Curt Doolittle

Form: Critique

  • Ian McGilchrist has created a narrative to defend his spiritual woo-woo. Like mo

    Ian McGilchrist has created a narrative to defend his spiritual woo-woo. Like most pseudoscientists he combines scientific half truth with projection, wishful thinking, and mysticism. It’s not seditious like say, Yuval Harari’s continuation of jewish pseudoscience, continuing the tradition of pseusocience of Lewontin, Lysenko, and Gould, Freud, Boaz, and Marx, Horkhimer, Fromm, Marcuse and Adorno,

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-09 10:56:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667123490971959297

  • THE END OF ART? (For now, yes.) (All art is propaganda: signaling) RE: Not bad b

    THE END OF ART?
    (For now, yes.) (All art is propaganda: signaling)
    RE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_rlmbMCcr0

    Not bad but Justificationary.

    1) Misses Dimensions of Art Measurement: a) craftsmanship b) design c) insightful, meaningful, cultural content d) representation of the best of the…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-30 12:35:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1663524604474695680

  • THE END OF ART? (For now, yes.) (All art is propaganda: signaling) RE: Not bad b

    THE END OF ART?
    (For now, yes.) (All art is propaganda: signaling)
    RE: https://t.co/TZmov6NxgD

    Not bad but Justificationary.

    1) Misses Dimensions of Art Measurement: a) craftsmanship b) design c) insightful, meaningful, cultural content d) representation of the best of the period or movement.

    2) Confuses a) Fashion b) Craft and c) Art. Why? See #2.

    3) Obscures Dialectic/Pilpul (approval, plato) vs Truth (independent of approval, aristotle) Judaism > abrahamic religions combined with Plato > Hegel(Plato v2).
    |Hierarchy|: Personal Preference(personal) > Agreement between preferences(interpersonal) > Truth Independent of Preference or Agreement(political).

    4) Obscures the Economics of producer and consumer – that all we are seeing is an increase in wealth and a popularization of consumption and the relative abandonment of high art for aristocratic(wealth), noble(state), religious(social), signaling. ie: trifunctionalism: Religion(Social, Wants) <> Commercial(Trade, Supply) <> State (Politics, Limits)

    5) There is no high art today because art is a property of architecture – and we have none of merit. And the movie industry is a great attractor for talent and profit, so it’s more correct to say that the moving art has replaced the static art, just a mass media and social media have replaced pulpit and podium. In the performing arts, there are remnants of art in music in particular, somewhat less so in dance, less so in literature, less so in the play (including movies). Our participatory religion was an extension of the play – the original church of the indo europeans was the play (Tragedy). And it has lost all meaning.

    6) Simple version: art requires a natural aristocracy – and we have none. The common pepole consume increasing hedonism (simplicity).

    7) The decline in art was an intentional construction of the marxist revolution and the ‘march through the institutionals of cultural production’ by the series marxism(class relations), communism(private property, meritocracy), neomarxism(culture), postmodernism(truth,quality, judgement), feminism(family), libertarianism(commons), neoconservatism(political markets), woke(race marxism).

    They wrote down what they were going to do. They funded it. The persued it. They succeeded at the conversion of high trust homogeneous northern european high culture into middle eastern low trust authority-seeking, tribalism.

    It was done with malice and forethought. And they found a willing masses to follow them into the hills as did the pied piper.

    All art is propaganda. Whether personal, private, or public. It’s signaling.

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-30 12:35:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1663524604130762752

  • THE END OF ART? (For now, yes.) (All art is propaganda: signaling) RE: Not bad b

    THE END OF ART?
    (For now, yes.) (All art is propaganda: signaling)
    RE: https://t.co/TZmov6NxgD

    Not bad but Justificationary.

    1) Misses Dimensions of Art Measurement: a) craftsmanship b) design c) insightful, meaningful, cultural content d) representation of the best of the period or movement.

    2) Confuses a) Fashion b) Craft and c) Art. Why? See #2.

    3) Obscures Dialectic/Pilpul (approval, plato) vs Truth (independent of approval, aristotle) Judaism > abrahamic religions combined with Plato > Hegel(Plato v2).

    4) Obscures the Economics of producer and consumer – that all we are seeing is an increase in wealth and a popularization of consumption and the relative abandonment of high art for aristocratic(wealth), noble(state), religious(social), signaling.

    5) There is no high art today because art is a property of architecture – and we have none of merit. And the movie industry is a great attractor for talent and profit, so it’s more correct to say that the moving art has replaced the static art, just a mass media and social media have replaced pulpit and podium.

    6) Simple version: art requires aristocracy – and we have none. The common pepole consume increasing hedonism (simplicity).

    7) The decline in art was an intentional construction of the marxist revolution and the ‘march through the institutionals of cultural production’ by the series marxism(class relations), communism(private property, meritocracy), neomarxism(culture), postmodernism(truth,quality, judgement), feminism(family), libertarianism(commons), neoconservatism(political markets), woke(race marxism).

    They wrote down what they were going to do. They funded it. The persued it. They succeeded at the conversion of high trust homogeneous northern european high culture into middle eastern low trust authority-seeking, tribalism.

    It was done with malice and forethought. And they found a willing masses to follow them into the hills as did the pied piper.

    All art is propaganda. Whether personal, private, or public. It’s signaling.

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-30 12:27:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1663522426498449409

  • I knew it was nonsense. 😉 Source “Sputnik” RU state owned media company – a new

    I knew it was nonsense. 😉
    Source “Sputnik” RU state owned media company – a news organization.
    Claim: “Using world bank data”.
    There is no evidence in the world bank data that RU economy is over 1.7 to 1.8T.
    Oil revenue is down 47% as of last month, even though production has returned to pre-war levels. Meaning there is less of a chance of a repeat of the destruction of oil infrastructure from disuse, even if threat of failure of infrastructure due to the departure of service companies.
    It may mean that the government throwing money into military production is increasing production – I don’t (we don’t) know.
    That doesn’t mean that the economy isn’t larger, but it means that the data is, as far as I know, propaganda.

