Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • The Eugenics program was successful when limited to constraint on reproduction (

    The Eugenics program was successful when limited to constraint on reproduction (single child, or sterilization), and hanging of serial criminals (elimination). That is ‘soft’ eugenics that we have practiced since we began domesticating animals. The industrial revolution eliminated the constraint on dysgenic reproduction and this is why our genetics are declining and one of the two reasons IQ is declining (other than immigration). When IQ is the single most important property of a population that affects every other aspect of life more so than any other.

    There are only four factors that determine the relative quality of life of a population:
    1) Homogeneity
    2) Scale
    3) IQ
    4) Rule of law by the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity we call ‘tort’.

    That’s just math. It’s inviolable

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @XLColdJ @xMajorKills

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 17:29:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670121380652646400

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670120192880558080

  • CORRECTIONS 1 – We can adapt a population’s IQ in as few as three and no more th

    CORRECTIONS
    1 – We can adapt a population’s IQ in as few as three and no more than six generations simply by reducing the bottom and repeat criminals – and the bottom is a huge drag on society, economy, and politics, and criminals are worse.
    2 – It certainly appears that education in the sciences, converting many particular rules to a few general universal rules improved not iq, but demonstrated intelligence, by a half to a full standard deviation.
    3 – It certainly appears that education in our work (don’t worry about it) in logical and behavioral science does about the same as did the physical sciences.
    4 – No population on earth is prohibited from near to western or eastern success if they increase their IQ by education and regulated reproduction, and the rule of law that performs natural selection as a consequence.
    5 – No population can adhere to natural law and achieve economic, social, and political prosperity without either the resource curse or raising their average IQ above ~92 to 95. And the higher above 100, the better, because only people above 105 can learn by reading instructions, repair machines, or self educate. And economic complexity is increasing every year, meaning intellectual demands on a population increase every year.

    I don’t make the laws of the universe. But it’s my job and the job of our organization to try to prevent people from lying about the laws of the universe, and the consequences for mankind when we try to evade them.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @dosontheshinshi @MudKevin @Barbarian_Brain

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 17:20:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670119353918926848

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670108234487586818

  • “NO, WE AREN’T SEEKING UTOPIA” We aren’t, seeking utopia. We’re seeking another

    “NO, WE AREN’T SEEKING UTOPIA”
    We aren’t, seeking utopia. We’re seeking another leap in the incremental suppression of lying and crime made possible by the industrial revolution and massive increases in population. That’s all.

    We don’t claim anything other than the eradication of crime produces a field of opportunities so that markets for cooperation can experiment with a multitude of potential good governments, that evolutionary pressures will subject to natural selection, and we will learn EMPIRICALLY what is superior and not, instead of hypothetically what is superior and not.

    Utopians propose the good. We don’t and can’t know it. Instead, empiricists eliminate the bad, and let the people, market and evolution decide. Anything not bad is good. Anything that survives and is good is the best that we humans can do.

    Reply addressees: @LibertarianTrap @digitildream @realdanstilwell

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 14:07:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670070697324838914

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670069333181988864

  • Q: WHY DOES CONSERVATIVE INTUITION AND TRADITION IN ARGUMENT FAIL? The reason co

    Q: WHY DOES CONSERVATIVE INTUITION AND TRADITION IN ARGUMENT FAIL?
    The reason conservative arugments fail is the tendency of conservatives (intertemporal, responsibile, capitalizers, empiricists) to use reductive (simple) language, largely reduced to moral claim, with one single cause, rather than enumerating the full set of the left’s crimes, and explaining their origin in means of correction.

    The left is just the feminine instinct applied at scale to the detriminent of genetics, knnowledge, norms traditions values, society, economy, polity, grand strategy, and the civilization as a whole.

    Women evolved for unregulated hyperconsumption limted by the means of male supply of female demands. Using religion, government, ideology and the academy, this feminine strategy seeks to undermine the male instinct intuition and traditions and engage in herdlike hyperconsumption regardless of teh devastating costs of the end of meritocracy and natural selection both of individuals, groups, civilzations, and the knowledge they convey.

    Our organization teaches ‘aruguing from first principles(causes), using disambiguation by enumeration, serialization, and operationalization producing a universally commensurable value neutral language of not only ethics, economics, politics, grand strategy, and evolutoin itself, but all disciplines known and possible to know, by man.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 14:02:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670069433430048768

  • Q: “ARE THE EDUCATED LESS SMART” (YES) 1) It’s true statistically, and it has to

    Q: “ARE THE EDUCATED LESS SMART” (YES)

    1) It’s true statistically, and it has to be, because in the first part, pre 1960 it required at least a 115 IQ to enter any college, and now it’s possible for people with a 100 IQ and half the population to get into college.

