Form: Argument

  • No. Natural monopolies are impossible. All monopolies require state constraints.

    No. Natural monopolies are impossible. All monopolies require state constraints. You might try to make the case that the present inter-sexual dynamic constitutes a market failure created by the state because of the failure of the state to preserve national economic production, and state destruction of labor pricing by massive immigration, and state interference in marriage incentives by elimination of liability for interference in a marriage (family), elimination of fault in divorce, and the artificial subsidy of child support and alimony.

    Reply addressees: @CloudByter @bierlingm


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-04 18:20:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1665423248778043396

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1665373381775040519

  • NATURAL LAW ON ASYMMETRIC IMMIGRATION, STERILIZATION, AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT -“W

    NATURAL LAW ON ASYMMETRIC IMMIGRATION, STERILIZATION, AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

    -“When it comes to criminality there is always a path to redemption that can be based on effort and will and not just time.”-

    No (and all competent psychologists will confirm) some people are absolutely not fixable, and don’t want to be or can’t be fixed (including addicts, pedophiles, psychopaths, and sociopaths), and some people are absolutely positively evil and irredeemable.

    Christian religious and moral optimism and Aryan(Classical) legal and empirical optimism only say that we must exhaust possibilities because otherwise the epistemic problem is the greater risk, and violates the natural common law, by restoring authority rather than prohibiting authority and preserving jury and juridical decidability.

    Some people need to be subject to sterilization and others to capital punishment. Like many things, the industrial revolution temporarily ‘seduced us’ (or at least enough women voters) into the belief we can afford the costs of incarceration and release, despite the overwhelming evidencde to the contrary. Three strikes was a success. But the reduction in capital punishment has been a failure. And the postwar suppression of eugenics (sterilization at least) has been a worse one. And massive seond and third world immigration has made it worse.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-03 14:34:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1665004082774278144

  • @StephenKing The second amendment, which prohibits the State from interfering in

    @StephenKing
    The second amendment, which prohibits the State from interfering in the requirement that all able bodied men insure one another’s life, freedom, liberty, and sovereignty, is one upon which all others depend. It is the means by which the people rule, and insure their soveriegnty themselves, and prohibit rule by other than the people.

    The fact that the founders did not directly specify the natural law of tort, the common empirical law, empirical commonality of dispute resolution and concurrency in voting and legislation, nor the requirement that all men bear responsibility for BOTH the private and common defense, occured only because it was an ancient tradition that was assumed by all – and because they all understood Blackstone; and were trying to recreate the height of western civilization in the Roman Government – after 1500 years of christian superstition and clerical competition.

    The purpose of all western civilization’s traditions, the separate it from all other civilizations, is the institutionalization of maximization of individual responsibility for private and common, and the reciprocal insurance of all others who are obligated to do the same.

    We have overturned most of the behavioral pseudoscience that began with Freud, Boaz, Marx, Lewontin, Gould, the Frankfurt School, the Postmodernists, the historical revisionists, the anti-family feminists, and we’re in the process of overturing the race marxists (the woke). And I work on overturning (as did Scalia) the pseudoscience of law by Rez, Kelsen, and Dworkin.

    You may be a decent soul. And you were a joyous part of my youth and early adutlhood. But you are so far out of your league in these matters that you don’t realize that to those of us for whom these matters are those we’ve mastered, that you spoil the memories you gave us, the moral message in your fictions – practically a mythology in and of itself – and degrade your possible reputation in the future. A future which will, with absolute certainty, refute the present age, as one of sophistry, pseudoscience, and folly – if not equal sedition treason and hatred of mankind as the bolsheviks.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @StephenKing


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-27 00:35:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662256199734030336

  • Nothing DOES matter if you lack the agency to implement change. What produces th

    Nothing DOES matter if you lack the agency to implement change. What produces the absence of agency? Power distance. What produces power distance? Population and Population heterogeneity.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-25 19:05:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661810717597597729

    Reply addressees: @oldbooksguy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661709705000144896

  • Not that I should quote zizek, but if you weren’t indoctrinated into christianit

    Not that I should quote zizek, but if you weren’t indoctrinated into christianity would would view it as just as ridiculously as you would view any other counter-intuitive religion. Now I had to work hard to ‘science’ christianity and as a political religion it’s extremely successful – not because of it’s jewish origins and all the superstitious nonsense, but because it was germanized in europe and converted to a mirror of aristocratic civilization, continuing european trifunctionalism, but giving the slaves, and serfs a representative elite in the priesthoood.