    Reply addressees: @AMG26 @RayJPolitics1

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-27 18:21:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662524441509634048

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662517136567287813

  • NWG’s preaching accomplishes nothing. He’s just another christian cult leader wh

    NWG’s preaching accomplishes nothing. He’s just another christian cult leader whose ideology is reducible to analogies to belief matters not action, and jesus saves.

    Conversely, Doug is the most intellectlually honest person on what I’d consider the separatist white nationalists.

    I don’t need to agree on ends with people I just need people to be intellectually honest and at least largely scientific. Because science just means testimony, and truth requires testimony. Everything else is just lying by one means or another.

    Reply addressees: @capernicus418 @radiofreenw @UltraTestoster1 @TheCommander99 @Bez_fren @NordicSupreme @WestmenMedia @NoWhiteGuiltNWG

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-17 16:54:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1658878590719492105

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1658875261478400001

  • CLOSE BUT NO. SEDITIOUS YES. POPPER’S A LIBERTARIAN – But Libertarianism Is Almo

    CLOSE BUT NO. SEDITIOUS YES. POPPER’S A LIBERTARIAN –
    But Libertarianism Is Almost as Bad as Leftism. and Soros Isnt a Leftist as Much as Advancing Jewish Interests

    1. Popper’s epistemology is the source of respect for his work. Critical Rationalism was half of the solution to the hard problem of Darwinian truth (science as testimony that survives falsification). Like hayek, popper’s project was directionally correct but incomplete because he couldn’t solve the entire problem of epistemology because it was harder than he (anyone) imagined.
    2. Popper is advancing jewish libertarianism like rothbard and rand, not leftism – by taking the optimistic and heroic view of man.
    3. Popper is to libertarianism (diaspora, statelessness, anarchism) what Plato is to the state.
    4. Soros weaponized Popper’s open society to advance jewish intersts not leftist interests. Leftists are tools of Soros (and many others).
    5. Jewish thought isn’t trifunctional as is western thought – it’s all monopolies: Marxist underclass, libertarian middle class, feminist and neocon upper class. Jewish thought is structurally authoritarian: universalist (female).
    6. Libertarianism is just as seditious as marxism, neomarxism, postmodernism, feminism, neoconservatism, and pc-woke cancel culture.
    7. European trifunctionalism is interesting because it uses the negative rule of law as referree, but maintains the ‘game’ of maximum rates of innovation, adaptation, and evolution of our people between the three possible elites and the three classes these elites bias in favor of: (-) feminine social religon and inclusion/exclusion, (=) ascendent male economy and production by trade/boycott, (+) dominant male political state and force/defense.

    So, not authority of religon(faith) or fascism(state) or libertarianism(individuals) but market by trifunctionalism: Faith, Law, State for lower, middle, upper classes. God(faith), Constitution(law), Country(state), Guns(us, the militia). The only insurer of trifunctionalism is the people who are armed and defend it.

    I won’t criticize Keith because he made a reasonable attempt for an amateur to address a difficult question.

    I probably should criticize Keith and his followers for failing to grasp the scientific and subsequent logical foundations of western civ because its the failure to grasp them that has led to so many 20th c and more recent failures to defend our civilization.

    Because y’all are well meaning, passionate, terribly overconfident and the enemy keeps winning precisely because you don’t know the logic of western civ and how to defend it. And that’s because western civ (other than indian) is the most complex of all.

    We’re the weird ones. 😉

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @jialaowai @KeithWoodsYT

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-15 08:30:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1658026994263523330

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657053165429174272

  • What another example of shallow political opinion – demonstrating why there is i

    What another example of shallow political opinion – demonstrating why there is increasing question over the introduction of women into the franchise: likeability doesn’t matter as much as policy and Trump policy was the correct necessary reform across the board, and the use of feminine ‘gossiping, rallying, shaming, outraging, moralizing and psychologizing’ is disapproval of the individual rather than his policies.

    Reply addressees: @mitchellvii

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 12:46:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656641810893086720

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656550557295755264

  • BELIEVE WHAT SCIENCE? (I deal with this every single day.) –“Around a third of

    BELIEVE WHAT SCIENCE?
    (I deal with this every single day.)

    –“Around a third of studies published in neuroscience journals, and about 24% in medical journals, are “made up or plagiarized,” according to a new paper.”–via Science

    Worse, that doesn’t account for the studies that are just bad science, bad statistics, logically ridiculous, or contain nonsense claims not supported by the evidence. And yes I’m talking about behavioral sciences here, as well as the non-sciences that dress up in costume and claim they’re sciences.

    Worse, even that doesn’t account for the *implications* the papers produce by means of suggestion.

    Worse, generally speaking, if a paper supports the “gated institutional narrative” you can nearly guarrantee it’s false.

    So trust the science? It’s like trusting politicians, advertizers, and financial advisors. For the same reason: malincentives.

    Scientific papers must be treated as court testimony. Meaning if one performs due diligence, then one can err, but not mislead by statement, inference, or suggestion.

    Thanks.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-10 23:55:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656447994697334784

  • @FirstPost is India’s new “Hate TV”, continuing the Indian tradition of blaming

    @FirstPost is India’s new “Hate TV”, continuing the Indian tradition of blaming others and shaming others because they can’t keep up, rather than demonstrating competitive excellence, responsibile government, and global citizenship.
    We have this same nonsense news in the States. It’s saddening to see that India is stooping to the same low level tripe as the low information demographic in America.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-10 01:24:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656107943748845570