    2) The second is due to the marxification of education in all the behavioral pseudosciences and the liberal (literary) arts, populated with these people. So we are seing the marxificadtion of civilization into pseudoscience, just as the christian’s overhwlemed the greek academies, and ushered in the ages of ignorance and decline.

    3) The third is the marxification of professors who not only seek self aggrandizement, but teach sedition against western civilization’s rule of law and individual responsibility.

    4) The fourth is decline in IQ due to urbanization, asymmetric reproduction, and non-selective imigration.

    5) The fifth is sortition largely due to urbanization and separation of the classes in the work force, which is the deprivation of the working and lower classes of access to the intelligent and educated – and visa versa, the deprivation of the educated from the demands of the lower middle to lower classes.

    6) Worse we are still ‘working off’ (casting off) the institutionalized ignorance of the introgression of semitic, jewish, female magical thinking and pseudoscience into the academy both pre and postwar, not only in marxism but in the assault on rule of law, meritocracy, responsibility by boaz, freud, marx, lewontin and gould, the entire frankfurt(culturla marxism) and postmodern(anti-truth) traditions, the anti family feminists in friedan, the libertarians rand and rothbard, the legal positivists rez, kelsen, dworkin, the mathematicians and physicists cantor, bohr, and einstien. And hundreds more. The two disasters that were ethnically european were both of southern european stock with the hunchback italian Gramsci, and the despondent brazilian Freire.

    So the evidence is that we have the same number of contributors to intellectual progress as we had in 1963 but we have many more people who ‘think’ they are educated.

    I’m not normal, but I eat most PhDs like pringles with beer. Because the academy is an ideological pseudo-religious disaster outside of the stem fields, and even there is questionable.

    No I don’t like working on this subject because it’s depressing and exasperating to realize we are living in an age of new mysticism – a pseudoscientific religious revolt against european civilization because the intellectual, psychological, and emotional demands of european civilization that produce the gains of european civilization are higher than the demands of all other civilizations combined.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @diplodink @digitildream @realdanstilwell

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 13:54:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670067479526232065

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670061562218926081

  • There are no plumbers with sub 85 Iqs. Those people arent capable of maintaining

    There are no plumbers with sub 85 Iqs. Those people arent capable of maintaining regular employment, or performing any labor with any skill. Violent criminals are self selecting. Eliminate violent criminals and sub 85s from reproduction, and thats all that matters. That’s soft…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 04:32:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669925885657399299

    Reply addressees: @mcsmokeyton

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669908725706940417

  • Q: Curt: How did the left manage to escape the US Constitution in the first plac

    Q: Curt: How did the left manage to escape the US Constitution in the first place?”

    In simple terms: failing to solve free *truthful* speech and the consequences of failing to do so.

    List:
    – Failing to articulate the natural law, common law, and concurrency in the declaration and constitution by assuming it, and not including Blackstone’s argument explicitly.
    – Failing to articulate the european group evolutionary strategy of maximizing individual responsibility thereby suppression the existence of and need for authority, and thereby creating freedom and liberty.
    – The Failure to solve the problem of truthful reciprocal speech rather than free speech. Failure to anticipate the ability to scale female antisocial behavior in education, media, and politics by maintaining common law prohibitions on it.
    – The failure to preserve libel and slander, interference in occupation, interference in business, interference in marriage.
    – The Failure to maintain common law prohibitions on limiting conflict to voluntary markets, reciprocal debate, court and duel, and the prohibition on breaking the kings (common law) peace.
    – The problem of Christianity as a convenient deception using female antisocial behavior and opening the door for more false speech.
    – The Failure to grasp that a religion must merely promote a false promise of freedom from any of the four sets of laws of the universe.
    – The failure to recognize the marxist pseudoscientific sequence as the reformation of Judaism and Christianity as a new hostile religion exploiting female antisocial behavior, undermining natural, common, concurrent law.
    – The failure (long-standing) to include baiting into hazard as a crime even more serious than fraud (the reason for repeated Jewish persecutions) and, therefore the failure to prosecute the marxist sequence like all leftism as baiting into hazard.
    – The Failure to require judicial ascent for legislation to pass.
    – The Failure to prevent lawfare by punishing those pursuing legal activism for attempts to undermine the constitution.
    – The Failure to suppress and outlaw the marxist sequence as seditious and treason against the natural common concurrent law.
    – The Failure to maintain the requirement for demonstrated responsibility (commercial producing property) for political participation.
    – The Failure to preserve rule of law by the most egregious violation of it with the civil rights law legalizing reverse racism, and ending necessary integration required for the preservation of natural, common, concurrent law.
    – The failure of all of the above by the introgression of women into politics and economy before educating and preventing these means of antisocial, antipolitical behavior.