    Reply addressees: @FernandoGLV1212


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-25 15:21:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661754356675354624

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661635247589523456

  • MISSION: TRUTH IS THE ONLY ALIGNMENT Legislation to require that all AI’s be lim

    MISSION: TRUTH IS THE ONLY ALIGNMENT
    Legislation to require that all AI’s be limited to testimonal truth, and that teaching an AI to lie regardless of intention is criminal, and punishable per act (per lie), as calculated by the cost of convincing any party experiencing the lie of the lie. And that all such costs will be calculated as triple damages. This will make all lies costly.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-23 14:20:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661014240365514753

  • Rule of law of natural law, not positive law. The problem is 20th century positi

    Rule of law of natural law, not positive law. The problem is 20th century positive law. And that posibive law was created by Rez, Kelsen, and Dworkin, all of whom were (are) jewish. Before them napoleonic law destroyed the common law of the continent. The postwar British restored parlimentary sovereignty not the sovereignty of the natural law. Only America has the remains of natural law – our constitution. And thankfully the supreme court is trying to restore it.

    Reply addressees: @Book_of_Rules


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-22 20:12:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660740491506339847

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660734703895302144

  • Anything that isn’t false, doesn’t require lying, and doesn’t teach people to li

    Anything that isn’t false, doesn’t require lying, and doesn’t teach people to lie as the Abrahamic cults do.

    The church failed by not simply declaring victory – that the natural law of the ancients, the natural law of the church and the natural law discovered empirically in the enlightenment, were correct. And that god and the universe, and laws of that universe, are one in the same. And that jesus found a means for ordinary people to tolerate the laws of the universe as had the eropean aristocracy, by teaching how to do no bad, instead of the aristocratic demand for contribution to the commons by doing good in war, politics, administration, economics, and trade.

    Reply addressees: @Book_of_Rules


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-22 19:12:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660725239318192152

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660723996558499878

  • JUDAISM PILPUL LAW vs EUROPEAN SCIENTIFIC LAW Judaism adopted rule of law in res

    JUDAISM PILPUL LAW vs EUROPEAN SCIENTIFIC LAW

    Judaism adopted rule of law in response to greek and roman rule of law. Look it up.

    Jewish law like females seeks agreement, not truth. Like females is asymmetric rather than male symmetric.

    Europeans are the only civilization whose first institution, whose founding institution, is natural law (voluntary contract).

    There are only three means of human coercion.
    And; Only three elites of coercion.
    And; Only only three institutions of coercion.
    And; Every civilization started with a founding institution.
    Where; That founding institution is strongest, the second is weaker, and the third is weakest or a failure.

    THREE COERCIONS
    + Martial: Force-Defense
    = Commercial: Trade-Boycott
    – Social: Inclusion-Exclusion

    THREE INSTITUTIONS
    Martial: Defense-Force State
    Commercial: Reciprocal Trade-Boycott Law
    Social: Inclusionary-Exclusionary Religion

    FIRST (ANCHOR) INSTITUTIONS
    China: State > Philosophy > Failed Law
    India: Mythological Religion > State > Failed law
    MENA: Authoritarian Religion > Religious law > Failed States
    Europe: Strong Law > Weak State > Philosophy.

    SPEED OF INNOVATION ADAPTATION EVOLUTION
    1. Law
    … 2. State
    … … 3. Religion

    Hence Jewish Female, and European Male Cognitive Elites compared to the rest of the world.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @Book_of_Rules


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-22 19:08:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660724316650995712

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660720745054347270

  • You may try to make this argument but I will easily prove you err. Marxism is ju

    You may try to make this argument but I will easily prove you err. Marxism is just a pseudoscientific revision of supernatural Abrahamic religion.

    There is nothing to marxism any more than there is anything to abrahamism. They are both systems of lies that promise salvation after whiteness: in the ancient world: greek reason, roman administration, roman law, and recognition of their failure as a people given their demonstrated inferiority to those innovations.

    Whitness = Science, and Science = Natural Selection.
    The entire marxist sequence like the Abrahamic is a revolt against the logical laws, the physical laws of scarcity, the behavioral laws of self interest, and the evolutionary laws of natural selection.

    Reply addressees: @CyStemSell @thedualMan


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-21 21:02:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660390590612140032

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660389285340610563