lot of women who believe in magical thinking, manifestation, astrology, and oppression narratives as a means of evading the responsibility of rational thought.

    Reply addressees: @DanielGregT @TysonBay @gentKarter91 @KaeleyT @RealCandaceO

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-18 16:51:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648368749253218304

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648362074441957377

  • THE CURSE OF WELL-MEANING FOOLS Had to block a ‘whataboutist’ practicing ‘whatab

    THE CURSE OF WELL-MEANING FOOLS
    Had to block a ‘whataboutist’ practicing ‘whataboutery’ yesterday who polluted every discussion by making excuses for everything imaginable. This person is male but effeminate in cognition, and ‘spiritual’ rather than empirical, and has the odd attraction to music, all of which are forms of self-gratification and emotional hyperconsumption.

    We had it right by limiting political participation to demonstrated competency.

    Our ‘solution’ is to increase the number of houses to separate those with demonstrated competency and demonstrated contribution to the commons by that competency, from those without having done so.

    Yes, rule of law matters far more than democracy. Yes it’s not clear that democracy is a net good rather than a net bad. But it is abundantly clear that unearned democratic participation is absolutely positively a net bad. And unearned democratic participation in the absence of rule of law of natural law, is just a slower road to totalitarianism, and the collapse that follows.

    The method of government is almost irrelevant. It’s rule of law by the natural law of self-determination, sovereignty and reciprocity that matters. Everything else ‘good’ is merely a privilege of having succeeded at it.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-15 14:02:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647238952196227072

  • THE CURSE OF WELL-MEANING FOOLS Had to block a ‘whataboutist’ practicing ‘whatab

    THE CURSE OF WELL-MEANING FOOLS
    Had to block a ‘whataboutist’ practicing ‘whataboutery’ yesterday who polluted every discussion by making excuses for everything imaginable. This person is male but effeminate in cognition, and ‘spiritual’ rather than empirical, and has the odd attraction to music, all of which are forms of self-gratification and emotional hyperconsumption.

    We had it right by limiting political participation to demonstrated competency.

    Our ‘solution’ is to increase the number of houses to separate those with demonstrated competency and demonstrated contribution to the commons by that competency, from those without having done so.

    Yes, rule of law matters far more than democracy. Yes it’s not clear that democracy is a net good rather than a net bad. But it is abundantly clear that unearned democratic participation is absolutely positively a net bad. And unearned democratic participation in the absence of rule of law of natural law, is just a slower road to totalitarianism, and the collapse that follows.

    The method of government is almost irrelevant. It’s rule of law by the natural law of self-determination, sovereignty and reciprocity that matters. Everything else ‘good’ is merely a privilege of having succeeded at it.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-15 14:02:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647238952032641024

  • NOW, WATCH GPT-4 FAIL WITHOUT A SPECIFIC PROMPT: PROMPT –“Can you precisely lis

    NOW, WATCH GPT-4 FAIL WITHOUT A SPECIFIC PROMPT:

    PROMPT
    –“Can you precisely list the criteria for Curt Doolittle’s Testimonial Truth?”–

    Yes, I can list the criteria for Curt Doolittle’s Testimonial Truth.

    Curt Doolittle’s Testimonial Truth is a method for determining the… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1646937234170339329

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-14 19:10:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646954142475100161

  • The problem isnt so much ‘news’ (awareness) but analysis) vs Political Posturing

    The problem isnt so much ‘news’ (awareness) but analysis) vs Political Posturing. I sort of run news while I’m working. The truth is not much of it’s worthy of recommendation. I just think the TLDR guys are the new generation of pretty honest reporters and that they’re pretty balanced and accurate in their analysis.

    TLDR News, Drivingmarkets, StoicMedia, Economics Explained, Zeihan, Caspian Report, WhatifaltHist, Kings and Generals.

    Mostly I enjoy channels that educate the public so that I don’t have to. 😉

    Reply addressees: @WalterIII

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-14 16:25:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646912490544979969

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646890690784395269