Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • We produced all the meaningful frameworks. Rule of law, natural law, democracy,

    We produced all the meaningful frameworks.
    Rule of law, natural law, democracy, republic, nation state, natural rights, human rights, the systematic ending of slavery.
    Testimonial truth, reason, philosophical logic, stoicism as the first non false religion, secular humanism, empiricism, science, and now operationalism.
    Money. The age of sail. The agrarian, commercial, financial, scientific and industrial, medical, and technological revolutions, and economics to measure them with.
    Geometry, calculus, all of advanced mathematics, and all of computation and all of artificial intelligence.
    And that’s just scratching the surface.
    We do have a framework. It’s just sophisticated and analytic (heroism, sovereignty, reciprocity, resulting in adversarial markets in everything) rather than simplistic and synthetic (a monopoly). The Chinese came close but could never trust one another. The MENA still don’t, and never will.

    Reply addressees: @yaduraya @SameeraKhan @hbdchick

    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-30 14:37:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696895040335867904

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696863771963076619

  • Anti-Semitism has nothing to do with Fascism. Anti-Semitism was a POLICY that wa

    Anti-Semitism has nothing to do with Fascism. Anti-Semitism was a POLICY that was the result of the open rebellion against the Germans by the Jews, who like today’s woke, had applied the same strategy as today’s woke. There is nothing new with this policy because Jews had been outcast from many dozens of countries for the same reasons over and over again.

    Fascism is a counter-revolution against both the hedonism of the French and English, and the threat of the communists. We know that because that’s what they said they were doing.

    What is fascism? It’s the militarization of the nationalism of the monarchical system, using the Napoleonic invention of Total War, in an attempt to prevent a repetition of the French destruction of Germany, which caused the need for German unification, by the Russian Soviet militarization of the economy, society, and politics, in order to conquer Europe as it had to the east..
    (Germany was in the right in each case for that matter.)

    Marxism is an evolution of the Abrahamic sequence:

    Version 1: Supernaturalism (Occult Fictionalism)
    1. Judaism ->
    2. … Christianity,
    3. … … Islam

    Into the Marxist sequence:

    Version 2: Pseudocience (Magical Fictionalism)
    1. Marxism(Lower Class) -> communism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, pc-woke,
    2. … Marxism->libertarianism(middle class) and
    3. … … Marxism-> Leninism Trotskyism, NeoConservatism (upper class).

    Using the same method of lying in the Abrahamic and Marxist versions using the Jewish unification of Roman Law, Greek Reason, and Semitic Mythicism into a competitor to the Bible of the Ancient World: the Epi. Cycle. And that’s why the Jews, Christians, and Muslims destroyed almost all records of the Epic Cycle, despite commentary on it being as pervasive as biblical was in the medieval ages.
    https://t.co/wZOLMCAb4u

    The Hebrew bible wasn’t new, it was a cheap imitation of the existing European Mediterranean canon. Instead of claiming these stories were myths, that they were truths.

    Let me know if I have to correct any other errors and fictions.

    Cheers.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @AntonyArakkal1 @MadsMikkel28560 @Viorp2 @Thedukeistheman @Sargon_of_Akkad

    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-29 18:23:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696589492029702144

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696567476308373663

  • SEX DIFFERENCES IN VOTING BEHAVIOR –“that doesn’t change the fact that a substa

    SEX DIFFERENCES IN VOTING BEHAVIOR
    –“that doesn’t change the fact that a substantial number of men make terrible voters too.”–

    Joan,
    the point is that not enough men vote badly to matter, while enough women vote badly to matter.
    And not surprisingly, your response utilizes the NAXALT/AXALT fallacy, which is the easiest, quickest, and most universal method of determining feminine cognition. Why? Women’s brains are evolved to obsess over outliers (children, women), demonstrating hyperbolic (hysterical) concern for weak outliers, while men’s brains are evolved to understand everything as a distribution – the majority necessary to maintain or affect state. This is why women find men insensitive and men find women childish.

    However any trivial comprehension of statistics, particularly voting statistics, demonstrates that the overlap between biological sex and sex cognitive bias is around 30%, meaning that some men and women will bias neutrally, while a small percentage of men will bias feminine in cognition (empathic, exceptions (tails)), and small percentage of women will bia masculine in cognition (rational, normal distributions).

    So even though you’re reasonably rational you are still demonstrating cognitive behavior of the female which uses the naxalt/axalt fallacy to justify female empathizing (non logical), and the irresponsibility to adapt your intuition and behavior to questions and problems of political scale.

    So yes, some men vote feminine. Some women vote masculine. The two party system guarrantees the gradual progression of the two parties toward specialization in the service of feminine cognition(feelz) vs masculine cognition(realz), with the advantage to the female because women are more cognitively indifferent, more conformative, more easily manipulated, and vote more consistently , while men are more cognitively divergent from libertarian (ascendent male), to classical liberal (balanced), to authoritarian (dominant, established), disagreeable (non-conforming), difficult to manipulate, and vote less.

    Reply addressees: @joanlarma @VelenskiMeir

    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-25 14:57:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1695088063171477504

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1695082827665064444

  • CORRECT ANSWER That’s the consistent Right Wing folly of “money’d be better spen

    CORRECT ANSWER
    That’s the consistent Right Wing folly of “money’d be better spent on what I want without this war” as consistent as the Left Wing Folly “Money’d be better spent on what I want without NASA”. When in fact the money would be spent on yet something else you don’t want because there is no correlation between spending and public want.

