Curt Doolittle

Form: Critique

  • For a guy that mass produces magical thinking on a daily basis, pretends knowled

    For a guy that mass produces magical thinking on a daily basis, pretends knowledge and understanding he doesn’t possess, engages in feminine social construction, using the feminine techniques of seduction into false promises, using the Jewish Marxist techniques of pilpul, critique, and personalizing, heaping undue praise and undue criticism, is a serial cheater on his wives, and LARPS for the dysfunctional lost boys with room temperature IQs, and who certainly can’t grasp even the basic foundations of my work, you’re just demonstrating I’m correct in the most exemplary fashion possible.
    In fact you’re the canonical example of the feminine, Jewish, Abrahamic, Marxist method of seduction and fraud by selling false promise, with magical thinking, sophistry, and critique to an alienated underclass who can sit at home and LARP that they’re virtuous, rather than the powerless, cowardly, weak, incompetent losers that deserve their low status in life. Playing savior to the vulgar peasantry.
    I don’t come after you out of respect for our past conversations which I viewed positively despite our differences. I expect the same treatment in return, or out of reciprocity I’ll return the treatment you give me.
    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @GonzaloLira1968 @kontherad1

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-01 17:21:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642215552541237251

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642059519265058817

  • For a guy that mass produces magical thinking on a daily basis, pretends knowled

    For a guy that mass produces magical thinking on a daily basis, pretends knowledge and understanding he doesn’t possess, engages in feminine social construction, using the feminine techniques of seduction into false promises, using the Jewish Marxist techniques of pilpul, critique, and personalizing, heaping undue praise and undue criticism, is a serial cheater on his wives, and LARPS for the dysfunctional lost boys with room temperature IQs, and who certainly can’t grasp even the basic foundations of my work, you’re just demonstrating I’m correct in the most exemplary fashion possible.
    In fact you’re the canonical example of the feminine, Jewish, Abrahamic, Marxist method of seduction and fraud by selling false promise, with magical thinking, sophistry, and critique to an alienated underclass who can sit at home and LARP that they’re virtuous, rather than the powerless, cowardly, weak, incompetent losers that deserve their low status in life. Playing savior to the vulgar peasantry.
    I don’t come after you out of respect for our past conversations which I viewed positively despite our differences. I expect the same treatment in return, or out of reciprocity I’ll return the treatment you give me.
    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-01 17:21:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642215552713195521

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642059519265058817

  • Good thing Joyce Vance White is just a prosecutor, not a judge, nor seated polit

    Good thing Joyce Vance White is just a prosecutor, not a judge, nor seated politician, nor a scholar of law, nor a theorist of jurisprudence. Because the people cannot be de facto sovereign without the arms to do so.

    Instead… What have you done, to create a school system, a family structure, a social structure, a political structure, an economy, a set of norms, belief, and mythos, that is producing so much mental illness, so much division, so much rage, that we see school shooters, or any other individual political violence?

    We know the answer, you know.
    You just can’t face it.
    And you’re the problem.

    Reply addressees: @cclarke52 @StandForSumpin

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-30 21:20:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641551067526692871

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640449328643710997

  • Good thing Joyce Vance White is just a prosecutor, not a judge, nor seated polit

    Good thing Joyce Vance White is just a prosecutor, not a judge, nor seated politician, nor a scholar of law, nor a theorist of jurisprudence. Because the people cannot be de facto sovereign without the arms to do so.

    Instead… What have you done, to create a school system, a family structure, a social structure, a political structure, an economy, a set of norms, belief, and mythos, that is producing so much mental illness, so much division, so much rage, that we see school shooters, or any other individual political violence?

    We know the answer, you know.
    You just can’t face it.
    And you’re the problem.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-30 21:20:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641551067669307395

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640449328643710997

  • LET’S SCIENCE JAMES LINDSAY’S “CRITICAL CONSCIOUSNESS”. (@ConceptualJames) So, h

    LET’S SCIENCE JAMES LINDSAY’S “CRITICAL CONSCIOUSNESS”. (@ConceptualJames)
    So, how do we convert nonsense leftism to sensible religio-philosophical prose. Well, James has done a good job. How do we convert James’ religio-philosophical prose to scientific language?
    Why do that?… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1640078455701135363

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 19:53:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640079604852445185

  • @Whatifalthist has written the best one-paragraph tear-downs of the entire acade

    @Whatifalthist has written the best one-paragraph tear-downs of the entire academy that I’ve evey read – and it’s true, obvious in retrospect, leaves you speechless, delegitimizes them completely, and leaves them with nowhere to run.