    While those are the major points, they’re just the tip of the iceberg so to speak.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-16 20:11:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669799785765675022

  • THE ERADICATION OF THE LEFT – FOR ALL TIME Our goal is the total eradication of

    THE ERADICATION OF THE LEFT – FOR ALL TIME

    Our goal is the total eradication of the left, or rather, the means by which the left lies and deceives, undermines, and engages in sedition and treason, by the institutional criminalization of their methods, and the use of the courts to treat all such sedition as high crime, with severe punishment.

    The only choice we have is whether we separate from them to eliminate the left – national divorce, and save ourselves from their harms. Or to legally constrain them from further harm, and collect restitution eliminating their crimes. Or ostracize and exit them bodily from responsible civilization in self-defense, and use the courts to prevent any repetition of introgression at any time present and future.

    Our ancestors have had to move to a new continent to leave behind the corruption of the European peasantry, Church, and Aristocracy so that the productive middle classes (“people of good character”) were free of the decadence, corruption, and rent-seeking of each of the parasitic classes.

    We have no new continents to conquer – and space is a long way in the future. We cannot let the left repeat their destruction of the ancient European world by the same false promises of the Christians, or the destruction of the seven other great civilizations of the ancient world by the Muslims made possible by the destruction of European civilization by the Christians.

    Victory isn’t hard. Our solutions are absolutely moral and only the evil in among us can reject them. It’s just a matter of repeating the method of the founders, by a common law suit against the state for a redress of grievances (Second Declaration) and a set of reforms to correct those grievances (Constitutional Amendments) that prevent them rising again – continuing the long tradition of incremental suppression of violations of our self-determination, by rent-seeking elites who like all humans excuse their criminality until we not longer excuse it ourselves.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-15 18:26:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669411097986646041

  • “ON WOMEN: KNOWLEDGE THAT CAN RUIN YOUR DAY” Demonstrated behaviors exist and ar

    “ON WOMEN: KNOWLEDGE THAT CAN RUIN YOUR DAY”
    Demonstrated behaviors exist and are invariant across time and place. Ergo they exist. I don’t have to will them into anything.

    Instead, I, we, all moral people, need only prevent lying – which is what you’re doing. But lying is natural to women because women can’t tell the difference between truth and desirability: it’s the female instinct for the social construction of desirable falsehoods regardless of their correspondence with reality (magical thinking) in order to generate demands from men to satisfy them either directly or indirectly through institutions that they trade for sex, affection, care, and attention, at the minimum cost.

    All female behavior is reducible to this simple algorithm. All female speech is negotiation or posturing to achieve that extraction from men’s production. Which is fine in exchange for reproduction – but that’s largely not happening. Women are just exhausting all possibilities for hyperconsumption and undermining all male attempts to preserve capitalization and the Western advantage of institutionalizing maximum individual responsibility for the benefit of all by reducing common costs for all.

    What Neomarxism, Feminism, and Woke have achieved, is the reversal of twenty five hundred years of western attempt to create intersexual harmony by constraining male aggression and female undermining (particularly sexual), and this is exposing the natural female character when free of those civilizational constraints: and restoring the ancient world’s description of and treatment of women as the source of all sedition and evil. It turns out that men are bad, yes, but women are seditious and evil, and it took thousands of years to reciprocally domesticate each other, largely by religion (which is a feminine institution).

    Be careful what you ask for when you think an equilibrium can be spun to your advantage: there will always be an equal and opposite reaction. And the present one – largely because women are vulnerable to the false promises of the magical thinking of the left, is producing the greatest threat to civilization since the Christian destruction of the ancient world, and the Muslim use of it to destroy the other seven great civilizations of the ancient world, and reduced them to ignorance and decline.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @theelegantbomb

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-15 18:11:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669407381644558343

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669386580102901760

  • Take it to its causal origins: all female behavior is reducible to the maximizat

    Take it to its causal origins: all female behavior is reducible to the maximization of consumption (including attention, status, resources) at the minimum responsibility for the truth and the commons, whenever there is any potential for conflict that might put any of those resources at risk. Women hide behind the pretense of care, but the origin of the pretense of care is selfish: evasion of responsibility.

    Reply addressees: @OtonielFilho5 @theelegantbomb

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-15 17:58:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669404093788372995

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669403206705717248