    What causes this left vs right behavior? Feminine Oppression theory vs Masculine Conspiracy theory. These are sex cognitive differences in expression of the feeling of ‘lack of control’ or ‘the world is out of control’, amplified by trait neuroticism. When both demographic groups are experiencing the same sense of ‘lack of control’.

    Reality: We are largely ‘spending’ stockpiles that would otherwise have to pay to decommission. We are trying to prevent future wars. And we are doing it by exhausting RU using a party that’s seeking freedom and self determination. And we are continuing the postwar strategy to end empires that produced the world wars and replace them with federations of nation states and free trade, thus raising humanity out of poverty, and again, reducing the potential and cost of world wars in the age of nuclear weapons.

    In other words we are paying a high cost of Pax Americana, and aside from ‘stopping too early’ in china, russia, and waiting out islam, it’s working.

    Reply addressees: @jeffreyatucker

    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-24 14:25:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694717677078773762

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694704447882981855

  • Either I am correct, or there is no legitimacy to our government, our legislatur

    Either I am correct, or there is no legitimacy to our government, our legislatures, our bureaucracies, our courts, and they are just whims of the seditious and treasonous enforced by lies and violence.

    There is only one legitimate form of government.
    We had it. Will you work hard to keep it?

    The Natural Law, The Common Law, and Concurrent Legislation, A Constitution of Processes and Procedures, that are insured by the People, for the People, and none other than the People ready and willing to bear arms in defense of them – against all usurpers of them whether foreign or domestic.
    😉

    And under the natural law, the common law, the declaration, and constitution we have not only the right but the duty to replace that government with one under that natural common concurrent law and constitution when it no longer serves those interests under those rules. 😉

    The constitution is a document of cooperative science – the rest of the world doesn’t have one. They have wishes and wants, not laws.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-22 23:52:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694135460610678784

  • Attempt at Falsification: If the middleman is the insurer, where defi has no ins

    Attempt at Falsification: If the middleman is the insurer, where defi has no insurer. This is the primary problem with trying to eradicate the state: the function of the state is the insurer of last resort, which is why it preserves the capacity of force as the last resort, and a monopoly over it: restitution.

    The ambition to eliminate the rent-seekers (banks) is not the same as the ambition to eliminate the insurer (state). As such, I’ve held the same conviction that all we are doing with crypto is research and development for the state (treasury) and killing off the parasitic properties of the financial sector, and as a consequence their influence in the state.

    Justificationary arguments are always false. (which is what the author is claiming, as do so many advocates. But testimony (science) requires enumerating and falsifying all competing theories. And the science suggests very clearly that we are just empowering the state. And that the state need only pursue institutional holders and users of the platforms to end the viability of the platforms. Even today the price is maintained by institutional holdings.

    Reply addressees: @BackTheBunny

    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-22 16:51:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694029487707447308

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669244042650210304

  • Tip: Natural selection isn’t opinion nor is the temporal division of cognitive l

    Tip: Natural selection isn’t opinion nor is the temporal division of cognitive labor between the polarity of the sexes, neotenic domestication as the direction of evolution, or genetic load resulting in sexes, classes, races.
    The universe is a vast irradiated hosile wasteland. Evolution isnt caring, considerate, or merciful – but brutally utilitarian. And truth is merely self defense.
    I don’t make the rules. I just prevent others from lying about and denying them. And I compose law to prevent that denying, deceit, lying, fraud and social construction of fraud so that mankind is defended agains nature and the wicked – those who rebel against truth with undermining, sedition, and treason.

    ie: You.

    Reply addressees: @MaxImp707

    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-21 15:53:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693652573742313473

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693641971544248654

  • COLONIZATION LARGELY WORKED The evidence is that european colonization resulted

    COLONIZATION LARGELY WORKED
    The evidence is that european colonization resulted in superior conditions campared to those absent it – by accelerating modernization. This is an empirical fact. Sorry. My argument is that the world wars ended the colonial modernization project, and that todays conflict with Islam in general, Iran, Russia, and China are the result of failing to complete the modernization program. And that the next and coming world war will be the effort to completethat project — inding empires and completing the incremental progress into nation state, free to determine their futures on their terms as long as thos thers impose no harms on others.

    Reply addressees: @smptelock @RyanLinandkevin @BladeoftheS

    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-20 20:35:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693361186740260864

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693356275491361148

  • There are questions that are decidable and questions that are open to discussion

    There are questions that are decidable and questions that are open to discussion. The problem with doomesticating women into politics is no different from the problem with domesticating men into politics – the only confounding factor is that women are verbally and socially seditious and destructive in their evasion of responsibility while men just compete for the rewards of responsibility. So we have to learn to prohibit women’s antisocial behavior (that they wrongly consider prosocial) just as we have prohibited male behavior.

    In large part my work (our work) tries to accomplish this goal, and I think succeeds.

    Reply addressees: @cavaller_humil

    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-20 17:16:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693311013490212864

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693287004581085327

  • Native people are in a far better position today for having been colonized (espe

    Native people are in a far better position today for having been colonized (especially by the English) than those that were not – and this is well studied in the literature. IMO the problem was the world wars ended the colonial project before the people were sufficiently self sufficient in modernity. The problem is that until the colonial project was pretty far under way it was not clear that less developed countries could ACHIEVE modernity. Once this was understood, the Spanish church and The English government started the movement to integrate rather than simply extract from.

    Reply addressees: @smptelock @RyanLinandkevin @BladeoftheS

    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-20 17:13:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693310296327094272

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693307778767429907