    (Maybe if we ‘beg’ he’ll get to a video on it sometime this or next year. Though, it’s not like he doesn’t have enough work to do already.)

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 14:17:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639270218009653257

  • @Whatifalthist has written the best one-paragraph tear-downs of the entire acade

    @Whatifalthist has written the best one-paragraph tear-downs of the entire academy that I’ve evey read – and it’s true, obvious in retrospect, leaves you speechless, delegitimizes them completely, and leaves them with nowhere to run.

    (Maybe if we ‘beg’ he’ll get to a video on it sometime this or next year. Though, it’s not like he doesn’t have enough work to do already.)

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 14:17:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639270217921581057

  • THE “SCIENCE” OF SCOTT ADAMS’ HYPERBOLE Scott Adams’ (@ScottAdamsSays ) hyperbol

    THE “SCIENCE” OF SCOTT ADAMS’ HYPERBOLE
    Scott Adams’ (@ScottAdamsSays ) hyperbole on the race question was obvious to anyone who uses hyperbole to illustrate a point that requires the combination of scaling, time, and inverse logic.

    The problem is, that inverse (negative) logic is the first capacity humans lose as IQ declines below 105. And it’s ‘gone’ by around 90. The same for ‘auto-scaling’ using hyperbole: “what if everyone did this all the time over time.” And that declines to literal interpretation by the same scale. Masculine cognitive bias provides a scale advantage, and Feminine cognitive bias (empathizing) provides a scale disadvantage. (FWIW: our current AI’s still can’t do inverse logic. Not possible.)

    Feminine and Leftists are ‘simple’, ’empathizing’, and ‘literal’. Meaning short-term experiential thinking. And Masculine and Conservatives use hyperbole for long-term systemic thinking.

    Men can at least vaguely understand leftist (feminine) men and women, but leftist (feminine) men and women cannot understand conservatives.

    It’s not complicated. It’s pretty well covered in the scientific literature. Even the difference between how men do math as models and women do math as pictures. This is the origin of our cognitive emotional ethical and moral differences: sex.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-16 14:15:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636370513315639297

  • THE “SCIENCE” OF SCOTT ADAMS’ HYPERBOLE Scott Adams’ (@ScottAdamsSays ) hyperbol

    THE “SCIENCE” OF SCOTT ADAMS’ HYPERBOLE
    Scott Adams’ (@ScottAdamsSays ) hyperbole on the race question was obvious to anyone who uses hyperbole to illustrate a point that requires the combination of scaling, time, and inverse logic.

    The problem is, that inverse (negative) logic is the first capacity humans lose as IQ declines below 105. And it’s ‘gone’ by around 90. The same for ‘auto-scaling’ using hyperbole: “what if everyone did this all the time over time.” And that declines to literal interpretation by the same scale. Masculine cognitive bias provides a scale advantage, and Feminine cognitive bias (empathizing) provides a scale disadvantage. (FWIW: our current AI’s still can’t do inverse logic. Not possible.)

    Feminine and Leftists are ‘simple’, ’empathizing’, and ‘literal’. Meaning short-term experiential thinking. And Masculine and Conservatives use hyperbole for long-term systemic thinking.

    Men can at least vaguely understand leftist (feminine) men and women, but leftist (feminine) men and women cannot understand conservatives.

    It’s not complicated. It’s pretty well covered in the scientific literature. Even the difference between how men do math as models and women do math as pictures. This is the origin of our cognitive emotional ethical and moral differences: sex.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-16 14:15:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636370513059799040

  • Ugh. (a) social pseudoscience. (b) economists are aught that people report false

    Ugh. (a) social pseudoscience. (b) economists are aught that people report falsely, that almost all surveys and models fail replication, that they contrive their results, that sample sizes are too small, and that the samples rely on student volunteers most likely to virtue signal. This survey isn’t public, doesn’t state it’s N, and is constructed.
    Ergo: we use the opposite model of demonstrated preference in voting or economy. OR what I do, use social media to create a kink of the hill game, and provoke a moral outrage and record the logic by which individuals attempt to conduct deception or coercion in favor of their biases. Linguistic analysis is the most successful method to day of determining intelligence and personality, moral biases, and in my case … how people lie to themselves and others.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 22:45:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635774108850896897

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635733709705076736